Dynamic progesterone responses to simulation of a natural pulse of a metabolite of prostaglandin F2α in heifers

Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone underlies luteolysis in cattle: A hypothesis

By virtue of the secretion of progesterone (P4), corpus luteum (CL) is important not only for normal cyclicity but also for conception and continuation of pregnancy in female mammals. Luteolysis (also called luteal regression) is defined as loss of the capacity to synthesize and secrete P4 followed by the demise of the CL. There is strong evidence that sequential pulses of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) secreted from the uterus near the end of luteal phase induces luteolysis in farm animals. Loss of luteal sensitivity to luteinizing hormone (LH) at the end of menstrual cycle has been reported to be critical for initiation of luteolysis in primates, however this has not been investigated in farm animals. A closer observation of the published real-time profiles of circulating hormones (P4, LH, and PGF) and their inter-relationships around the time of the beginning of spontaneous luteolysis in cattle revealed- 1) A natural pulse of PGF causes a transient P4 suppression lasting a couple of hours followed by a rebound in P4 concentration, 2) The P4 secretions that occur in response to LH pulses before the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., preluteolysis) either fail or do so to a lesser extent during luteolysis indicating a loss of sensitivity to LH, and 3) The loss of sensitivity coincides with the beginning of luteolysis (i.e., transition), and apparently luteolysis does not initiate until there is loss of sensitivity to LH. The CL is sensitive to LH during preluteolysis, and the LH-stimulated P4-dependent and/or independent local survival mechanisms maintain the steroidogenic capability and viability of the CL until the very end of preluteolysis. Luteolysis does not appear to initiate with the PGF pulse(s) that occur during this period. With the loss of sensitivity to LH at the transition, however, a progressive decline in P4 begins initiating luteolysis. Also, the survival mechanisms become compromised making the CL less viable. The uterine PGF pulses that occur after the beginning of luteolysis induces increase in the local luteolytic factors, which contribute to further luteolysis, more importantly, structural luteolysis with ultimate demise of the CL. Therefore, I hypothesize that the loss of luteal sensitivity to LH underlies luteolysis in cattle. The hypothesis not only unifies the basic mechanism of luteolysis in a farm animal and primates but also provides a perspective to view luteolysis as a process rather than a factor-mediated event. A novel unified working model for luteolysis in a farm animal and primates is described. A better understanding of the luteal physiology including how responsiveness to LH diminishes in aging CL would help in the development of novel strategies in modulating CL structure-function to improve and/or control fertility in humans as well as in animals.

Mifepristone and PGF2α activate phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis in the ovine corpus luteum

Two experiments were conducted to determine whether mifepristone (RU486) and PGF₂α activate the phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis pathway during the midluteal phase of the ovine estrous cycle. In experiment 1, ewes on day 8 of the cycle were given 10 μg RU486 or vehicle into the ovarian artery with removal of the corpus luteum (CL) after 10 min. Blood collected prior to and after treatment was analyzed for progesterone. Aliquots of CL were incubated with 10 μCi of ³H-inositol and in the presence and absence of PGF₂α (10 nM) for 15 min. Exposure of CL to RU486 and PGF₂α increased phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis (p < 0.05). Serum progesterone was reduced in both control and RU486-treated ewes (p < 0.05) compared to concentrations before treatments. In experiment 2, aliquots of CL collected from ewes on day 8 of the cycle were incubated with ³H-inositol and exposed to RU486 (2 μM) in the presence and absence of PGF₂α (1 μM) for 15 min. Treatments stimulated phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis as in Exp 1 (p < 0.05). Progesterone concentrations in incubation medium were increased in response to RU486 and PGF₂α (p < 0.05). Collectively, these data suggest that RU486 and PGF₂α act to stimulate phosphatidylinositol hydrolysis in the mature ovine CL.

