Rituximab hypersensitivity and desensitization: a personalized approach to treat cancer and connective tissue diseases

New guidelines and therapeutic updates for the management of lupus nephritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) can be a devastating condition, striking young patients often in their prime reproductive years. Lupus nephritis is a common and serious complication occurring in roughly 50% of SLE cases, indicating a high likelihood of disease progression, morbidity, and mortality. As the early trials of steroid therapy, and later cyclophosphamide (CYC), therapeutic changes had been stagnant. Then came the introduction of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in the 2000s. After the Aspreva Lupus Management Study, there had been a dearth of trials showing positive therapy results. Since 2020, new studies have emerged for lupus nephritis involving the use of anti-BLYS agents, novel calcineurin inhibitors, CD20 blockade, and antiinterferon agents. Nephrology and rheumatology society guidelines in the United States and across the world are still catching up.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although therapeutic guidelines are being developed, updates that have come through have focused on improved diagnostic and monitoring guidelines. One theme is the recommendation of increasingly tight proteinuria control and firmer guidelines for the rapid induction of remission. The reality of multitarget therapy and the expectation of rapid induction for a more complete remission are being widely recognized.

SUMMARY

The need for more complete and more rapid induction and control of lupus nephritis is undisputed according to the evidence and guidelines, and the medications to achieve this are growing at a rate not seen over the prior two decades. What remains is a stepwise approach to recognize how to best optimize therapy. Based on available evidence, an algorithm for induction and maintenance treatment of lupus nephritis used by the University of California Irvine Lupus Nephritis clinic, is recommended.

Ofatumumab Desensitization Protocol: A Case of Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenic Purpura

Chronic immune thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP) is an acquired hematologic condition that involves immune-mediated platelet destruction with resultant bleeding of variable severity. Refractory ITP occurs when patients fail to tolerate and/or respond to multiple treatment modalities. In this case, we examine the clinical course of a 39-year-old female with refractory ITP and discuss how we navigated a multitude of challenges by adapting an established desensitization protocol to meet our patient's needs. To our knowledge, we describe the first successful desensitization to ofatumumab for use in ITP in the current literature.

A novel prednisone premedication protocol significantly decreases infusion‑related reactions of rituximab in newly diagnosed diffuse large B‑cell lymphoma

Rituximab is a widely used anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody with a high incidence of infusion-related reactions (IRRs) during administration. Reducing the incidence of IRRs remains problematic in hematological practices. In the present study, a novel strategy of a prednisone pretreatment regimen was designed similar to the combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with the aim of exploring the effect on the incidence of IRRs to rituximab in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL). A prospective, randomized (1:1) and controlled study was conducted in three regional hospitals in two groups (n=44 for each group): i) A control group treated with standard R-CHOP-like regimen; and ii) a group receiving a prednisone-pretreatment, modified R-CHOP-like protocol for newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. The primary endpoint was to assess the incidence of IRRs to rituximab, as well as the association of IRRs with the efficacy of treatment. The second endpoint involved clinical outcomes. The total incidence of IRRs to rituximab in the treatment group was significantly lower compared with that in the control group (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051). The different grade incidence of IRRs was lower in the treatment group compared with that in the control group (P=0.0053). In total, 29.5% of patients (26/88) experienced >1 IRR episode. The incidence of IRRs in the pre-treatment group was decreased compared with that in the control group in the 1st cycle (15.9 vs. 43.2%; P=0.0051) and 2nd cycle (6.8 vs. 27.3%; P=0.0107). The overall response rate was similar between the two groups (P>0.05). Median progression-free survival and median overall survival time were not statistically distinct between the two groups (P=0.5244 and P=0.5778, respectively). Grade ≥III toxicities mainly included vomiting and nausea (<20%), leukopenia and granulocytopenia (<20%), and alopecia (<25%). No death events were reported. Apart from IRRs to rituximab, the incidence of other adverse events was similar in both groups. The novel prednisone-pretreatment R-CHOP-like protocol in the present study significantly decreased the total and different grade incidences of IRRs to rituximab among newly diagnosed patients with DLBCL. This clinical trial was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number, ChiCTR2300070327; date of registration, 10 April 2023).

Utilizing Biologics in Drug Desensitization

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this literature review was to review the latest advancements with biologics in rapid drug desensitization. Our methodology was to highlight both desensitization to biologics themselves and the use of biologics in desensitization to both biologic and nonbiologic drugs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Biologics are a vast category of drugs that include monoclonal antibodies, nanobodies, modern vaccinations, and even hormones. Desensitization to biologics can be safely performed through standardized procedure. Biomarkers are used both in vitro and in vivo to help identify and classify hypersensitivity reactions. Hypersensitivity reactions to the mRNA vaccinations against SARS-CoV-2 present their own unique challenges to management. There are specific excipients in monoclonal antibodies that are thought to be responsible for many of their hypersensitivity reactions. Certain biologics can even be used to assist in desensitization to other drugs. Rapid drug desensitization is a standardized procedure that may be able to help many patients who have experienced hypersensitivity reactions to biologics and would best be treated with them to continue to receive them. Biologic drugs have opened a new era in medicine for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases, cancer, and inflammatory diseases. Hypersensitivity reactions to biologics are quite common. This literature review presents the latest advancements in our understanding of hypersensitivity reactions to biologics, how rapid drug desensitization can be used to continue therapy despite history of hypersensitivity, and how biologics themselves can be used to aid in desensitization itself.

