Effect of age at cochlear implantation on auditory and speech development of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: an updated systematic review

BACKGROUND

The goal of managing auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) is to restore the children's ability to discriminate auditory information. Children who are not making sufficient progress in speech comprehension, and speech and language development after receiving adequate auditory re/habilitation and/or acoustic amplification may be candidates for cochlear implantation (CI). Despite the growing number of published literature on CI outcomes in children with ANSD, the current evidence is primarily based on case reports or retrospective chart reviews some of which had a limited number of children. In addition, the outcomes of CI seem to vary between children with ANSD. Thus, compelling evidence is lacking. This updated systematic review evaluated the speech perception, language, and speech intelligibility outcomes of children with ANSD post-CI.

METHODS

An online bibliographic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and CENTRAL databases. We included both interventional and observational studies that assessed the outcomes of the CI in  children with ANSD.

RESULTS

Thirty-three studies were included in this systematic review. Several tests were used to assess speech perception following CI in children with ANSD. The findings of this study revealed that  children with ANSD had mean Categories of Auditory Performance scores ranging from 4.3 to 7 post-operatively, this result was better than the pre-operative scores which ranged between 0.4 to 2.5. Likewise, the Infant-Toddler Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale, Phonetically Balanced Kindergarten, and multisyllabic lexical neighborhood test showed clinically relevant improvement after CI. The same findings were reported for language and speech intelligibility scores. One study investigated the quality of life/children satisfaction after CI and showed overall good satisfaction with the outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

The present systematic review suggests that CI is a feasible and effective hearing  rehabilitation modality for children with ANSD.

REGISTRATION AND PROTOCOL

PROSPERO ID: CRD42021279140.

Indicators for cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A systematic review

PURPOSE

ANSD refers to a group of auditory diseases demonstrating intact outer hair cells and desynchronized neural firings of the auditory nerve. A cochlear implant is a promising intervention strategy for severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL). However, due to its variable outcomes in children with ANSD, a consensus has yet to be reached on its performance. This study aimed to review the literature to determine the efficacy of cochlear implants in children with ANSD and to determine prognostic indicators. The study identifies the pre-operative and post-operative predictors of success for CI in children with ANSD.

METHOD

The review was carried out using PRISMA guidelines. This resulted in 9630 topic-related articles. Among these, 17 articles met the inclusion and exclusion criteria that were included for the study. The quality and potential risks associated with each article were evaluated using the quality impact assessment protocol (QUIPS) tool.

RESULTS

A review of 17 articles was conducted to highlight these predictors. Most selected studies included case reports, case series, cohorts, and comparisons between children with ANSD and SNHL. Assessment of study quality reported an overall low risk of bias. The overall result showed cochlear implant would be an effective option for children with ANSD. However, there are specific prognostic indicators about which clinician needs to be aware before recommending CI for children with ANSD. Our review study identified a set of pre-operative and post-operative indicators that predicted speech and auditory performance and gave some insight into the lesion site in ANSD individuals.

CONCLUSION

This review concludes CI is an effective option for children with ANSD. However, before recommending CI, a detailed assessment is required from different perspectives, which could serve as predictors of postoperative outcomes. This review highlights the need to include more precise tools, such as genetic testing to describe the lesion site to choose the most appropriate management strategy for children with ANSD. Knowledge about the prognostic indicators and the effective assessment protocols would help clinicians for the better candidacy selection.

An Umbrella Review of Cochlear Implant Outcomes in Children With Auditory Neuropathy

PURPOSE

The objective of this overview of systematic reviews (SRs; umbrella review) was to systematically summarize and critically appraise current evidence of cochlear implant (CI) outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD).

METHOD

This study was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 statement. The methodological quality and the risk of bias in the included SRs were assessed using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews 2 checklist and the Risk of Bias in Systematic Reviews tool, respectively.

RESULTS

According to eight included SRs, children with ANSD achieve CI outcomes (speech perception performance) similar to their peers with sensorineural hearing loss. In children with postsynaptic ANSD (cochlear nerve deficiency), cochlear nerve hypoplasia is associated with better speech recognition outcomes compared with cochlear nerve aplasia, especially in the absence of additional disabilities. Except for one study, the overall quality of the included SRs was critically low, and except for three studies, evidence of a high risk of bias was identified in other included SRs.

