Gourevitch R, Boiteux C, Guedj-Bourdiau MJ. [Psychiatric emergencies and sense of urgency occurring upstream from health services: What should be done?].
Encephale 2020;
47:82-84. [PMID:
32586623 DOI:
10.1016/j.encep.2020.03.008]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2019] [Revised: 03/16/2020] [Accepted: 03/30/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The French psychiatric health system is not properly organized for managing the sense of urgency felt in critical situations that occur upstream from psychiatric health services, in "inappropriate" locations (e.g. home, street, work.), particularly for patients who are unwilling to cooperate and receive health care. Emergency services, police departments, or psychiatric teams - who should take charge? Families are distraught. The authors draw the line to propose a comprehensive and coherent model. Pressing emergencies require the intervention of emergency services, who may, when necessary, receive remote counsel from psychiatric health professionals. Other situations require a quick but delayed access to specialized care, including at-home care. With this comprehensive model, the authors address both a pre-hospital emergency occurring out of a dedicated sanitary place, as well as access to care for patients who are unwilling or partly unwilling to receive health care.
Collapse