1
|
Liebl AL, Wesner JS, Russell AF, Schrey AW. Methylation patterns at fledging predict delayed dispersal in a cooperatively breeding bird. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252227. [PMID: 34086730 PMCID: PMC8177507 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/11/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Individuals may delay dispersing from their natal habitat, even after maturation to adulthood. Such delays can have broad consequences from determining population structure to allowing an individual to gain indirect fitness by helping parents rear future offspring. Dispersal in species that use delayed dispersal is largely thought to be opportunistic; however, how individuals, particularly inexperienced juveniles, assess their environments to determine the appropriate time to disperse is unknown. One relatively unexplored possibility is that dispersal decisions are the result of epigenetic mechanisms interacting between a genome and environment during development to generate variable dispersive phenotypes. Here, we tested this using epiRADseq to compare genome-wide levels of DNA methylation of blood in cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babblers (Pomatostomus ruficeps). We measured dispersive and philopatric individuals at hatching, before fledging, and at 1 year (following when first year dispersal decisions would be made). We found that individuals that dispersed in their first year had a reduced proportion of methylated loci than philopatric individuals before fledging, but not at hatching or as adults. Further, individuals that dispersed in the first year had a greater number of loci change methylation state (i.e. gain or lose) between hatching and fledging. The existence and timing of these changes indicate some influence of development on epigenetic changes that may influence dispersal behavior. However, further work needs to be done to address exactly how developmental environments may be associated with dispersal decisions and which loci in particular are manipulated to generate such changes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea L Liebl
- Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, United States of America
| | - Jeff S Wesner
- Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, South Dakota, United States of America
| | - Andrew F Russell
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, United Kingdom
| | - Aaron W Schrey
- Department of Biology, Georgia Southern University, Armstrong, Georgia, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cones AG, Liebl AL, Houslay TM, Russell AF. Temperature-mediated plasticity in incubation schedules is unlikely to evolve to buffer embryos from climatic challenges in a seasonal songbird. J Evol Biol 2020; 34:465-476. [PMID: 33325597 DOI: 10.1111/jeb.13743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2020] [Revised: 11/03/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Phenotypic plasticity is hypothesized to facilitate adaptive responses to challenging conditions, such as those resulting from climate change. However, tests of the key predictions of this 'rescue hypothesis', that variation in plasticity exists and can evolve to buffer unfavourable conditions, remain rare. Here, we investigate among-female variation in temperature-mediated plasticity of incubation schedules and consequences for egg temperatures using the chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps) from temperate regions of inland south-eastern Australia. Given recent phenological advances in this seasonal breeder and thermal requirements of developing embryos (>~25°C, optimally ~38°C), support for evolutionary rescue-perhaps paradoxically-requires that plasticity serves to buffer embryos more from sub-optimally low temperatures. We found significant variation in the duration of incubation bouts (mean ± SD = 27 ± 22 min) and foraging bouts (mean ± SD = 17 ± 11 min) in this maternal-only incubator. However, variation in each arose because of variation in the extent to which mothers increased on- and off-bout durations when temperatures (0-36°C) were more favourable rather than unfavourable as required under rescue. In addition, there was a strong positive intercept-slope correlation in on-bout durations, indicating that those with stronger plastic responses incubated more at average temperatures (~19°C). Combined, these effects reduced the functional significance of plastic responses: an individual's plasticity was neither associated with daily contributions to incubation (i.e. attentiveness) nor average egg temperatures. Our results highlight that despite significant among-individual variation in environmental-sensitivity, plasticity in parental care traits need not evolve to facilitate buffering against unfavourable conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra G Cones
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.,Department of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Andrea L Liebl
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.,Department of Biology, University of South Dakota, Vermillion, SD, USA
| | - Thomas M Houslay
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK
| | - Andrew F Russell
