Case logging habits among general surgery residents are discordant and inconsistent

Current Procedural Terminology Code Selection, Attitudes, and Practices of the Orthopaedic Surgery Resident Case Log: A Survey of Residents and Program Directors

Introduction

The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education Resident Case Log is one of the primary tools used to track surgical experience. Owing to the self-reported nature of case logging, there is uncertainty in the consistency and accuracy of case logging. The aims of this study are two-fold: to assess current resident case log Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) code selection and practices across orthopaedic surgery residencies and to understand current attitudes of both program directors (PD) and residents surrounding case logging.

Methods

Residents and PDs from 18 residency programs received standardized, consensus-built surveys distributed through the Collaborative Orthopaedic Educational Research Group. Resident surveys additionally contained clinical orthopaedic subspecialties vignettes on sports, trauma, and spine. Each subspecialty section contained 4 clinical vignettes with stepwise increases in complexity/CPT coding procedures.

Results

One hundred sixteen residents (response rate: 28.4%) and 16 PDs (response rate: 88.9%) participated. Formal case log training was reported by 53.0% of residents and 56.3% of PDs. A total of 7.8% of residents rated themselves "excellent" at applying CPT codes for the case log, while 0.0% PDs rated their residents' ability as "excellent." In total, 40.9% of residents and 81.3% of PDs responded that it was "extremely important" or "very important" to code accurately (p = 0.006). Agreement between resident CPT code selection and number of cases and procedures logged for each clinical vignette was conducted using Fleiss' kappa. As the clinical vignettes increased in complexity, there was a decreasing trend in kappa values from the first (least complex) to the last (most complex) clinical vignette.

Conclusions

The inconsistent case logging practices, dubious outlook on case log accuracy and resident case logging ability and attitude, and lack of formal training signals a need for formal, standardized case log training. Enhanced case logging instruction and formalized educational training for PDs and residents would be a meaningful step toward capturing true operative experience, which would have a substantial impact on orthopaedic surgery resident education and assessment.

Surgical Specialty Impacts Quality of Operative Training in Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is currently performed by multiple surgical specialties. The impact of surgical specialty and operative volume on post-CEA outcomes has been well described. However, it is unclear whether trainees of different surgical specialties have similar quality of operative training.

METHODS

Data from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education annual reports were collected and compared between graduating vascular surgery (VS) residents, VS fellows, and neurological surgery (NS) residents. Only cases reported as chief/senior/lead resident, surgeon junior, or surgeon fellow were included in analysis. Linear regression analysis was utilized to evaluate trends in case-mix and volume.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2022, total CEA case volume was higher among VS residents and fellows, compared to NS residents (52.8 ± 0.8 vs. 44.3 ± 1.4 vs. 12.9 ± 0.6, P < 0.0001). Additionally, VS residents and fellows performed other carotid operations including transfemoral or transcarotid artery stenting (11.1 ± 0.9 vs. 11.2 ± 0.8 vs. 0), carotid body tumor resection (0.7 ± 0.1 vs. 0.7 ± 0.0 vs. 0), and extracranial cervical bypass (6.7 ± 0.3 vs. 6.3 ± 0.3 vs. 0) that were not reported by the NS resident cohort (P < 0.0001 each). On linear regression analysis, total CEA procedures did not change for VS residents (R2 = 0.03, P = 0.62), decreased for VS fellows (-1.29 cases/yr, R2 = 0.75, P < 0.0001), and decreased among NS residents (-0.41 cases/yr, R2 = 0.44, P = 0.01) over the study period.

CONCLUSIONS

Although residents of multiple surgical specialties are trained in CEA, vascular training offers significantly greater numbers and diversity of extracranial carotid cases. It also appears that CEA volume is decreasing among neurosurgical trainees. In light of recent reports on the volume-outcome effect in carotid surgery, these data may have implications for future practice patterns in the domain of extracranial carotid artery disease.

Unreasonable Expectations: A Call for Training and Educational Transparency in Gender-affirming Surgery

Although in most areas of practice, there is a reasonable expectation that doctors are sufficiently trained to offer care, this is not true in the case of gender-affirming procedures, which are not required learning in any surgical residency. At the current time, the field of gender surgery is too rapidly evolving, with available resources too scarce for fellowship or residency training to be a realistic requirement for offering these procedures, as the demand already outstrips the available workforce. However, patients are currently given too little information about surgeons' history with these procedures to provide truly informed consent. There is, as such, an ethical mandate to mold the culture of gender-affirming surgery such that surgeons are expected to routinely disclose relevant information about their training, experience, and outcomes to facilitate patient decision-making about care.

