Appendectomy: a risk factor for colectomy in patients with Clostridium difficile

Intra-abdominal Surgery and Intestinal Syndromes After Pelvic Radiation Therapy

Purpose

To determine the effects of intra-abdominal surgery on the intensities of 5 radiation-induced intestinal syndromes in survivors of pelvic cancer.

Methods and Materials

The analysis included 623 women born in 1927 or later who had survived cancer. They all had received external radiation therapy toward the pelvic area to treat gynecologic cancers. Information from 344 women who did not undergo irradiation, matched for age and residency, was also included. Main outcome measures after the surgical procedures were the intensity scores for 5 radiation-induced intestinal syndromes: urgency-tenesmus syndrome, fecal-leakage syndrome, excessive mucus discharge, excessive gas discharge, and blood discharge. The scores were based on symptom frequencies obtained from patient-reported outcomes and on factor loadings obtained from a previously reported factor analysis. Follow-up was 2 to 15 years after radiation therapy.

Results

Among survivors of cancer, intra-abdominal surgery increased the intensity of the urgency-tenesmus syndrome, the fecal-leakage syndrome, excessive gas discharge, and blood discharge but had a negligible effect on mucus discharge. Intra-abdominal surgery had an especially negative effect on the urgency-tenesmus syndrome. Although the combination of appendectomy with 1 or more other intra-abdominal surgeries resulted in the highest score for all syndromes, appendectomy alone had weak to no effect. In women who did not undergo irradiation, a similar pattern was seen, albeit with much lower scores.

Conclusions

We found intra-abdominal surgery to be a risk factor among survivors of gynecologic cancer, increasing the intensity score of 4 out of 5 radiation-induced intestinal syndromes. During radiation therapy, it may be worthwhile to pay extra attention to the dose of unwanted ionizing radiation to the intestines if the patient previously has undergone intra-abdominal surgery.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: A Prior Appendectomy Does Not Increase the Risk of Severe Clostridioides difficile Infection or Recurrence

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

There is conflicting evidence regarding the association between a prior appendectomy and severity of Clostridioides difficile infection. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate this association.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Comprehensive review of multiple databases was performed up to May 2022. The primary outcome assessed was the rate of severe Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with a prior appendectomy compared to patients with an appendix. The secondary outcomes assessed were recurrence, mortality, and colectomy rates associated with Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with a prior appendectomy compared to patients with an appendix.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 666 patients with a prior appendectomy and 3580 patients without an appendectomy were included. The odds ratio of severe Clostridioides difficile infection in patients who underwent prior appendectomy was 1.03 (95% CI 0.6-1.78, p = 0.92). The odds ratio of recurrence in patients who underwent prior appendectomy was 1.29 (95% CI 0.82-2.02, p = 0.28). The odds ratio of colectomy due to Clostridioides difficile infection in patients who underwent prior appendectomy was 2.16 (95% CI 1.27-3.67, p = 0.004). The odds ratio of mortality due to Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with a prior appendectomy was 0.92 (95% CI 0.62-1.37, p = 0.68).

CONCLUSION

Patients with appendectomy are not at increased risk for developing severe Clostridioides difficile infection or recurrence. Further prospective studies are needed to establish these associations.

Fecal microbiota transplantation as potential first-line treatment for patients with Clostridioides difficile infection and prior appendectomy

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) is a global health problem. The association of appendectomy on the severity and prognosis of CDI has been reported in many literatures, but there are still contradictions. In a retrospective study entitled “Patients with Closterium diffuse infection and prior appendectomy may be prone to word outcomes” published in World J Gastrointest Surg 2021, the author found that prior appendectomy affects the severity of CDI. Appendectomy may be a risk factor for increasing the severity of CDI. Therefore, it is necessary to seek alternative treatment for patients with prior appendectomy when they are more likely to have severe or fulminant CDI.

Appendix and Ulcerative Colitis: a Key to Explaining the Pathogenesis and Directing Novel Therapies?

