Health-related quality of life during trans-arterial chemoembolization with drug-eluting beads loaded with doxorubicin (DEBDOX) for unresectable hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma

What matters most to people with metastatic uveal melanoma? A qualitative study to inform future measurement of health-related quality of life

Metastatic uveal melanoma (mUM) is a rare cancer with poor prognosis, but novel treatments are emerging. Currently, there are no mUM-specific health-related quality of life (HRQL) questionnaires available for clinical research. We aimed to explore how mUM and its treatment affect HRQL and assess the content validity of existing questionnaires. Participants were patients with mUM and healthcare professionals involved in their care. Qualitative data were collected using semi-structured interviews and focus groups. Data collection and analysis used an integrative approach involving inductive questions/coding to elicit new concepts and deductive questions/coding based on domains of existing HRQL questionnaires. Initial interviews/focus groups focussed on HRQL questionnaires designed for patients with uveal melanoma or liver metastases. As new concepts were elicited, domains and items from other questionnaires were subsequently added. Seventeen patients and 16 clinicians participated. HRQL concerns assessed by uveal melanoma-specific questionnaires were largely resolved by the time of metastasis. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Immunotherapy Module (FACT-ICM) adequately captured most immunotherapy-related side effects during initial treatment cycles. However, most patients emphasised emotional impacts over physical ones, focussing on the existential threat posed by disease amidst uncertainty about treatment accessibility and effectiveness. Patients were also concerned with treatment burden, including time commitment, travel, need for hospitalisation, and expenses. The relative importance of HRQL issues varied over time and across treatment modalities, with no single questionnaire being sufficient. Pending further development and psychometric testing, clinical researchers may need to take a modular approach to measuring the HRQL impacts of mUM.

Role of interventional oncology for treatment of liver metastases: evidence based best practice

The presence of liver metastases is associated with a poor prognosis in many cancer diseases. Multiple studies during the last decades aimed to find out the best multimodal therapy to achieve an ideal, safe and highly effective treatment. In addition to established therapies such as systemic therapy, surgery and radiation therapy, interventional oncology with thermal ablation, transarterial chemoembolisation and radioembolisation, is becoming the fourth pillar of cancer therapies and is part of a personalised treatments' strategy. This review informs about the most popular currently performed interventional oncological treatments in patients with liver metastases.

A novel application of drug-eluting transarterial chemoembolization in treating non-liver cancers

This case series aimed to preliminarily evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) in patients with lung, renal, gastric, and other non-liver cancers.Twenty-four patients who underwent DEB-TACE or DEB-TACE combined with other therapies were reviewed in this case series. Treatment responses were assessed at 1 month after treatment according to the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS) and adverse events were recorded.In the total patients, the objective response and disease control rate were 79.2% and 87.5%, respectively. And the mean OS in total patients was 14.7 months (95% confidence interval: 9.6-19.9 months). The number of patients who had generalized aches, nausea, vomit, fever, abdominal discomfort, chest discomfort, elevated blood pressure, cough, loss of appetite, and headache in total patients were 7 (29.2%), 11 (45.8%), 6 (25.0%), 2 (8.3%), 3 (12.5%), 3 (12.5%), 1 (4.2%), 1 (4.2%), 1 (4.2%), and 1 (4.2%), respectively. The objective response rates in patients with lung, renal, gastric, and other non-liver cancer were 70.0%, 85.7%, 100.0%, and 80.0%, respectively. In patients with lung, renal, gastric, and other non-liver cancers, the mean values of the OSs were 13.4 months, 12.4 months, 7.6 months, and 20.3 months, respectively. And the most common adverse events in lung cancer patients, renal carcinoma patients, gastric cancer patients, and patients with other non-liver cancers were post-embolization syndrome.DEB-TACE may be an effective and safe therapeutic option in patients with lung, renal, gastric, and other non-liver cancers.

Efficacy and safety of drug-eluting beads for transarterial chemoembolization in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has more recently become a leading cause of cancer-associated mortality worldwide. Particularly at an advanced stage, the prognosis is generally poor due to lack of effective treatments. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is now a recognized therapy for advanced HCC, serving to deprive tumors of feeder arteries through induced ischemic necrosis. However, there is also a potential for undesired circulatory toxicity owing to drug reflux from tumor artery to surrounding healthy tissues. Although effective chemotherapeutic drug concentrations are thus lowered, the side effects of systemic chemotherapy are aggravated. The mid-2000 emergence of drug-eluting beads (DEB) loaded with anti-neoplastic drugs has proven particularly advantageous, enabling localized treatment and directed delivery of chemotherapeutics. DEB-TACE (dTACE) augments local infusion of anti-neoplastic agents to prolong agent/tumor contact, expanding upon conventional TACE. At present, data on DEB use in China are limited, particularly in terms of proprietary microspheres (CalliSpheres; Hengrui Medicine Co.). To explore the efficacy and safety of CalliSpheres, A total of 90 patients receiving this means of dTACE for advanced HCC were assessed in the present study. Clinical efficacy was evaluated based on tumor response and overall survival rates using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events to assess tolerability. The satisfactory tumor response and acceptable tolerability demonstrated in the follow-up confirm the promising utility of CalliSpheres in treating patients with advanced HCC.