Mannitol as an indirect bronchoprovocation test for the 21st century

Changes in exhaled volatile organic compounds following indirect bronchial challenge in suspected asthma

BACKGROUND

Inhaled mannitol provokes bronchoconstriction via mediators released during osmotic degranulation of inflammatory cells, and, hence represents a useful diagnostic test for asthma and model for acute attacks. We hypothesised that the mannitol challenge would trigger changes in exhaled volatile organic compounds (VOCs), generating both candidate biomarkers and novel insights into their origin.

METHODS

Participants with a clinical diagnosis of asthma, or undergoing investigation for suspected asthma, were recruited. Inhaled mannitol challenges were performed, followed by a sham challenge after 2 weeks in participants with bronchial hyper-responsiveness (BHR). VOCs were collected before and after challenges and analysed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients (mean (SD) age 52 (16) years) completed a mannitol challenge, of which 16 (35%) were positive, and 15 of these completed a sham challenge. Quantities of 16 of 51 identified VOCs changed following mannitol challenge (p<0.05), of which 11 contributed to a multivariate sparse partial least square discriminative analysis model, with a classification error rate of 13.8%. Five of these 16 VOCs also changed (p<0.05) in quantity following the sham challenge, along with four further VOCs. In patients with BHR to mannitol distinct postchallenge VOC signatures were observed compared with post-sham challenge.

CONCLUSION

Inhalation of mannitol was associated with changes in breath VOCs, and in people with BHR resulted in a distinct exhaled breath profile when compared with a sham challenge. These differentially expressed VOCs are likely associated with acute airway inflammation and/or bronchoconstriction and merit further investigation as potential biomarkers in asthma.

Methods for assessing cough sensitivity

Cough sensitivity can be described as the reaction intensity of the cough reflex to different stimuli which activate chemically and mechanically sensitive vagal afferent nerves innervating airways and lungs. Measurement of cough reflex sensitivity plays an important role in revealing the underlying mechanisms of cough and evaluating the effects of pharmacological interventions. Besides, different responses to cough suppression therapies indicate the existence of cough hypersensitivity. In consideration of these factors stated above, cough sensitivity should therefore be assessed with a variety of cough challenge tests. Based on the neuroanatomical characteristics of the cough reflex, chemical challenge tests have been developed to objectively assess cough sensitivity. In cough inhalation challenges, capsaicin and citric acid are commonly used as the tussive agents to induce cough, which are validated for describing a profile of cough sensitivity to chemical irritants. Recently, mechanical methodologies have also been tried to measure the mechanical sensitivity of the cough reflex. Methodological consideration and selection are necessary for the reasonable assessment of cough sensitivity while employing cough challenges in clinical trials. Thus, in this review, we will focus on describing various methodologies of cough sensitivity measurement and, detailing some factors influencing on the accuracy of outcomes in the experimentally induced cough.

Usefulness of mannitol challenge testing for diagnosing asthma in everyday clinical practice

Background: The mannitol test is widely used for assessment of airway responsiveness in patients with possible asthma, but our knowledge of the value in everyday clinical practice is limited.Objective: To investigate the diagnostic value of the mannitol test in a clinical setting.Methods: All patients having a mannitol challenge test as part of their diagnostic work-up for asthma at the respiratory outpatient clinic, Hvidovre Hospital, over a 5-year period were included in the present analysis. Case history, including previous diagnoses, spirometry, exhaled nitric oxide (F_ENO) was obtained. The mannitol challenge was performed according to guidelines, i.e. increasing doses of mannitol (from 5 to 635 mg) until maximum dose or a 15% decline in FEV₁ (PD₁₅) was achieved (positive test defined as a PD₁₅ < 635 mg).Results: Our cohort comprised 566 patients (210 men). Post-challenge, 247 patients were diagnosed with asthma by a specialist in respiratory medicine, of whom 138 (56%) had a positive mannitol test. A diagnosis of asthma was ruled out by the specialist in 319 individuals, of whom 18 (6%) had a positive mannitol test and 77 (24%) previous doctor-diagnosed asthma (but with no evidence of a confirmatory test). The specificity and sensitivity of the test was 94% and 56%, respectively. Female gender (p = 0.005), increasing BMI (p < 0.001), exercise-induced cough (p = 0.002), night-time respiratory symptoms (p = 0.002), low FEV₁/FVC ratio (p = 0.008) and high F_ENO (p < 0.001) were determinants for a positive mannitol test.Conclusion: In everyday clinical work-up of patients with possible asthma, the sensitivity and specificity of the mannitol challenge test is comparable to previous controlled trials.

Risk and safety requirements for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology: World Allergy Organization Statement

One of the major concerns in the practice of allergy is related to the safety of procedures for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic disease. Management (diagnosis and treatment) of hypersensitivity disorders involves often intentional exposure to potentially allergenic substances (during skin testing), deliberate induction in the office of allergic symptoms to offending compounds (provocation tests) or intentional application of potentially dangerous substances (allergy vaccine) to sensitized patients. These situations may be associated with a significant risk of unwanted, excessive or even dangerous reactions, which in many instances cannot be completely avoided. However, adverse reactions can be minimized or even avoided if a physician is fully aware of potential risk and is prepared to appropriately handle the situation. Information on the risk of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergic diseases has been accumulated in the medical literature for decades; however, except for allergen specific immunotherapy, it has never been presented in a systematic fashion. Up to now no single document addressed the risk of the most commonly used medical procedures in the allergy office nor attempted to present general requirements necessary to assure the safety of these procedures. Following review of available literature a group of allergy experts within the World Allergy Organization (WAO), representing various continents and areas of allergy expertise, presents this report on risk associated with diagnostic and therapeutic procedures in allergology and proposes a consensus on safety requirements for performing procedures in allergy offices. Optimal safety measures including appropriate location, type and required time of supervision, availability of safety equipment, access to specialized emergency services, etc. for various procedures have been recommended. This document should be useful for allergists with already established practices and experience as well as to other specialists taking care of patients with allergies.

Comparison of diagnostic validity of mannitol and methacholine challenges and relationship to clinical status and airway inflammation in steroid-naïve asthmatic patients

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and compare the diagnostic validity of two bronchial challenges and to investigate their correlation with patient clinical status, atopy and inflammation markers.

METHODS

Eighty-eight patients, 47 women and 41 men, mean age 38.56 ± 16.73 years who presented with asthma related symptoms and were not on any anti-asthma medication, were challenged with mannitol and methacholine on separate days. Medical history regarding asthmatic symptoms, physical examination, skin prick tests and FeNO levels were also assessed. The clinical diagnosis of asthma was based on bronchodilator reversibility test.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven patients were diagnosed with asthma and 21 without asthma. Both methacholine (P < 0.014) and mannitol (P < 0.000) challenges were significant in diagnosing asthma. The positive/negative predictive value was 93.33%/41.86% for methacholine, 97.72%/45.45% for mannitol and 97.05%/45.45%. for both methods assessed together. Worthy of note that 22% of asthmatics had both tests negative. There was a negative correlation between PC20 of methacholine and the FeNO level P < 0.001, and positive with the PD15 of mannitol P < 0.001 and the pre-test FEV₁% pred P < 0.005, whereas PD15 of mannitol was negatively correlated with the FeNO level P < 0.001. Furthermore, dyspnea was the only asthmatic symptom associated with FeNO level P < 0.035 and the positivity of mannitol P < 0.014 and methacholine P < 0.04.

CONCLUSIONS

Both challenge tests were equivalent in diagnosing asthma. Nevertheless, specificity appeared to be slightly higher in mannitol challenge.