1
|
Jannusch K, Bittner AK, Bruckmann NM, Morawitz J, Stieglitz C, Dietzel F, Quick HH, Baba HA, Herrmann K, Umutlu L, Antoch G, Kirchner J, Kasimir-Bauer S, Hoffmann O. Correlation between Imaging Markers Derived from PET/MRI and Invasive Acquired Biomarkers in Newly Diagnosed Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061651. [PMID: 36980537 PMCID: PMC10046153 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2023] [Accepted: 03/06/2023] [Indexed: 03/30/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Evaluate the diagnostic potential of [18F]FDG-PET/MRI data compared with invasive acquired biomarkers in newly diagnosed early breast cancer (BC). METHODS Altogether 169 women with newly diagnosed BC were included. All underwent a breast- and whole-body [18F]FDG-PET/MRI for initial staging. A tumor-adapted volume of interest was placed in the primaries and defined bone regions on each standard uptake value (SUV)/apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) dataset. Immunohistochemical markers, molecular subtype, tumor grading, and disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) of each patient were assessed after ultrasound-guided biopsy of the primaries and bone marrow (BM) aspiration. Correlation analysis and group comparisons were assessed. RESULTS A significant inverse correlation of estrogen-receptor (ER) expression and progesterone-receptor (PR) expression towards SUVmax was found (ER: r = 0.27, p < 0.01; PR: r = 0.19, p < 0.05). HER2-receptor expression showed no significant correlation towards SUV and ADC values. A significant positive correlation between Ki67 and SUVmax and SUVmean (r = 0.42 p < 0.01; r = 0.19 p < 0.05) was shown. Tumor grading significantly correlated with SUVmax and SUVmean (ρ = 0.36 and ρ = 0.39, both p's < 0.01). There were no group differences between SUV/ADC values of DTC-positive/-negative patients. CONCLUSIONS [18F]FDG-PET/MRI may give a first impression of BC-receptor status and BC-tumor biology during initial staging by measuring glucose metabolism but cannot distinguish between DTC-positive/-negative patients and replace biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Jannusch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Ann-Kathrin Bittner
- Department Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Nils Martin Bruckmann
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Janna Morawitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Cleo Stieglitz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Frederic Dietzel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Harald H Quick
- High-Field and Hybrid MR Imaging, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
- Erwin L. Hahn Institute for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, University Duisburg-Essen, 45141 Essen, Germany
| | - Hideo A Baba
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Lale Umutlu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Gerald Antoch
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Julian Kirchner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, 40225 Dusseldorf, Germany
| | - Sabine Kasimir-Bauer
- Department Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Oliver Hoffmann
- Department Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, 45147 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Correlation Analysis of Ultrasound Elastography Score with Invasive Breast Cancer and Biological Prognostic Factors. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2022:1174541. [PMID: 35873667 PMCID: PMC9273460 DOI: 10.1155/2022/1174541] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Invasive breast cancer (IBC) is a kind of malignant tumor in which cancer cells have broken through the basement membrane of breast ducts or lobular acini and invaded the stroma. Although ultrasound elastography score (UES) has shown unique advantages in the diagnosis of IBC, its value in the prognosis is not clear. Here, we explored the correlation of UES with IBC and biological prognostic factors. The datum of 86 patients with suspected IBC from January 2018 to December 2021 was collected. UE was applied in the examination of all patients. The lesion tissue of the malignant group was punctured to detect and analyze the expression of biological prognostic factors, including estrogen receptor (E receptor), progesterone receptor (P receptor), and human epidermal growth factor 2 (HER factor 2) and Ki67. The differences in UES under different biological prognostic factors were compared. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was applied to analyze the diagnostic value of UES of IBC and the expression of biological prognostic factors. Based on the pathological diagnosis results, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UES in the diagnosis of IBC were analyzed. The correlation of UES with IBC and biological prognostic factors was analyzed by multiple linear regression and Spearman method. ROC analysis showed that the area under the curve of UES for diagnosing IBC and evaluating the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67 were 0.877, 0.704, 0.763, and 0.820, respectively (P<0.05). The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of UES when diagnosing IBC were 92.42%, 90.00%, 91.86%, 96.83%, and 78.26%, respectively. The UES of E receptor expression (positive and negative group) showed no obvious variance (
> 0.05). The UES of P receptors (positive and negative), HER factor 2 (positive and negative), and Ki67 (high and low expression) showed obvious differences (
< 0.05). Multiple linear regression and Spearman indicated UES was significantly correlated with the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67 (P<0.05). UES has a certain diagnostic value for IBC and is significantly correlated to the expression of P receptor, HER factor 2, and Ki67, which is helpful for evaluating the prognosis of patients with IBC.
Collapse
|