Plasma clearance and half-life of prostaglandin F2alpha: a comparison between mares and heifers

Horses are about five times more sensitive to the luteolytic effect of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) than cattle, as indicated by a recommended clinical dose of 5 mg in horses and 25 mg in cattle. Novel evaluations of the PGF plasma disappearance curves were made in mares and in heifers, and the two species were compared. Mares and heifers (n = 5) of similar body weight were injected (Min 0) intravenously with PGF (5 mg per animal). Blood was sampled every 10 sec until Min 3, every 30 sec until Min 5, every 10 min until Min 60, and every 30 min until Min 240. The mean PGF concentration was greater (P < 0.05) in mares than in heifers at Min 1 through Min 60 and at Mins 180 and 240. The mean time to maximum PGF concentration was not different between mares (42.0 ± 8.6 sec) and heifers (35.0 ± 2.9 sec). The apparent plasma clearance, distribution half-life, elimination half-life, and maximum plasma PGF concentration were 3.3 ± 0.5 L h(-1) kg(-1), 94.2 ± 15.9 sec, 25.9 ± 5.0 min, and 249.1 ± 36.8 ng/ml, respectively, in mares and 15.4 ± 2.3 L h(-1) kg(-1), 29.2 ± 3.9 sec, 9.0 ± 0.9 min, and 51.4 ± 22.6 ng/ml, respectively, in heifers. Plasma clearance was about five times less (P < 0.0005), maximum plasma PGF concentration was five times greater (P < 0.002), and the distribution half-life and elimination half-life were about three times longer (P < 0.005) in mares than in heifers. The fivefold greater plasma clearance of PGF in heifers than in mares corresponds to the recommended fivefold greater clinical dose of PGF in cattle and supported the hypothesis that the metabolic clearance of PGF is slower in mares than heifers.

Dynamics of circulating progesterone concentrations before and during luteolysis: a comparison between cattle and horses

The profile of circulating progesterone concentration is more dynamic in cattle than in horses. Greater prominence of progesterone fluctuations in cattle than in horses reflect periodic interplay in cattle between pulses of a luteotropin (luteinizing hormone; LH) and pulses of a luteolysin (prostaglandin F2alpha; PGF2alpha). A dose of PGF2alpha that induces complete regression of a mature corpus luteum with a single treatment in cattle or horses is an overdose. The overdose effects on the progesterone profile in cattle are an immediate nonphysiological increase taking place over about 30 min, a decrease to below the original concentration, a dose-dependent rebound 2 h after treatment, and a progressive decrease until the end of luteolysis. An overdose of PGF2alpha in horses results in a similar nonphysiological increase in progesterone followed by complete luteolysis; a rebound does not occur. An overdose of PGF2alpha and apparent lack of awareness of the rebound phenomenon has led to faulty interpretations on the nature of spontaneous luteolysis. A transient progesterone suppression and a transient rebound occur within the hours of a natural PGF2alpha pulse in cattle but not in horses. Progesterone rebounds are from the combined effects of an LH pulse and the descending portion of a PGF2alpha pulse. A complete transitional progesterone rebound occurs at the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis and returns progesterone to its original concentration. It is proposed that luteolysis does not begin in cattle until after the transitional rebound. During luteolysis, rebounds are incomplete and gradually wane. A partial rebound during luteolysis in cattle is associated with a concomitant increase in luteal blood flow. A similar increase in luteal blood flow does not occur in mares.

Patterns of gene expression in the bovine corpus luteum following repeated intrauterine infusions of low doses of prostaglandin F2alpha

Natural luteolysis involves multiple pulses of prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) released by the nonpregnant uterus. This study investigated expression of 18 genes from five distinct pathways, following multiple low-dose pulses of PGF. Cows on Day 9 of the estrous cycle received four intrauterine infusions of 0.25 ml of phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) or PGF (0.5 mg of PGF in 0.25 ml of PBS) at 6-h intervals. A luteal biopsy sample was collected 30 min after each PBS or PGF infusion. There were four treatment groups: Control (n = 5; 4 PBS infusions), 4XPGF (4 PGF infusions; n = 5), 2XPGF-non-regressed (2 PGF infusions; n = 5; PGF-PBS-PGF-PBS; no regression after treatments), and 2XPGF-regressed (PGF-PBS-PGF-PBS; regression after treatments; n = 5). As expected, the first PGF pulse increased mRNA for the immediate early genes JUN, FOS, NR4A1, and EGR1 but unexpectedly also increased mRNA for steroidogenic (STAR) and angiogenic (VEGFA) pathways. The second PGF pulse induced immediate early genes and genes related to immune system activation (IL1B, FAS, FASLG, IL8). However, mRNA for VEGFA and STAR were decreased by the second PGF infusion. After the third and fourth PGF pulses, a distinctly luteolytic pattern of gene expression was evident, with inhibition of steroidogenic and angiogenic pathways, whereas, there was induction of pathways for immune system activation and production of PGF. The pattern of PGF-induced gene expression was similar in corpus luteum not destined for luteolysis (2X-non-regressed) after the first PGF pulse but was very distinct after the second PGF pulse. Thus, although the initial PGF pulse induced mRNA for many pathways, the second and later pulses of PGF appear to have set the distinct pattern of gene expression that result in luteolysis.

