Vestibular-like facial nerve schwannoma

Preoperative Differences in Intracranial Facial Versus Vestibular Schwannomas: A Four Nerve Assessment

OBJECTIVES

Assesses whether preoperative functional testing can distinguish vestibular schwannomas from facial nerve schwannomas medial to the labyrinthine segment.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

METHODS

Retrospectively review surgically managed intracranial facial and vestibular schwannomas between January 2015 and December 2019 at two tertiary care centers. Patients with neurofibromatosis 2 and surgery for recurrence were excluded. Preoperative functional testing to include House-Brackmann scores, electroneuronography (ENoG), cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (cVEMP), caloric testing, acoustic brainstem responses (ABRs), acoustic reflexes, and audiograms was compared between the two groups of schwannomas.

RESULTS

Twelve facial and 128 vestibular schwannomas met inclusion criteria. In only one case was a facial schwannoma diagnosed preoperatively from imaging. No statistically significant difference was found in preoperative House-Brackmann scores, ENoG, cVEMP, caloric testing, ABRs, or acoustic reflexes. Pure tone average was worse in the vestibular schwannoma group (63 dB [95% CI: 58-68 dB] vs. 46 dB [95% CI: 34-58 dB], P = .01), and the difference was more apparent in the lower frequencies. Word recognition score was better in the facial schwannoma group (66% [95% CI: 45-86%] vs. 41% [95% CI: 34-47%], P = .02).

CONCLUSION

Specialized preoperative functional evaluation of the nerves of the internal auditory canal cannot reliably predict the presence of an intracranial facial schwannoma. Hearing is better in facial schwannomas, particularly in the lower frequencies. This should raise the index of suspicion for an intracranial facial schwannoma, especially in candidates for hearing preservation vestibular schwannoma surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:2098-2105, 2021.

Surgical Outcomes of Intratemporal Facial Nerve Schwannomas According to Facial Nerve Manipulation

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the preoperative and postoperative facial nerve (FN) function in patients with FN schwannoma (FNS) and analyze the duration of preoperative facial palsy according to the preoperative and postoperative facial function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 29 patients with FNS who underwent surgery. We evaluated the FN function according to the type of FN manipulation and location of the anastomoses in the cable nerve graft, and we also analyzed the duration of facial palsy according to the facial function before and after surgery.

RESULTS

All 4 patients who underwent nerve-stripping surgery had the House-Brackmann (H-B) Grade III, 12 of 21 who underwent a cable nerve graft had the H-B Grade III or better postoperatively, and all 4 who underwent a hypoglossal facial crossover had the H-B Grade IV. Patients who underwent cable nerve grafting were more likely to have better FN function when the proximal anastomosis site was located in the internal auditory canal, geniculate ganglion, tympanic segment of FN, and distal end in the mastoid segment of FN. The duration of preoperative facial palsy was statistically shorter in patients with better postoperative facial function.

CONCLUSION

Surgery can be considered in patients with FNS who have the H-B Grade III or worse. A shorter duration of facial palsy prior to surgery resulted in better postoperative facial function.

Management of Facial Nerve Schwannoma: A Multicenter Study of 50 Cases

Objective  In the management of facial nerve schwannoma (FNS), surgical tumor resection is now often being replaced with more conservative approaches, such as observation with serial imaging or stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). Given the scarcity of these lesions, determining the optimal management of FNS remains challenging and subject of debate with multiple treatment approaches supported in the literature. Methods  A retrospective chart review was performed in two academic centers for patients diagnosed with FNS between 1996 and 2017. The clinical presentation, treatment modalities employed, tumor control rates, and facial nerve function (FNF) outcomes (House-Brackmann system) were assessed and analyzed. Results  The study comprised 50 adult patients. Initial treatment modalities included observation with serial clinicoradiologic review in 27 patients (54%), surgery in 17 patients (34%), and SRS in 6 patients (12%). The FNF were decreased in more than half of the patients who had surgery. Nonetheless, more than 80% of the patients who were initially managed with observation or SRS had stable or improved FNF. Conclusion  A prevailing trend toward more conservative treatment modalities for FNS has evolved over time, providing relatively long-term preservation of FNF. As there are multiple management options available, it is of paramount importance that the treating physician be familiar with all treatment modalities and outcomes and counsel patients appropriately. The surgery should be reserved for large tumors and poor FNF at initial presentation or follow-up while watchful observation with imaging is the treatment of choice for rest of the patients.

Management of multiple tumors in neurofibromatosis type 2 patients

INTRODUCTION

Neurofibromatosis type 2 is characterized by the presence of bilateral vestibular schwannomas. However, other nervous system tumors may also occur. Therefore, the management of NF2 patients is complex and requires a multidisciplinary discussion in a specialized center.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All recent articles concerning tumors other than vestibular schwannoma in NF2 disease were reviewed, using PubMed databases.

