1
|
Oliver C, Charlesworth M, Pratt O, Sutton R, Metodiev Y. Anaesthetic subspecialties and sustainable healthcare: a narrative review. Anaesthesia 2024; 79:301-308. [PMID: 38207014 DOI: 10.1111/anae.16169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 01/13/2024]
Abstract
The principles of environmentally sustainable healthcare as applied to anaesthesia and peri-operative care are well documented. Associated recommendations focus on generic principles that can be applied to all areas of practice. These include reducing the use of inhalational anaesthetic agents and carbon dioxide equivalent emissions of modern peri-operative care. However, four areas of practice have specific patient, surgical and anaesthetic factors that present barriers to the implementation of some of these principles, namely: neuroanaesthesia; obstetric; paediatric; and cardiac anaesthesia. This narrative review describes these factors and synthesises the available evidence to highlight areas of sustainable practice clinicians can address today, as well as posing several unanswered questions for the future. In neuroanaesthesia, improvements can be made by undertaking awake surgery, moving towards more reusables and embracing telemedicine in quaternary services. Obstetric anaesthesia continues to present questions regarding how services can move away from nitrous oxide use or limit its release to the environment. The focus for paediatric anaesthesia is addressing the barriers to total intravenous and regional anaesthesia. For cardiac anaesthesia, a significant emphasis is determining how to focus the substantial resources required on those who will benefit from cardiac interventions, rather than universal implementation. Whilst the landscape of evidence-based sustainable practice is evolving, there remains an urgent need for further original evidence in healthcare sustainability targeting these four clinical areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Oliver
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
| | - M Charlesworth
- Department of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesia, Critical Care and ECMO, Wythenshawe Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - O Pratt
- Department of Anaesthesia, Salford Care Organisation, Northern Care Alliance NHS Foundation Trust, Salford, UK
| | - R Sutton
- Department of Anaesthesia, Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Y Metodiev
- Department of Anaesthesia, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, UK
- School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen PS, Xue FS, Li CW. Evaluation of the Effect of New Multimodal Analgesia Regimen for Cardiac Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled, Single-Center Clinical Study [Letter]. Drug Des Devel Ther 2023; 17:2353-2354. [PMID: 37583845 PMCID: PMC10424689 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s429365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Pei-Shan Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Fu-Shan Xue
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| | - Cheng-Wen Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, People’s Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pearl RG, Cole SP. Development of the Modern Cardiothoracic Intensive Care Unit and Current Management. Crit Care Clin 2023; 39:559-576. [PMID: 37230556 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The modern cardiothoracic intensive care unit (CTICU) developed as a result of advances in critical care, cardiology, and cardiac surgery. Patients undergoing cardiac surgery today are sicker, frailer, and have more complex cardiac and noncardiac morbidities. CTICU providers need to understand postoperative implications of different surgical procedures, complications that can occur in CTICU patients, resuscitation protocols for cardiac arrest, and diagnostic and therapeutic interventions such as transesophageal echocardiography and mechanical circulatory support. Optimum CTICU care requires a multidisciplinary team with collaboration between cardiac surgeons and critical care physicians with training and experience in the care of CTICU patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ronald G Pearl
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H3589.
