Disparities in elective surgery for diverticulitis: Identifying the gap in care

Racial Disparities in Surgical Outcomes of Acute Diverticulitis: Have We Moved the Needle?

INTRODUCTION

There has been increasing national attention on reducing healthcare disparities. Prior studies cite worse surgical outcomes and less use of laparoscopy for Black patients with diverticulitis. Re-evaluation of these disparities is lacking despite national initiatives to improve health equity. This study aimed to evaluate the association of race with short-term outcomes and surgical approaches in patients with acute diverticulitis.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients who underwent nonelective surgery for acute diverticulitis from 2015 to 2019. Severity of presentation, morbidity, mortality, surgical approach, and ostomy creation were compared by race.

RESULTS

Of the 13,996 patients included in the study, 82.4% were White, 7.6% were Black, 1.1% Asian, 0.61% American Indian/Alaska Native, and 0.20% Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI). Overall 30-day morbidity was 44.3% and 30-day mortality was 3.9%. In a multivariate logistic regression analysis, compared to Whites, Black race was independently associated with higher 30-day morbidity (Odds Ratio: 1.24, 95% confidence interval: 1.07-1.43, P = 0.003) and NH/PI race was independently associated with higher mortality (Odds Ratio: 5.35, 95% confidence interval: 1.32-21.6, P = 0.019). There was no difference in complicated disease (abscess or perforation), use of laparoscopy, or ostomy creation among races.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite national efforts to achieve equity in healthcare, disparities persist in surgical outcomes for those with diverticulitis. Black and NH/PI race are independently associated with increased morbidity and mortality, respectively. Use of laparoscopy, however, is no longer different by race suggesting some gaps may be closing.

Temporary vs. permanent stoma: factors associated with the development of complications and costs for rectal cancer patients

OBJECTIVE

To compare in-hospital complication rates and treatment costs between rectal cancer patients receiving permanent and temporary stomas. Surgical complications and costs associated with permanent stoma formation are still poorly understood. While choosing between the two stoma options is usually based on clinical and technical factors, disparities exist.

METHODS

Patients with rectal cancer, stoma formation, complications, and cost of care were identified from the Florida Agency for Health Care Administration Discharge Database. Rectal cancer patients who underwent elective surgery and received a permanent or temporary stoma were identified using ICD-10 codes. Patients who underwent colostomy with resection were included in the "Permanent stoma" group, and those who underwent "resection with ileostomy" were included in the "temporary stoma" group. Multivariable models compared patients receiving temporary vs. permanent stomas.

RESULTS

Regression models revealed no difference in the odds of having a complication between patients who obtained permanent versus temporary stoma (OR 0.96, 95% CI: 0.70-1.32). Further, after adjusting for the number of surgeries, demographic variables, socioeconomic and regional factors, comorbidities, and type of surgery, there was a significant difference between permanent and temporary stomas for rectal cancer (ß - 0.05, p = 0.03) in the log cost of creating a permanent stoma.

CONCLUSION

Our findings suggest there are no differences associated with complications, and reduced cost for permanent compared to temporary stomas. Increased costs are also associated with receiving minimally invasive surgery. As a result, disparities associated with receipt of MIS could ultimately influence the type of stoma received.

Predictors of complications from stoma closure in elective colorectal surgery: an assessment from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACSNSQIP)

BACKGROUND

There is significant morbidity after diverting ileostomy closure, so identifying predictors of complications could be of great benefit. The aim of our study was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for postoperative morbidity after elective ileostomy closure.

METHODS

The ACS-NSQIP dataset was evaluated for elective ileostomy closures from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2016. Demographic characteristics, operative, and postoperative outcomes were evaluated. The primary outcome was 30-day major morbidity (Clavien class III and greater). Secondary outcomes were rates and predictors of major morbidity, superficial site infection (SSI), reoperation, and readmission from multivariate logistic regression modeling.

RESULTS

We retrospectively evaluated 1885 patients. The median operative time was 65 (IQR 50-90) minutes and median length of stay was 3 (IQR 2-5) days. Major morbidity was recorded in 6.7%, including mortality (1.0%), deep/organ space SSI (2.6%), dehiscence (0.8%), reintubation (0.5%), sepsis (1.7%), septic shock (0.8%), and reoperation (3.7%). Readmission was recorded in 9.7% and 6.2% had SSI. Multivariate logistic regression showed male sex (OR 1.584; 95% CI 1.068-2.347; p = 0.022) and longer operative time (OR 1.004; 95% CI 1.001-1.007; p = 0.009) were among those variables associated with increased odds of major morbidity. Dyspnea (OR 2.431; 95% CI 1.139-5.094; p = 0.021) and longer operative time (OR 1.003; 95% CI 1.001-1.007; p = 0.034) were among the independent risk factors for SSI. Male sex (OR 2.246; 95% CI 1.297-3.892; p = 0.004, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.959; 95% CI 1.153-7.591; p = 0.024), and longer operative time (OR 1.005; 95% CI 1.001-1.009; p = 0.011) were associated with increased odds of reoperation. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 2.578; 95% CI 1.338-4.968; p = 0.005), wound infection (OR 2.680; 95% CI 1.043-6.890; p = 0.041), and inflammatory bowel disease (OR 2.565; 95% CI 1.203-5.463; p = 0.015) were associated with increased odds of readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Elective stoma closure has significant risk of morbidity. Patients with longer operative times were at increased risk for major morbidity, overall SSI, and reoperation. From the analysis, factors specifically associated with major morbidity, overall infectious complications, readmissions, and reoperations were identified. This information can be used to prospectively prepare for these high-risk patients, potentially improving postoperative outcomes.