Boas Práticas na Administração do Rituximab: Revisão Integrativa da Literatura

Introdução: O rituximab e um anticorpo monoclonal quimérico camundongo/humano, amplamente utilizado no cenário terapêutico de vários diagnósticos. Por apresentar diferentes protocolos de administração, manejo e efeitos adversos, seu uso requer atenção da equipe de saúde. Objetivo: Descrever os protocolos infusionais do rituximab na primeira infusão, nas subsequentes e na dessensibilização, e caracterizar a sua segurança. Método: Revisão integrativa da literatura. A busca pelos periódicos foi realizada nas bases de dados e bibliotecas eletrônicas: LILACS, PubMed, MEDLINE, SciELO e BDEnf. Resultados: O cruzamento dos descritores proporcionou a identificação de 413 artigos. Destes, 113 foram lidos na integra e, ao final, 16 artigos foram aplicáveis ao desenho do estudo. Os artigos foram publicados entre os anos de 2016 e 2020, com predomínio da língua inglesa (87,5%).  uanto as principais formas de administração do medicamento, nove estudos abordaram a infusão por via intravenosa (em variadas modalidades de tempo) e sete por via subcutânea. Conclusão: De acordo com a literatura cientifica, todas as modalidades de infusão intravenosa e subcutânea demostram ser seguras e eficazes se os protocolos forem adequadamente indicados e corretamente aplicados.

Successful desensitization to high dose rituximab for a child with nephrotic syndrome - The first report in the literature

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody, which is mainly used in the treatment of lymphoma and autoimmune disorders, but also has been recently approved for the treatment of nephrotic syndrome. The treatment dose is between 375 mg/m² and 750 mg/m². Rituximab has been associated with hypersensitivity reactions, which can be classified either into early and late infusion-associated adverse reactions. Different desensitization protocols have been described in adult patients who require rituximab, however, there is a limited experience in children and in patients with nephrotic syndrome. Additionally, all the published protocols for adults and children are based on the low-dose rituximab desensitization. We report the first case in the literature of desensitization to high-dose rituximab in a child with nephrotic syndrome, suggesting a well-tolerated protocol adjusted on the high dose and the clinical reaction to the drug. This protocol can be used for children with nephrotic syndrome and severe reaction that require 750 mg/m² of rituximab.

Drug Desensitizations for Chemotherapy: Safety and Efficacy in Preventing Anaphylaxis

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to antineoplastic drugs are increasing due to the expanding use of classical and new drugs in a wide variety of malignancies. PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The goal of this review is to provide current best practices in the diagnosis and management of HSRs based on data and evidence. RECENT FINDINGS: A plethora of studies have provided evidence of the safety and efficacy of rapid drug desensitizations (RDD) to allow for the reintroduction of antineoplastic drugs following an HSR, based on risk stratification. Recently described biomarkers such as basophil activation test, total IgE, BRCA genotyping, and serum IL-6 can aid in guiding improved precision desensitization protocols. Personalized premedication regimens and protocols have improved RDD safety and outcomes. RDD allows for the continued use of chemotherapeutic drugs without impaired drug efficacy. RDD represents the best approach to maintain cancer patients on their most effective treatments.

Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis to checkpoint inhibitor-monoclonal antibodies and desensitization

OBJECTIVE

To review type 1 hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis to checkpoint inhibitor-monoclonal antibodies and its management with drug desensitization.

DATA SOURCES

English-language literature on MEDLINE regarding hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis, and checkpoint inhibitor-monoclonal antibodies.

STUDY SELECTIONS

References were selected based on relevance, novelty, robustness, and applicability.

RESULTS

There are well-known tissue toxicities associated to checkpoint inhibitors, but hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been underreported. The presentation of these reactions is based on clinical phenotypes with underlying endotypes identified by specific biomarkers. Drug desensitizations have been successfully applied to checkpoint inhibitor drugs to allow patients with cancer to receive first-line therapies. This review provides current best practices for the recognition and diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis to checkpoint inhibitors and their management using drug desensitization.

CONCLUSION

Hypersensitivity reactions and anaphylaxis have been identified as potential adverse effects induced by checkpoint inhibitor-monoclonal antibodies. Drug desensitization is a safe and effective treatment option for patients who experience hypersensitivity reactions in need of these monoclonal antibodies to improve cancer outcomes.