CONCLUSIONS

Current evidence supports CI benefits for children with ANSD. To improve the quality of evidence, well-designed, prospective studies with appropriate sample sizes, using valid outcome measures, clarifying matching criteria, and taking into account the role of confounding factors are essential.

Systematic Literature Review and Early Benefit of Cochlear Implantation in Two Pediatric Auditory Neuropathy Cases

Approximately 1 in 10 children with hearing loss is affected by auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). People who have ANSD usually have great difficulty understanding speech or communicating. However, it is possible for these patients to have audiograms that may indicate profound hearing loss up to normal hearing. This disorder is prognosed with positive, intact or present otoacoustic emissions (OAE) and/or cochlear microphonics (CM) as well as abnormal or absent auditory brainstem responses (ABR). Treatment methods include conventional hearing aids as well as cochlear implants. Cochlear implants (CI) usually promise better speech understanding for ANSD patients. We performed a systematic literature review aiming to show what improvements can effectively be achieved with cochlear implants in children with ANSD and compare this with our experience with two cases of ANSD implanted at our clinic. The retrospective review of two young CI patients diagnosed with ANSD during infancy demonstrated improvements over time in speech development communicated by their parents.

Precision Medicine Approach to Cochlear Implantation

In the early days of cochlear implantation (CI) surgery, when the types of electrodes were limited and the etiology of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) was not well understood, the one-size-fits-all approach to CI held true, as in all other fields. However, in the era of personalized medicine, there have been attempts to associate CI performance with the etiology of SNHL and to establish customized surgical techniques that can maximize performance according to individual cochlear dimensions. Personalized genomic-driven assessments of CI candidates and a better understanding of genotype-phenotype correlations could provide clinically applicable diagnostic and prognostic information about questions such as who, how, and when to implant. Rigorous and strategic imaging assessments also provide better insights into the anatomic etiology of SNHL and cochlear dimensions, leading to individualized surgical techniques to augment CI outcomes. Furthermore, the precision medicine approach to CI is not necessarily limited to preoperative planning, but can be extended to either intraoperative electrode positioning or even the timing of the initial switch-on. In this review, we discuss the implications of personalized diagnoses (both genetic and nongenetic) on the planning and performance of CI in patients with prelingual and postlingual SNHL.

Cochlear Implant Behavioral Outcomes for Children With Auditory Neuropathy Spectrum Disorder: A Mini-Systematic Review

Objective The aim of this mini-systematic review was to evaluate the evidence reporting speech, language, and auditory behavioral outcome measures for children with a diagnosis of auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) who received cochlear implants (CIs) prior to 3 years of age. Method A mini-systematic review of the literature supporting evidence-based practices was performed. Two databases were searched utilizing a search strategy derived from the PICO (patient, intervention, comparison, outcome) framework. Peer-reviewed articles published between 2009 and 2019 evaluating children with a diagnosis of ANSD who were implanted prior to 3 years of age with a range of speech, language, and auditory behavioral outcomes were included. Four articles meeting inclusion criteria were critically appraised for reputable research design and risks of bias. Each of the four studies was assigned a level of evidence for effectiveness and quality assessment rating. Results Evidence supports cochlear implantation as an appropriate intervention for children with ANSD. Improvements in outcome performance were observed in all the included studies. Children with ANSD fit with CIs can achieve outcomes similar to children with sensorineural hearing loss and CIs, despite the heterogeneity of ANSD. Conclusion These findings have implications for clinical practice and for future research with current CI technology for facilitating parent education, counseling, and realistic expectations for children with ANSD and CIs.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Patients With OTOF Mutations

