1
|
Li B, Liu Y, Sun S. Pump proton inhibitors display anti-tumour potential in glioma. Cell Prolif 2022:e13321. [PMID: 35961680 DOI: 10.1111/cpr.13321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2022] [Revised: 06/28/2022] [Accepted: 07/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Glioma is one of the most aggressive brain tumours with poor overall survival despite advanced technology in surgical resection, chemotherapy and radiation. Progression and recurrence are the hinge causes of low survival. Our aim is to explain the concrete mechanism in the proliferation and progression of tumours based on tumour microenvironment (TME). The main purpose is to illustrate the mechanism of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in affecting acidity, hypoxia, oxidative stress, inflammatory response and autophagy based on the TME to induce apoptosis and enhance the sensitivity of chemoradiotherapy. FINDINGS TME is the main medium for tumour growth and progression. Acidity, hypoxia, inflammatory response, autophagy, angiogenesis and so on are the main causes of tumour progress. PPIs, as a common clinical drug to inhibit gastric acid secretion, have the advantages of fast onset, long action time and small adverse reactions. Nowadays, several kinds of literature highlight the potential of PPIs in inhibiting tumour progression. However, long-term use of PPIs alone also has obvious side effects. Therefore, till now, how to apply PPIs to promote the effect of radio-chemotherapy and find the concrete dose and concentration of combined use are novel challenges. CONCLUSIONS PPIs display the potential in enhancing the sensitivity of chemoradiotherapy to defend against glioma based on TME. In the clinic, it is also necessary to explore specific concentrations and dosages in synthetic applications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bihan Li
- Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Department of Toxicology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| | - Shilong Sun
- NHC Key Laboratory of Radiobiology, School of Public Health, Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin 130021, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Magné N, Bouleftour W, Daguenet E, Natier E, Maison M, Tinquaut F, Suchaud JP, Rancoule C, Guy JB. Assessing toxicities of curative radiotherapy combined with concomitant non anti-cancer drugs: A sub-analysis of the prospective epidemiological RIT trial. Radiother Oncol 2022; 168:23-27. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
3
|
Jacob JS, Dutra BE, Garcia-Rodriguez V, Panneerselvam K, Abraham FO, Zou F, Ma W, Grivas P, Thompson JA, Altan M, Oliva ICG, Zhang HC, Thomas AS, Wang Y. Clinical Characteristics and Outcomes of Oral Mucositis Associated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Cancer. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1415-1424. [PMID: 34348238 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7697] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2020] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy predisposes patients to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Data are limited regarding the incidence, management, and outcomes of one such irAE: mucositis. In this study, we evaluated the clinical characteristics, disease course, treatment, and outcomes of ICI-mediated mucositis. METHODS This was a retrospective, single-center study of patients who received ICI therapy and developed oral mucositis at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center from January 2009 to September 2019. Inclusion criteria included age ≥18 years, a diagnosis of oral mucositis and/or stomatitis based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, and therapy using CTLA-4 or PD-1/L1 inhibitors alone or combined with other agents. RESULTS We identified 152 patients with a mean age of 60 years, 51% of whom were men. Of the sample patients, 73% had stage IV cancer, with melanoma the most common (28%). Median time from ICI initiation to mucositis was 91 days. The most common clinical presentation of mucositis was odynophagia and/or oral pain (89%), 91% developed CTCAE grade 1-2 mucositis, and 78% received anti-PD-1/L1 monotherapy. Compared with anti-PD-1/L1-based therapy, anti-CTLA-4-based therapy was more frequently associated with earlier onset of mucositis (73 vs 96 days; P=.077) and a lower rate of symptom resolution (76% vs 92%; P=.029); 24% of patients required immunosuppressive therapy, which was associated with longer symptom duration (84 vs 34 days; P=.002) and higher mucositis recurrence rate (61% vs 32%; P=.006). ICI interruption was associated with worse survival (P=.037). Mucositis recurrence, immunosuppressant use, and presence of other irAEs did not affect survival. CONCLUSIONS For ICI-mediated mucositis, a diagnosis of exclusion has not been well recognized and is understudied. Although the clinical symptoms of mucositis are mostly mild, approximately 25% of patients require immunosuppression. Mucositis recurrence can occur in approximately 39% patients. Our results showed that ICI interruption compromises overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake S Jacob
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Barbara E Dutra
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Victor Garcia-Rodriguez
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Kavea Panneerselvam
- 1Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Fiyinfoluwa O Abraham
- 2Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas
| | - Fangwen Zou
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,4Department of Oncology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Weijie Ma
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,5Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Petros Grivas
- 6Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - John A Thompson
- 6Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, Washington; and
| | - Mehmet Altan
- 7Department of Thoracic/Head & Neck Medical Oncology, and
| | - Isabella C Glitza Oliva
- 8Department of Melanoma Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Hao Chi Zhang
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Anusha S Thomas
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Yinghong Wang
