Risk factors and therapeutic measures for postoperative complications associated with esophagectomy

Metabolic Syndrome and the Risk of Postoperative Complications Following Esophagectomy: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Study

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic syndrome has become a major health risk affecting patients worldwide and has been shown to be a risk factor for postoperative complications following abdominal surgery. This study aims to elucidate the link between metabolic syndrome and postoperative complications and mortality following esophagectomy.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study analyzing the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database (2017-2021). This study compared 30-d postoperative complications of patients undergoing esophagectomy with and without metabolic syndrome. Metabolic syndrome was defined as obesity (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2), diabetes, and hypertension.

RESULTS

A total of 4911 patients met the study criteria, and of these, 303 patients (6.17%) met the inclusion criteria for the modified definition of metabolic syndrome. The metabolic syndrome group had higher American Society of Anesthesiologists scores compared to the control group (American Society of Anesthesiologists 3 or 4: 96% versus 84%, P < 0.001). Operative time was significantly higher in the metabolic syndrome group (378 mins versus 361, P = 0.004). Mortality was higher in the metabolic syndrome group (4.3% versus 2.3%, P = 0.03), as was serious morbidity (35% versus 30%, P = 0.05). Metabolic syndrome patients also had higher risks of postoperative complications of pneumonia (18.5% versus 14%, P = 0.04), unplanned intubation (15.5% versus 9.9%, P = 0.002), and sepsis (7.6% versus 4.9%, P = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, 30-d mortality was increased in the metabolic syndrome group.

CONCLUSIONS

Metabolic syndrome patients who undergo esophagectomy are associated with increased rates in morbidity and mortality. When controlled for other patient factors in multivariate analysis, 30-d mortality also had an associated increase. By focusing on modifiable risk factors with metabolic syndrome patients, mortality and morbidity for this high-risk procedure could be reduced in the future.

Long-term impact of aerodigestive symptoms on adults with oesophageal cancer: A qualitative study

PURPOSE

The impact of long-term aerodigestive symptoms following oesophageal cancer surgery is still not well understood. This study aimed to qualitatively understand the long-term impact of aerodigestive symptoms on quality of life in adults post-oesophagectomy.

METHOD

Participants who received curative transhiatal/transthoracic surgery for oesophageal cancer in Ireland's National Oesophageal Cancer Centre were invited to attend semi-structured interviews. Surgery had to be completed at least 12 months prior. Reflexive thematic analysis was conducted.

RESULT

Forty participants were interviewed individually face-to-face. Four key themes were identified: (a) isolation, reflecting the reported solitude experienced by oesophageal cancer survivors when attempting to manage their ongoing aerodigestive symptoms; (b) fear, including fear of choking and fear that dysphagia symptoms may indicate recurrence of oesophageal cancer; (c) altered work capacity, caused by ongoing aerodigestive symptoms; and (d) avoidance of social situations involving food, due to the pain, discomfort, and embarrassment caused by these symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Oesophageal cancer treatment can be lifesaving, however, such medical interventions can result in distressing physiological aerodigestive symptoms throughout survivorship, which can significantly impact quality of life. Our findings indicate a need for greater community support to manage aerodigestive symptoms and reduce the impact these have on quality of life.

Effectiveness of a Protocol Intervention for Aspiration Pneumonia Prevention in Patients With Esophageal Cancer During Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy: A Randomized Control Trial

BACKGROUND

Dysphagia is a leading cause of aspiration pneumonia and negatively affects tolerance of chemoradiotherapy in patients with esophageal cancer.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess a protocol for preventing the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia for adult patients with esophageal cancer experiencing swallowing dysfunction.

METHODS

This study tested a dysphagia intervention that included high-risk patients confirmed by the Eating Assessment Tool questionnaire and Water Swallowing Test. A protocol guide (Interventions for Esophageal Dysphagia [IED]) to prevent aspiration pneumonia during chemoradiotherapy was also implemented. Thirty participants were randomly assigned to an intervention or control group. The study period was 50 days; participants were visited every 7 days for a total of 7 times. Instruments for data collection included The Eating Assessment Tool, Water Swallowing Test, and personal information. The IED was administered only to the experimental group. All data were managed using IBM SPSS statistics version 21.0.

RESULTS

The IED significantly reduced the occurrence of aspiration pneumonia ( P = .012), delayed the onset of aspiration pneumonia ( P = .005), and extended the survival time ( P = .007) in the experimental group.

CONCLUSION

For patients with esophageal cancer undergoing chemoradiotherapy, this protocol improved swallowing dysfunction and reduced aspiration pneumonia.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

The IED protocol should be included in continuous educational training for clinical nurses to help them become familiar with these interventions and to provide these strategies to patients.