Auditory neuropathy is a special type of hearing loss caused by dysfunction of the synapse of the inner hair cells, the auditory nerve, and/or the auditory nerve itself. For patients with auditory neuropathy who have severe to profound hearing loss or failed auditory skills development with hearing-aids, cochlear implantation (CI) serves as the only possible effective treatment. It is accepted that the exact sites of lesion causing auditory neuropathy determine the CI performance. Mutations in the OTOF gene were the first identified and the most common cause of congenital auditory neuropathy. The site of lesion in patients with auditory neuropathy caused by biallelic OTOF mutations (OTOF-related auditory neuropathy) is presumed to be presynaptic, leaving auditory nerve function intact. Thus, OTOF-related auditory neuropathy is expected to have good CI performances. In this review, we describe the CI outcomes in patients with OTOF mutations. We will focus on whether biallelic OTOF mutations are ideal indications for CI in patients with auditory neuropathy. Also, the factors that may still influence the CI outcomes in patients with OTOF mutations are discussed.

Long-term treatment outcomes in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD)

INTRODUCTION

The present article shows long-term results in the hearing and speech development of children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Some children were followed up for nearly 20 years, monitoring their progress through childhood into adulthood.

METHODS

This retrospective study examined data from 10 children who were diagnosed and treated at our tertiary referral center. All children were provided with hearing aids and/or cochlear implants. The children's hearing and speech development and their social and educational development were evaluated.

RESULTS

Seven children were provided with cochlear implants on both sides; three children, one of which had single-sided deafness, received hearing aids. All children with cochlear implants on both sides used their devices full-time. Speech perception ranged between 100% and 0% on one side. Five children attended a school for the hearing impaired; four children attended a regular school. Four children attended vocational training.

CONCLUSIONS

At present, there is a lack of literature on the long-term outcomes of treatment in children with ANSD. The data presented show that the hearing and speech development in children with ANSD are significantly heterogeneous. Regular school education and social integration of children with ANSD can be achieved with intensive and supportive rehabilitative methods.

The Clinical Journey of Patients with Riboflavin Transporter Deficiency Type 2

PURPOSE

To identify symptoms and health care interactions with patients with riboflavin transporter deficiency (RTD) type 2 prior to diagnosis.

METHODS

Parents of children with riboflavin transporter deficiency type 2 (n = 10) were interviewed to collect data on the patient's clinical journey.

RESULTS

The average diagnostic delay was 27.6 months. Neurologists were the most commonly visited clinician (90%). Common symptoms during the first year of the patient's clinical journey included abnormal gait and/or ataxia (70%), nystagmus (50%), and upper body muscle weakness (40%). Prior to diagnosis, optic atrophy, sleep apnea, breath-holding spells, and dysphagia were commonly observed. Hearing loss was only reported in 40% of subjects prior to diagnosis. Riboflavin responsive megaloblastic anemia is reported for the first time. Mitochondrial disease was the most common suspected diagnosis (30%).

CONCLUSION

Despite clinical variability, common early symptoms of riboflavin transporter deficiency type 2 exist that can better allow clinicians to more rapidly identify riboflavin transporter deficiency type 2.

Evaluation and therapy outcome in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD)

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the present study are to: describe diagnostic findings in patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD); and demonstrate the outcomes of different therapies like hearing aids (HAs) or cochlear implantation.

METHODS

32 children were diagnosed and treated at our tertiary referral center and provided with HAs or cochlear implants (CIs). All of them underwent free-field or pure-tone audiometry. Additionally, otoacoustic emissions (OAEs), impedance measurements, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs), auditory steady-state responses (ASSR), electrocochleography, and cranial magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) were all performed. Some patients also underwent genetic evaluation. Following suitable provision pediatric audiological tests, psychological developmental diagnostic and speech and language assessments were carried out at regular intervals in all the children.

RESULTS

OAEs could initially be recorded in most of the children; 17 had no ABRs. The other eight children had a poor ABR morphology. Most of the children had typical, long-oscillating cochlear microphonics (CMs) in their ABRs, which was also observed in all of those who underwent electrocochleography. Eight children were provided with a HA and 17 received a CI. The functional gain was between 32 and 65 decibel (dB) with HAs and between 32 and 50 dB with CI. A speech discrimination level between 35 and 100% was achieved during open-set monosyllabic word tests in quiet with HA or CI. With the Hochmair-Schulz-Moser (HSM) sentence test at 65 dB SPL (sound pressure level), 75% of the children with a CI achieved a speech discrimination in noise score of at least 60% at a signal to noise ratio (SNR) of 5, and four scored 80% or higher. Most of the children (72%) were full-time users of their devices. All the children with a CI used it on a regular basis.

