Corticosteroid use is associated with a reduced incidence of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a retrospective cohort study

Budesonide, an anti-inflammatory drug, exacerbate clostridioides difficile colitis in mice

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) induces intense acute inflammatory responses through toxin release. A combination of antibiotic and anti-inflammatory agents is sometimes recommended in severe, non-responsive cases, although clinical trials have been inconclusive, raising concerns about potential complications. This study aims to investigate the effect of budesonide and mesalamine in the treatment of CDI in a murine model, by evaluating the combination of fidaxomicin and these anti-inflammatory drugs.

METHOD

C57BL/6 J female mice pretreated with an antimicrobial mixture were challenged with C. difficile VPI 10463 or culture media by gavage. After the challenge, mice received placebo, fidaxomicin alone (20 mg/kg), or fidaxomicin combined with mesalamine (200, 400 mg/kg) or budesonide (0.2, 1, 10 mg/kg) for 5 days. The mice were monitored for 7 days with weight and survival. Colon and cecum tissues were harvested for histological assessment.

RESULTS

CDI of mice caused 80% mortality. Fidaxomicin completely protected against CDI in all parameters (weight, survival and pathscores). Mortality rates were up to 90%, 70% in budesonide(10 mg/kg) and mesalamine (400 mg/kg) treatment group, respectively. Budesonide (0.02,0.1 and 1 mg/kg) adjunction to fidaxomicin worsened the disease outcome according to all tested parameters. While mesalamine in combination with fidaxomicin (200, 400 mg/kg) did not lead to any deaths during CDI treatment, it did not provide additional benefits.

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-inflammatory drugs including corticosteroid therapy may worsen the incidence and severity of CDI in this mouse model. These studies may have important clinical implications for understanding the role of anti-inflammatory/ corticosteroid therapy in CDI and inflammatory bowel disease management.

The Impact of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Hospitalized Patients: What Changed during the Pandemic?

(1) Background: Clostridioides difficile (C. difficile) and SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus represent significant health threats. Our study focused on the impact of concurrent infections on patient outcomes against the backdrop of changes imposed by the pandemic. (2) Materials and methods. We performed a retrospective analysis and included patients diagnosed with CDI who were admitted in our hospital before and during the pandemic. We compared patient exposure to risk factors for CDI in both groups and patient negative outcomes: need for ICU care, prolonged hospitalization, organ failure, toxic megacolon, and death. (3) Results. Overall, 188 patients were included, of which 100 had CDI (the pre-pandemic group), and 88 patients presented both CDI and COVID-19 (the pandemic group). Patients in the pandemic group were significantly older, with a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and a greater exposure to antibiotics and corticosteroids, and were more likely to develop organ dysfunction, to require ICU care and have prolonged hospitalization. The severity of COVID-19, leukocytosis and increased D-dimer levels were indicators of poor prognosis in the pandemic group. Higher CCI scores and leukocytosis increased the risk for negative outcomes in CDI alone patients. (4) Conclusions. The study highlights the negative impact of associated infections on patient outcome. The severity of COVID-19 directly influences the prognosis of patients with concurrent infections.

Corticosteroids Do Not Increase the Likelihood of Primary Clostridioides difficile Infection in the Setting of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotic Use

Background

The pathogenesis of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) involves a significant host immune response. Generally, corticosteroids act by suppressing the host inflammatory response, and their anti-inflammatory effects are used to treat gastrointestinal disorders. Although previous investigations have demonstrated mixed results regarding the effect of corticosteroids on CDI, we hypothesized that the anti-inflammatory effect of corticosteroids would decrease the risk of CDI in hospitalized patients.

Methods

This was a case–control study of hospitalized adults. The case population included patients diagnosed with primary CDI who received at least 1 dose of a high-risk antibiotic (cefepime, meropenem, or piperacillin-tazobactam) in the 90 days before CDI diagnosis. The control population included patients who received at least 1 dose of the same high-risk antibiotic but did not develop CDI in the 90 days following their first dose of antibiotic. The primary study outcome was the development of CDI based on receipt of corticosteroids.

Results

The final study cohort consisted of 104 cases and 153 controls. Those who received corticosteroids had a lower odds of CDI after adjusting for age, proton pump inhibitor use, and antibiotic days of therapy (odds ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.30–0.97; P = .04). We did not observe an association between corticosteroid dose or duration and CDI.

Conclusions

We demonstrated a 46% relative reduction in the odds of developing CDI in patients who received corticosteroids in the past 90 days. We believe that our results provide the best clinical evidence to further support mechanistic studies underlying this phenomenon.

Lack of Association Between the Clinical Outcome of Clostridium difficile Infection and Current Steroids Use

Background

The purpose of this study was to compare the outcome of Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients on systemic steroids for various indications to patients not on steroids in term of disease severity, and associated morbidity and mortality.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed records of all patients with CDI at our hospital from January 2011 to December 2016. Patients were evaluated for baseline characteristics, comorbidities, medications, disease severity, disease-related length of stay (LOS) from the diagnosis of CDI to discharge, need for surgical intervention, and disease-related mortality. Based on systemic steroids use, patients who were using steroids for different indications constituted the study population, and those with no steroids use were clustered as a control group.

