Thoracoscopic thymectomy - The method of choise in surgical treatment of non-invasive thymomas

Surgical, Radiation, and Systemic Treatments of Patients With Thymic Epithelial Tumors: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Thymic epithelial tumors are rare and are classified as thymoma, thymic carcinoma, and thymic neuroendocrine tumors. The objective of this systematic review was to evaluate the treatment options for patients with thymic epithelial tumors.

METHODS

This systematic review was developed by Ontario Health (Cancer Care Ontario)'s Program in Evidence-Based Care and by the Lung Cancer Disease Site Group. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for studies comparing surgical, radiotherapy, or systemic treatments against any combination of these treatments in patients with thymic epithelial tumors. Meta-analyses were conducted with clinically homogenous studies.

RESULTS

A total of 106 studies were included, mainly from observational studies. There was an overall survival benefit with postoperative radiotherapy for patients with thymic carcinoma (hazard ratio = 0.65, 95% confidence interval: 0.47-0.89) and for patients with thymoma (hazard ratio = 0.70, 95% confidence interval: 0.59-0.82), especially for those with a high risk for mortality. Patients with thymic carcinoma or thymoma had a response to chemotherapy. Selection bias affected the results for studies that evaluated neoadjuvant chemotherapy or minimally invasive surgical techniques. Furthermore, the overall survival benefit found for adjuvant chemotherapy may have been confounded by the administration of postoperative radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with thymoma or thymic carcinoma, the literature is of low quality and subject to bias. There were overall survival benefits with postoperative radiotherapy. The results of this systematic review were used to inform treatment recommendations in a clinical practice guideline. Future large-scale prospective studies that control for confounders are needed.

[Long-term outcomes of thoracoscopic thymectomy for thymoma stage i-ii]

OBJECTIVE

To compare long-term outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) and conventional open surgery in patients with early-stage (Masaoka stage I-II) thymic malignancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS. A

Retrospective study included patients after VATS and open thymectomy for the period 2000-2019. Long-term outcomes were analyzed.

RESULTS

VATS thymectomy was performed in 53 (54.1%) patients, open thymectomy - in 45 (45.9%) cases. Median follow-up period was 66.9 months. Overall 5-year survival was 89.8% and 97% in the Open and VATS groups, respectively (p=0.076). Disease-free survival rates were 79.6% and 86.6% (p=0.279), respectively. There was no significant difference in cumulative incidence of recurrence (13.3% vs 7.5%, p=0.505). Age <50 years and tumor size >5 cm were the independent risk factors of recurrence.

CONCLUSION

VATS thymectomy is an effective approach ensuring similar long-term outcomes in patients with early stages of thymic malignancies.

Comparison of different surgical approaches for anterior mediastinal tumor

Background

Different video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) approaches may related to heterogeneous clinical outcomes in anterior mediastinal tumor surgery. Herein, we assessed the comparison between the subxiphoid and intercostal approach, and also compare the left versus the right incision in the intercostal approach for anterior mediastinal tumor patients.

Methods

Clinical data of patients receiving thoracoscopic anterior mediastinal tumor resection were retrospectively collected. Patients were divided into two groups according to the approaches: subxiphoid and the intercostal group. The intercostal group was further subdivided into two groups according to different sides: left and right incision group. Intraoperative and postoperative variables were compared between subgroups.

Results

A total of 238 patients were consecutively included in this analysis; 198 (83.2%) patients received intercostal procedure and 40 (16.8%) patients received subxiphoid approach. After 1:1 propensity score matching, all baseline characters were well balanced between intercostal and subxiphoid approach, left and right intercostal approach. The visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score was lower in patients underwent subxiphoid approach than intercostal group at first post-operative evaluation in 12–24 h (4.36 vs. 2.23; P=0.03). According to left and right approach, postoperative drainage time (1.9 vs. 1.2 days, P=0.016), postoperative drainage volume (312.1 vs. 193.9 mL, P=0.041) and hospitalization time (5.3 vs. 4.1 days, P=0.043) were significantly increased in the left thoracic approach group compared with the right thoracic approach.

Conclusions

Subxiphoid approach is associated with less pain compared with intercostal approach. The right intercostal thoracic approach may offer better clinical effect of short-term postoperative recovery.