CONCLUSION

Only a few case reports are available in the literature regarding the long-term outcomes of ANSD therapy. The present study reveals satisfactory outcomes with respect to hearing and speech discrimination in children with CIs or HAs. The nearly permanent use of the devices reflects a subjective benefit for the children. Provision with a suitable hearing device depends on audiological results, the speech and language development of an individual child, and any accompanying disorders. Repeated audiological evaluations, interdisciplinary diagnostics, and intensive hearing and speech therapy are essential for adequate rehabilitation of this group of children.

Functional Outcomes in Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion Technique: Difference or No Difference?

With the introduction and rapid development of Cochlear Implants since the 1970s, there has been marked improvement in the speech recognition and spoken language skills of the implanted profoundly deaf children. The cochlear implant can be done by means of different techniques, traditionally by Cochleostomy method and round window membrane (RWM) insertion technique. Post operatively, the functional outcomes are measured by many scores more commonly by Categories of Auditory Performance (CAP) and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) scores. To study the speech and hearing perception skills in pediatric cases of Congenital non syndromic bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss after Cochleostomy and Round Window Insertion technique of Cochlear Implantation. 31 patients clinically diagnosed as congenital non syndromic bilateral profound sensorineural hearing loss who had undergone Cochlear implantation either by Cochleostomy or by RWM insertion technique and fulfilling the eligibility criteria were enrolled for study. Post operatively functional outcomes were assessed subjectively by measuring CAP and SIR scores. All the patients showed increase in their CAP and SIR scores post-operatively, measured at 03 months, 06 months and 01 year after Cochlear Implantation. The mean CAP and SIR scores in the two groups were comparable at 03 months, 06 months and 1 year after surgery. There was no significant difference in the speech and hearing perception skills of post implantees in the two groups (p value < 0.05). There is no difference in functional outcomes of Cochlear implantation by Cochleostomy and round window membrane insertion technique.

Outcome of Cochlear Implantation in Prelingually Deafened Children According to Molecular Genetic Etiology

OBJECTIVES

About 60% of Korean pediatric cochlear implantees could be genetically diagnosed (GD) and we previously reported that a substantial portion of undiagnosed cases by deafness gene panel sequencing were predicted to have a nongenetic or complex etiology. We aimed to compare the outcomes of cochlear implantation (CI) in GD and genetically undiagnosed (GUD) patients and attempted to determine CI outcomes according to etiology.

DESIGN

Ninety-three pediatric cochlear implantees underwent molecular genetic testing. Fifty-seven patients carried pathogenic variants and 36 patients remained GUD after panel sequencing of 204 known or potential deafness genes (TRS-204). Among them, 55 cochlear implantees with reliable speech evaluation results with a follow-up of longer than 24 months were recruited. Longitudinal changes in the audiologic performance were compared between the GD (n = 31) and GUD (n = 24) groups. The GD group was subdivided into cochlear implantee with SLC26A4 mutations (group 1) and cochlear implantee with other genetic etiology (group 2), and the GUD group was subdivided into groups 3 and 4, that is, patients with or without inner ear anomaly, respectively.

RESULTS

Group 1 related to SLC26A4 mutations had the highest categories of auditory perception scores among all groups pre- and postoperatively. Group 4 with inner ear anomaly had the lowest categories of auditory perception scores. At 24 months post-CI, the group 2 with another genetic etiology had significantly better outcomes than molecularly undiagnosed group 3, which had with the same condition as group 2 except that the candidate gene was not detected. This finding was recapitulated when we limited cases to those that underwent CI before 24 months of age to minimize age-related bias at implantation. Furthermore, on extending the follow-up to 36 months postoperatively, this tendency became more prominent. Additionally, our preliminary clinical data suggest a narrower sensitive window period for good CI outcomes for implantees with OTOF mutation rather than the GJB2 and other genes.

