Improved dairy cattle mating plans at herd level using genomic information

Animal board invited review: Practical applications of genomic information in livestock

Access to high-dimensional genomic information in many livestock species is accelerating. This has been greatly aided not only by continual reductions in genotyping costs but also an expansion in the services available that leverage genomic information to create a greater return-on-investment. Genomic information on individual animals has many uses including (1) parentage verification and discovery, (2) traceability, (3) karyotyping, (4) sex determination, (5) reporting and monitoring of mutations conferring major effects or congenital defects, (6) better estimating inbreeding of individuals and coancestry among individuals, (7) mating advice, (8) determining breed composition, (9) enabling precision management, and (10) genomic evaluations; genomic evaluations exploit genome-wide genotype information to improve the accuracy of predicting an animal's (and by extension its progeny's) genetic merit. Genomic data also provide a huge resource for research, albeit the outcome from this research, if successful, should eventually be realised through one of the ten applications already mentioned. The process for generating a genotype all the way from sample procurement to identifying erroneous genotypes is described, as are the steps that should be considered when developing a bespoke genotyping panel for practical application.

Evaluation of Linear Programming and Optimal Contribution Selection Approaches for Long-Term Selection on Beef Cattle Breeding

The optimized selection method can maximize the genetic gain in offspring under the premise of controlling the inbreeding level of the population. At present, genetic gain has been largely improved by using genomic selection in multiple farm animals. However, the design of the optimal selection method and assessment of its effects during long-term selection in beef cattle breeding are yet to be fully explored. In this study, a simulated beef cattle population was constructed, and 15 generations of simulated breeding were carried out using the linear programming breeding strategy (LP) and optimal contribution selection strategy (OCS), respectively. The truncation selection strategy (TS-I and TS-II) was used as the control. During the breeding process, genetic parameters including genetic gain, average kinship coefficient, QTL effect variance, and average observed heterozygosity were calculated and compared across generations. Our results showed that the LP method can significantly improve the genetic gain in the population, especially the genetic performance of the traits with high heritability and the traits with high weight in the breeding process, but the inbreeding level of the population is higher under LP strategy. Although the genetic gain in the population under the OCS strategy is lower than the TS-II strategy, this method can effectively control the inbreeding level of the population. Our findings also suggest that the LP and OCS method can be used as an effective means to improve genetic gain, while the OCS method is a more ideal method to obtain sustainable genetic gain during long-term selection.

Mating allocations in Holstein combining genomic information and linear programming optimization at the herd level

In this study, we explored mating allocation in Holstein using genomic information for 24,333 Holstein females born in Denmark, Finland, and Sweden. We used 2 data sets of bulls: the top 50 genotyped bulls and the top 25 polled genotyped bulls on the Nordic total merit scale. We used linear programming to optimize economic scores within each herd, considering genetic level, genetic relationship, semen cost, the economic impact of genetic defects, polledness, and β-casein. We found that it was possible to reduce genetic relationships and eliminate expression of genetic defects with minimal effect on the genetic level in total merit index. Compared with maximizing only Nordic total merit index, the relative frequency of polled offspring increased from 13.5 to 22.5%, and that of offspring homozygous for β-casein (A2A2) from 66.7 to 75.0% in one generation, without any substantial negative impact on other comparison criteria. Using only semen from polled bulls, which might become necessary if dehorning is banned, considerably reduced the genetic level. We also found that animals carrying the polled allele were less likely to be homozygous for β-casein (A2A2) and more likely to be carriers of the genetic defect HH1. Hence, adding economic value to a monogenic trait in the economic score used for mating allocation sometimes negatively affected another monogenetic trait. We recommend that the comparison criteria used in this study be monitored in a modern genomic mating program.

Progress in Genomic Mating in Domestic Animals

Simple Summary

Since animal domestication, breeders have been selecting candidates for breeding based on phenotypic performance. Estimating breeding values through the best linear unbiased prediction method represents a revolutionary shift in animal breeding. On this basis, selection and mating are utilized to improve the production level of animals. The application of genomic selection has once again revolutionized animal breeding methods. However, although this kind of truncated selection based on breeding values can significantly improve genetic gain, the genetic relationship between individuals with a high breeding value is usually closed, and the probability of being co-selected is greater, which will lead to a rapid increase in the rate of inbreeding in the population. Reduced genetic variation is not conducive to long-term sustainable breeding, so a trade-off between genetic gain and inbreeding is required. Genomic mating is the use of candidate individuals’ genomic information to implement optimized breeding and mating, which can effectively control the rate of inbreeding in the population and achieve long-term and sustainable genetic gain. It is more suitable for modern animal breeding, especially for conservation and genetic improvement of local domestic animal breeds.

Abstract

Selection is a continuous process that can influence the distribution of target traits in a population. From the perspective of breeding, elite individuals are selected for breeding, which is called truncated selection. With the introduction and application of the best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) method, breeders began to use pedigree-based estimated breeding values (EBV) to select candidates for the genetic improvement of complex traits. Although truncated selection based on EBV can significantly improve the genetic progress, the genetic relationships between individuals with a high breeding value are usually closed, and the probability of being co-selected is greater, which will lead to a rapid increase in the level of inbreeding in the population. Reduced genetic variation is not conducive to long-term sustainable breeding, so a trade-off between genetic progress and inbreeding is required. As livestock and poultry breeding enters the genomic era, using genomic information to obtain optimal mating plans has formally been proposed by Akdemir et al., a method called genomic mating (GM). GM is more accurate and reliable than using pedigree information. Moreover, it can effectively control the inbreeding level of the population and achieve long-term and sustainable genetic gain. Hence, GM is more suitable for modern animal breeding, especially for local livestock and poultry breed conservation and genetic improvement. This review mainly summarized the principle of genomic mating, the methodology and usage of genomic mating, and the progress of its application in livestock and poultry.

Mating allocations in Nordic Red Dairy Cattle using genomic information

In this study, we compared mating allocations in Nordic Red Dairy Cattle using genomic information. We used linear programming to optimize different economic scores within each herd, considering genetic level, semen cost, the economic impact of recessive genetic defects, and genetic relationships. We selected 9,841 genotyped females born in Denmark, Finland, or Sweden in 2019 for mating allocations. We used 2 different pedigree relationship coefficients, the first tracing the pedigree 3 generations back from the parents of the potential mating and the second based on all available pedigree information. We used 3 different genomic relationship coefficients, 1 SNP-by-SNP genomic relationship and 2 based on shared genomic segments. We found high correlations (≥0.83) between the pedigree and genomic relationship measures. The mating results showed that it was possible to reduce the different genetic relationships between parents with minimal effect on genetic level. Including the cost of known recessive genetic defects eliminated expression of genetic defects. It was possible to reduce genomic relationships between parents with pedigree measures, but it was best done with genomic measures. Linear programming maximized the economic score for all herds studied within seconds, which means that it is suitable for implementation in mating software to be used by advisors and farmers.