The luteal outcome of anoestrus ewes induced to ovulate by the male effect is not related to the population of ovarian antral follicles before male exposure

Interactions between Nutrition and the “Ram Effect” in the Control of Ovarian Function in the Merino Ewe

Simple Summary

Clean, green, and ethical management of sheep flocks involves the use of socio-sexual stimuli (the “ram effect”) to coordinate nutritional inputs into reproductive success. However, the value of the “ram effect” is limited by three factors: (i) the proportion of the ewe flock that ovulates; (ii) ovulation rate in ewes that respond to the ram stimulus; and (iii) luteal failure after the first ram-induced ovulation, leading to short luteal phases. We tested whether these problems could be overcome by using a brief nutritional supplement (500 g lupin grain per head daily for 6 days) to stimulate ovarian activity. Lupin supplementation before ram introduction did not improve the percentage of the ewe flock that ovulates or reduce the frequency of short cycles (so will not improve the synchrony of lambing). However, lupin supplementation after ram introduction should be used to increase prolificacy.

Abstract

We tested whether short-term nutritional supplementation (500 g lupin grain per head daily) would affect the response of ewes to the ram effect. Experiment 1 (end of non-breeding season): ewes were supplemented for either Days −6 to −1 relative to ram introduction (n = 24) or for 12 days after ram introduction (Days 11 to 22 of the ram-induced cycle; n = 29). Controls (n = 30) were not supplemented. Across all groups, 94–100% of ewes ovulated. Supplementation before ram introduction did not affect ovulation rate at the ram-induced ovulation but increased it during the ram-induced cycle (Control 1.37; supplemented 1.66; p < 0.05). Experiment 2 (the middle of non-breeding season): the supplement was fed for Days −5 to −1 relative to ram introduction. Again, supplementation did not increase number ovulating (Control 16/29; Supplemented 10/29) but it did increase ovulation rate at the ram-induced ovulation (Control 1.31; Supplemented 1.68; p < 0.05). In neither experiment did supplementation affect the frequency of short cycles. Supplementation before ram introduction did not improve the percentage of ewes ovulating or reduce the frequency of short cycles (so will not improve the synchrony of lambing). However, supplementation after ram introduction can increase prolificacy.