CONCLUSIONS

Current molecular genetic testing including deafness panel sequencing helps to predict the 2-year follow-up outcomes after CI in prelingually deafened children. GD cochlear implantees show better functional outcomes after CI than undiagnosed cochlear implantees as determined by deafness panel sequencing, suggesting a genotype-functional outcome correlation. The genetic testing may provide a customized optimal window period in terms of CI timing for favorable outcome according to genetic etiology.

Cochlear implantation in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder: A multicenter study on auditory performance and speech production outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the auditory performance and speech production outcome in children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). The effect of age on the outcomes of the surgery at the time of implantation was also evaluated.

METHODS

Cochlear implantation was performed in 136 children with bilateral severe-to- profound hearing loss due to ANSD, at four tertiary academic centers. The patients were divided into two groups based on the age at the time of implantation; Group I: Children ≤24 months, and Group II: subjects >24 months. The categories of auditory performance (CAP) and speech intelligibility rating (SIR) scores were evaluated after the first and second years of implantation. The differences between the CAP and SIR scores in the two groups were assessed.

RESULTS

The median CAP scores improved significantly after the cochlear implantation in all the patients (p value < 0.001). The improvement in the CAP scores during the first year in Group II was greater than Group I (p value: 0.007), but the improvement in CAP scores tended to be significantly higher in patients who were implanted at ≤24 months (p value < 0.001). There was no significant difference between two groups in SIR scores at first-year and second-year follow-ups. The evaluation of the SIR improvement revealed significantly higher values for Group I during the second-year follow-up (p value: 0.003).

CONCLUSION

The auditory performance and speech production skills of the children with ANSD improved significantly after cochlear implantation, and this improvement was affected by age at the time of implantation.

Auditory neuropathy in Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome due to riboflavin transporter RFVT2 deficiency

AIM

Mutations in the genes encoding the riboflavin transporters RFVT2 and RFVT3 have been identified in Brown-Vialetto-Van Laere syndrome, a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by hearing loss and pontobulbar palsy. Treatment with riboflavin has been shown to benefit individuals with the phenotype of RFVT2 deficiency. Understanding the characteristics of hearing loss in riboflavin transporter deficiency would enable early diagnosis and therapy.

METHOD

We performed hearing assessments in seven children (from four families) with RFVT2 deficiency and reviewed results from previous assessments. Assessments were repeated after 12 months and 24 months of riboflavin therapy and after cochlear implantation in one individual.

RESULTS

Hearing loss in these individuals was due to auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD). Hearing loss was identified between 3 years and 8 years of age and progressed rapidly. Hearing aids were not beneficial. Riboflavin therapy resulted in improvement of hearing thresholds during the first year of treatment in those with recent-onset hearing loss. Cochlear implantation resulted in a significant improvement in speech perception in one individual.

INTERPRETATION

Riboflavin transporter deficiency should be considered in all children presenting with an auditory neuropathy. Speech perception in children with ANSD due to RFVT2 deficiency may be significantly improved by cochlear implantation.

Current trends in outcome studies for children with hearing loss and the need to establish a comprehensive framework of measuring outcomes in children with hearing loss in China

Since the 1970s, outcome studies for children with hearing loss expanded from focusing on assessing auditory awareness and speech perception skills to evaluating language and speech development. Since the early 2000s, the multi-center large scale research systematically studied outcomes in the areas of auditory awareness, speech-perception, language development, speech development, educational achievements, cognitive development, and psychosocial development. These studies advocated the establishment of baseline and regular follow-up evaluations with a comprehensive framework centered on language development. Recent research interests also include understanding the vast differences in outcomes for children with hearing loss, understanding the relationships between neurocognitive development and language acquisition in children with hearing loss, and using outcome studies to guide evidence-based clinical practice. After the establishment of standardized Mandarin language assessments, outcomes research in Mainland China has the potential to expand beyond auditory awareness and speech perception studies.