When rural is no longer rural: Demand for subspecialty trained surgeons increases with increasing population of a non-metropolitan area

Resident Perspectives on the Value of Rural General Surgery Rotations: It's Not Just About the Cases

PURPOSE

Understand the scope of cases that residents participate in during rural general surgery rotations and the value residents and program directors find in such rotations. In turn, our goal is to add to the ongoing conversation the value exposure to rural surgery brings to surgery training.

METHODS

Qualitative study analyzed reviews of residents' self-reported case lists and field notes from exit interviews with the site director.

RESULTS

Trainees participated in an average of 105 cases during the rotation, including basic and advanced endoscopy along with exposure to a wide array of surgical cases. Residents had exposure to the rural facility and its staff and participated in a busy outpatient surgical clinic, the hospital, and community activities. We received overwhelmingly positive qualitative feedback from residents regarding how this rural rotation advanced their skills, helped prepare them for life after residency, and for some confirmed their plans to practice in a rural location.

CONCLUSION

With the decline in the number of rural general surgeons and projected continuance of this trend, it is important to understand how trainees view their residency experiences and how those experiences may be shaping their outlook on career choices. Our single-site, qualitative study showed that a rural general surgery rotation during residency has broad importance and value in general surgery resident training. Having a rural rotation also allowed residents to gain understanding of a rural lifestyle, workflow, and the social fabric including the rural surgeons' connections with their communities.

Addressing the gap in laparoscopic common bile duct exploration training for rural surgeons: imparting procedural ability is not enough

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) is an underutilized therapy for choledocholithiasis. The driving factors of this practice gap are poorly defined. We sought to evaluate the attitudes and practice patterns of surgeons who underwent training courses using an LCBDE simulator.

METHODS

Surgeons completed a half-day simulator-based LCBDE curriculum at national courses, including the American College of Surgeons Advanced Skills Training for Rural Surgeons and the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons annual meeting. Attitudes were assessed with Likert surveys immediately before and after curriculum completion. Follow-up surveys were distributed electronically.

RESULTS

159 surgeons completed training during six courses. Surgeon attitudes regarding the overall superiority of LCBDE vs. ERCP shifted towards favoring LCBDE after course participation (4.0 vs 3.3; Likert scale 1-5, p < 0.001). 44% of surgeons completed follow-up surveys at a mean of 3 years post-course. Surgeons remained confident in their ability to perform LCBDE, with only 14% rating their skill as a significant barrier to practice, as compared with 43% prior to course participation (p < 0.01). However, only 28% of surgeons saw an increase in LCBDE volume. Deficiencies in operating room (OR) staff knowledge and instrument availability were the most significant barriers to post-course practice implementation and were inversely correlated with LCBDE case volume (ρ = - 0.44 and - 0.47, both p < 0.01). Surgeons for whom OR staff knowledge of LCBDE was not a significant barrier performed nearly 4 times more LCBDE than those who rated staff knowledge as a moderate, strong, or complete barrier.

CONCLUSIONS

Surgeons trained at an LCBDE course retained long-term confidence in their procedural ability. Practice implementation was hindered by deficiencies in OR staff knowledge and instrument availability. Surgeons with knowledgeable operating room staff performed significantly more LCBDEs than those with less capable assistance. These barriers should be addressed in future curricula to improve procedural adoption.

The Isolated Surgeon: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

Surgeons in resource-limited environments often provide care outside the expected scope of current general surgery training. Geographically isolated patients may be unwilling or unable to travel for specialty care. These same patients also present with life-threatening emergencies beyond the typical breadth of a general surgeon's practice, in hospitals with limited professional and material support. This review characterizes the unique role of isolated surgeons, so individual surgeons and health care organizations may focus professional development resources more efficiently, with the ultimate goal of improved patient care.

METHODS

We performed a scoping review of the isolated surgeon, reviewing 25 years of literature regarding isolated US civilian and military surgeons. We examined emerging themes regarding the definition of an isolated surgeon, the scope of surgical practice beyond current training norms, and training gaps identified by surgeons in an isolated role.

RESULTS

From 904 articles identified, we included 91 for final review. No prior definition exists for the isolated surgeon, although multiple definitions describe rural surgeons, patients, or hospitals; we propose an initial definition from consistent themes in the literature. Isolated surgeons across varied practice settings consistently performed relatively large volumes of cases of, and identified training gaps in, orthopedic, obstetric and gynecologic, urologic, and vascular surgery subspecialties. Life-threatening, "rare-but-real" cases in the above and neurosurgical disciplines are uncommon, but consistent across practice settings.

CONCLUSIONS

This review represents the largest examination of the isolated surgeon in the current literature. Clarifying the identity, practice components, and training gaps of the isolated surgeon represent the first step in formalizing support for this small but critical group of surgeons and their patients.

Using Qualitative Research to Study the Profession of Rural Surgery

This is a systematic review of original research articles that use qualitative methods to investigate rural surgery over the last decade (2010-2019). This review found that interviews and focus groups were common, most often engaging with patients and health care professionals. Thematic analysis and grounded theory were data analysis methods most frequently used among these qualitative rural surgery studies. Studies in this review often pertained to obstetrics or the provision of other other surgical services. Areas for future qualitative research on rural surgery are surgical teamwork, scope of practice, workforce shortages, and issues related to the aging rural patient.

Scope of Practice of the Rural Surgeon

The scope of practice of a rural surgeon depends not only the individual skillset of the surgeon, but also local resources.