Results

Of the 258 patients included, males were 127 (49%). Severe and severe-complicated CDI developed in 21/63 (33.3%) and 1/63 (1.6%) of patients on steroids (average daily dose of 20 mg), and in 73/195 (37.4%) and 5/195 (2.6%) of patients with no steroids use (P = 0.56 and P = 0.66, respectively). Surgical intervention was not required in the steroids group and 5/195 (2.7%) of patients not on steroids underwent bowel surgeries (P = 0.38). Mean LOS (days) was 11.6 ± 1.5 in the steroids group and 10.4 ± 0.7 in the no-steroids group (P = 0.4). CDI-related mortality occurred in 9/63(14.3%) of patients on steroids, and in 15/195 (7.7%) of patients not on steroids (P = 0.12; odds ratio (OR): 2; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.8 - 4.8).

Conclusion

There was no significant difference in the severity of CDI, need for surgical interventions, disease-related LOS and mortality in systemic steroids users compared to patients not on steroids.

Evaluation of Risk Factors for Clostridium difficile Infection in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients

STUDY OBJECTIVES

The primary objective was to determine the impact of hematologic malignancies and/or conditioning regimens on the risk of developing Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Secondary objectives were to determine if traditional CDI risk factors applied to patients undergoing HSCT and to determine the presence of CDI markers of severity of illness among this patient population.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective case-control study.

SETTING

Quaternary care academic medical center.

PATIENTS

A total of 105 patients who underwent HSCT between December 2009 and December 2014; of these patients, 35 developed an initial episode of CDI (HSCT/CDI group [cases]), and 70 did not (controls). Controls were matched in a 2:1 ratio to cases based on age (± 10 yrs) and date of HSCT (± 6 mo).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced regarding age, sex, race, ethnicity, and type of HSCT. No significant differences in conditioning regimen, hematologic malignancy, total body irradiation received for HSCT, use of antibiotics within 60 days of HSCT, or use of prophylactic antibiotics after HSCT were noted between the two groups. Patients in the control group were 10.57 (95% confidence interval 1.24-492.75) more likely to have received corticosteroids prior to HSCT than patients in the HSCT/CDI group (p=0.01). Use of proton pump inhibitors at the time of HSCT was greater among the control group than among patients in the HSCT/CDI group (97% vs 86%, p=0.048). No significant difference in mortality was noted between the groups at 3, 6, and 12 months after HSCT. Metronidazole was frequently prescribed for patients in the HSCT/CDI group (34 patients [97%]). Severe CDI was not common among patients within the HSCT/CDI group (13 patients [37%]); vancomycin was infrequently prescribed for these patients ([31%] 4/13 patients).

CONCLUSION

Hematologic malignancies and a conditioning regimen administered for HSCT were not significant risk factors for the development of CDI after HSCT. Use of corticosteroids prior to HSCT and use of proton pump inhibitors at the time of HSCT were associated with a significantly decreased risk of CDI.

Comparison of Clostridium difficile Ribotypes Circulating in Australian Hospitals and Communities

Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) is becoming less exclusively a health care-associated CDI (HA-CDI). The incidence of community-associated CDI (CA-CDI) has increased over the past few decades. It has been postulated that asymptomatic toxigenic C. difficile (TCD)-colonized patients may play a role in the transfer of C. difficile between the hospital setting and the community. Thus, to investigate the relatedness of C. difficile across the hospital and community settings, we compared the characteristics of symptomatic and asymptomatic host patients and the pathogens from these patients in these two settings over a 3-year period. Two studies were simultaneously conducted; the first study enrolled symptomatic CDI patients from two tertiary care hospitals and the community in two Australian states, while the second study enrolled asymptomatic TCD-colonized patients from the same tertiary care hospitals. A total of 324 patients (96 with HA-CDI, 152 with CA-CDI, and 76 colonized with TCD) were enrolled. The predominant C. difficile ribotypes isolated in the hospital setting corresponded with those isolated in the community, as it was found that for 79% of the C. difficile isolates from hospitals, an isolate with a matching ribotype was isolated in the community, suggesting that transmission between these two settings is occurring. The toxigenic C. difficile strains causing symptomatic infection were similar to those causing asymptomatic infection, and patients exposed to antimicrobials prior to admission were more likely to develop a symptomatic infection (odds ratio, 2.94; 95% confidence interval, 1.20 to 7.14). Our findings suggest that the development of CDI symptoms in a setting without establishment of hospital epidemics with binary toxin-producing C. difficile strains may be driven mainly by host susceptibility and exposure to antimicrobials, rather than by C. difficile strain characteristics.