1
|
Zhang M, Ni JZ, Cheng L. Safety of intranasal corticosteroids for allergic rhinitis in children. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 21:931-938. [PMID: 35199623 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2046731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common chronic inflammatory disease of the nasal mucosa, affecting about 10-40% of children worldwide. Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are the first line anti-inflammatory drug in the treatment of pediatric AR. The systemic and local adverse effects of INCSs in children with AR should be assessed. AREAS COVERED Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) reporting local and systemic adverse effects of INCSs in pediatric populations with AR were searched out of PubMed and Embase. EXPERT OPINION Overall, INCSs displayed a favorable safety profile and high local-systemic balance of bioavailability with a low incidence of adverse events in the treatment of AR children. Nevertheless, the use of INCSs should be designed depending on one patient's response and adverse effects. The benefits and risks of INCSs should be assessed to ensure the clinical efficacy and avoid the insidious events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Jing-Zi Ni
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Lei Cheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.,International Centre for Allergy Research, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wu EL, Harris WC, Babcock CM, Alexander BH, Riley CA, McCoul ED. Epistaxis Risk Associated with Intranasal Corticosteroid Sprays: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2019; 161:18-27. [DOI: 10.1177/0194599819832277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Objective Intranasal corticosteroids (INCSs) are widely utilized for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Epistaxis is a known adverse effect of INCSs, but it is not known if the risk of epistaxis differs among INCSs. Data Sources Systematic review of primary studies identified through Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed Central, and Cochrane databases. Review Methods Systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA standard. English-language studies were queried through February 1, 2018. The search identified randomized controlled trials of INCSs for treatment of allergic rhinitis that reported incidence of epistaxis. An itemized assessment of the risk of bias was conducted for each included study, and meta-analysis was performed of the relative risk of epistaxis for each INCS. Results Of 949 identified studies, 72 met the criteria for analysis. Meta-analysis demonstrated an overall relative risk of epistaxis of 1.48 (95% CI, 1.32-1.67) for all INCSs. The INCSs associated with the highest risk of epistaxis were beclomethasone hydrofluoroalkane, fluticasone furoate, mometasone furoate, and fluticasone propionate. Beclomethasone aqueous, ciclesonide hydrofluoroalkane, and ciclesonide aqueous were associated with the lowest risk of epistaxis. Conclusions about epistaxis with use of budesonide, triamcinolone, and flunisolide are limited due to the low number of studies and high heterogeneity. Conclusions While a differential effect on epistaxis among INCS agents is not clearly demonstrated, this meta-analysis does confirm an increased risk of epistaxis for patients using INCSs as compared with placebo for treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric L. Wu
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - William C. Harris
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Casey M. Babcock
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Bailin H. Alexander
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| | - Charles A. Riley
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Edward D. McCoul
- Department of Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery, School of Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
- Ochsner Clinical School, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Luk LJ, DelGaudio JM. Topical Drug Therapies for Chronic Rhinosinusitis. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2017; 50:533-543. [DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2017.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
|
4
|
Mansfield LE. Beclomethasone HFA for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2015; 16:2849-57. [DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2015.1115014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
|
5
|
Ferrante G, Montalbano L, Cilluffo G, Malizia V, Marchese D, La Grutta S. Beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane for the treatment of allergic rhinitis. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2015; 12:279-88. [PMID: 26558604 DOI: 10.1586/1744666x.2016.1118347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common respiratory disease, and its prevalence is increasing all over the world, both in adults and in children. Patients experience symptoms that may negatively impact on physical, social and psychological well-being. Hence, if left untreated, allergic rhinitis may significantly affect quality of life. Under current guidelines, intranasal corticosteroids are considered the most effective drugs and they are recommended as first-line therapy. Among the several corticosteroid intranasal sprays available, beclomethasone dipropionate is one of the most prescribed. Recently, new intranasal hydrofluoroalkane-propelled formulations with little or no impact on the ozone layer have been developed for the treatment of AR. The use of these devices might improve patients' adherence to treatment, avoiding some of the most common side effects associated with aqueous formulations. This review provides the most recent evidence for the efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol in the treatment of allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuliana Ferrante
- a Department of Science for Health Promotion and Mother and Child Care , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Laura Montalbano
- b National Research Council CNR , Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology IBIM , Palermo , Italy.,c Department of Psychology , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Giovanna Cilluffo
