A video anchored rating scale leads to high inter-rater reliability of inexperienced and expert raters in the absence of rater training

Development and initial validation of a video-based peroral endoscopic myotomy assessment tool

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Video analysis has emerged as a potential strategy for performance assessment and improvement. We aimed to develop a video-based skill assessment tool for peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM).

METHODS

POEM was deconstructed into basic procedural components through video analysis by an expert panel. A modified Delphi approach and 2 validation exercises were conducted to refine the POEM assessment tool (POEMAT). Twelve assessors used the final POEMAT version to grade 10 videos. Fully crossed generalizability (G) studies investigated the contributions of assessors, endoscopists' performance, and technical elements to reliability. G coefficients below .5 were considered unreliable, between .5 and .7 as modestly reliable, and above .7 as indicative of satisfactory reliability.

RESULTS

After task deconstruction, discussions, and the modified Delphi process, the final POEMAT comprised 9 technical elements. G analysis showed low variance for endoscopist performance (.8%-24.9%) and high interrater variability (range, 63.2%-90.1%). The G score was moderately reliable (≥.60) for "submucosal tunneling" and "myotomy" and satisfactorily reliable (≥.70) for "active hemostasis" and "mucosal closure."

CONCLUSIONS

We developed and established initial content and response process validity evidence for the POEMAT. Future steps include appraisal of the tool using a wider range of POEM videos to establish and improve the discriminative validity of this tool.

Comparing Simulator Metrics and Rater Assessment of Laparoscopic Suturing Skills

BACKGROUND

Laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing is important to master and competence should be ensured using an optimal method in a simulated environment before proceeding to real operations. The objectives of this study were to gather validity evidence for two tools for assessing laparoscopic intracorporeal knot tying and compare the rater-based assessment of laparoscopic intracorporeal suturing with the assessment based on simulator metrics.

METHODS

Twenty-eight novices and 19 experienced surgeons performed four laparoscopic sutures on a Simball Box simulator twice. Two surgeons used the Intracorporeal Suturing Assessment Tool (ISAT) for blinded video rating.

RESULTS

Composite Simulator Score (CSS) had higher test-retest reliability than the ISAT. The correlation between the number performed procedures including suturing and ISAT score was 0.51, p<0.001, and 0.59 p<0.001 for CSS. We found an inter-rater reliability (0.72, p<0.001 for test 1 and 0.53 p<0.001 for test 2). The pass/fail rates for ISAT and CSS were similar.

CONCLUSION

CSS and ISAT provide similar results for assessing laparoscopic suturing but assess different aspects of performance. Using simulator metrics and raters' assessments in combination should be considered for a more comprehensive evaluation of laparoscopic knot-tying competency.

Technical skills simulation in transplant surgery: a systematic review

Purpose

 Transplant surgery is a demanding field in which the technical skills of the surgeon correlates with patient outcomes. As such, there is potential for simulation-based training to play an important role in technical skill acquisition. This study provides a systematic assessment of the current literature regarding the use of simulation to improve surgeon technical skills in transplantation.

Methods

 Data were collected by performing an electronic search of the PubMed and Scopus database for articles describing simulation in transplant surgery. The abstracts were screened using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Three reviewers analyzed 172 abstracts and agreed upon articles that met the inclusion criteria for the systematic review.

Results

 Simulators can be categorized into virtual reality simulators, cadaveric models, animal models (animate or inanimate) and synthetic physical models. No virtual reality simulators in transplant surgery are described in the literature. Three cadaveric models, seven animal models and eight synthetic physical models specific to transplant surgery are described. A total of 18 publications focusing on technical skills simulation in kidney, liver, lung, pancreas, and cardiac transplantation were found with the majority focusing on kidney transplantation.

Conclusions

 This systematic review identifies currently reported simulation models in transplant surgery. This will serve as a reference for general surgery and transplant surgery professionals interested in using simulation to enhance their technical skills.

A resource efficient and reliable standard setting method for OSCEs: Borderline regression method using standardized patients as sole raters in clinical case encounters with medical students

Finding a reliable, practical and low-cost criterion-referenced standard setting method for performance-based assessments has proved challenging. The borderline regression method of standard setting for OSCEs has been shown to estimate reliable scores in studies using faculty as raters. Standardized patients (SPs) have been shown to be reliable OSCE raters but have not been evaluated as raters using this standard setting method. Our study sought to find whether SPs could be reliably used as sole raters in an OSCE of clinical encounters using the borderline regression standard setting method.SPs were trained for on a five-point global rating scale. In an OSCE for medical students, SPs completed skills checklists and the global rating scale. The borderline regression method was used to create case passing scores. We estimated the dependability of the final pass or fail decisions and the absolute dependability coefficients for global ratings, checklist scores, and case pass-score decisions using generalizability theory.The overall dependability estimate is 0.92 for pass or fail decisions for the complete OSCE. Dependability coefficients (0.70-0.86) of individual case passing scores range demonstrated high dependability.Based on our findings, the borderline regression method of standard setting can be used with SPs as sole raters in a medical student OSCE to produce a dependable passing score. For those already using SPs as raters, this can provide a practical criterion-referenced standard setting method for no additional cost or faculty time.

Development and initial validation of an instrument for video-based assessment of technical skill in ERCP

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The accurate measurement of technical skill in ERCP is essential for endoscopic training, quality assurance, and coaching of this procedure. Hypothesizing that technical skill can be measured by analysis of ERCP videos, we aimed to develop and validate a video-based ERCP skill assessment tool.

METHODS

Based on review of procedural videos, the task of ERCP was deconstructed into its basic components by an expert panel that developed an initial version of the Bethesda ERCP Skill Assessment Tool (BESAT). Subsequently, 2 modified Delphi panels and 3 validation exercises were conducted with the goal of iteratively refining the tool. Fully crossed generalizability studies investigated the contributions of assessors, ERCP performance, and technical elements to reliability.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine technical elements were initially generated from task deconstruction. Ultimately, after iterative refinement, the tool comprised 6 technical elements and 11 subelements. The developmental process achieved consistent improvements in the performance characteristics of the tool with every iteration. For the most recent version of the tool, BESAT-v4, the generalizability coefficient (a reliability index) was .67. Most variance in BESAT scores (43.55%) was attributed to differences in endoscopists' skill, indicating that the tool can reliably differentiate between endoscopists based on video analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Video-based assessment of ERCP skill appears to be feasible with a novel instrument that demonstrates favorable validity evidence. Future steps include determining whether the tool can discriminate between endoscopists of varying experience levels and predict important outcomes in clinical practice.