Modified open technique for laparoscopic gastrostomy tube placement results in more leakage post operatively than Seldinger technique

Gastrostomy Tube Use in Pediatrics: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Despite frequency of gastrostomy placement procedures in children, there remains considerable variability in preoperative work-up and procedural technique of gastrostomy placement and a paucity of literature regarding patient-centric outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This review summarizes existing literature and provides consensus-driven guidelines for patients throughout the enteral access decision-making process.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Google Scholar, Medline, and Scopus.

STUDY SELECTION

Included studies were identified through a combination of the search terms "gastrostomy," "g-tube," and "tube feeding" in children.

DATA EXTRACTION

Relevant data, level of evidence, and risk of bias were extracted from included articles to guide formulation of consensus summaries of the evidence. Meta-analysis was conducted when data afforded a quantitative analysis.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

Four themes were explored: preoperative nasogastric feeding tube trials, decision-making surrounding enteral access, the role of preoperative imaging, and gastrostomy insertion techniques. Guidelines were generated after evidence review with multidisciplinary stakeholder involvement adhering to GRADE methodology.

RESULTS

Nearly 900 publications were reviewed, with 58 influencing final recommendations. In total, 17 recommendations are provided, including: (1) tTrial of home nasogastric feeding is safe and should be strongly considered before gastrostomy placement, especially for patients who are likely to learn to eat by mouth; (2) rRoutine contrast studies are not indicated before gastrostomy placement; and (3) lLaparoscopic placement is associated with the best safety profile.

LIMITATIONS

Recommendations were generated almost exclusively from observational studies and expert opinion, with few studies describing direct comparisons between GT placement and prolonged nasogastric feeding tube trial.

CONCLUSIONS

Additional patient- and family-centric evidence is needed to understand critical aspects of decision-making surrounding surgically placed enteral access devices for children.

Emergency department utilization following pediatric gastrostomy tube placement is driven by a small cohort of patients

PURPOSE

Pediatric gastrostomy tubes (G-tubes) are associated with frequent postoperative problems and consumption of healthcare resources. We hypothesized that a small cohort of patients disproportionately drives healthcare resource utilization after G-tube insertion. This study aimed to characterize this population in order to implement evidence-based pathways to reduce healthcare utilization after G-tube insertion.

METHODS

All surgically placed pediatric G-tubes at a quaternary care center between March 2011 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Healthcare utilization including radiographic studies, emergency department (ED) visits, hospital admissions, procedures, and diagnoses was abstracted. Encounter specific charges based on CPT codes were collected. Statistical analyses were performed with Mann Whitney U, Fisher's Exact Test, and multivariate nominal logistic regression. Institutional review board approval was obtained.

RESULTS

During the study period, 189 patients underwent G-tube insertion; 24% of patients presented to the ED two or more times and accounted for 82% of ED visits. This cohort of high ED utilizers was more likely to present with G-tube dislodgement [both within the first three months (early) and after three months (late)], required more radiographic studies, and accrued significantly more charges compared to low ED utilizers. Multivariate analyses demonstrated high ED utilization was significantly associated with non-Caucasian race and the surgeon performing the procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

At our institution, a significant proportion of healthcare utilization following G-tube placement is consumed by a relatively small cohort of children. Future efforts will target patients with two or more G-tube related ED visits or an early G-tube dislodgement for additional education and integration with outpatient resources.

TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective study.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.