Validation of a commercial allergen microarray platform for specific immunoglobulin E detection of respiratory and plant food allergens

Screening asthmatics for atopic status using the ALergy EXplorer (ALEX2) macroarray

BACKGROUND

Screening asthma patients for atopy facilitates management. Since 2010, the core biomarker for screening asthma subjects for atopic status has been the qualitative Phadiatop. multi-aeroallergen screen. A more quantitative macroarray, the Allergy Explorer (ALEX2), shows promise as an alternative.

OBJECTIVE

The study's goal was to examine the pros and cons of the use of ALEX2 in the screening of asthma patients for atopic status.

METHODS

We evaluated the atopic (IgE-sensitization) status in asthmatic Amish and Hutterite farm children using the ImmunoCAP and ALEX2 assays in Phadiatop equivocal and positive subjects.

RESULTS

All 42 asthmatic children were analyzed by Phadiatop and total serum IgE. Of these, 22 had a negative Phadiatop (<0.1 kUa/L) and total IgE <100 kU/L which defined them as non-atopic and they were excluded from ALEX2 testing. Of six children with equivocal Phadiatops (0.1-0.2 kUa/L-Group 1) and three children with a negative Phadiatop but total IgE >100 kUa/L (group 3), 44% (n = 4) had detectable IgE antibody by ALEX2 to mite, tree pollen, and other allergens not detected by Phadiatop, but confirmed by allergen-specific ImmunoCAP testing. In 11 Phadiatop positive subjects (>0.2 kUa/L-group 2), all but one were positive by ALEX2. IgE antibody specific for mold and rabbit aeroallergens matched their agricultural and pet exposure history. Three children were positive for IgE antibody to allergens in the profilin, nsLTP, or PR-10 cross-reactive protein families.

CONCLUSION

Judicious use of ALEX2's enhanced specificity data not provided by the Phadiatop can aid in the interpretation of sensitization patterns and planning management of atopic asthmatics, but sensitization relevance must be confirmed by the patient's clinical history.

Multiplex Assays in Allergy Diagnosis: Allergy Explorer 2 versus ImmunoCAP ISAC E112i

ImmunoCAP ISAC E112i (ISAC) and Allergy Explorer 2 (ALEX2) detect specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) reactivity. Both multiplex assays contain molecular allergens and ALEX2 additionally includes allergen extracts and inhibitors that block the binding of IgE to cross-reacting carbohydrate determinants (CCDs). This study aimed to compare the performance of ISAC and ALEX2 by determining the IgE reactivity against allergen extracts and/or allergen components and by using qualitative, semiquantitative, and quantitative analyses of all comparable allergen components in sera from 216 participants recruited in South Tyrol/Italy. For extract sensitization in ALEX2, the analysis revealed negative corresponding allergen components in 18.4% and at least one positive corresponding allergen component in 81.6% of all cases. For ISAC, the corresponding results were 23.5% and 76.5% of cases, respectively. The ALEX2 CCD inhibitor eliminated CCD-positive signals detected by ISAC in 88.5% of cases. Based on sensitization values of 0.3-14.9 ISU or kUA/L, there was good agreement between ALEX2 and ISAC, although ALEX2 showed higher values than ISAC. The addition of allergen-extract tests in ALEX2 resulted in the detection of more sensitizations than with corresponding allergen components alone. In the range of <15 ISU or kUA/L, ALEX2 may be more effective in detecting sensitizations.

Understanding of lipid transfer protein sensitization patterns and its clinical significance in children

Background: Lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are the most common food allergens in the Mediterranean region. Objective: The study aimed to investigate co-sensitization patterns and cluster relationships between LTP allergen molecules across a broad range of allergen-specific sensitization patterns, and clinical outcomes in eastern Mediterranean children. Methods: Among 496 children evaluated for multiple sensitizations with multiplex testing, 105 children (21%) with 16 different LTP sensitizations were analyzed. Clinical reactivity was examined based on clear-cut history of immunoglobulin E mediated symptoms (oral allergy syndrome [OAS], systemic reactions, and anaphylaxis). Results: All children included were sensitive to food LTPs, but 56% were sensitive to pollen LTPs. The number of children with OAS and clinical reactivity was 12 and 59, respectively, and no cofactors were reported. The most common sensitizations were Pru p 3 (74%) and Cor a 8 (66%). Significant correlations were observed in the heatmap between the LTP molecules other than Par j 2 and Tri a 14. Overall, clinical reactivity was associated with increased age and number of LTP molecule positivity. Conclusion: In the eastern Mediterranean region, 21% of children with multiple food and/or pollen sensitizations were found to have LTP sensitization; however, almost half reported clinical reactivity. The hierarchical pathway highlights that distinct LTP allergen molecules can act as primary sensitizers. Clinical reactivity is linked to increasing numbers of LTP molecule positivity and increasing age.