- b National Research Council CNR , Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology IBIM , Palermo , Italy.,d Department of Economics, Business, and Statistics , University of Palermo , Palermo , Italy
| | - Velia Malizia
- b National Research Council CNR , Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology IBIM , Palermo , Italy
| | - Donatella Marchese
- e Istituto di Biomedicina e Immunologia Molecolare (IBIM) Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) Palermo , Italy
| | - Stefania La Grutta
- b National Research Council CNR , Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology IBIM , Palermo , Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hampel FC, Nayak NA, Segall N, Small CJ, Li J, Tantry SK. No hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal function effect with beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol, based on 24-hour serum cortisol in pediatric allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 115:137-42. [PMID: 26250771 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2015] [Revised: 05/20/2015] [Accepted: 05/23/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intranasal corticosteroids are the mainstay of allergic rhinitis (AR) treatment. Their potential to suppress the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis should be evaluated, especially after long-term daily use in children. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the effects of treatment with non-aqueous beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol on hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function in children with perennial AR. METHODS In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, patients (6-11 years old) with perennial AR were randomized (2:1) to BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day (n = 67) or placebo (n = 32). The primary end point was change from baseline in 24-hour serum cortisol (SC) weighted mean for BDP nasal aerosol and placebo after 6 weeks of treatment, which was analyzed in the per-protocol population. RESULTS The per-protocol population included 97 patients (BDP nasal aerosol, n = 66; placebo, n = 31). Baseline geometric mean SC weighted mean values were similar in the 80-μg/day BDP nasal aerosol and placebo groups (5.97 and 6.47 μg/dL, respectively). After 6 weeks' treatment, geometric mean values were 6.19 and 7.13 μg/dL, respectively, with no decrease from baseline in either group. Geometric mean SC ratio of BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day to placebo was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.81-1.03), indicating predefined noninferiority. SC concentration-time profiles were similar for the placebo and 80-μg/day BDP nasal aerosol groups at baseline and week 6. BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day was generally well tolerated. CONCLUSION In pediatric patients with perennial AR, 24-hour SC profiles were comparable for BDP nasal aerosol and placebo, indicating that once-daily BDP nasal aerosol treatment did not significantly affect hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov; NCT01697956.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Calvin J Small
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| | - Jiang Li
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| | - Sudeesh K Tantry
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Berger WE, Jacobs RL, Amar NJ, Tantry SK, Li J, Small CJ. Efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol in children with perennial allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 115:130-6. [PMID: 26115578 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2015] [Revised: 04/28/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol (non-aqueous) is approved for management of seasonal and perennial allergic rhinitis (PAR) in adolescents and adults. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day in children with PAR. METHODS This 12-week, phase 3, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study randomized 547 children (4-11 years old) with PAR to once-daily BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day or placebo. The primary end point was change from baseline in average morning and evening reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) during the first 6 weeks of treatment in patients 6 to 11 years old. Changes from baseline in average morning and evening instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS) in children 6 to 11 years old and average rTNSS and iTNSS in children 4 to 11 years old were assessed during the first 6 weeks of treatment. RESULTS Improvements were significantly greater with BDP nasal aerosol than with placebo during the first 6 weeks of treatment in children 6 to 11 years old in average morning and evening rTNSS and iTNSS (mean treatment difference -0.66 [P = .002] and -0.58 [P = .004], respectively). Improvements in average morning and evening rTNSS and iTNSS also were significantly greater in patients 4 to 11 years receiving BDP nasal aerosol than with placebo during the first 6 weeks of treatment (P = .002 and P = .004, respectively). Similar improvements were seen during 12 weeks of treatment. The safety profile of BDP nasal aerosol was comparable to that of placebo. CONCLUSION The BDP nasal aerosol at 80 μg/day in children 4 to 11 years old was well tolerated and effective in controlling nasal symptoms of PAR. TRIAL REGISTRATION www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT01783548.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Administration, Inhalation
- Anti-Allergic Agents/therapeutic use
- Beclomethasone/therapeutic use
- Child
- Child, Preschool
- Double-Blind Method
- Drug Administration Schedule
- Female
- Humans
- Male
- Nasal Sprays
- Quality of Life/psychology
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/drug therapy
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/immunology
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/physiopathology
- Rhinitis, Allergic, Perennial/psychology
- Treatment Outcome
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Berger
- Allergy and Asthma Associates of Southern California, Mission Viejo, California.