Developing sarcopenia during neoadjuvant therapy is associated with worse survival in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients

BACKGROUND

Sarcopenia in cancer patients has been associated with mixed postoperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the development of sarcopenia during the neoadjuvant period is predictive of postoperative mortality in esophageal adenocarcinoma patients.

METHODS

We queried a prospective database to retrieve the sarcopenic status of patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent cross-sectional imaging of the third lumbar vertebra at diagnosis and within 2 months of undergoing an esophagogastrectomy between 2014 and 2022.

RESULTS

Of the 71 patients included in the study, 36 (50.7%) presented with sarcopenia at diagnosis. Of the 35 non-sarcopenic patients, 14 (40%) developed sarcopenia during the neo-adjuvant period. Patients who were not sarcopenic at diagnosis but developed sarcopenia preoperatively had significantly worse overall survival than patients sarcopenic at diagnosis and not sarcopenic preoperatively and patients experiencing no change in sarcopenic status (median 18 vs 47 vs 31 months; P = .02). Diagnostic and preoperative sarcopenic status alone were not significantly associated with overall survival (P = .48 and P = .56, respectively). Although 37 (52.1%) patients died, the cause of death was often not cancer-related (54.1%) and included acute respiratory failure, pneumonia, and cardiac arrest. No significant survival difference was observed when stratified by >10% weight loss (P = .9) or large loss in body mass index (P = .8).

CONCLUSION

Developing sarcopenia during the neo-adjuvant period may be associated with worse overall survival in patients requiring esophagogastrectomy.

Complication Prediction after Esophagectomy with Machine Learning

Esophageal cancer can be treated effectively with esophagectomy; however, the postoperative complication rate is high. In this paper, we study to what extent machine learning methods can predict anastomotic leakage and pneumonia up to two days in advance. We use a dataset with 417 patients who underwent esophagectomy between 2011 and 2021. The dataset contains multimodal temporal information, specifically, laboratory results, vital signs, thorax images, and preoperative patient characteristics. The best models scored mean test set AUROCs of 0.87 and 0.82 for leakage 1 and 2 days ahead, respectively. For pneumonia, this was 0.74 and 0.61 for 1 and 2 days ahead, respectively. We conclude that machine learning models can effectively predict anastomotic leakage and pneumonia after esophagectomy.

The use of indocyanine green (ICYG) angiography intraoperatively to evaluate gastric conduit perfusion during esophagectomy: does it impact surgical decision-making?

BACKGROUND

Ischemia is known to be a major contributor for anastomotic leaks and indocyanine green (ICYG) fluorescence angiography has been utilized to assess perfusion. Experienced esophageal surgeons have clinically assessed the gastric conduit with acceptable outcomes for years. We sought to examine the impact of ICYG in a surgeon's decision-making during esophagectomy.

METHODS

We queried a prospectively maintained database to identify patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy. Time to initial perfusion, time to maximum perfusion, and residual ischemia were measured and used as a guide to resection of residual stomach. During esophagectomy the surgeon identified the anticipated line of ischemic demarcation (LOD) prior to ICYG injection. The distance between the surgeon's LOD and ICYG LOD was measured.

RESULTS

We identified 312 patients who underwent robotic esophagectomy, 251 without ICYG and 61 with ICGY. There were no differences in age, sex, race, body mass index, histology, stage, or neoadjuvant therapy use between groups. The incidence of anastomotic leak did not differ between groups (non-ICYG, 5.2% vs. ICYG, 6.6%), p = 0.67. The initial perfusion time was ≥ 10 s and max perfusion was > 25 s in all the patients in the ICYG that developed anastomotic leaks. All patients were noted to have at least 1 cm of residual gastric ischemia. Fifteen patients underwent independent surgeon evaluation of the ischemic LOD prior to ICYG. Differential distances were noted in 12 (80%) patients with a mean distance between surgical line of demarcation and ICYG LOD of 0.77 cm.

CONCLUSION

While the implementation of ICYG during esophagectomy demonstrates no significant improvements in anastomotic leak rates compared to historical controls, surgeon's decision-making is impacted in 80% of cases resulting in additional resection of the gastric conduit. Elevated times to initial perfusion and maximum perfusion were associated with increased gastric ischemia and anastomotic leaks.

Pattern of Aorto-coeliac Calcification Correlating Cervical Esophago-gastric Anastomotic Leak After Esophagectomy for Cancer: a Retrospective Study

PURPOSE

Cervical esophagogastric anastomotic leak (CEGAL) is a troublesome complication after esophagectomy and gastric pull-up. The aim of the study was to identify the preoperative clinical and radiological factors associated with increased risk of CEGAL.

