Diabetes is associated with perforated appendicitis: evidence from a population-based study

Diabetes as a Risk Factor for Perforated Appendicitis: A National Analysis

BACKGROUND

A few important risk factors play into rates of perforation following acute appendicitis. Diabetes may be an additional risk factor due to various systemic complications that may contribute to perforation and additional adverse outcomes following acute appendicitis, all of which currently remains unknown in the United States.

METHODS

Adult patients with acute appendicitis under 65 years of age were identified from the National Inpatient Sample between 2012 and 2014 and the distribution of baseline variables was examined across diabetic status using Rao-Scott chi square and student's t-test. A propensity score match was implemented for a conditional logistic regression that assessed differences in rates of perforation, outcomes, as well as postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Among all patients with acute appendicitis, approximately 7% had diabetes. Diabetics were more likely to experience perforated appendicitis (odds ratio 95% confidence interval 1.093 (1.029, 1.160); P = .0036), experience a longer length of stay (1.540 (1.434, 1.654); P < .0001), receive an open appendectomy (1.139 (1.05, 1.236); P = .0018), and experience postoperative cardiovascular complications (2.103 (1.325, 3.340)); P = .0016).

DISCUSSION

Diabetic adult patients under 65 years of age with acute appendicitis experience higher rates in perforation, a longer length of stay, more open surgical approach, and cardiovascular postoperative complications. Diabetes should be one of many risk factors considered in the evaluation and management of perforation following acute appendicitis.

Association of sarcopenia with a higher risk of infection in patients with type 2 diabetes

AIMS

This study aimed to determine whether patients with type 2 diabetes and sarcopenia had a higher risk of infection.

STUDY DESIGNS

A cross-sectional study and a follow-up study were performed.

METHOD

A total of 2562 patients were enrolled and assessed for body composition and infection status. They were classified into four groups according to body fat (BF) and muscle mass index (ASMI): obese, sarcopenic, sarcopenic obese, and normal. Among these, 275 patients were followed for a median follow-up period of 1.84 years to evaluate the relationship of changes in skeletal muscle with infection status.

RESULTS

The sarcopenic and sarcopenic obese groups showed a higher risk of infection, an increase by 49.6% (OR = 1.496, 95% CI 1.102-2.031) and 42.4% (OR = 1.424, 95% CI 1.031-1.967) compared with the normal group, and also had a higher risk of respiratory infection, an increase by 56.0% (OR = 1.560, 95% CI 1.084-2.246) and 57.4% (OR = 1.574, 95% CI 1.080-2.293), respectively. Patients with the increased ASMI (OR = 0.079, 95% CI 0.021-0.298) represented a lower risk of infection than those with the decreased ASMI. Even a minor change (OR = 0.125, 95% CI 0.041-0.378) against age was beneficial to lowering the risk of infection. However, no association was found in the changes of body mass index and BF with infection status.

CONCLUSIONS

Sarcopenia, especially in patients with diabetes who are also obese, increases the risk of infection. Maintaining or improving muscle mass is expected to reduce infections.