The vermiform appendix is generally considered a redundant organ, but recent evidence suggests that the appendix could contribute to the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel diseases, in particular ulcerative colitis (UC), and may even have a therapeutic role; however, mechanisms of the appendix involvement remain unclear. Here, we highlight current evidence on the link between the appendix and UC and consider plausible therapeutic implications. A literature search was conducted using PubMed and PubMed Central from inception to Nov 2021 using the terms "Appendix", "UC", "Appendix & UC," "Appendectomy", and "Peri-appendicular patch," including only articles published in English. Reference lists from the selected studies were manually searched and reviewed to gather additional related reports. Inflammation around the appendix ("peri-appendicular patch") has been frequently observed in UC patients without other cecal involvement, and this inflammation can even precede the onset of UC. Epidemiologic studies propose that appendectomy reduces the risk of developing UC or even the risk of flare after UC is diagnosed, although this remains controversial. We reviewed studies showing altered host-microbe interactions in the appendix in UC, which suggest that the appendix could act as a priming site for disease via alterations in the immune response and changes in microbiota carried distally to the colon. In summary, recent literature suggests a possible role for microbes and immune cells within the appendix; however, the role of the appendix in the pathogenesis of UC remains unclear. Further research could clarify the therapeutic potential related to this organ.

Clostridioides difficile infection after appendectomy: An analysis of short-term outcomes from the NSQIP database

BACKGROUND

Clostridioides difficile infection can be a significant complication in surgical patients. The purpose of this study was to describe the incidence and impact on outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection in adult patients after appendectomy.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data set was used to identify all patients with the primary procedure code of appendectomy between 2016 and 2018. Patient demographics and clinical characteristics were extracted from the database, and descriptive statistics were performed. A multivariate logistic regression was created to identify predictors of Clostridioides difficile infection following appendectomy.

RESULTS

A total of 135,272 patients who underwent appendectomy were identified, and of those, 469(0.35%) developed Clostridioides difficile infection. Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection were more likely to be older (51.23 vs 40.47 years; P < .0001), female (P = .004), American Society of Anesthesiology score >2 (P < .0001), present with septic shock (P < .0001), or lack functional independence (P < .0001). Patients with Clostridioides difficile infection were more likely to have increased operative time (62.9 vs 50.4 minutes; P < .0001), have perforated appendicitis (48.9% vs 23.5%; P < .0001), and underwent open surgery (7.0% vs 4.0%; P = .0006). Postoperatively, patients with Clostridioides difficile infection required a longer length of stay (4.8 vs 1.8 days; P < .0001), had increased mortality (2.1% vs 0.1%; P < .0001), higher incidences of postoperative abscess (14.9% vs 2.9%; P < .0001), postoperative sepsis (15.1% vs 4.0%; P < .0001), and readmission (30.7% vs 3.4%; all P < .0001). On multivariate analysis, older age (P < .0001), female sex (P = .0043), septic shock (P = .0002), open surgery (P = .037), and dirty wound class (P = .0147) were all independently predictive factors of Clostridioides difficile infection after appendectomy.

CONCLUSION

Clostridioides difficile infection is an uncommon postoperative complication of appendectomy and is associated with worse outcomes and higher mortality. Older patients, female sex, those with sepsis, and those undergoing open surgery are at higher risk for developing Clostridioides difficile infection.

Incidence of Early and Late-Onset Clostridioides difficile Infection following Appendectomy Compared to Other Common Abdominal Surgical Procedures

Introduction. Clostridioides difficile associated diarrhea (CDAD) is a major public health issue. The appendix may function as a reservoir for the intestinal microbiome, which may repopulate the intestine following enteric infections including CDAD. Patients/Methods. This retrospective cohort study includes a total of 12,039 patients undergoing appendectomy, hemicolectomy, and cholecystectomy at a single center between 1992 and 2011 who were diagnosed with early and late-onset CDAD and were followed for a minimum of two years. Results. Cumulative CDAD rates were 2.3% after appendectomy, 6.4% after left and 6.8% after right hemicolectomy, and 4% after cholecystectomy with a median onset of 76 (range 1–6011) days after the procedure. Median time to CDAD onset was 76 days after appendectomy, 23 days after left, 54 days after right hemicolectomy, and 122 days after cholecystectomy ( $p<0.05$ ). Late-onset CDAD (>1 year) was significantly more common following appendectomy (37%) and cholecystectomy (39%) than after left (17%) and right (21%) hemicolectomy. Significant differences in age, gender, complication rate, and length of hospitalization between the four groups need to be considered when interpreting the results. Conclusion. The incidence of CDAD after various abdominal surgeries ranged between 2% and 7% in this study. Whereas, hemicolectomy patients had predominantly early onset CDAD, and appendectomy and cholecystectomy may increase the risk for late-onset CDAD. Appendectomy per se does not seem to increase the risk for late-onset CDAD.

