Recurrent cutaneous basal cell carcinoma after surgical excision: A retrospective clinicopathological study

Recurrence of Basal Cell Carcinoma Treated with Surgical Excision and Histopathological Analysis with Frozen Section Technique with Complete Margin Control (CMC-FS): A 15-Year Experience of a Reference Center

BACKGROUND

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common type of eyelid malignancy and it is considered to be dangerous due to its proximity to functionally essential organs. Early diagnosis and complete excision of the primary lesion are crucial to prevent infiltration and metastasis. The study aims to evaluate the extent of recurrence in subjects affected by BCC of the upper third of the face treated with surgical eradication and the frozen section technique with complete margin control (CMC-FS), in comparison with the gold standard Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study included 111 patients with 111 biopsy-proven eyelid BCCs. On clinical examination, all lesions were removed with 2 mm margins clinically free of neoplasm. Prior to reconstruction, CMC-FS analysis of all surgical margins was performed on each tumor for histopathologic confirmation. Subsequently, all margins were presented for the permanent paraffin sections.

RESULTS

There were 69 primary carcinomas and 42 secondary carcinomas among the 111 samples. No recurrence occurred in 109 tumors followed-up for at least 5 years, with a total recurrence rate of 1.8%. The median time between lesion excision and diagnosis of recurrence was 20 months.

CONCLUSIONS

at 5-year follow-up, CMC-FS guided excision of BCCs of the eyelids resulted in recurrence rates equivalent to MMS. Intraoperative microscopic control of all margins reduced the recurrence rate of the upper third of the facial BCCs, correlating with easier reconstruction with better esthetic and functional outcome.

Insight on common forms of cutaneous head and neck carcinoma (Review)

To improve the outcome and quality of life for patients with head and neck carcinoma, an increasing amount of research has been performed on the particularities of this type of cancer and its treatment methods. Starting from clinical aspects, including histology and imaging features, up-to-date studies from different parts of the world have determined new data leading to a better understanding of the mechanisms behind the disease and proposed new treatment protocols. The head and neck areas are predisposed to almost all skin neoplasms, most commonly those related to ultraviolet exposure. Squamous cell carcinoma and basal cell carcinoma account for almost 90% of non-melanoma skin cancers in this region; therefore, reviewing the literature on cutaneous carcinomas of the head and neck area and sharing particular aspects of their physiopathology are beneficial for a great number of patients.

Sun-Exposed versus Sun-Protected Cutaneous Basal Cell Carcinoma: Clinico-Pathological Profile and p16 Immunostaining

Introduction: Although widespread, BCC is still relatively poorly understood in regards to pathogenesis and prognosis, particularly the lesions formed on anatomical sites away from sun exposure. With the aim of deepening our understanding of the pathogenesis and clinico-pathological correlations of BCCs, we conducted this study. Methods: Tissue blocks and data of 52 Egyptian patients diagnosed with BCC were retrieved for clinical information and inclusion criteria, then re-examined histologically; p16 immunostaining was carried out and evaluated for analysis and comparison between the two groups, i.e., sun-exposed and sun-protected. Results: Sex, age, clinical suspicion, tumor size, recurrence status, and histologic variants did not show a significant difference between the sun-protected and sun-exposed groups; however, the mean ages recorded were 67.2 vs. 62.7 for the sun-protected and sun-exposed groups, respectively. A total of 52% of BCCs were positive for p16. The sun-protected lesions showed p16 positivity in 61% of cases, whereas 49% of the sun-exposed lesions were positive with no significant difference. There was a significant difference in p16 expression between the recurrent and non-recurrent lesions. Conclusions: A significant difference was seen in the case of cancer recurrence, where all the recurrent BCCs in this study demonstrated negative p16 immunostaining of the primary lesions; however, the positively stained cases in total were 52% of BCCs. The mean patient age of the sun-protected group was much higher than in previous peer studies. We assume that the biological, prognostic, and clinical aspects of p16 protein expression in BCCs are still far from being clearly understood. Further studies are highly recommended, with more focus on its role in the pathogenesis and the prognostic factors.