| | - Sheela Pai Cole
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford University School of Medicine, 300 Pasteur Drive, Room H3589
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gregory AJ, Noss CD, Chun R, Gysel M, Prusinkiewicz C, Webb N, Raymond M, Cogan J, Rousseau-Saine N, Lam W, van Rensburg G, Alli A, de Vasconcelos Papa F. Perioperative Optimization of the Cardiac Surgical Patient. Can J Cardiol 2023; 39:497-514. [PMID: 36746372 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2022] [Revised: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Perioperative optimization of cardiac surgical patients is imperative to reduce complications, utilize health care resources efficiently, and improve patient recovery and quality of life. Standardized application of evidence-based best practices can lead to better outcomes. Although many practices should be applied universally to all patients, there are also opportunities along the surgical journey to identify patients who will benefit from additional interventions that will further ameliorate their recovery. Enhanced recovery programs aim to bundle several process elements in a standardized fashion to optimize outcomes after cardiac surgery. A foundational concept of enhanced recovery is attaining a better postsurgical end point for patients, in less time, through achievement and maintenance in their greatest possible physiologic, functional, and psychological state. Perioperative optimization is a broad topic, spanning multiple phases of care and involving a variety of medical specialties and nonphysician health care providers. In this review we highlight a variety of perioperative care topics, in which a comprehensive approach to patient care can lead to improved results for patients, providers, and the health care system. A particular focus on patient-centred care is included. Although existing evidence supports all of the elements reviewed, most require further improvements in implementation, as well as additional research, before their full potential and usefulness can be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander J Gregory
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Christopher D Noss
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Rosaleen Chun
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Michael Gysel
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Christopher Prusinkiewicz
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Nicole Webb
- Cumming School of Medicine and Libin Cardiovascular Institute, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Meggie Raymond
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jennifer Cogan
- Montreal Heart Institute, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | | | - Wing Lam
- Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Gerry van Rensburg
- Mazankowski Alberta Heart Institute, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Ahmad Alli
- Department of Anesthesia, St Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chen IW, Sun CK, Ko CC, Fu PH, Teng IC, Liu WC, Lin CM, Hung KC. Analgesic efficacy and risk of low-to-medium dose intrathecal morphine in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: An updated meta-analysis. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:1017676. [PMID: 36275818 PMCID: PMC9581243 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.1017676] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 09/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background To evaluate the analgesic efficacy and risk of low-to-medium dose intrathecal morphine (ITM) (i.e., ≤0.5 mg) following cardiac surgery. Methods Medline, Cochrane Library, Google scholar and EMBASE databases were searched from inception to February 2022. The primary outcome was pain intensity at postoperative 24 h, while the secondary outcomes included intravenous morphine consumption (IMC), extubation time, hospital/intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and ITM-associated side effects (e.g., respiratory depression). Subgroup analysis was performed on ITM dosage (low: <0.3 mg vs. medium: 0.3–0.5 mg). Results Fifteen RCTs involving 683 patients published from 1988 to 2021 were included. Pooled results showed significantly lower postoperative 24-h pain scores [mean difference (MD) = −1.61, 95% confidence interval: −1.98 to −1.24, p < 0.00001; trial sequential analysis: sufficient evidence; certainty of evidence: moderate] in the ITM group compared to the controls. Similar positive findings were noted at 12 (MD = −2.1) and 48 h (MD = −1.88). Use of ITM was also associated with lower IMC at 24 and 48 h (MD: −13.69 and −14.57 mg, respectively; all p < 0.05) and early tracheal extubation (i.e., 48.08 min). No difference was noted in hospital/ICU LOS, and nausea/vomiting in both groups, but patients receiving ITM had higher risk of pruritus (relative risk = 2.88, p = 0.008). There was no subgroup difference in IMC except a lower pain score with 0.3–0.5 mg than <0.3 mg at postoperative 24 h. Respiratory depression events were not noted in the ITM group. Conclusion Our results validated the analgesic efficacy of low-to-medium dose ITM for patients receiving cardiac surgery without increasing the risk of respiratory depression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- I-Wen Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Liouying, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Cheuk-Kwan Sun
- Department of Emergency Medicine, E-Da Hospital, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan,College of Medicine, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Chung Ko
- Department of Medical Imaging, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan,Department of Health and Nutrition, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan City, Taiwan,Institute of Biomedical Sciences, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
| | - Pei-Han Fu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - I-Chia Teng
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Cheng Liu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Ming Lin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan
| | - Kuo-Chuan Hung
- Department of Anesthesiology, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan City, Taiwan,*Correspondence: Kuo-Chuan Hung,
| |
Collapse
|