Telemedicine for Anesthesiologists

Cardiac Remote Monitoring Devices and Technologies: A Review for the Perioperative Physician and Telemedicine Providers

Cardiovascular complications are a major cause of morbidity and mortality after surgery, necessitating adequate and thorough preoperative risk stratification and screening. Several technological advances in cardiac remote monitoring have improved the assessment and diagnosis of cardiovascular disease in patients before and after surgery. These devices perform measurements of physiological function, including vital signs, and more advanced functions, such as electrocardiograms and heart sound recordings. Some of the currently available devices include Fitbit® (Google LLC, Mountain View, CA, USA), BodyGuardian® (Preventive Inc., Rochester, MN, USA), ZephyrTM Performance Systems (Zephyr Inc., Annapolis, MD, USA), Sensium® (The Surgical Company, Amersfoort, UT, The Netherlands), KardiaMobile® (AliveCor, Mountain View, CA, USA), Coala® Heart Monitor (Coala Life Inc., Uppsala, Sweden), Smartex® Wearable Wellness System (Smartex, Porto, LX, Portugal), Eko® CORE and DUO (Eko Health, Emeryville, CA, USA), and TytoCareTM (TytoCare Ltd., New York, USA). Early studies have applied these devices to asymptomatic individuals and those with known cardiovascular disease with good sensitivity and specificity for electrophysiologic diagnosis. These devices carry several technical and other limitations, somewhat restricting the generalization of their use to all patients. However, information gathered from these devices can further guide anesthetic technique, operative timing, and postoperative follow-up, among other variables. As telehealth becomes more prevalent and comprehensive, it is paramount for the perioperative physician to be familiar with the available cardiac remote monitoring technologies.

Online Group Consultation on Labor Analgesia for Pregnant Women: Is It Feasible?

INTRODUCTION

Our department of anesthesiology has been conducting weekly, for several years, a group consultation to educate childbearing people about labor analgesia. The emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic forced an adaptation to a virtual consultation format. Since there are no studies about online group consultation on labor analgesia in order to understand its role, an anonymous questionnaire was created and applied. The objective was to evaluate this new consultation format, namely the ease of access, usefulness of the content provided, and its impact on the satisfaction and experience of childbirth.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An observational prospective study was conducted. A questionnaire was sent by e-mail after childbirth to all childbearing people participating in the online consultation from January 20, 2021, to March 2, 2022. SPSS Statistics version 28.0 (IBM Corp. Released 2021. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 28.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp) was used for statistical analysis. Internal consistency was analyzed using Cronbach's alpha.

RESULTS

A total of 563 participants were eligible, and 404 (71.8%) completed questionnaires were analyzed. A few technical problems were reported. The participants considered their privacy respected, and more than 90% were satisfied with the content of the online consultation, the opportunity to pose questions, and the help managing expectations. Considering face-to-face consultation, 89.6% of patients considered the online format an effective alternative, 63.2% believed it could replace the old model, and 96.3% would recommend it.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates that online consultation on labor analgesia was a good strategy during the COVID-19 pandemic and has the potential to be used in this format in the future.

A Feasibility Study on a Telemedicine Hybrid Protocol for Preoperative Anesthetic Assessment

Background Over the past decade, telemedicine has experienced significant growth due to technological advancement, and the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic further accelerated its adoption. However, the field of anesthesiology has been slow in integrating and embracing telemedicine compared to other medical specialties. Methods We conducted an observational pilot feasibility study at a tertiary hospital in Singapore to assess the viability of a telemedicine hybrid protocol for preoperative anesthetic assessment. The study included patients aged 21 to 65 years, classified as American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) physical status class 1 or 2, with a body mass index (BMI) below 35 kg/m², who were capable of managing video conferencing. The patients selected were scheduled for low-risk surgeries. The primary objective was to evaluate the medical and technical feasibility of our telemedicine hybrid protocol, while the secondary objectives included assessing patient satisfaction and obtaining feedback from relevant stakeholders. Results From November 2021 to April 2022, a total of 116 patients were recruited, with 96 patients completing the study. No technical difficulties, surgical case cancellations, or incidents of unanticipated difficult airways were reported. The majority of survey respondents (88%) expressed satisfaction with the video consultation and indicated a preference for it over physical consultations for future preoperative anesthesia evaluations. Conclusion Based on our findings, a telemedicine hybrid protocol for preoperative anesthetic assessment demonstrated both technical and medical feasibility while yielding high patient satisfaction. Future research could focus on expanding the protocol to encompass more complex surgeries and include patients with higher ASA status.

Modern preoperative evaluation in ambulatory surgery - who, where and how?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Ambulatory surgery is increasingly performed in medically complex patients. This dynamic environment requires new approaches to ensure cost-effective, efficient, and ultimately safe preoperative evaluation of the patient. This review investigates recent advances in the assessment of ambulatory patients, with a special focus on patient screening, digital communication, and multidisciplinary team evaluation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Identifying suitable candidates for ambulatory surgery relies on a variety of medical, surgical, and institutional factors. Identification of high-risk patients and optimization of their treatment can be achieved through multidisciplinary protocols specific to the local institution and in line with current guidelines. Virtual assessment may be sufficient for most patients and provide an efficient evaluation strategy and high patient satisfaction. Prescreening can be supported by preoperative nursing teams.

SUMMARY

The increasing complexity of treatment provided in day surgery offers a unique opportunity to highlight the importance of anesthesiology staff as perioperative caregivers. Preoperative evaluation serves as a central junction to integrate a variety of surgical, medical, and institutional factors to provide safe, satisfactory, and efficient care for patients. Implementing technological innovation to streamline and facilitate this process is paramount.

Telemedicine for preanesthesia evaluation: review of current literature and recommendations for future implementation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The in-person preanesthesia visit serves multiple purposes including identification and optimization of comorbid conditions as well as patient education. However, it imposes a significant burden on patients and healthcare providers. In this review, we define the scope of telemedicine and present the most up-to-date literature supporting its role for the preanesthesia evaluation. The opportunities and challenges are discussed and approaches to implementation of telemedicine in preanesthesia care are offered. Finally, the future of telemedicine as it pertains to preanesthesia care is examined.

RECENT FINDINGS

Although telemedicine for preanesthesia practice was proposed almost two decades ago, the COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated its implementation. The potential benefits of telemedicine include improved patient satisfaction as well as the ability to provide cost-effective specialty services while reducing the burden on healthcare providers. Limitations to telemedicine include lack of technology, training, regulatory barriers, and an inability to perform a physical exam.

SUMMARY

Telemedicine will continue to expand and its application to the preanesthesia evaluation is a clear example of how technology will revolutionize anesthesia practice. In order for telemedicine to continue to expand in the postpandemic period, steps must be taken to ensure that healthcare facilities and providers keep up with the times.