Gallbladder cancer: 7-Year experience from Qatar

Proposal for a new morphological "combined type" of gallbladder cancer: description of radiopathological characteristics and comparison with other morphological types

OBJECTIVE

To describe the radiopathological characteristics of a new morphological "combined type" of gallbladder cancer (GBC) and compare it with the mass replacing gallbladder and thickening types of GBC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The imaging and pathological details of consecutive patients with GBC between August 2020 and December 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Two radiologists reviewed computed tomography/magnetic resonance imaging in consensus for the morphological type of GBC. The radiologists classified GBC as mass replacing gallbladder, wall thickening, and combined type. The combined type was defined as a mass arising from the thickened wall of an adequately distended gallbladder that extended exophytically into the adjacent liver parenchyma. The presence of calculi, site, and size of lesion, biliary/portal vein involvement, liver, lymph node, and omental metastases was compared among the various types. The pathological characteristics were also compared.

RESULTS

Of the 481 patients (median age 55 years, 63.2% females) included in the study, mass replacing gallbladder, wall thickening, and combined-type GBC were seen in 42.8% (206/481), 40.5% (195/481), and 16.6% (80/481) of patients, respectively. In the combined type of GBC, biliary/portal vein involvement was seen in 63.7% (51/80) and 7.5% (6/80) of patients. Liver, lymph node, and omental metastases were seen in 67.5% (54/80), 40% (32/80), and 41.2% (33/80) patients, respectively. Liver metastases were significantly more common in the combined type (p = 0.002). There were no significant differences in pathological characteristics among the various types.

CONCLUSION

Combined-type GBC is less common than the mass replacing gallbladder and thickening types and is associated with a higher risk of liver metastases.

Prevalence and risk factors of gallbladder polyps in primary health care centers among patients examined by abdominal ultrasonography in Qatar: a case-control study

BACKGROUND

Gallbladder (GB) polyps are raised lesions from the GB wall and projected into its lumen. The prevalence of GB polyps ranged between 4.3% and 12.3%. The clinical presentation of GB polypoid lesions vary, can be nonspecific and vague, and may be asymptomatic. Identifying malignant and premalignant polyps is important to provide treatment early and prevent cancer spread or development of malignancy. Ultrasonography (US) is the first imaging modality widely used in abdominal imaging. It is a noninvasive, rapid, painless, and safe imaging technique, with no radiation; thus, it is considered the best available examination with good sensitivity and specificity for GB polyps.

AIM OF THE WORK

This study aimed to determine the relative frequency of the GB polyps and its risk factors among patients who underwent abdominal US in Primary Health Care Corporation, Qatar.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was quantitative multicenter observational case-control study nested in a cross-sectional design. For the cross-sectional top-level study, the first step was to assess available abdominal ultrasound studies for the presence of GB polyps and stones. The second step was to perform a case-control study with three groups (a case group and two control groups; first, participants without GB stones and GB polyps; second, patients with GB stones but without GB polyps).

RESULTS

The study evaluated the GB images of 7156 individuals. The overall prevalence of GB polyps was 7.4% in the study population. Specifically, the overall prevalence of solitary GB polyp was 4.2% and that of multiple GB polyps was 3.2%. Regarding the size distribution of GB polyps in positive cases, 89.4% were < 6 mm, 9.3% were 69 mm, and 1.3% were ≥ 10 mm. Prevalence rate of selected comorbidities were as follows: liver disease, 1.8%; diabetes mellitus, 25.5%; hypertension, 25.5%; and dyslipidemia, 29.8%. The prevalence in male and female patients was 7.7% and 7%, respectively. The prevalence of GB polyps was higher in south-eastern patients (21.4% of positive cases) and was the highest in the overweight group (8.8%). A higher prevalence was noted in the hypertensive group (hypertensive group, 9.8%; non-hypertensive group, 6.6%) and dyslipidemia group (dyslipidemia group, 7.8%; no dyslipidemia group, 7.2%). Moreover, a higher prevalence was noted in hepatitis B surface (HBS)-positive group (15%) than in the HBS-negative group (8.2%) and slightly higher in Helicobacter pylori antigen positive group than in the negative group.

CONCLUSION

Abdominal US is an important and commonly used imaging modality in the detection of GB polyps. In this study, the prevalence of GB polyps was approximately 7.4%, with higher prevalence in participants who were overweight and had diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.

Gallbladder Carcinoma and Its Differential Diagnosis at MRI: What Radiologists Should Know

Gallbladder carcinoma is the most common cancer of the biliary system. It is challenging to diagnose because patients are often asymptomatic or present with nonspecific symptoms that mimic common benign diseases. Surgical excision is the only curative therapy and is best accomplished at early non-locally advanced stages. Unfortunately, gallbladder cancer often manifests at late locally advanced stages, precluding cure. Early tumors are often incidentally detected at imaging or at cholecystectomy performed for another indication. Typical imaging features of localized disease include asymmetric gallbladder wall thickening, polyps larger than 1.0 cm, and a solid mass replacing the gallbladder lumen. Advanced tumors are often infiltrative and can be confusing at CT and MRI owing to their large size. Determination of the origin of the lesion is paramount to narrow the differential diagnosis but is often challenging. It is important to identify gallbladder cancer and distinguish it from other benign and malignant hepatobiliary processes. Since surgical resection is the only curative treatment option, radiologist understanding and interpretation of pathways of nodal and infiltrative tumor spread can direct surgery or preclude patients who may not benefit from surgery. While both CT and MRI are effective, MRI provides superior soft-tissue characterization of the gallbladder and biliary tree and is a useful imaging tool for diagnosis, staging, and evaluation of treatment response. ^©RSNA, 2020.