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, University of Exeter, Penryn, Cornwall, UK.,Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nomano FY, Savage JL, Browning LE, Griffith SC, Russell AF. Breeding Phenology and Meteorological Conditions Affect Carer Provisioning Rates and Group-Level Coordination in Cooperative Chestnut-Crowned Babblers. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
4
|
Koenig WD, Walters EL, Barve S. Does Helping-at-the-Nest Help? The Case of the Acorn Woodpecker. Front Ecol Evol 2019. [DOI: 10.3389/fevo.2019.00272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
5
|
van Boheemen LA, Hammers M, Kingma SA, Richardson DS, Burke T, Komdeur J, Dugdale HL. Compensatory and additive helper effects in the cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler ( Acrocephalus sechellensis). Ecol Evol 2019; 9:2986-2995. [PMID: 30891231 PMCID: PMC6405499 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.4982] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In cooperatively breeding species, care provided by helpers may affect the dominant breeders' investment trade-offs between current and future reproduction. By negatively compensating for such additional care, breeders can reduce costs of reproduction and improve their own chances of survival. Alternatively, helper care can be additive to that of dominants, increasing the fledging fitness of the current brood. However, the influence helpers have on brood care may be affected by group size and territory quality. Therefore, the impact of helping needs to be disentangled from other factors determining offspring investment before conclusive inferences about the effect of help on additive and compensatory care can be made. We used 20 years of provisioning data to investigate the effect of helping on provisioning rates in the facultative cooperatively breeding Seychelles warbler Acrocephalus sechellensis. Our extensive dataset allowed us to statistically disentangle the effects of helper presence, living in larger groups and different food availability. We show compensatory and additive care (i.e., partial compensation) in response to helper provisioning. Helpers lightened the provisioning load of the dominant male and female and increased total provisioning to nestlings. This was irrespective of group size or territory quality (food availability). Moreover, our results illustrate sex-specific variation in parental care over the course of the breeding event. We discriminate between temporal variation, group size, and territory quality processes affecting cooperative care and as such, gain further insight into the importance of these factors to the evolutionary maintenance of helping behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lotte A. van Boheemen
- School of Biological SciencesMonash UniversityClaytonVictoriaAustralia
- Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Martijn Hammers
- Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Sjouke A. Kingma
- Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
- Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal ScienceWageningen University & ResearchWageningenThe Netherlands
| | - David S. Richardson
- School of Biological SciencesUniversity of East AngliaNorwichUK
- Nature SeychellesMahéRepublic of Seychelles
| | - Terry Burke
- Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
| | - Jan Komdeur
- Behavioural and Physiological Ecology, Groningen Institute for Evolutionary Life SciencesUniversity of GroningenGroningenThe Netherlands
| | - Hannah L. Dugdale
- Department of Animal and Plant SciencesUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK
- Faculty of Biological Sciences, School of BiologyUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tanaka H, Frommen JG, Engqvist L, Kohda M. Task-dependent workload adjustment of female breeders in a cooperatively breeding fish. Behav Ecol 2017. [DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arx149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
7
|
Dixit T, English S, Lukas D. The relationship between egg size and helper number in cooperative breeders: a meta-analysis across species. PeerJ 2017; 5:e4028. [PMID: 29188141 PMCID: PMC5704713 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.4028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Life history theory predicts that mothers should adjust reproductive investment depending on benefits of current reproduction and costs of reduced future reproductive success. These costs and benefits may in turn depend on the breeding female’s social environment. Cooperative breeders provide an ideal system to test whether changes in maternal investment are associated with the social conditions mothers experience. As alloparental helpers assist in offspring care, larger groups might reduce reproductive costs for mothers or alternatively indicate attractive conditions for reproduction. Thus, mothers may show reduced (load-lightening) or increased (differential allocation) reproductive investment in relation to group size. A growing number of studies have investigated how cooperatively breeding mothers adjust pre-natal investment depending on group size. Our aim was to survey these studies to assess, first, whether mothers consistently reduce or increase pre-natal investment when in larger groups and, second, whether these changes relate to variation in post-natal investment. Methods We extracted data on the relationship between helper number and maternal pre-natal investment (egg size) from 12 studies on 10 species of