The role of endoscopic resection for selected patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma

Nasal Cavity and Paranasal Sinus Cancer: Diagnosis and Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to analyze the diagnosis and treatments of the sinonasal malignant tumors throw systematic reviewed literature. The systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA guidelines.

RECENT FINDINGS

Total 11,653 cases of five article were analyzed. The cohort of 3824 cases received appropriate treatment. The most frequent histotype of the group of sinonasal malignancies was squamous cell carcinoma. Squamous cell carcinoma was represented by 54%. The other histopathological subtypes were esthesioneuroblastoma with 9,9%, melanoma 9,8%, adenocarcinoma 7,5%, sarcoma 7,3%, adeno cystic carcinoma 7,1%, sinonasal undifferentiated carcinoma 3,9%, sinonasal neuroendocrine carcinoma 2,8% respectively. All 772 cases of total 3824 were treated only surgically. All 62 cases of total 3824 were treated without surgery, 20 cases with proton technique and SFUD, and 42 cases with proton technique and IMRT. The other 2990 cases of total 3824 were treated with multimodality treatment. The diagnosis and treatment of sinonasal cancers require a interdisciplinary approach and multimodality treatment.

Targeted next-generation sequencing of Japanese patients with sinonasal mucosal melanomas identifies frequent NRAS and CTNNB1 mutations

OBJECTIVE

Mucosal melanoma is a rare malignancy; however, the reported incidence rate of mucosal melanoma is higher in Asians than in Caucasians. Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an aggressive malignancy with a poor prognosis due to distant metastasis. Systemic therapy with BRAF inhibitor and MEK inhibitor is one of the standards of care for cutaneous melanoma patients with BRAF V600 mutations. However, no molecular targeted therapy for patients with mucosal melanoma has been established. Relatively few studies have described the genetic mutations associated with mucosal melanoma because of its low frequency. Furthermore, to the best of our knowledge, the genetic mutations among Japanese patients have not been reported. Therefore, in the current study, we evaluated the genetic and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with SNMM.

METHODS

A total of 18 tissue samples obtained from patients with SNMM were analyzed for genetic mutations based on targeted next-generation sequencing to investigate the driver of tumorigenesis and/or candidate genes for predicting clinical outcomes in SNMM. We also performed immunohistochemistry for patients identified with CTNNB1 mutations.

RESULTS

Eight of the 18 (44 %) patients had genetic mutations. The most frequent mutation was NRAS (6/18, 33 %), followed by CTNNB1 (2/18, 11 %) and BRAF (1/18, 5.6 %). One patient had both NRAS and CTNNB1 mutations. Clinical outcomes did not differ significantly between those with and without genetic mutations. NRAS mutations were associated with relatively higher T classification and worse survival rates, although the differences were not significant. The nuclear translocation of β-catenin was detected in both tumors with CTNNB1 mutations. The amino acid change in the BRAF mutation was K601R in exon 15. In the current study, no BRAF V600 mutations were detected.

CONCLUSION

Genetic mutations were not significantly associated with clinical outcomes. However, NRAS mutations may be a prognostic predictor and CTNNB1 mutation may be a treatment effector for immune check inhibitors. A larger prospective study is required to clarify the clinical importance of genetic mutations in patients with SNMM.

Long-Term Outcomes of Endoscopic Resection versus Open Surgery for Locally Advanced Sinonasal Malignancies in Combination with Radiotherapy

Objective  Our objective was to compare the long-term outcomes of endoscopic resection versus open surgery in combination with radiotherapy for locally advanced sinonasal malignancies (SNMs). Methods  Data for continuous patients with sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma who received surgery (endoscopic or open surgery) combined with radiotherapy in our center between January 1999 and December 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. A 1:1 matching with propensity scores was performed. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and local recurrence rate (LRR) were evaluated. Results  We identified 267 eligible patients, 90 of whom were included after matching: 45 patients in the endoscopy group and 45 in the open group. The median follow-up time was 87 months. In the endoscopic group, 84.4% of patients received intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), with a mean gross tumor volume (GTV) dose of 68.28 Gy; in the open surgery group, 64.4% of patients received IMRT, with a mean GTV dose of 64 Gy. The 5-year OS, PFS, and LRR were 69.9, 58.6, and 24.5% in the endoscopic group and 64.6, 54.4, and 31.8% in the open surgery group, respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that the surgical approach was not associated with lower OS, PFS, or LRR. The overall postoperative complications were 13% in the endoscopic group, while 21.7% in the open group. Conclusion  For patients with locally advanced SNMs, minimally invasive endoscopic resection, in combination with a higher radiation dose and new radiation techniques such as IMRT, yields survival outcomes similar to those of open surgery in combination with radiotherapy.