Rituximab Hypersensitivity: From Clinical Presentation to Management

Rituximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody (mAb) against CD20 molecule which is expressed on human B cells. It has been used for the treatment of various lymphoid malignancies, lymphoproliferative diseases, and rheumatologic disorders. Rituximab is generally well tolerated. However, increased use of rituximab has been associated with hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs), which can be classified as infusion-related, cytokine-release, type I (IgE/non-IgE), mixed, type III, and type IV reactions. Immediate infusion-related reactions to rituximab are quite common and decrease in frequency with subsequent infusions. However, in about 10% of patients, severe infusion-related reactions develop, which prevent its use. Some of the immediate infusion reactions are due to a cytokine-release but some reactions raise concerns for type I (IgE/non-IgE) hypersensitivity. Recent studies have shown the presence of serum anti-rituximab antibodies, either represented by the IgG or IgE isotype. In some cases, clinical manifestations of IgE-mediated reactions and cytokine-release reactions partially overlap, which is called a mixed reaction. Classified as Type III reaction, rituximab-induced serum sickness reactions have been reported in patients with autoimmune diseases and hematological malignancies. The classic serum sickness triad (fever, rash, and arthralgia) has been observed in patients mainly with an underlying rheumatologic condition. Severe delayed type IV hypersensitivity reactions including non-severe maculopapular rash to severe reactions such as Stevens–Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis have been rarely reported following rituximab injection. Comprehensive reviews focused on rituximab-induced HSRs are scarce. We aimed to review clinical presentations, underlying mechanisms of rituximab hypersensitivity, as well as management including rapid drug desensitization.

Rituximab desensitization in pediatric acute lymphoblastic leukemia with severe anaphylaxis

INTRODUCTION

Hypersensitivity reactions (HSRs) to rituximab occur during the first infusion in 29% to 40% of patients. Commonly, these hypersensitivity reactions are the result of a release of cytokines, although IgE mediated reactions have also been reported.

CASE REPORT

A 7-year-old female patient with diagnosis of CD-20 positive acute lymphoblastic B-cell leukemia was included in a pilot study that consisted of two doses of rituximab treatment in the induction to remission phase by the pediatric hematology service; 30 minutes after the first administration of 300 mg of rituximab the patient started with generalized rash, nausea, vomiting, tachycardia, dyspnea, foreign body sensation in throat, oxygen desaturation until 89% and hypotension; therefore, the infusion of rituximab was suspended, and intramuscular epinephrine was administered as well as intravenous hydrocortisone and chlorphenamine and supplemental oxygen supply with adequate resolution of symptoms.

MANAGEMENT & OUTCOME

Intradermal skin testing with rituximab at the concentration 1 mg/ml (dilution 1:10), was positive. Desensitization to rituximab was indicated by our service with 4 bags - 16 steps protocol with an initial concentration dose of 1/1,000 of the total dose. The patient was premedicated 1 hour prior with intravenous chlorphenamine, methylprednisolone and ondansetron. Intravenous prophylactic fluids with normal saline solution were administered during the infusion. The procedure was carried out with close monitoring of vital signs in a course of 6.67 hours, without presenting hypersensitivity reactions.

DISCUSSION

HSR to rituximab may be induced by the activation of mast cells and basophils. Desensitization protocols are developed when there is no alternative drug for the underlying condition.

Drug hypersensitivity in the fast lane: What clinicians should know about phenotypes, endotypes, and biomarkers

OBJECTIVE

To review novel concepts in drug hypersensitivity and the management of immediate hypersensitivity reactions.

DATA SOURCES

English language literature on MEDLINE and Embase surrounding drug hypersensitivity and desensitization.

STUDY SELECTIONS

References were selected based on relevance, date of publication, and originality.

RESULTS

There are numerous citations looking at categorizing drug reactions, pathogenesis, biomarkers, and desensitization. Current understanding supports the use of a phenotype-endotype-biomarker model for categorizing immediate hypersensitivity reactions. Drug desensitization is a powerful therapeutic strategy that enables temporary induction of tolerance to medications that triggered immediate reactions.

CONCLUSION

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions are diverse in presentation and pathogenesis. Drug desensitization is an effective intervention with sufficient evidence to support its more widespread availability.

Desensitization to biological agents used in rheumatology

Biological agents such as monoclonal antibodies and fusion proteins are widely used for the treatment of patients with various rheumatic disorders, influencing the quality of life, disability and even mortality in patients. However, biological agents can evoke adverse reactions of different grades of severity. Although drug avoidance remains a gold standard in the care of patients hypersensitive to medication, in certain clinical situations the culprit drug is the drug of choice and cannot be replaced by another equally effective compound. In such cases, desensitization can allow the patient to be treated within current guidelines and with the most effective treatment. The authors searched Medline and Scopus databases for English-language sources using the following key words: hypersensitivity, desensitization, biologicals, adalimumab, etanercept, adalimumab, certolizumab, golimumab, rituximab, infliximab, ixekizumab, tocilizumab, anakinra and canakinumab. The aim of our review is to present the current knowledge about desensitization to biological agents and some guidelines according to patient inclusion, contraindications, procedures, and safety requirements. Drug desensitization is a new issue in rheumatology, and the solution to the problem of allergic reactions to biological drugs, which gives patients with rheumatic diseases the opportunity to extend and prolong their therapy. The present article is one of the first widely discussing this topic in the biological treatment of rheumatic diseases.