Induction of PGFM pulses and luteolysis by sequential estradiol-17β treatments in heifers

The effects of sequential induction of PGFM pulses by estradiol-17β (E2) on prominence of PGFM pulses and progesterone (P4) concentration were studied in heifers. Three treatments of vehicle (n = 12) or E2 (n = 12) at doses of 0.05 or 0.1 mg were given at 12-h intervals beginning on Day 15 postovulation. Blood samples were collected every 12 h from Days 13-24 and hourly for 12 h after the first and third treatments. On Day 15, all heifers were in preluteolysis and on Day 16 were in preluteolysis in the vehicle-treated heifers (n = 11) and either preluteolysis (n = 4) or luteolysis (n = 8) in the E2-treated heifers. Peak concentration of induced PGFM pulses during preluteolysis on Day 15 was greater (P < 0.04) than for pulses during preluteolysis on Day 16. The interval from ovulation to the beginning of luteolysis was shorter (P < 0.04) in the E2-treated heifers than in the vehicle-treated heifers. An E2-induced PGFM pulse was less prominent (P < 0.008) in heifers in temporal association with a transient resurgence in P4 than in heifers with a progressive P4 decrease. The hypothesis that repeated E2 exposure stimulates increasing prominence of PGFM pulses was not supported. Instead, repeated exposure reduced the prominence of PGFM pulses, in contrast to the stimulation from the first E2 treatment. Reduced prominence of a PGF(2α) pulse during luteolysis can lead to a transient resurgence in P4 concentration.

Effect of dose of estradiol-17β on prominence of an induced 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2α) (PGFM) pulse and relationship of prominence to progesterone, LH, and luteal blood flow in heifers

Various doses of estradiol-17β (E(2)) were used in heifers to induce a pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F(2α) (PGFM). The effect of E(2) concentration on the prominence of PGFM pulses and the relationship between prominence and intrapulse concentration of progesterone (P(4)), LH, and luteal blood flow were studied. A single dose of 0 (vehicle), 0.01, 0.05, or 0.1 mg of E(2) was given (n = six/group) 14 d after ovulation. Blood samples were collected, and luteal blood flow was evaluated hourly for 10 h after the treatment. The 0.05-mg dose increased and the 0.1-mg dose further increased the prominence of the induced PGFM pulse, compared with the 0.0-mg dose and the 0.01-mg dose. The PGFM pulses were subdivided into three different prominence categories (<50, 50 to 150, and >150 pg/mL at the peak). In the 50 to 150 category, P(4) concentration increased (P < 0.05) between -2 h and 0 h (0 h = peak of PGFM pulse). In the >150 category, P(4) decreased (P < 0.05) between -1 h and 0 h, LH increased (P < 0.05) at 1 h, and luteal blood flow apparently decreased (P < 0.05) at 2 h of the PGFM pulse. The novel results supported the following hypotheses: (1) an increase in E(2) concentration increases the prominence of a PGFM pulse, and (2) greater prominence of a PGFM pulse is associated with a greater transient intrapulse depression of P(4) at the peak of the PGFM pulse. In addition, the extent of the effect of prostaglandin F(2α) on the increase in LH and changes in blood flow within the hours of a PGFM pulse was related positively to the prominence of the PGFM pulse.

