Influence of the male effect on the reproductive performance of female Payoya goats implanted with melatonin at the winter solstice

Effect of body condition and melatonin implants, inserted at different times of the year, on ovarian activity in goats maintained without male contact from the time of implantation

The aim of the present work was to asses (1) whether body condition (BC) and (2) melatonin implants, inserted at different times of the year between the winter and summer solstices, have an effect on seasonal ovulatory activity in goats without presence of males. Sixty-six Blanca Andaluza does were divided into six groups. Five of these received a melatonin implant on either 18 December (n = 10), 3 February (n = 12), 19 March (n = 12), 30 April (n = 11) or 11 June (n = 11). Following this procedure, the does were completely isolated from bucks. Another 10 goats (YEAR group) were used to monitor natural annual ovarian activity; these females were completely isolated from males over the entire experimental period (from 18 December of one year until 17 December of the next year). Half the does of each group had a low body condition score (BC; ≤2.50; 2.46 ± 0.02), and half had a high BC (≥3.00; 3.24 ± 0.04). Ovulatory activity was monitored via the progesterone concentrations determined in blood samples collected twice per week for 4 months following melatonin implantation, and over 12 months for the YEAR group. Over 46% of the females showed ovarian activity after the melatonin treatment, ranging from the lowest response in December (30%) and the highest one in February (75%) without differences between the dates of melatonin insertion (P > 0.05). However, the response to the melatonin implant was higher in the females with a high BC than in females with a low BC (63% vs 31% for high and of low BC respectively, P < 0.05). The present results indicated that melatonin implants induce ovarian activity in does in the absence of male contact. The moment of melatonin implantation did not modify ovulatory activity. However, the ovulatory response to melatonin implants was higher in the females with a BC of ≥3.00.

Effect of light intensity on ovarian gene expression, reproductive performance and body weight of rabbit does

The objective of the experiment was to find the minimum light intensity which could improve reproduction by examining its effect on ovarian gene expression, reproductive performance and body weight of rabbit does with three different light intensities: 60 (L), 80 (M), and 100 (H)lx. A total of 144 Rex-rabbits submitted to a 49-day reproductive regimen were used in this study. Ovaries were collected and relative abundance of mRNA for ovarian proteins of interest was examined with real-time PCR. Amount of protein for proteins of interest was examined by immunohistochemistry. Reproductive performance and doe bodyweight of the first three consecutive reproductive periods after initiation of the light intensity treatments were evaluated. The results provided evidence that light intensity had no effect on relative abundance of estradiol receptor-α (ER-α), follicle stimulating hormone receptor (FSHR), luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR), gonadotropin releasing hormone receptor 1 (GnRHR1) and progesterone receptor (PGR) mRNA. The relative abundance of growth hormone receptor (GHR) mRNA was, however, greater in Group L than M and H (P<0.05). No difference was observed for all reproductive indices as a result of submission to the three light intensities (P>0.05). The bodyweight of the does in Group L was greater than the other two groups at first insemination, second insemination and the second postpartum period (P<0.05). There was no difference in bodyweight after the second postpartum period (P>0.05). These observations suggest that light intensity between 60 and 100lx has no effect on the reproductive performance of rabbit does, however, the amounts of GHR mRNA and growth hormone (GH) protein were affected and the greater light intensity had a negative effect on bodyweight between the time of the first insemination and the second partum period.

The isolation of females from males to promote a later male effect is unnecessary if the bucks used are sexually active

It has been suggested that female goats in permanent contact with males become refractory to their presence, and need to be previously separated from them for 40-45 days if the presence of bucks is to induce reproductive activity, ovulation and oestrous during seasonal anoestrous. The present study examines the reproductive response (ovulation and oestrus) and reproductive performance of does isolated from bucks for different periods before their reintroduction to male company. A total of 103 Payoya and Blanca Andaluza does were distributed into six treatment groups that required their isolation from males for different periods: 0 days (N = 29), 5 days (N = 15), 10 days (N = 14), 20 days (N = 16), 30 days (N = 14) and 39 days (N = 15). After this period they were introduced to sexually active bucks (ensured to be in this condition by keeping them under long days light treatment for three months), and oestrous activity was recorded daily by direct visual observation of the marks left by the marking harnesses worn by these males. Ovulation was confirmed via the plasma progesterone concentration (measured in blood samples taken twice per week). The ovulation rate was assessed by transrectal ultrasonography. Fecundity, fertility, prolificacy and productivity were also determined. The sexual behaviour of the males towards the females was also monitored on Days 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 9 after their meeting with the latter. The length of the female isolation period had no effect on the percentage of does that responded to contact with the males, nor did it affect the oestrous response, fecundity, fertility or productivity. The males, however, undertook more ano-genital sniffing and nudging with the 5 day group females compared to those of the other groups (P < 0.05). However, the sexual behaviour of the males changed as the days passed, with ano-genital sniffing becoming less common, and nudging, licking, sneezing and mounts with intromission more frequent on Days 8 and 9 than on Day 0, 1 and 2 after the sexes were reunited (P < 0.05). These results show that the isolation of females is not necessary for an efficient male effect if the bucks used are sexually active. In addition, the sexual behaviour of the bucks changes as the time in contact with the does increases, but in general is not affected by the duration of female isolation.

Reducing exposure to long days from 75 to 30 days of extra-light treatment does not decrease the capacity of male goats to stimulate ovulatory activity in seasonally anovulatory females

The response of male goats exposed to different durations of long days (LD) during an extra-light treatment in autumn-winter, and their ability to induce ovulations in seasonally anovulatory goats were investigated in 2 experiments. In experiment 1, control males were exposed to natural photoperiod (n = 5), whereas 4 additional groups (n = 5/group) were exposed to 16 h of light per d during 75, 45, 30, or 15 d of LD. In the 4 groups, photoperiodic treatments ended on January 15th. Plasma concentrations of testosterone were determined in blood samples obtained once a week from October 15th to May 30th. The rise of testosterone levels occurred earlier in males from the 75-LD and 45-LD groups than in those from the 30-LD, 15-LD, and control groups (P < 0.05). In addition, the time during which levels of testosterone remained >5 ng/mL was longer in males from the 75-LD and 45-LD than in those from the 30-LD and 15-LD groups (P < 0.05). In experiment 2, a group of anovulatory goats (n = 13) was isolated from males, while 3 additional groups were put in contact during 15 d with males previously exposed to 75, 45, or 30 days of LD (n = 25, 27, and 26 females/group, respectively and n = 3 males per group). The proportion of goats that ovulated was higher in the 3 groups in contact with the photo-stimulated males (range: 88%-92%) than in the group isolated from them (0%; P < 0.05). The proportion of pregnant females did not differ between the 3 groups of does in contact with photo-stimulated males (range: 78%-92%; P > 0.05). We conclude that, in our experimental conditions, a photoperiodic treatment as short as 30 d of LD during autumn-winter, stimulated testosterone secretion of bucks during their period of sexual rest and rendered them able to induce ovulations in seasonal anestrous goats and to obtain pregnancies in these females.