cooperatively breeding vertebrates. We performed meta-analyses to calculate the overall estimated relationship between egg size and helper number, and to quantify variation among species. We also tested whether these relationships are stronger in species in which the addition of helpers is associated with significant changes in maternal and helper post-natal investment. Results Across studies, there is a significant negative relationship between helper number and egg size, suggesting that in most instances mothers show reduced reproductive investment in larger groups, in particular in species in which mothers also show a significant reduction in post-natal investment. However, even in this limited sample, substantial variation exists in the relationship between helper number and egg size, and the overall effect appears to be driven by a few well-studied species. Discussion Our results, albeit based on a small sample of studies and species, indicate that cooperatively breeding females tend to produce smaller eggs in larger groups. These findings on prenatal investment accord with previous studies showing similar load-lightening reductions in postnatal parental effort (leading to concealed helper effects), but do not provide empirical support for differential allocation. However, the considerable variation in effect size across studies suggests that maternal investment is mitigated by additional factors. Our findings indicate that variation in the social environment may influence life-history strategies and suggest that future studies investigating within-individual changes in maternal investment in cooperative breeders offer a fruitful avenue to study the role of adaptive plasticity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tanmay Dixit
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Sinead English
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Current affiliation: School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| | - Dieter Lukas
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.,Current affiliation: Department of Human Behavior, Ecology and Culture, Max Plank Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Savage JL, Browning LE, Manica A, Russell AF, Johnstone RA. Turn-taking in cooperative offspring care: by-product of individual provisioning behavior or active response rule? Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2017; 71:162. [PMID: 29081573 PMCID: PMC5644705 DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2391-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Revised: 09/28/2017] [Accepted: 09/29/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Abstract For individuals collaborating to rear offspring, effective organization of resource delivery is difficult because each carer benefits when the others provide a greater share of the total investment required. When investment is provided in discrete events, one possible solution is to adopt a turn-taking strategy whereby each individual reduces its contribution rate after investing, only increasing its rate again once another carer contributes. To test whether turn-taking occurs in a natural cooperative care system, here we use a continuous time Markov model to deduce the provisioning behavior of the chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps), a cooperatively breeding Australian bird with variable number of carers. Our analysis suggests that turn-taking occurs across a range of group sizes (2–6), with individual birds being more likely to visit following other individuals than to make repeat visits. We show using a randomization test that some of this apparent turn-taking arises as a by-product of the distribution of individual inter-visit intervals (“passive” turn-taking) but that individuals also respond actively to the investment of others over and above this effect (“active” turn-taking). We conclude that turn-taking in babblers is a consequence of both their individual provisioning behavior and deliberate response rules, with the former effect arising through a minimum interval required to forage and travel to and from the nest. Our results reinforce the importance of considering fine-scale investment dynamics when studying parental care and suggest that behavioral rules such as turn-taking may be more common than previously thought. Significance statement Caring for offspring is a crucial stage in the life histories of many animals and often involves conflict as each carer typically benefits when others contribute a greater share of the work required. One way to resolve this conflict is to monitor when other carers contribute and adopt a simple “turn-taking” rule to ensure fairness, but natural parental care has rarely been studied in sufficient detail to identify such rules. Our study investigates whether cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babblers “take turns” delivering food to offspring, and (if so) whether this a deliberate strategy or simply a by-product of independent care behavior. We find that babblers indeed take turns and conclude that part of the observed turn-taking is due to deliberate responsiveness, with the rest arising from the species’ breeding ecology. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1007/s00265-017-2391-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James L Savage
