Skilled nursing facility care after colorectal cancer surgery: A call for quality improvement efforts

Effect of perioperative airway management on postoperative outcomes of colorectal cancer patients with sarcopenia

BACKGROUND

It is common for colorectal cancer patients to have sarcopenia as a comorbidity, which has been shown to have a negative impact on prognosis after surgery. This study explored whether implementing a novel care program could improve postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with sarcopenia.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of patients diagnosed with sarcopenia before undergoing radical colorectal cancer surgery. We divided the patients into two groups according to the time point of program implementation and, compared the clinical characteristics and postoperative outcomes of these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 227 patients were included in the study. The baseline clinical characteristics of the two groups were similar. Compared with the control group, patients in the implementation group had a significantly lower rate of total complications (18.5% vs. 30.3%, P = 0.041), a significantly lower rate of pulmonary complications (2.8% vs. 10.9%, P = 0.017), and a significantly shorter postoperative hospital stay (12 days vs. 14 days, P = 0.001). Implementation of perioperative airway management (P = 0.018) was shown to be a protective factor against pulmonary complications in colorectal cancer patients with sarcopenia.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative airway management program implemented at our center was easy to perform and can effectively improve short-term postoperative outcomes in colorectal cancer patients with sarcopenia.

Influence of Early Predictive Nursing on Complications and Quality of Life in Patients after Colorectal Cancer Surgery

Objective

To analyze the effect of early predictive nursing on complications and quality of life in patients after colorectal cancer surgery.

Methods

A total of 130 patients with colorectal cancer who were diagnosed and underwent surgical resection in our hospital from 2019 to 2021 were recruited and assigned via the random number table method (1 : 1) to receive either conventional nursing (routine group) or predictive nursing (study group). Outcome measures included the incidence of complications and the quality of life.

Results

Predictive nursing was associated with shorter operation time and hospital stay and less blood loss (2.35 ± 0.41, 9.32 ± 1.86, and 70.52 ± 16.52) versus conventional nursing (3.02 ± 0.78, 11.20 ± 2.14, and 81.51 ± 17.74) (all P < 0.05). Patients in the study group showed a lower incidence of complications than the control group (10.76% vs 35.38%) (all P < 0.05). Predictive nursing resulted in better anxiety relief than conventional nursing (P < 0.05). Predictive nursing was associated with higher emotional function, cognitive function, role function, and physical function scores (83.51 ± 12.56, 82.45 ± 9.15, 82.48 ± 10.46, 84.43 ± 13.48, and 82.73 ± 9.67) than conventional nursing (73.85 ± 13.54, 72.54 ± 12.74, 72.48 ± 10.45, 73.99 ± 14.51, and 72.45 ± 11.69) (all P < 0.05). Patients receiving predictive nursing showed a significantly higher nursing satisfaction versus conventional nursing (P < 0.05).

Conclusion

Early predictive nursing for patients receiving colorectal cancer surgery can lower the incidence of complications, effectively improve the quality of life of patients, shorten the hospital stay, reduce the amount of bleeding, and enhance the satisfaction of patients.