| | | | | | - Sudeesh K Tantry
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| | - Jiang Li
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| | - Calvin J Small
- Teva Branded Pharmaceutical Products R&D, Inc, Frazer, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Platt M. Pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2015; 4 Suppl 2:S35-40. [PMID: 25182353 DOI: 10.1002/alr.21381] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2014] [Revised: 07/01/2014] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pharmacotherapy for allergic rhinitis is a mainstay of treatment for patients with mild to severe nasal allergy symptoms. A wide array of medical treatment options is available for both episodic relief and prevention of symptoms. Treatment regimens can be tailored to individual patients based on nasal symptoms, severity, and associated atopic disorders. The purposes of this review are to identify available pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis, to discuss the benefits and limitations of each treatment option, and to help guide practitioners in providing optimal medical treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis. METHODS A comprehensive review of pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis was performed using a PubMed search. Secondary sources within indexed studies were also compiled to review current medication options for patients with allergic rhinitis. The benefits and limitations of each class of allergy medication were reviewed to provide information on selecting the optimal treatment regimen for patients with allergic rhinitis. RESULTS Pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis that are currently used in clinical practice include antihistamines, corticosteroids, leukotriene modifiers, mast cell stabilizers, expectorants, and decongestants. Symptoms of nasal congestion, itching, sneezing, and rhinorrhea can be targeted with specific therapies that modulate the acute-phase or late-phase allergic reactions. Associated atopic disorders, including conjunctivitis and asthma, can help guide medication selection. CONCLUSION Pharmacotherapies for allergic rhinitis offer numerous options that are safe, effective, and readily available to target specific nasal symptoms. Symptom-based selection of allergy medications can result in optimal treatment for patients with allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Platt
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Kheirandish-Gozal L, Bhattacharjee R, Bandla HPR, Gozal D. Antiinflammatory therapy outcomes for mild OSA in children. Chest 2014; 146:88-95. [PMID: 24504096 DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-2288] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND OSA is highly prevalent in children and usually initially treated by adenotonsillectomy. Nonsurgical alternatives for mild OSA primarily consisting of antiinflammatory approaches have emerged, but their efficacy has not been extensively assessed. METHODS A retrospective review of clinically and polysomnographically diagnosed patients with OSA treated between 2007 and 2012 was performed to identify otherwise healthy children ages 2 to 14 years who fulfilled the criteria for mild OSA and who were treated with a combination of intranasal corticosteroid and oral montelukast (OM) for 12 weeks (ICS + OM). A subset of children continued OM treatment for 6 to 12 months. RESULTS A total of 3,071 children were diagnosed with OSA, of whom 836 fulfilled mild OSA criteria and 752 received ICS + OM. Overall, beneficial effects occurred in > 80% of the children, with nonadherence being documented in 61 children and adenotonsillectomy being ultimately performed in 12.3%. Follow-up polysomnography in a subset of 445 patients showed normalization of sleep findings in 62%, while 17.1% showed either no improvement or worsening of their OSA. Among the latter, older children (aged > 7 years; OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.43-4.13; P < .001) and obese children (BMI z-score > 1.65; OR: 6.3; 95% CI, 4.23-11.18; P < .000001) were significantly more likely to be nonresponders. CONCLUSIONS A combination of ICS + OM as initial treatment of mild OSA appears to provide an effective alternative to adenotonsillectomy, particularly in younger and nonobese children. These results support implementation of multicenter randomized trials to more definitively establish the role of ICS + OM treatment in pediatric OSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Kheirandish-Gozal
- Section of Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Biological Sciences Division, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Rakesh Bhattacharjee
- Section of Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Biological Sciences Division, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - Hari P R Bandla
- Section of Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Biological Sciences Division, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL
| | - David Gozal
- Section of Pediatric Sleep Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Biological Sciences Division, Pritzker School of Medicine, The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Thamboo A, Manji J, Szeitz A, Santos RD, Hathorn I, Gan EC, Alsaleh S, Javer AR. The safety and efficacy of short-term budesonide delivered via mucosal atomization device for chronic rhinosinusitis without nasal polyposis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2014; 4:397-402. [PMID: 24449682 DOI: 10.1002/alr.21280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2013] [Revised: 11/22/2013] [Accepted: 12/03/2013] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Budesonide is a potent corticosteroid commonly prescribed for management of inflammation in chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). The standard for prescribing budesonide is via impregnated nasal saline irrigation (INSI), although recently the mucosal atomization device (MAD) has emerged as a theoretically superior method of distributing medication into the sinuses. The MAD atomizes medication into small droplets and this is thought to enhance absorption and improve bioavailability. However, no studies have shown whether enhanced absorption and improved bioavailability of budesonide via MAD causes adrenal suppression. The objective of this study is to determine whether budesonide via MAD affects the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. METHODS Twenty CRS patients were recruited from a tertiary rhinology clinic and randomized to take budesonide (1 mg) via MAD or via INSI twice a day for 60 days. The adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) stimulation test and 22-item Sinonasal Outcomes Test (SNOT-22) questionnaire were administered on days 1, 30, and 60 of the study. Plasma budesonide and cortisol levels were simultaneously quantified using a high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry technique. RESULTS There was no indication of adrenal suppression in either group (n = 20) based on ACTH stimulation test results nor was there significant plasma budesonide levels detected in either group. Quality of life, as indicated by SNOT-22, did not differ between groups at 60 days (p = 0.404; 95% confidence interval [CI], -37.2 to 15.9), but SNOT-22 scores for patients using MAD did show statistically significant improvement at 60 days compared to baseline (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION The MAD is likely a safe and effective method of delivering budesonide to the sinuses in the short term.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Thamboo
- Division of Otolaryngology, niversity of British Columbia, St. Paul's Sinus Centre, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Raphael GD, Berger WE, Prenner BM, Finn AF, Kelley L, Tantry SK. Efficacy, safety, and optimal dose selection of beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol for seasonal allergic rhinitis in adolescents and adults. Curr Med Res Opin 2013; 29:1329-40. [PMID: 23815103 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2013.821055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Some patients with allergic rhinitis (AR) may prefer nonaqueous intranasal corticosteroid aerosols because of unwanted attributes of aqueous formulations. The mandatory removal of chlorofluorocarbon-propelled nonaqueous aerosols from the market limited available treatment options. To fulfill this unmet need, a nonaqueous, hydrofluoroalkane-propelled beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) nasal aerosol was developed and approved for treatment of AR nasal symptoms. As part of the development program, this dose-ranging study evaluated three doses of BDP nasal aerosol to determine the optimally safe and effective dose for adolescent and adult patients (≥12 years old) with seasonal AR (SAR). METHODS After a 7 to 21 day placebo run-in period, eligible patients with SAR were randomly assigned to once-daily BDP nasal aerosol 80 µg, 160 µg, 320 µg, or placebo. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline in average a.m. and p.m. patient-reported reflective total nasal symptom scores (rTNSS) over 2 weeks. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. A potential study limitation could be lack of objective assessment of AR symptoms. RESULTS Significant improvements were seen in average a.m. and p.m. rTNSS (least squares [LS] mean treatment difference, -0.63; 95% CI: -1.13, -0.13; p = 0.013) as well as in average a.m. and p.m. instantaneous TNSS (iTNSS; LS mean treatment difference, -0.60; 95% CI: -1.09, -0.11; p = 0.016) with BDP nasal aerosol 320 µg/day compared with placebo. Although there were numerical improvements from baseline in patient-reported rTNSS and iTNSS with BDP nasal aerosol 80 µg and 160 µg, these doses did not achieve statistical significance compared with placebo. BDP nonaqueous nasal aerosol was well tolerated at all doses tested, with a safety profile comparable to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS These data indicate that 320 µg/day of BDP nasal aerosol is the optimally safe and effective dose for the treatment of SAR in adolescent and adult patients. Trial registration NCT: #NCT00854360.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gordon D Raphael
