Noninvasive tests for eosinophilic esophagitis: Ready for use?

A clinical predictive model identifies pediatric patients at risk for eosinophilic esophagitis

BACKGROUND

Identifying children needing endoscopic evaluation for suspected eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is crucial for prompt diagnosis and management.

AIMS

We aimed to develop a clinical prediction tool to distinguish children with EoE from children without the disease before endoscopy.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective case-control study of children undergoing upper endoscopy at a tertiary care center. Clinical characteristics before endoscopy were extracted from 380 EoE cases and 380 controls without EoE. We built a predictive model for case-control status and performed age-stratified analyses.

RESULTS

After multivariable analysis, history of adaptive eating behaviors, food allergy, food impaction, male sex, and regurgitation were independently associated with EoE, and abdominal pain and failure to thrive with control status (AUC 0.81). Food allergy and male sex were predictors of EoE across all ages. Regurgitation and adaptive eating behaviors were specific to EoE in early (0-5 years) (AUC 0.74) and middle childhood (6-11 years) (AUC 0.82), while dysphagia and food impaction were specific to EoE in the adolescence (12-17 years) (AUC 0.87).

CONCLUSION

We determined age-specific clinical features that predict EoE with good discrimination in a pediatric population before endoscopy. Validation of this model in an independent population can confirm the utility of this tool.

Common and disparate clinical presentations and mechanisms in different eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a group of diseases characterized by selective eosinophil infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the absence of other causes of eosinophilia. These diseases are generally driven by type 2 inflammation, often in response to food allergen exposure. Among all EGIDs, the clinical presentation often includes a history of atopic disease with a variety of GI symptoms. EGIDs are traditionally separated into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs. EoE is relatively better understood and now associated with clinical guidelines and 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments, whereas non-EoE EGIDs are rarer and less well-understood diseases without US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. Non-EoE EGIDs are further subclassified by the area of the GI tract that is involved; they comprise eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis (including eosinophilic duodenitis), and eosinophilic colitis. As with other GI disorders, the disease presentations and mechanisms differ depending on the involved segment of the GI tract; however, the differences between EoE and non-EoE EGIDs extend beyond which GI tract segment is involved. The aim of this article is to summarize the commonalities and differences between the clinical presentations and disease mechanisms for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs.

Minimally Invasive Approaches to Diagnose and Monitor Eosinophilic GI Diseases

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review seeks to understand novel avenues for eosinophilic GI disease management. Biomarkers offer a unique and non-invasive approach to tracking EoE disease progression. While no biomarkers have definitively met the diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic GI diseases, some biomarkers have been shown to be associated with disease activity. Here, we examine the potential of recently studied biomarkers.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current research shows advancements in blood, luminal fluid, and breath testing. Particular areas of interest include mRNA analyses, protein fingerprinting, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), T cells and IgE receptors, eosinophilic cationic proteins, cytokines, and nitric oxide exhalation. Preliminary results showed that mucosal biomarkers, directly captured from the esophagus, may reflect the best representation of biopsy-based results, in contrast to biomarkers obtained from indirect or peripheral (blood, breath) methods. However, this is based on limited clinical studies without sufficient numbers to evaluate true diagnostic accuracy. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to fully ascertain both the optimal sampling technique and the specific biomarkers that reflect diagnostic status of the disease.

Breakthroughs in understanding and treating eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases presented at the CEGIR/TIGERs Symposium at the 2022 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology Meeting

The Consortium of Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Diseases and The International Gastrointestinal Eosinophil Researchers organized a day-long symposium at the 2022 Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. The symposium featured a review of recent discoveries in the basic biology and pathogenesis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) in addition to advances in our understanding of the clinical features of EGIDs. Diagnostic and management approaches were reviewed and debated, and clinical trials of emerging therapies were highlighted. Herein, we briefly summarize the breakthrough discoveries in EGIDs.

Salivary microRNAs in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis

Background: Diagnosis and management of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) occur via esophagogastroduodenoscopy with tissue biopsy. Objective: We sought to determine if salivary microribonucleic acid (miRNA) levels could differentiate children with EoE, serving as a noninvasive biomarker. Methods: Saliva was collected from children undergoing esophagogastroduodenoscopy (N = 291). miRNA analysis was conducted on 150 samples: EoE (n = 50), no pathologic alteration (n = 100). RNA was quantified with high throughput sequencing and aligned to build hg38 of the human genome using sequencing and alignment software. Quantile normalized levels of robustly expressed miRNAs (raw counts > 10 in 10% of samples) were compared across EoE and non-EoE groups with Wilcoxon rank sum testing. miRNA biomarker candidates were selected based on variable importance projection (VIP) scoring with partial least squared discriminant analysis (VIP > 1.5). Ability of these miRNAs to differentiate EoE status was assessed via logistic regression. Putative biologic targets for the miRNA candidates were determined in miRNA pathway analysis software. Results: Of the 56 salivary miRNAs reliably detected, miR-205-5p displayed the largest difference between EoE and non-EoE groups (V = 1623, adjusted p = 0.029). Six miRNAs (miR-26b-5p, miR-27b-3p, Let-7i-5p, miR-142-5p, miR-30a-5p, miR-205-5p) displayed elevated VIP scores (>1.5) and were able to differentiate EoE samples on logistic regression analysis with 70% sensitivity and 68% specificity. These six miRNAs demonstrated significant enrichment for gene targets involved in valine, leucine, and isoleucine biosynthesis (p = 0.0012), 2-oxycarboxylic acid metabolism (p = 0.043), and steroid hormone biosynthesis (p = 0.048). Conclusions: Salivary miRNAs represent a noninvasive, biologically relevant measure that may aid disease monitoring of EoE.

Plasma Biomarkers and Fractional Exhaled Nitric Oxide in the Diagnosis of Eosinophilic Esophagitis

OBJECTIVES

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic disease which requires endoscopy with biopsies for diagnosis and monitoring. We aimed to identify a panel of non-invasive markers that could help identify patients with active EoE.

METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, we enrolled 128 children aged 5-18 years old, scheduled for endoscopy for suspected esophageal or peptic disease. On the day of the endoscopy, fractionated exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) was measured; and blood was collected for peripheral absolute eosinophil count (AEC), plasma amino acids, and plasma polyamine analysis. Patients were grouped into controls (n = 91), EoE in remission (n = 16), or active EoE (n = 21), based on esophageal eosinophilia and history of EoE.

RESULTS

AEC was not statistically significant different among the groups compared ( P = 0.056). Plasma amino acids: citrulline (CIT), β-alanine (β-ALA), and cysteine (CYS) were higher in active EoE compared to controls ( P < 0.05). The polyamine spermine was lower in active EoE versus controls ( P < 0.05). Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve to assess the predictive capability of a combined score made of FeNO, β-ALA, CYS, and spermine had an area under curve (AUC) of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.80-0.96) in differentiating active EoE from controls and 0.87 (95% CI: 0.74-1.00) when differentiating active EoE from EoE in remission.

CONCLUSION

A panel comprising FeNO, 2 plasma amino acids (β-ALA, CYS) and the polyamine spermine can be used as a non-invasive tool to differentiate active EoE patients from controls.