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.,Behavioural Ecology Group, Department of Animal Sciences, Wageningen University, De Elst 1, 6708 WD Wageningen, The Netherlands.,School of Biological, Earth, and Environmental Sciences, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, T23 TK30 Ireland
| | - Lucy E Browning
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK.,Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station, School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales, Sydney, 2052 NSW Australia
| | - Andrea Manica
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK
| | - Andrew F Russell
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Tremough Campus, Penryn, TR10 9FE UK
| | - Rufus A Johnstone
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, CB2 3EJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Parental and alloparental investment in campo flickers (Colaptes campestris campestris): when relatedness comes first. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2017. [DOI: 10.1007/s00265-017-2368-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
10
|
Sorato E, Griffith SC, Russell AF. The price of associating with breeders in the cooperatively breeding chestnut‐crowned babbler: foraging constraints, survival and sociality. J Anim Ecol 2016; 85:1340-51. [DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2015] [Accepted: 04/14/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Sorato
- Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney NSW 2109 Australia
- Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM) Linköping University Linköping 58183 Sweden
| | - Simon C. Griffith
- Department of Biological Sciences Macquarie University Sydney NSW 2109 Australia
- Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
| | - Andy F. Russell
- Fowlers Gap Arid Zone Research Station School of Biological, Earth and Environmental Sciences University of New South Wales Sydney NSW 2052 Australia
- Centre for Ecology and Conservation College of Life and Environmental Sciences University of Exeter, Tremough Campus Penryn TR10 9FE UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Liebl AL, Browning LE, Russell AF. Manipulating carer number versus brood size: complementary but not equivalent ways of quantifying carer effects on offspring. Behav Ecol 2016; 27:1247-1254. [PMID: 27418754 PMCID: PMC4943111 DOI: 10.1093/beheco/arw038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2015] [Revised: 02/01/2016] [Accepted: 02/03/2016] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Measuring the causal effects of increasing carer number on offspring success is required to understand the evolution of cooperative care systems. Here, we did so using 2 experimental techniques in the chestnut-crowned babbler from outback Australia. Both carer removal and brood size manipulations indicate causal effects of helpers on offspring food acquisition. However, the results were not equivalent, with nestlings receiving more food following brood size manipulations, even after controlling for similar carer to offspring ratios. Experiments designed to quantify the effects of increasing numbers of carers on levels of offspring care are rare in cooperative breeding systems, where offspring are reared by individuals additional to the breeding pair. This paucity might stem from disagreement over the most appropriate manipulations necessary to elucidate these effects. Here, we perform both carer removal and brood enhancement experiments to test the effects of numbers of carers and carer:offspring ratios on provisioning rates in the cooperatively breeding chestnut-crowned babbler (Pomatostomus ruficeps). Removing carers caused linear reductions in overall brood provisioning rates. Further analyses failed to provide evidence that this effect was influenced by territory quality or disruption of group dynamics stemming from the removals. Likewise, adding nestlings to broods caused linear increases in brood provisioning rates, suggesting carers are responsive to increasing offspring demand. However, the 2 experiments did not generate quantitatively equivalent results: Each nestling received more food following brood size manipulation than carer removal, despite comparable carer:offspring ratios in each. Following an at-hatching split-design cross-fostering manipulation to break any links between prehatching maternal effects and posthatching begging patterns, we found that begging intensity increased in larger broods after controlling for metrics of hunger. These findings suggest that manipulation of brood size can, in itself, influence nestling provisioning rates when begging intensity is affected by scramble competition. We highlight that carer number and brood size manipulations are complimentary but not equivalent; adopting both can yield greater overall insight into carer effects in cooperative breeding systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A L Liebl
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , Treliever Road, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE , UK and
| | - L E Browning
- UNSW Arid Zone Research Station, School of Biological, Earth & Environmental Sciences, University of New South Wales , Sydney, New South Wales 2052 , Australia
| | - A F Russell
- Centre for Ecology & Conservation, College of Life & Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter , Treliever Road, Penryn, Cornwall TR10 9FE , UK and
| |
Collapse
|