- Bethesda Allergy, Asthma and Research Center, LLC , Bethesda, MD , USA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate nasal aerosol in pediatric patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2013; 111:408-414.e1. [PMID: 24125150 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2013.07.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2013] [Revised: 06/04/2013] [Accepted: 07/26/2013] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Aerosolized intranasal corticosteroid formulations are desirable for many patients with allergic rhinitis (AR), especially children, who wish to avoid the "wet feeling" and "drip down the throat" associated with aqueous formulations. Beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) hydrofluoroalkane nasal aerosol has been shown to be safe and effective in adolescents and adults with AR. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of BDP nasal aerosol in pediatric patients with moderate to severe seasonal AR. METHODS In this double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, children (6-11 years of age) with seasonal AR were randomized to once-daily treatment with BDP nasal aerosol 80 μg (n = 239) or 160 μg (n = 242) or placebo (n = 234). The primary end point was change from baseline in average morning and evening reflective total nasal symptom score over the 2-week treatment period. RESULTS Treatment with BDP nasal aerosol showed significantly greater improvements in average morning and evening reflective total nasal symptom score vs placebo (80 μg, -0.71; 160 μg, -0.76; P < .001 for the 2 comparisons). Similarly, significantly greater improvements in average morning and evening instantaneous total nasal symptom score were seen with BDP nasal aerosol vs placebo (80 μg, -0.63; 160 μg, -0.73; P < .001 for the 2 comparisons). The incidence of adverse events from BDP nasal aerosol was comparable to that from placebo. CONCLUSION BDP nasal aerosol (80 or 160 μg/d) provided significant and clinically meaningful nasal symptom relief and an established overall safety profile similar to that of placebo, suggesting that it is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for pediatric patients with moderate to severe seasonal AR. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT012073190.
Collapse
|
13
|
Carr WW. New therapeutic options for allergic rhinitis: back to the future with intranasal corticosteroid aerosols. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2013; 27:309-13. [PMID: 23816748 DOI: 10.2500/ajra.2013.27.3946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Under current guidelines, intranasal corticosteroids (INSs) are considered the most effective first-line therapy to improve allergic rhinitis (AR) symptoms and burden of disease. In the late 1980s-1990s, chlorofluorocarbon (CFC)-propelled corticosteroid aerosol nasal sprays formed the standard of care for the treatment of AR. Because of environmental concerns, CFC aerosols were gradually phased out, and aqueous INS formulations of nasal sprays became the standard of care. Although many aqueous INS sprays are available, specific product-related factors can reduce patient adherence to an INS and subsequently reduce treatment efficacy. The purpose of this paper was to review the evolution of AR therapeutics and drug devices and how it may have an effect on patient adherence/compliance and patient satisfaction with current available therapies and show the unmet need to improve INS delivery systems. METHODS Although aqueous INSs are effective and well tolerated, use in some patients may be compromised because of patient sensory perception and device preference. A historical review of the evolution of intranasal delivery of INSs was undertaken to provide further insight into improving treatment options for patients with AR. RESULTS Although the various approved INSs appear to be equivalent in terms of reducing AR disease burden, the method in which an INS is delivered to a patient has significant bearing on the overall success of each specific drug product. CONCLUSION Hydrofluoroalkane-propelled INS drug products offer a back-to-the-future delivery approach that may be further tailored to the individual patient's needs. Past experiences and the development of new devices are paving the way toward further therapy choices, ultimately affording health care providers access to the most effective treatments for patients with AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Warner W Carr
- Allergy & Asthma Associates of Southern California, 27800 Medical Center Road, Mission Viejo, CA 92691, USA.
| |
Collapse
|