Outcomes of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy at a bariatric unit in South Africa

Comparison of Dietary Quality and Surgical Satisfaction Between Patients With Suboptimal and Optimal Weight Loss After Sleeve Gastrectomy Using Food Tolerance Score and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System Questionnaires

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the association of dietary quality and surgical satisfaction with the amount of total weight loss (TWL) 1 year after laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) using the food tolerance score (FTS) and Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS) questionnaires.

Materials and Methods

This single-center retrospective study included patients who underwent LSG due to morbid obesity. Only those who have 1-year follow-up data were included and divided into 2 groups: suboptimal TWL (STWL) ≤20% and optimal TWL (OTWL) >20%. Clinical data and questionnaires recorded 1 year after surgery were collected. FTS was used to evaluate the degree of food tolerance, and BAROS assessed surgical outcomes, including weight loss, comorbidity changes, and quality of life (QoL). The total FTS and BAROS scores of the 2 groups were compared.

Results

Of 580 patients, 159 were included. Patients in STWL (n=17) were significantly older than those in OTWL (n=142) (42.24±9.28 vs. 35.92±8.71 years old, P=0.006). The total FTS (1-30 points) for STWL and OTWL were 24.88±3.43 and 25.04±3.14, respectively (P=0.845). Although the total BAROS scores (maximum: 9 points) were significantly lower in STWL than in OTWL (5.96±1.48 vs. 7.20±1.40, P<0.001). The only variable that made this difference was weight loss. There were no significant differences in other variables, such as medical conditions, QoL, and complications.

Conclusion

In terms of FTS and BAROS score, there is no difference in postoperative satisfaction and QoL between STWL and OTWL after LSG, except for the degree of weight loss.

Sleeve gastrectomy in the surgical management of obesity in Cameroon (a sub-Saharan country): A single-institute retrospective review of 30-day postoperative morbidity and mortality

BACKGROUND

METHODS

RESULTS

CONCLUSION

•

Sleeve gastrectomy is a safe procedure in a sub-Saharan African low setting.

•

Bleeding is the only intraoperative complication encountered in 14.3% of cases.

•

The prevalence of 30-day postoperative morbidity of sleeve gastrectomy is 38.1%.

•

Postoperative 30-day complications after sleeve gastrectomy are minor.

•

The 30-day postoperative mortality after sleeve gastrectomy is nil.

The Impact of Drain and Reinforcement on the Outcomes of Bariatric Surgery: A Prospective Study

Purpose We aimed to investigate the impact of reinforcement and abdominal drains on the outcome of laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods The present study was a prospective study that included obese patients scheduled to undergo LSG. Patients were assigned to receive drain, reinforcement, or both according to the surgeon's preference and followed up for one month after surgery. The present study's primary outcome was the identification of the association between intraoperative drain/reinforcement and the incidence of postoperative complications. Results A total of 125 (20.3%) patients received intraoperative drains. The proportion of postoperative morbidity was comparable between the drain and non-drain groups (3.2% versus 1.6%; p = 0.25). Patients in the drain group had similar incidence of blood transfusion (2.4% versus 1.7% in non-drain group; p = 0.43) and postoperative leakage (0.8% versus 0.2% in non-drain group; p = 0.36). The incidences of blood transfusion (p = 0.56) and reoperation (p = 0.98) were comparable between the drain and non-drain groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the drain and non-drain groups regarding postoperative mortality and wound infection (p > 0.05). On the other hand, 440 (71.3%) patients received reinforcement. The proportion of postoperative morbidity was comparable between the reinforcement and non-reinforcement groups (1.6% versus 2.8%, p = 0.07). Patients in the reinforcement group were less likely to develop postoperative bleeding (0.7% versus 4% in the non-reinforcement group; p = 0.004), while no significant difference was detected in terms of postoperative leakage (p = 0.33) and in-hospital mortality. Conclusion In conclusion, abdominal drainage did not reduce the complications of LSG patients. Reinforcement has some role in controlling the bleeding but not leaks. Both techniques did not significantly impact the mortality rate. In the future, additional, large randomized trials are needed to examine the gastrointestinal-related quality of life.