RESULTS

Intracranial meningiomas occur in 50% of NF2 patients, and are often multiple. Surgery remains the main treatment and should be performed in cases of growing tumors. The role of antiangiogenic therapy is currently under evaluation and the role of radiosurgery still remains to be defined in NF2 disease. Spinal tumors occur in about half of NF2 patients. Surgery should be discussed when radiological tumor progression is demonstrated, even if spinal tumors are asymptomatic, in order to preserve neurological function and good quality of life. As regards lower cranial nerve schwannomas, radiosurgery appears to be a more appropriate treatment for growing tumor with a small volume in order to avoid post-operative complications, especially swallowing disorders. Facial nerve schwannomas may appear, on MRI, like vestibular schwannomas. The diagnosis should be suspected when the facial palsy is an early symptom during cerebello-pontine tumor progression. Trigeminal schwannomas are frequent in NF2 disease and fortunately they are often asymptomatic. Among major neurofibromatosis types, peripheral nerve sheath schwannomas are only present in patients with NF2 disease and schwannomatosis. Surgical resection is required when the cutaneous schwannomas is painful or when tumor progression is observed and causes symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Tumors other than vestibular schwannoma are also associated with a poor prognosis in NF2 patients. Surgery remains the main treatment in most cases. Each treatment decision in NF2 disease requires a complete evaluation of all cranial and spinal locations of the disease in order to establish surgical priorities and strategies.

Surgical findings to differentiate between facial nerve schwannoma and vestibular schwannoma

Objectives

Facial nerve schwannomas may be misdiagnosed as vestibular schwannomas (VSs) if the tumor is confined to the internal auditory canal (IAC) without involvement the geniculated ganglion or labyrinthine segment of facial nerve. Because facial nerve schwannomas may be misdiagnosed as VSs, we investigated the differences between the two.

Methods

The study included 187 patients with a preoperative diagnosis of VS. Of these, six were diagnosed with facial nerve schwannomas during surgery. We reviewed the preoperative evaluations and surgical findings of facial nerve schwannomas mimicking VSs.

Results

No useful preoperative predictors are available for facial nerve schwannomas mimicking VSs. Facial nerve schwannomas are usually confined to the IAC. After opening the dura of the IAC, a facial nerve schwannoma can be diagnosed after identifying a normal-appearing nerve located lateral to the tumor. When this was the case, we performed facial nerve preservation surgery or decompression.

Conclusion

Facial nerve schwannomas can be differentiated from VSs by identifying specific findings during surgery.

Identification of the nervus intermedius using 3T MR imaging

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Improved MR imaging at higher field strengths enables more detailed imaging of cranial nerves. The aim of this study was to assess the identifiability of the NI in the CPA and IAC by using high-resolution 3T MR imaging.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-seven healthy volunteers (13 men and 14 women; mean age, 33 years) underwent 3T MR imaging of the CPA. The section thicknesses of the CISS sequence was 0.4 mm (TR, 12.18 ms; TE, 6.09 ms) using a 12-channel head coil. Evaluation was performed by using MPR mode. Image quality and identifiability of the NI were rated independently by 2 observers according to predefined criteria on an ordinal scale. Interobserver agreement was assessed by κ statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-four NIs were evaluated. Both observers were able to identify the NI in nearly 60% of cases. It was possible to indentify at least 1 NI in 70% of all volunteers in the CPA and/or IAC. Image quality ratings showed a substantial agreement (κ = 0.65) and identifiability ratings an almost perfect (κ = 0.83) agreement.

CONCLUSIONS

Careful evaluation of all nervous and vascular structures in the CPA and IAC at high-resolution 3T MR imaging allows reliable depiction of the NI.

Useful surgical techniques for facial nerve preservation in tumorous intra-temporal lesions

The management of the facial nerve in tumorous temporal lesions is particularly challenging due to its complex anatomic location and potential postoperative complications, including permanent facial paralysis. The most important concern regarding surgical treatment of a tumorous temporal lesion is the inevitable facial paralysis caused by nerve injury during the tumor removal, especially in patients with minimal to no preoperative facial nerve dysfunction. We describe successful four cases in which various surgical techniques were developed for the preservation of the facial nerve in treatment of intratemporal tumorous lesions.

Management of Facial Nerve Schwannoma in Patients With Favorable Facial Function

OBJECTIVE

We report six cases of facial nerve schwannomas in which surgical management allowed the preservation of facial nerve function. Specifically, this paper reports that a stripping surgery may provide favorable functional outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of preoperative and postoperative data for six patients with facial nerve schwannoma that had normal facial nerve function or a House-Brackmann grade II facial palsy before the surgery.

METHODS

Stripping surgery, which removed the schwannoma from the remaining nerve fascicle, was attempted on the six patients. Postoperative facial nerve function and imaging (magnetic resonance imaging) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Stripping surgery with gross total tumor removal of the mass was performed in four cases. In the two remaining cases, the stripping surgery was not possible, and decompression alone was performed. Favorable preservation of facial function was achieved in all six cases.

CONCLUSION

It was possible to preserve facial function after surgery to remove facial nerve schwannoma. We suggest that stripping surgery, focused on the preservation of continuity of the facial nerve, may be attempted for facial nerve schwannoma in which favorable facial function has been preserved.