Intern Perceptions and Participation in the Operating Room

OBJECTIVE

ACGME work hour restrictions and decreasing resident case volumes have led to concern regarding competence of surgical residency graduates. Early operative experience is an important component of surgical education, providing a foundation for further learning. Intern year represents an opportunity for increased exposure. We sought to examine factors impacting intern perceptions and participation in the operating room.

METHODS

This cross-sectional retrospective study evaluated the experience of interns from June 2019 through June 2020. Data was collected from nursing operative case logs, self-reported ACGME intern case logs, and an intern survey from the 2019 to 2020 academic year for 3 surgical services at a large academic institution. The primary endpoint was intern presence in operative cases and perceived experience.

SETTING

University of California, Davis Medical Center, a large academic training institution and tertiary referral center located in Sacramento, California.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 31 interns comprised the 2019 to 2020 training cohort, including preliminary, categorical general surgery, and integrated subspecialty residents classified as intern by the institution, regardless of postgraduate training year.

RESULTS

Interns were present in 945 (46%) of 2054 operative cases. Multivariable analysis indicated the presence of an APP (OR 1.68, 95% C.I. 1.34-2.10, p = 0.00) and a female attending (OR 1.30, 95% C.I. 1.07-1.58, p = 0.01) increased the likelihood of intern participation, while presence of an upper level resident decreased the likelihood (OR 0.35, 95% C.I. 0.22-0.57, p = 0.00). Interns participated in more cases later in the year compared to earlier (43% vs 59%, Z = 4.72, p = < 0.001). Surveys demonstrated participation was associated with encouragement by faculty and senior residents and a positive learning environment. Competing floor and clinic responsibilities negatively impacted participation (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Intern operative experience can be robust in the setting of ACGME work hour guidelines. Identified factors represent possible areas for improvement in service organization.

ACGME Case Log Reminder Does Not Improve Resident Accuracy in Logging Cases

To assess competency of residents prior to graduation, the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) maintains a case log system, where residents self-report cases they perform. This mechanism results in underreporting of resident involvement in patient care. To determine if an intraoperative case log reminder would increase the frequency of ACGME case logging amongst anesthesiology residents. An intraoperative ACGME case log reminder was implemented on March 13, 2019. The authors collected data for all 53 PGY2-4 anesthesiology residents at the authors' institution from July 14, 2018 to July 16, 2019 from the electronic medical record and ACGME system to calculate the proportion of cases logged and the "lag time" between case occurrence and logging. Data was analyzed for all residents, classes, and individuals. A total of 16,342 anesthetics were performed, and a total of 11,713 cases were logged. The reminder did not improve overall logging rates. Case-logging rates amongst PGY2 residents remained unchanged and declined for PGY3 and PGY4 residents. The lag time between case occurrence and logging increased. An automatic reminder did not improve logging frequency. This may be because residents are unable to log cases intraoperatively in many instances, or they may not feel as though they have participated enough in a case to log it. Additionally, senior residents may log cases less frequently once they have met required case minimums. An automatic case-logging system that transmits resident information directly to the ACGME may be the best way to increase logging accuracy.

New endocrine fellowship programs do not decrease the endocrine surgery experience of residents in co-located general surgery programs

BACKGROUND

New pediatric and vascular surgical fellowship programs decrease resident operative experience in those subspecialties in co-located general surgery programs.After 2 decades of increases, the mean number of endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents nationally has decreased since 2010 to 2011. We hypothesized that new endocrine surgery fellowship programs lead to a decrease in the number of endocrine surgery cases performed by co-located general surgery residents and may be a contributing factor in the recent national decline in endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents.

METHODS

Endocrine surgery fellowship programs associated with a single, Accreditation Council of Graduate Medical Education-accredited general surgery program that have completed training of 1 fellow by the 2014-2015 academic year were identified. Endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents who completed co-located general surgery programs from 2002 to 2003 through 2017 to 2018 were recorded. Descriptive statistics are shown as mean ± standard deviation. Statistical significance was calculated using the Mann-Whitney U Test.

RESULTS

In the 13 general surgery programs with 5 years of case log data after the matriculation of the first fellow, the mean number of total endocrine surgery cases/resident increased from 47 ± 23 in year 0 to 57 ± 25 in year 5 (z-score = 2.53; P < .05).

CONCLUSION

New endocrine surgery fellowship programs do not decrease the endocrine surgery cases performed by general surgery residents and have not contributed to the national decline in endocrine surgery cases by general surgery residents.