Dupilumab use in recalcitrant allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

TH2-driven manifestations of inborn errors of immunity

Monogenic lesions in pathways critical for effector functions responsible for immune surveillance, protection against autoinflammation, and appropriate responses to allergens and microorganisms underlie the pathophysiology of inborn errors of immunity (IEI). Variants in cytokine production, cytokine signaling, epithelial barrier function, antigen presentation, receptor signaling, and cellular processes and metabolism can drive autoimmunity, immunodeficiency, and/or allergic inflammation. Identification of these variants has improved our understanding of the role that many of these proteins play in skewing toward TH2-related allergic inflammation. Early-onset or atypical atopic disease, often in conjunction with immunodeficiency and/or autoimmunity, should raise suspicion for an IEI. This becomes a diagnostic dilemma if the initial clinical presentation is solely allergic inflammation, especially when the prevalence of allergic diseases is becoming more common. Genetic sequencing is necessary for IEI diagnosis and is helpful for early recognition and implementation of targeted treatment, if available. Although genetic evaluation is not feasible for all patients with atopy, identifying atopic patients with molecular immune abnormalities may be helpful for diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic purposes. In this review, we focus on IEI associated with TH2-driven allergic manifestations and classify them on the basis of the affected molecular pathways and predominant clinical manifestations.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

Emerging Therapies in the Medical Management of Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis

A non-invasive type of chronic sinusitis named allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS), which is a variant of allergic bronchopulmonary aspergillosis with nasal obstruction, was first described in 1976. The goal of this article was to provide an overview of various treatment approaches and how they can be used to control AFRS. Since this is an inflammatory disease rather than an invasive fungal infection, the treatment tries to modulate inflammation and reduce disease burden. A comprehensive treatment strategy must incorporate medicinal, surgical, biological, and immunological techniques. Owing to the chronic nature of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis and its high propensity for flare-ups and recurrence, multiple procedures are frequently required. The most likely method of establishing a long-term disease control for AFRS is a comprehensive management strategy that integrates medical, surgical, and immunological care. However, there are still disagreements regarding the exact combinations. In this review, we have mentioned different modalities in the management of AFRS, such as monoclonal antibodies, probiotic Manuka honey, and aPDT among others, some of which are promising but require further research.

Successful Use of Dupilumab as a Salvage Therapy for Recalcitrant Allergic Fungal Rhinosinusitis: A Case Report

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) which is distinguished by the presence of eosinophilic mucin, type 1 hypersensitivity reaction resulting from fungi residing within the sinus, and characteristic imaging findings of the paranasal sinuses. Surgical intervention, sinonasal irrigations, and topical and systemic medications are commonly used to reduce the fungal load and antigenic stimulation. Despite the advancement of medical and surgical management of AFRS, a high recurrence rate is still a significant concern. The proper treatment for refractory AFRS remains controversial. Herein, we discuss the use of dupilumab for controlling refractory AFRS. We report a case of a 33-year-old female patient known to have had AFRS for 16 years. Due to the recurring nature of her illness, 16 functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) have been done to control her symptoms. The last operation was done in our institution; evidence for cure was insufficient with the persistence of symptoms. After a consensus decision with the multidisciplinary management team, she was an appropriate candidate for therapy with dupilumab. After six months of using the medication, magnificent improvement and control of symptoms were noted, and post-treatment CT scans illustrated excellent progression from previous scans. AFRS could be an extremely debilitating disease with significant impairment of quality of life even when standard therapy and extensive surgical interventions are implemented. Dupilumab can be an excellent option as a salvage therapy for recalcitrant AFRS with significant improvement in patients' quality of life and resolution of symptoms.

Dupilumab: An emerging therapy in allergic fungal rhinosinusitis

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a highly resistant disease and is challenging to treat. Patients with recurrent attacks of the disease despite surgical management can benefit from biologics as adjunct therapies. Dupilumab has shown promising endpoints in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). This case series reports 4 patients with resistant AFRS concomitant with asthma, for which dupilumab therapy was administered. Long-term follow-ups showed that dupilumab improved the symptoms and improved the results of objective tools such as imaging and pulmonary function test.

A case report of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis managed with Dupilumab

Introduction

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis (AFRS) is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. It is characterized by eosinophilic mucin, which results from an inflammatory reaction to non-invasive fungal hyphae in the rhino-sinuses. It is clinically recognizable due to the criteria set by Bent and Kuhn. The treatment approach is multimodal, and the main treatment approach is surgical debridement, followed by a course of oral and/or topical corticosteroids to decrease recurrence post-surgery. This case report aims to illustrate the effect of Dupilumab, on the number of relapse episodes in a patient and the associated parameters.

Case presentation

Herein we report a case of a 40-year-old woman referred to our institution as a case of refractory AFRS for which she underwent four functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESS) and was on maximum medical treatment. She presented with complaints of facial fullness and pain, headache, and purulent discharge. After another trial of surgery which did not control her symptoms, she was assessed for criteria to start biological treatment. The symptoms were successfully controlled after initiation of the agent, and she was followed up using multiple subjective and objective measures.

Conclusion

AFRS is a non-invasive immune-mediated sub-clinical entity of chronic rhinosinusitis. A multimodal approach to its treatment based on surgical debridement with medical therapy has shown positive outcomes. In this case we present significant improvement after administering Dupilumab; therefore, suggesting its addition to the treatment regimen of refractory AFRS.

•

Allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is a subtype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

•

The distinguishing feature of allergic fungal rhinosinusitis is high immunoglobulin E.

•

Multimodal approach with the mainstay being surgery is the treatment method followed for allergic fungal rhinosinusitis.

Guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in Brazil

•

The use of immunobiologicals is an option for the management of patients with chronic rinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) refractory to conventional treatment.

•

The guideline lists the main drugs currently available in Brazil, their indications, and recommendations for use.

Introduction

Severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has a negative impact on an individual’s quality of life. Therefore, new biologics have emerged for use in specific phenotypes of chronic rhinosinusitis, changing the paradigms of its treatment.

Objective

To review the current status of biologic treatment indications in chronic rhinosinusitis.

Methods

The Brazilian Academy of Rhinology brought together different specialists to suggest a course of action, considering its particularities and aspects related to the national reality.

Results

Of particular interest for decision making will be the identification of subgroups of patients refractory to pre-existing treatment options and the construction of a strategy that improves their quality of life, with the best cost-benefit ratio.

Conclusion

The use of biologics is a valid option for treatment in more severe cases. This strategy must be better understood and improved in the future, with more studies and greater clinical experience.