Intrapulse temporality between pulses of a metabolite of prostaglandin F 2α and circulating concentrations of progesterone before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis in heifers

Pulses of the prostaglandin F(2α) (PGF) metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF(2α) (PGFM) and the intrapulse concentrations of progesterone were characterized hourly during the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods in seven heifers. The common hour of the end of preluteolysis and the beginning of luteolysis was based on a progressive progesterone decrease when assessed only at the peaks of successive oscillations. The end of the luteolytic period was defined as a decrease in progesterone to 1 ng/mL. Blood samples were taken hourly from 15 d after ovulation until luteal regression as determined by color-Doppler ultrasonography. Between Hours -2 and 2 (Hour 0 = PGFM peak) of the last PGFM pulse of the preluteolytic period, progesterone decreased between Hours -1 and 0, and then returned to the prepulse concentration. Concentration did not change significantly thereafter until a PGFM pulse early in the luteolytic period; progesterone decreased by Hour 0 and transiently rebounded after Hour 0, but not to the prepulse concentration. In the later portion of the luteolytic period, progesterone also decreased between Hours -1 and 0 but did not rebound. After the defined end of luteolysis, progesterone decreased slightly throughout a PGFM pulse. Results demonstrated for the first time that the patterns of progesterone concentrations within a PGFM pulse differ considerably among the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods.

Luteal blood flow and concentrations of circulating progesterone and other hormones associated with a simulated pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin F2α in heifers

Progesterone and luteal blood flow effects of an i.u. 2-h infusion of 0.25 mg/h of prostaglandin F2α (PGF) that simulated a natural pulse of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF (PGFM) were compared to the effects of a single bolus i.u. injection of PGF (4 mg) that induced complete luteolysis in heifers. Blood sampling and an estimate of the percentage of luteal area with colour-Doppler signals of blood flow were performed every 2 min for 20 min and less frequently thereafter for 6 h. After the beginning of PGF infusion or a bolus injection, progesterone increased to a peak at 14 and 10 min respectively, and was accompanied by an increase in blood flow in the bolus group but not in the infusion group. Progesterone then decreased for 1 or 2 h and was accompanied by a continued elevation in blood flow in the PGF bolus group and by a slight increase in the PGF infusion group. Progesterone then rebounded in both groups, but the rebound was greater in the infusion group. Blood flow decreased during the descending arm of the progesterone rebound. Cortisol and prolactin began to increase 6 min after the bolus PGF injection but did not increase during or after PGF infusion. The increases in cortisol, prolactin and blood flow after a PGF bolus treatment but not during a simulated PGFM pulse indicated that the bolus treatment was pharmacologic, and its use may lead to faulty conclusions on the nature of physiologic luteolysis. The comparisons between progesterone and blood flow are novel.

Characteristics of pulses of 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-prostaglandin f2alpha before, during, and after spontaneous luteolysis and temporal intrapulse relationships with progesterone concentrations in cattle

Pulses of the prostaglandin F2alpha (PGF) metabolite 13,14-dihydro-15-keto-PGF (PGFM) were compared among heifers that were in the preluteolytic, luteolytic, and postluteolytic periods (n = 7 or 8 heifers/period). Hourly blood sampling was done in 18-h sessions 15, 16, or 17 days after ovulation. Hourly sampling and statistical identification of a PGFM pulse allowed novel comparisons of PGFM pulses among the three periods. Each period had a similar number of PGFM pulses (2.3 +/- 0.2). The pulses were more prominent during the luteolytic period than during the other periods, as indicated by significantly greater concentration for the peak and amplitude between nadir and peak. Significantly more fluctuations that did not meet the definition of a pulse occurred at the beginning of the preluteolytic period and end of the postluteolytic period than during the luteolytic period. The same nadir ended a pulse and began the next pulse in 85% of adjacent pulses. Seven heifers were selected objectively, based on a progesterone concentration >5 ng/ml at Hour -3 (Hour 0 = peak of PGFM pulse) and a progressive decrease in progesterone from Hours -3 to 0. Progesterone increased (P < 0.03) between Hours 0 and 1, remained at a mean plateau at Hours 1 and 2, and then decreased. Results support the hypothesis of a transient intrapulse rebound in progesterone during an individual PGFM pulse, but only during the first portion of luteolysis. These findings should be considered in future proposals on the mechanisms involved in the effects of PGF on progesterone concentrations.