Food availability reverses the effect of hunger state on copulation rate in Drosophila prolongata females

Reproductive advantage of the winners of male-male competition in Drosophila prolongata

In the resource-defence mating system, where males compete for limited resources to acquire females, male traits associated with fighting ability are selected, leading to the evolution of sexual dimorphism. However, the evolution of sexual dimorphism is also driven by other mechanisms, such as female selection. Therefore, to elucidate the evolutionary mechanisms of male traits, it is necessary to clarify their contribution to fitness through male-male competition. In this regard, it is surprising that numerous studies on sexually dimorphic species have assumed the resource-defence mating system without directly examining the relationship between resource-defending behaviour and mating success. In a sexually dimorphic fruit fly, Drosophila prolongata, the presence of the resource-defence mating system has been suggested, but technical difficulties had prevented spatial quantification of the resource-defending behaviour. In this study, by using an automated behaviour analysis tool previously developed, we located the occurrence of male-male competition and courtship to investigate their relationship in D. prolongata, considering the position of food resources. We found that the male-male competition led to the exclusive occupation of resources, increasing the courtship opportunities of the resource holders. These results illustrate the importance of resource-defending for reproductive success in D. prolongata.

Fight outcome influences male mating success in Drosophila prolongata

The outcomes of preceding fights can influence the probability of winning a subsequent fight, known as the winner/loser effect. However, we know relatively little about how the experience of a preceding fight influences subsequent mating success. Here, we investigated the influence of preceding fight outcomes on subsequent mating behavior in a fruit fly Drosophila prolongata. Subordinate males mated less in two-choice mating assays, showing that the fight outcome predicts male mating success in this species. This tendency remained in a no-choice mating assay where direct interaction between the dominant and subordinate males was eliminated, suggesting that the mating disadvantage of the subordinate males was dependent on the experience of the previous fight rather than the direct interference by the dominant male. When a no-choice mating assay was performed before the fight, the prospective subordinate males mated at the same rate as the dominant males, confirming that the intrinsic male qualities in fighting and mating performances were independent of each other in our experiments. These results indicated that the experience-dependent changes in the subordinate males led to the reduced mating success.

An Indirect Cost of Male-Male Aggression Arising from Female Response

Animal behavior is often polymorphic between individuals within a population. A cost/benefit balance of a particular behavioral pattern may be influenced by social interaction with other individuals with different behavioral patterns. Males of a fruitfly, Drosophila prolongata, show genetically defined polymorphism in aggressiveness and boldness against rival males. Males of the H strain are highly aggressive, and their fights tend to escalate into boxing, the highest level of aggressive interaction. H males are also bold against sneaker males and do not hesitate to perform leg vibration (LV), a courtship behavior that is vulnerable to interception of the female by surrounding rival males. In contrast, males of the L strain rarely engage in boxing and do not perform LV in the presence of rival males. We examined their mating success in small experimental populations. The mating success of L males was higher in a pure L population than in a mixed population with H males, whereas that of H males was higher in a mixed population than in a pure H population. Notably, this 'cost of aggression' in a pure H population seemed not directly derived from the male-to-male interaction but was imposed by the female's response of escaping from fighting males, compromising the benefit of the resource monopolization as territory.

Flexibility of neural circuits regulating mating behaviors in mice and flies

Mating is essential for the reproduction of animal species. As mating behaviors are high-risk and energy-consuming processes, it is critical for animals to make adaptive mating decisions. This includes not only finding a suitable mate, but also adapting mating behaviors to the animal's needs and environmental conditions. Internal needs include physical states (e.g., hunger) and emotional states (e.g., fear), while external conditions include both social cues (e.g., the existence of predators or rivals) and non-social factors (e.g., food availability). With recent advances in behavioral neuroscience, we are now beginning to understand the neural basis of mating behaviors, particularly in genetic model organisms such as mice and flies. However, how internal and external factors are integrated by the nervous system to enable adaptive mating-related decision-making in a state- and context-dependent manner is less well understood. In this article, we review recent knowledge regarding the neural basis of flexible mating behaviors from studies of flies and mice. By contrasting the knowledge derived from these two evolutionarily distant model organisms, we discuss potential conserved and divergent neural mechanisms involved in the control of flexible mating behaviors in invertebrate and vertebrate brains.

The female sex pheromone (Z)-4-undecenal mediates flight attraction and courtship in Drosophila melanogaster

Specific mate communication and recognition underlies reproduction and hence speciation. Our study provides new insights in Drosophila melanogaster premating olfactory communication. Mate communication evolves during adaptation to ecological niches and makes use of social signals and habitat cues. Female-produced, species-specific volatile pheromone (Z)-4-undecenal (Z4-11Al) and male pheromone (Z)-11-octadecenyl acetate (cVA) interact with food odour in a sex-specific manner. Furthermore, Z4-11Al, which mediates upwind flight attraction in both sexes, also elicits courtship in experienced males. Two isoforms of the olfactory receptor Or69a are co-expressed in the same olfactory sensory neurons. Z4-11Al is perceived via Or69aB, while the food odorant (R)-linalool is a main ligand for the other variant, Or69aA. However, only Z4-11Al mediates courtship in experienced males, not (R)-linalool. Behavioural discrimination is reflected by calcium imaging of the antennal lobe, showing distinct glomerular activation patterns by these two compounds. Male sex pheromone cVA is known to affect male and female courtship at close range, but does not elicit upwind flight attraction as a single compound, in contrast to Z4-11Al. A blend of the food odour vinegar and cVA attracted females, while a blend of vinegar and female pheromone Z4-11Al attracted males, instead. Sex-specific upwind flight attraction to blends of food volatiles and male and female pheromone, respectively, adds a new element to Drosophila olfactory premating communication and is an unambiguous paradigm for identifying the behaviourally active components, towards a more complete concept of food-pheromone odour objects.