European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: 2021 update on the treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection in adults

SCOPE

In 2009, the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) published the first treatment guidance document for Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI). This document was updated in 2014. The growing literature on CDI antimicrobial treatment and novel treatment approaches, such as faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and toxin-binding monoclonal antibodies, prompted the ESCMID study group on C. difficile (ESGCD) to update the 2014 treatment guidance document for CDI in adults.

METHODS AND QUESTIONS

Key questions on CDI treatment were formulated by the guideline committee and included: What is the best treatment for initial, severe, severe-complicated, refractory, recurrent and multiple recurrent CDI? What is the best treatment when no oral therapy is possible? Can prognostic factors identify patients at risk for severe and recurrent CDI and is there a place for CDI prophylaxis? Outcome measures for treatment strategy were: clinical cure, recurrence and sustained cure. For studies on surgical interventions and severe-complicated CDI the outcome was mortality. Appraisal of available literature and drafting of recommendations was performed by the guideline drafting group. The total body of evidence for the recommendations on CDI treatment consists of the literature described in the previous guidelines, supplemented with a systematic literature search on randomized clinical trials and observational studies from 2012 and onwards. The Grades of Recommendation Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system was used to grade the strength of our recommendations and the quality of the evidence. The guideline committee was invited to comment on the recommendations. The guideline draft was sent to external experts and a patients' representative for review. Full ESCMID endorsement was obtained after a public consultation procedure.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Important changes compared with previous guideline include but are not limited to: metronidazole is no longer recommended for treatment of CDI when fidaxomicin or vancomycin are available, fidaxomicin is the preferred agent for treatment of initial CDI and the first recurrence of CDI when available and feasible, FMT or bezlotoxumab in addition to standard of care antibiotics (SoC) are preferred for treatment of a second or further recurrence of CDI, bezlotoxumab in addition to SoC is recommended for the first recurrence of CDI when fidaxomicin was used to manage the initial CDI episode, and bezlotoxumab is considered as an ancillary treatment to vancomycin for a CDI episode with high risk of recurrence when fidaxomicin is not available. Contrary to the previous guideline, in the current guideline emphasis is placed on risk for recurrence as a factor that determines treatment strategy for the individual patient, rather than the disease severity.

Prognostic factors for severe and recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: a systematic review

OBJECTIVES

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), its subsequent recurrences (rCDIs), and severe CDI (sCDI) provide a significant burden for both patients and the healthcare system. Identifying patients diagnosed with initial CDI who are at increased risk of developing sCDI/rCDI could lead to more cost-effective therapeutic choices. In this systematic review we aimed to identify clinical prognostic factors associated with an increased risk of developing sCDI or rCDI.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, Emcare, Web of Science and COCHRANE Library databases were searched from database inception through March, 2021. The study eligibility criteria were cohort and case-control studies. Participants were patients ≥18 years old diagnosed with CDI, in which clinical or laboratory factors were analysed to predict sCDI/rCDI. Risk of bias was assessed by using the Quality in Prognostic Research (QUIPS) tool and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) tool modified for prognostic studies. Study selection was performed by two independent reviewers. Overview tables of prognostic factors were constructed to assess the number of studies and the respective effect direction and statistical significance of an association.

RESULTS

136 studies were included for final analysis. Greater age and the presence of multiple comorbidities were prognostic factors for sCDI. Identified risk factors for rCDI were greater age, healthcare-associated CDI, prior hospitalization, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) started during or after CDI diagnosis, and previous rCDI.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognostic factors for sCDI and rCDI could aid clinicians to make treatment decisions based on risk stratification. We suggest that future studies use standardized definitions for sCDI/rCDI and systematically collect and report the risk factors assessed in this review, to allow for meaningful meta-analysis of risk factors using data of high-quality trials.

Long-term effects of appendectomy in humans: is it the optimal management of appendicitis?

INTRODUCTION

Appendectomy remains the gold standard for treating uncomplicated and complicated appendicitis. However, the vermiform appendix may play a significant role in the immune system (secondary immune function) and maintain a reservoir of the normal microbiome for the human body. The aim of this study was to summarize the long-term effects after appendectomy and discuss whether appendectomy is suitable for all appendicitis patients.

