Setting up an ambulatory regional anesthesia program for orthopedic surgery

High turnover for ambulatory orthopedic surgery

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The trend in the perioperative management of patients having orthopedic surgery in the ambulatory setting emphasizes time-efficiency and rapid turnovers. Anesthetic techniques and management continue to evolve to increase efficiency and decrease time spent in recovery.

RECENT FINDINGS

Minimizing time patients spend in phase 1 recovery or bypassing phase 1 altogether, known as fast-tracking, has become an important goal in containing costs in high turnover, ambulatory settings. Anesthetic techniques, particularly implementation of regional anesthesia and multimodal analgesia, have evolved to maximize efficiency.

SUMMARY

Anesthetic goals in the setting of high-turnover orthopedic surgery include effective multimodal analgesia, decreasing monotherapy with opioids, and patient education. Regional anesthesia as part of a multimodal analgesic regimen is increasingly used in ambulatory surgery fast-tracking protocols.

The effect of regional anesthesia blocks on post-operative pain after ambulatory orthopedic trauma surgery

PURPOSE

To determine if regional anesthesia had added benefit to general anesthesia, with or without local anesthesia, in controlling post-operative pain in outpatient orthopedic trauma surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of prospectively gathered data on 71 patients undergoing outpatient orthopedic trauma surgery. All patients received general anesthesia and an addition 52 patients received additional regional anesthesia. Regional vs. no regional anesthesia groups were compared in terms of post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) pain visual analog scores (VAS), PACU length of stay (LOS), opioid use, and pain control at two weeks.

RESULTS

The regional anesthesia group not differ in demographics or proportion of patients receiving local anesthesia, but was less likely to be undergoing major procedures (13% vs. 37%, proportional difference (PD) - 23%; 95% confidence interval (CI) - 46% to - 0.4%). There were no detectable differences in PACU opioid requirements (median difference (MD) - 7.5 mg, CI - 8 to 0), PACU LOS (MD - 13 min, CI - 63 to 24), discharge pain VAS (MD 0, CI - 1 to 1), post-discharge pain VAS (MD 0, CI - 1 to 1), opioid refills (PD - 6%, CI - 31% to 18%), or patient-perceived pain control (PD - 24%, CI - 41% to 0%). On multivariate analysis, regional anesthesia was the only variable negatively associated with patient-perceived pain control at two weeks (Odds Ratio 0.15; 95% CI 0.03 to 0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Regional anesthesia did not improve post-operative opioid requirements, PACU LOS, or patient-reported pain in the immediate or short-term post-operative period.

Surgery of the hallux valgus in an ambulatory setting: a liability risk?

INTRODUCTION

The primary objective of the study is to make an inventory of malpractice in hallux valgus surgery in an ambulatory setting and to identify the patient characteristics for a higher risk of malpractice. The secondary objective is creating a methodology for analyzing the medicolegal aspects of a surgery in day case comparing with hospitalization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The database of the Branchet insurance company was used. A total of 11,000 claims for a period of 11 years (2002-2013) have been investigated. The files of the patients with hallux valgus surgery were isolated from the insurer's database using CCAM codes. The medical director, a medical officer, the legal expert and finally the judge had already analyzed all these cases. The authors reviewed the various documents with a specific questionnaire.

RESULTS

We identified 14 cases of claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery among a total of 138 claims for hallux valgus including all techniques (10%). All patients were female. The mean age was 42.6 years (19-64) in ambulatory patients (AG group) in comparison with 49.5 years (19-73) in hospitalized patients (HG group). Percutaneous techniques were significantly more represented in the AG group (p = 0.002) and scarfs osteotomies in the HG group (p = 0.004). The use of tourniquet seemed to be lower in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (p = 0.085). In term of anesthesia procedures, no significant differences were seen between the two groups. The comparison of the complications common to both groups showed no significant difference except for insufficient results which were more frequent in the AG group (p = 0.026). The rate of insufficient informed consent seemed to be higher in the AG group, but it was a not significant trend (p = 0.084).

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION

No specific data regarding claims in relation with hallux valgus 1-day surgery are available to our knowledge in the literature. We did not identify in our study specific complications related to ambulatory procedures except for insufficient results. Hallux valgus 1-day surgery does not seem to expose surgeons to higher medicolegal problems than classical hospitalization. Nevertheless, a specific consent form for ambulatory patients is required to limit claims regarding information.