METHODS

Consecutive patients whose clinical and imaging data were available and who underwent cervical esophago-gastric anastomosis following esophagectomy and gastric pull-up for esophageal cancer, between January 2013 and January 2021, were included. The patient details were collected from a prospectively maintained database. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data including preoperative hemoglobin and serum albumin levels were recorded. Preoperative computed tomographic (CT) images were reviewed by two independent radiologists to assign vascular calcification scores for proximal aorta, distal aorta, aortic bifurcation, celiac trunk, and celiac artery branches. The primary outcome evaluated was clinically evident neck leak. Univariate and multivariate analysis of the clinical and radiological factors was performed to identify significant predictors.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients (mean age: 54.7 years; 60 males, 40 females) were included in the study and of them, 27 developed CEGAL. Compared to the group without CEGAL, the patient group with CEGAL had significantly higher mean age (60.3 vs. 52.7 years, p < 0.01), and higher incidences of diabetes mellitus (25.9% vs 10.9%, p = 0.03), major proximal aortic calcification (29.6% vs. 6.3%, p < 0.01), and major celiac trunk calcification (22.2% vs. 6.3%, p = 0.02). Multivariate regression analysis identified age and presence of major proximal aortic calcification as independent risk factors for the development of CEGAL.

CONCLUSION

Major calcification of the proximal aorta and advanced age are independent risk factors for CEGAL after esophagectomy.

Recruitment s during mechanical ventilation with sequential high-flow nasal oxygen after extubation to prevent postoperative pulmonary complications in patients undergone thoracic surgery: a protocol, prospective randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications (PPCs) following thoracic surgery is high, which increases the mortality rate, prolongs the length of hospital stay and increases medical costs. Some studies have confirmed that preoperative risk assessment, intraoperative anaesthesia methods and intraoperative mechanical ventilation strategies, including recruitment manoeuvres (RMs), can reduce the incidence of PPCs. Despite these improved strategies, the incidence of PPCs remains high. However, mechanical ventilation strategies have not been studied in the postoperative period.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

We assume that RM during mechanical ventilation with sequential high-flow nasal oxygen therapy (HFNO) after extubation can maintain the opening of the postoperative alveoli and ultimately reduce the incidence of PPCs after thoracic surgery. We will include thoracic surgery patients and divide them into the RM with sequential HFNO group and the control group. They will be given RMs and sequential HFNO or be given conventional treatment. The sample size is 654 adult patients (327 per group) undergone thoracic surgery and presenting to the intensive care unit.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Biomedical Research Ethics Committee of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (REC2019-730). It is expected that this study will lead to a randomised controlled trial. We assume that the findings will provide more evidence about PPCs and improve the management of patients undergone thoracic surgery.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100046356.

Prevalence, nature and trajectory of dysphagia postoesophageal cancer surgery: a prospective longitudinal study protocol

INTRODUCTION

Dysphagia is a common problem following oesophagectomy, and is associated with aspiration pneumonia, malnutrition, weight loss, prolonged enteral feeding tube dependence, in addition to an extended in-hospital stay and compromised quality of life (QOL). To date, the prevalence, nature and trajectory of post-oesophagectomy dysphagia has not been systematically studied in a prospective longitudinal design. The study aims (1) to evaluate the prevalence, nature and trajectory of dysphagia for participants undergoing an oesophagectomy as part of curative treatment, (2) to determine the risk factors for, and post-operative complications of dysphagia in this population and (3) to examine the impact of oropharyngeal dysphagia on health-related QOL across time points.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

A videofluoroscopy will be completed and analysed on both post-operative day (POD) 4 or 5 and at 6-months post-surgery. Other swallow evaluations will be completed preoperatively, POD 4 or 5, 1-month and 6-month time points will include a swallowing screening test, tongue pressure measurement, cough reflex testing and an oral hygiene evaluation. Nutritional measurements will include the Functional Oral Intake Scale to measure feeding tube reliance, Malnutrition Screening Tool and the Strength, Assistance With Walking, Rise From a Chair, Climb Stairs and Falls questionnaire. The Reflux Symptom Index will be administered to investigate aerodigestive symptoms commonly experienced by adults post-oesophagectomy. Swallowing-related QOL outcome measures will be determined using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-18, MD Anderson Dysphagia Inventory and the Swallowing Quality of Life Questionnaire.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Ethical approval has been granted by the Tallaght University Hospital/St. James' Hospital Research Ethics Committee (JREC), Dublin, Ireland (Ref. No. 2021-Jul-310). The study results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and presented at national and international scientific conferences.