AREAS COVERED

A comprehensive and unbiased literature search was performed in PubMed. The terms 'appendix,' 'appendicitis,' 'appendectomy,' and 'endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy' were searched in the title and/or abstract. This review summarizes the long-term effects of appendectomy on some diseases in humans and describes three methods including appendectomy, medical treatment, and an 'organ-sparing' technique, named endoscopic retrograde appendicitis therapy (ERAT) to treat appendicitis.

EXPERT OPINION

Appendectomy remains the first-line therapy for appendicitis. The patient's problem is appendix, not appendicitis. If we treat appendicitis, the problem should be resolved. During COVID-19, an initial antibiotic treatment of mild appendicitis represents a promising strategy. For patients who are worried about the long-term adverse effect after appendectomy and have a strong desire to preserve the appendix and are aware of the risk of appendicitis recurrence, medical treatment, or ERAT could be proposed.

Appendectomy as a Potential Predisposing Factor for the Development of Recurrent and Fulminant Clostridium Difficile

This literature review assesses how the vermiform appendix has been considered a vestigial organ by many, but over the years, new research has allowed us to reconsider its potential purpose. Studies have indicated that the appendix plays an evident role in immune response and harbors a biofilm that may remain unaffected by gastrointestinal infections, such as infection with Clostridium difficile. Our research analyzes the prominent gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) as a mechanism of defence in infection, as well as the robust biofilm that could aid in the reinoculation of beneficial bacteria within the colon. Furthermore, we wanted to determine if patients who have undergone a prior appendectomy, leading to decreased GALT and a lack of a bacterial reservoir, were predisposed to the development of Clostridium difficile, with particular emphasis in the recurrence and development of fulminant Clostridium difficile infections. Although research continues to be conflicting, there appears to be some connection between these variables, but prospective studies are needed in order to say for certain that there is a link.

2019 update of the WSES guidelines for management of Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile infection in surgical patients

In the last three decades, Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) has increased in incidence and severity in many countries worldwide. The increase in CDI incidence has been particularly apparent among surgical patients. Therefore, prevention of CDI and optimization of management in the surgical patient are paramount. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts from the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) updated its guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients according to the most recent available literature. The update includes recent changes introduced in the management of this infection.

Non-operative management of appendicitis in children

While appendicectomy has been considered the mainstay of treatment for children with acute appendicitis for many decades, there has been a great deal of recent interest in non-operative treatment (NOT) with antibiotics alone. Initial results suggest that many children with appendicitis can indeed be safely treated with NOT and can be spared the surgeon's knife. Many as yet unanswered questions remain, however, before NOT can be considered a realistic and reliable alternative to surgery. This review summaries current knowledge and understanding of the role of NOT in children with appendicitis and outlines and discusses the outstanding knowledge gaps.

Appendectomy as a Risk Factor for Bacteremic Biliary Tract Infection Caused by Antibiotic-Resistant Pathogens

Background/Aims

Recent evidence has suggested that appendix plays a pivotal role in the development and preservation of intestinal immune system. The aim of this study is to examine whether prior appendectomy is associated with an increased risk for the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in bacteremia from biliary tract infection (BTI).

Methods

Charts from 174 consecutive cases of bacteremia derived from BTI were retrospectively reviewed. Using multivariate analysis, independent risk factors for development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria were identified among the clinical parameters, including a history of appendectomy.

Results

In total, 221 bacteria strains were identified from 174 BTI events. Of those, 42 antibiotic-resistant bacteria were identified in 34 patients. Multivariate analysis revealed that prior appendectomy (Odds ratio (OR), 3.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.15–7.87; p = 0.026), antibiotic use within the preceding three months (OR, 3.06; 95% CI, 1.26–7.64; p = 0.013), and bilioenteric anastomosis or sphincterotomy (OR, 3.77; 95% CI, 1.51–9.66; p = 0.0046) were independent risk factors for antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

Conclusions

Prior appendectomy was an independent risk factor for the development of antibiotic-resistant bacteria in bacteremia from BTI.

WSES guidelines for management of Clostridium difficile infection in surgical patients

In the last two decades there have been dramatic changes in the epidemiology of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI), with increases in incidence and severity of disease in many countries worldwide. The incidence of CDI has also increased in surgical patients. Optimization of management of C difficile, has therefore become increasingly urgent. An international multidisciplinary panel of experts prepared evidenced-based World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES) guidelines for management of CDI in surgical patients.