- 3Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vallard A, Rancoule C, Espenel S, Garcia MA, Langrand-Escure J, He MY, Ben Mrad M, El Meddeb Hamrouni A, Ouni S, Trone JC, Rehailia-Blanchard A, Guillaume E, Vial N, Riocreux C, Guy JB, Magné N. Harnessing drug/radiation interaction through daily routine practice: Leverage medical and methodological point of view (MORSE 02-17 study). Radiother Oncol 2018; 129:471-478. [PMID: 29937210 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Revised: 06/02/2018] [Accepted: 06/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Safety profile of the interaction between anticancer drugs and radiation is a recurrent question. However, there are little data regarding the non-anticancer treatment (NACT)/radiation combinations. The aim of the present study was to investigate concomitant NACTs in patients undergoing radiotherapy in a French comprehensive cancer center. METHODS A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted. All cancer patients undergoing a palliative or curative radiotherapy were consecutively screened for six weeks in 2016. Data on NACTs were collected. RESULTS Out of 214 included patients, a NACT was concomitantly prescribed to 155 patients (72%), with a median number of 5 NACTs per patient (range: 1-12). The most prescribed drugs were anti-hypertensive drugs (101 patients, 47.2%), psychotropic drugs (n = 74, 34.6%), analgesics (n = 78, 36.4%), hypolipidemic drugs (n = 57, 26.6%), proton pump inhibitors (n = 46, 21.5%) and antiplatelet drugs (n = 38, 17.8%). Although 833 different molecules were reported, only 20 possible modifiers of cancer biological pathways (prescribed to 74 patients (34.5%)) were identified. Eight out of the 833 molecules (0.9%), belonging to six drug families, have been investigated in 28 ongoing or published clinical trials in combo with radiotherapy. They were prescribed to 63 patients (29.4%). CONCLUSION Drug-radiation interaction remains a subject of major interest, not only for conventional anticancer drugs, but also for NACTs. New trial designs are thus required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Vallard
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France; Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - C Rancoule
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France; Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - S Espenel
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France; Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - M-A Garcia
- General Health Department, Hygée Institute, Avenue Albert Raimond, BP 60008, 42271 Saint-Priest en Jarez, France
| | - J Langrand-Escure
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - M Y He
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - M Ben Mrad
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - A El Meddeb Hamrouni
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - S Ouni
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - J-C Trone
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - A Rehailia-Blanchard
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - E Guillaume
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - N Vial
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - C Riocreux
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France
| | - J-B Guy
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France; Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622 Villeurbanne, France
| | - N Magné
- Radiotherapy Department, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, 42270 St Priest en Jarez, France; Cellular and Molecular Radiobiology Laboratory, CNRS UMR 5822, IPNL, 69622 Villeurbanne, France.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Scarpignato C, Gatta L, Zullo A, Blandizzi C. Effective and safe proton pump inhibitor therapy in acid-related diseases - A position paper addressing benefits and potential harms of acid suppression. BMC Med 2016; 14:179. [PMID: 27825371 PMCID: PMC5101793 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-016-0718-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 245] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2016] [Accepted: 10/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) into clinical practice has revolutionized the management of acid-related diseases. Studies in primary care and emergency settings suggest that PPIs are frequently prescribed for inappropriate indications or for indications where their use offers little benefit. Inappropriate PPI use is a matter of great concern, especially in the elderly, who are often affected by multiple comorbidities and are taking multiple medications, and are thus at an increased risk of long-term PPI-related adverse outcomes as well as drug-to-drug interactions. Herein, we aim to review the current literature on PPI use and develop a position paper addressing the benefits and potential harms of acid suppression with the purpose of providing evidence-based guidelines on the appropriate use of these medications. METHODS The topics, identified by a Scientific Committee, were assigned to experts selected by three Italian Scientific Societies, who independently performed a systematic search of the relevant literature using Medline/PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane databases. Search outputs were distilled, paying more attention to systematic reviews and meta-analyses (where available) representing the best evidence. The draft prepared on each topic was circulated amongst all the members of the Scientific Committee. Each expert then provided her/his input to the writing, suggesting changes and the inclusion of new material and/or additional relevant references. The global recommendations were then thoroughly discussed in a specific meeting, refined with regard to both content and wording, and approved to obtain a summary of current evidence. RESULTS Twenty-five years after their introduction into clinical practice, PPIs remain the mainstay of the treatment of acid-related diseases, where their use in gastroesophageal reflux disease, eosinophilic esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori infection, peptic ulcer disease and bleeding as well as, and Zollinger-Ellison syndrome is appropriate. Prevention of gastroduodenal mucosal lesions (and symptoms) in patients taking non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) or antiplatelet therapies and carrying gastrointestinal risk factors also represents an appropriate indication. On the contrary, steroid use does not need any gastroprotection, unless combined with NSAID therapy. In dyspeptic patients with persisting symptoms, despite successful H. pylori eradication, short-term PPI treatment could be attempted. Finally, addition of PPIs to pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy in patients with refractory steatorrhea may be worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS Overall, PPIs are irreplaceable drugs in the management of acid-related diseases. However, PPI treatment, as any kind of drug therapy, is not without risk of adverse effects. The overall benefits of therapy and improvement in quality of life significantly outweigh potential harms in most patients, but those without clear clinical indication are only exposed to the risks of PPI prescription. Adhering with evidence-based guidelines represents the only rational approach to effective and safe PPI therapy. Please see related Commentary: doi: 10.1186/s12916-016-0724-1 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmelo Scarpignato
- Clinical Pharmacology & Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Maggiore University Hospital, Cattani Pavillon, I-43125, Parma, Italy.
| | - Luigi Gatta
- Clinical Pharmacology & Digestive Pathophysiology Unit, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Parma, Maggiore University Hospital, Cattani Pavillon, I-43125, Parma, Italy
- Gastroenterology & Endoscopy Unit, Versilia Hospital, Azienda USL Toscana Nord Ovest, Lido di Camaiore, Italy
| | - Angelo Zullo
- Division of Gastroenterology & Digestive Endoscopy, Nuovo Regina Elena Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Corrado Blandizzi
- Division of Pharmacology, Department of Clinical & Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|