Evolution Toward Chip-Based Arrays in the Laboratory Diagnosis of Human Allergic Disease

Multiplex-based specific IgE antibody assays have emerged into the clinical immunology laboratory through the combined use of pure, recombinant allergenic molecules and new methods to simultaneously and accurately analyze specific IgE antibodies to hundreds of allergens. This review traces the historical development and examines outstanding questions related to the strengths and limitations of these new molecular allergen multipex technologies for the assessment of human allergic sensitization. Multiplexed technologies are poised to provide the most cost-effective and comprehensive evaluation of patients with suspected allergy as compared with the commonly used singleplex autoanalyzers. How analytically sensitive and quantitative are the multiplex technologies, down to 0.1 kUA/L? Because each allergen is viewed as a unique assay, how will analytical and clinical performance be documented at the manufacturing and clinical laboratory levels to guarantee reproducibility and obtain government regulatory clearance? Will interference by naturally occurring allergen-specific IgG compromise analytical performance? Successful resolution of these and other questions covered in this review will position multiplex technologies to become the single most-effective means of screening patients for allergic sensitization, assessing IgE antibody cross-reactivity, and planning therapy directed at the patient with allergy.

Would the choice of multiplex platform impact the management of the allergic patient? A first approach focusing on LTPs

BACKGROUND

In the Mediterranean area, patients with LTP syndrome who are sensitized to multiple allergens are often tested for sIgE using multiplex platforms. The results obtained from different commercial platforms are not interchangeable, so it is important to compare and validate the platform selected for use. The objective of this study is to compare and validate the performance of the ImmunoCAP ISAC E112i and the macroarray ALEX2 in our daily practice.

METHODS

From August 2021 to March 2022, we tested 20 random serum samples from polysensitized patients using the ALEX2 test (MADx) and ImmunoCAP tIgE and ISAC E112i (Thermo Fisher Scientific). We compared the total IgE (tIgE) and sIgE levels for shared allergens.

RESULTS

The heatmap generally showed more intense results for ISAC. The overall correlation was good, but some exceptions were noted. The main discrepancies were found for Ole e 7, which was positive for 11 patients in ISAC but negative for all patients in ALEX2, and for nut LTPs, for which ISAC showed a threefold higher detection rate for Ara h 9 and a fivefold higher detection rate for Cor a 8 and Jug r 3 compared to ALEX2. The regression model showed no interchangeability of tIgE results.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite our small sample size and the complexity of comparing a quantitative and a semi-quantitative platform, our results suggest that patient diagnosis and management can be influenced by the platform used. Therefore, our findings must be taken into consideration when choosing a platform to use for some profiles of LTP-polysensitized patients, even though more data is needed.

Going over Fungal Allergy: Alternaria alternata and Its Allergens

Fungal allergy is the third most frequent cause of respiratory pathologies and the most related to a poor prognosis of asthma. The genera Alternaria and Cladosporium are the most frequently associated with allergic respiratory diseases, with Alternaria being the one with the highest prevalence of sensitization. Alternaria alternata is an outdoor fungus whose spores disseminate in warm and dry air, reaching peak levels in temperate summers. Alternaria can also be found in damp and insufficiently ventilated houses, causing what is known as sick building syndrome. Thus, exposure to fungal allergens can occur outdoors and indoors. However, not only spores but also fungal fragments contain detectable amounts of allergens and may function as aeroallergenic sources. Allergenic extracts of Alternaria hyphae and spores are still in use for the diagnosis and treatment of allergic diseases but are variable and insufficiently standardised, as they are often a random mixture of allergenic ingredients and casual impurities. Thus, diagnosis of fungal allergy has been difficult, and knowledge about new fungal allergens is stuck. The number of allergens described in Fungi remains almost constant while new allergens are being found in the Plantae and Animalia kingdoms. Given Alt a 1 is not the unique Alternaria allergen eliciting allergy symptoms, component-resolved diagnosis strategies should be applied to diagnose fungal allergy. To date, twelve A. alternata allergens are accepted in the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Subcommittee, many of them are enzymes: Alt a 4 (disulfide isomerase), Alt a 6 (enolase), Alt a 8 (mannitol de-hydrogenase), Alt a 10 (aldehyde dehydrogenase), Alt a 13 (glutathione-S-transferase) and Alt a MnSOD (Mn superoxide dismutase), and others have structural and regulatory functions such as Alt a 5 and Alt a 12, Alt a 3, Alt a 7. The function of Alt a 1 and Alt a 9 remains unknown. Other four allergens are included in other medical databases (e.g., Allergome): Alt a NTF2, Alt a TCTP, and Alt a 70 kDa. Despite Alt a 1 being the A. alternata major allergen, other allergens, such as enolase, Alt a 6 or MnSOD, Alt a 14 have been suggested to be included in the diagnosis panel of fungal allergy.

EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0

Since the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE) as a mediator of allergic diseases in 1967, our knowledge about the immunological mechanisms of IgE-mediated allergies has remarkably increased. In addition to understanding the immune response and clinical symptoms, allergy diagnosis and management depend strongly on the precise identification of the elicitors of the IgE-mediated allergic reaction. In the past four decades, innovations in bioscience and technology have facilitated the identification and production of well-defined, highly pure molecules for component-resolved diagnosis (CRD), allowing a personalized diagnosis and management of the allergic disease for individual patients. The first edition of the "EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide" (MAUG) in 2016 rapidly became a key reference for clinicians, scientists, and interested readers with a background in allergology, immunology, biology, and medicine. Nevertheless, the field of molecular allergology is moving fast, and after 6 years, a new EAACI Taskforce was established to provide an updated document. The Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0 summarizes state-of-the-art information on allergen molecules, their clinical relevance, and their application in diagnostic algorithms for clinical practice. It is designed for both, clinicians and scientists, guiding health care professionals through the overwhelming list of different allergen molecules available for testing. Further, it provides diagnostic algorithms on the clinical relevance of allergenic molecules and gives an overview of their biology, the basic mechanisms of test formats, and the application of tests to measure allergen exposure.

Feasibility of the ALEX multiplex platform in the diagnosis of nut allergy from a Mediterranean population

BACKGROUND

ALEX multiplex platform has been recently commercialized but its clinical utility as quantitative technique respect to ImmunoCAP-singleplex as the reference method has not yet been confirmed on patients suffering from nut allergy and co-sensitization to different nuts.

METHODS

58 serum samples from patients with nut allergy from a Mediterranean population were assayed in parallel by ALEX-multiplex and ImmunoCAP-singleplex techniques. Patients were diagnosed based on clinical symptoms and positive skin prick tests (SPTs). The following whole extracts were compared between both techniques: walnut, hazelnut, peanut, almond, pistachio and sunflower seed; besides the recombinant Pru p 3. A qualitative and quantitative study was carried out.

RESULTS

Both techniques had similar sensitivities respect to whole extracts from walnut, hazelnut and peanut as well as to Pru p 3 (p > 0.05). However for whole extracts from almond, pistachio and sunflower seed the sensitivity obtained by ALEX was much lower than ImmunoCAP (9.09 % vs 88.63 %; 14.81 vs 70.37 %; and 8.51 % vs 88.88 %; respectively). The concordance between both techniques showed only a substantial agreement for Pru p 3 (k = 0.791); moderate agreement for hazelnut and peanut (k = 0.550 and k = 0.544, respectively); fair agreement for walnut (k = 0.386) and poor agreement for almond, pistachio and sunflower seed (k < 0.2). Quantitative analysis showed that ImmunoCAP for walnut, peanut and sunflower seed had higher mean values than ALEX. Relationships were significant for all specific IgE levels except to for almond, pistachio and sunflower seed.

CONCLUSIONS

ALEX platform is a suitable technique to patients with nut allergy from the Mediterranean area except to for those suffering from allergy to almond, pistachio and sunflower seed.

ALEX versus ISAC multiplex array in analyzing food allergy in atopic children

ALEX multiplex array is a relatively new multiplex allergy test which analyses more than 120 allergen extracts and 170 molecular components. ISAC is the most used and studied multiplex array to date, offering 112 molecular components. In ten atopic children with multiple food allergies good agreement was observed between ALEX and ISAC sIgE results for nearly all shared food components. Presence of larger number of allergens in ALEX could help clinicians to improve personalized dietary advice. However more positive sensitizations with unknown clinical relevance were found by ALEX, potentially increasing clinical complexity. Pediatric allergists should be aware of this, especially in young atopic children with (severe) eczema who have not introduced all sorts of food yet.