International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal neoplasms, whether benign and malignant, pose a significant challenge to clinicians and represent a model area for multidisciplinary collaboration in order to optimize patient care. The International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Sinonasal Tumors (ICSNT) aims to summarize the best available evidence and presents 48 thematic and histopathology-based topics spanning the field.

METHODS

In accordance with prior International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology documents, ICSNT assigned each topic as an Evidence-Based Review with Recommendations, Evidence-Based Review, and Literature Review based on the level of evidence. An international group of multidisciplinary author teams were assembled for the topic reviews using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses format, and completed sections underwent a thorough and iterative consensus-building process. The final document underwent rigorous synthesis and review prior to publication.

RESULTS

The ICSNT document consists of four major sections: general principles, benign neoplasms and lesions, malignant neoplasms, and quality of life and surveillance. It covers 48 conceptual and/or histopathology-based topics relevant to sinonasal neoplasms and masses. Topics with a high level of evidence provided specific recommendations, while other areas summarized the current state of evidence. A final section highlights research opportunities and future directions, contributing to advancing knowledge and community intervention.

CONCLUSION

As an embodiment of the multidisciplinary and collaborative model of care in sinonasal neoplasms and masses, ICSNT was designed as a comprehensive, international, and multidisciplinary collaborative endeavor. Its primary objective is to summarize the existing evidence in the field of sinonasal neoplasms and masses.

Treatment outcomes of the patient with sinonasal mucosal melanoma: the role of endoscopic resection and postoperative radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The standard of care for sinonasal mucosal melanoma is surgery and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT). Our treatment strategy comprises endoscopic resection and PORT. We performed combined endoscopic and open resection or applied an external approach alone when sufficient resection was difficult to achieve endoscopically. The objective of this study was to evaluate the validity of our treatment strategy.

METHODS

We assessed 30 patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma who underwent definitive therapy between January 2002 and April 2021, and conducted a retrospective analysis. The median follow-up period was 2.2 years. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for the calculation of survival rates, the cumulative incidence of distant metastasis, and local recurrence.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients underwent surgery. The other two patients were treated by definitive proton beam therapy. Twenty-one of 28 (75%) patients underwent resection by endoscopic approach alone. Postoperative radiotherapy was performed for all 28 patients who underwent surgery. Twenty-one patients (70%) experienced recurrence during the observation period. Overall, distant metastasis was observed in 19 patients. Twelve patients died during the observation period, with 10 of the 12 patients (83%) dying of distant metastasis. The overall survival rate at 2 and 5 years was 70% and 46%, respectively. The cumulative incidence rate of distant metastasis at 2 years was 63%, while the 2-year cumulative incidence rate of local recurrence was 6.7%.

CONCLUSION

The local disease was controlled by our treatment strategy. To improve treatment outcomes, control of the distant metastasis is needed.

The Selective Role of Open and Endoscopic Approaches for Sinonasal Malignant Tumours

Endoscopic endonasal surgery has been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of selected cases of sinonasal cancers. However, in cases of locally advanced neoplasms, as well as recurrences, the most appropriate approach is still debated. The present review aims to summarize the current state of knowledge on the utility of open approaches to resect sinonasal malignant tumours. Published comparative studies and meta-analyses suggest comparable oncological results with lower morbidity for the endoscopic approaches, but selection biases cannot be excluded. After a critical analysis of the available literature, it can be concluded that endoscopic surgery for selected lesions allows for oncologically safe resections with decreased morbidity. However, when endoscopic endonasal surgery is contraindicated and definitive chemoradiotherapy is not appropriate, craniofacial and transfacial approaches remain the best therapeutic option.

Prognostic Factors and Outcomes of De Novo Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To review overall survival (OS), recurrence patterns, and prognostic factors of de novo sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma (DN-SCC).

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, OVID Medline, and Cochrane databases from 2006 to December 23, 2020.

REVIEW METHODS

The study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles were required to report either recurrence patterns or survival outcomes of adults with DN-SCC. Case reports, books, reviews, meta-analyses, and database studies were all excluded.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies reported on survival or recurrence outcomes. The aggregate 5-year OS was 54.5% (range, 18%-75%) from 35 studies (n = 1903). Patients undergoing open surgery were more likely to receive radiation therapy and present at an advanced stage compared to those receiving endoscopic surgery (all P < .001). Advanced T stage, presence of cervical nodal metastases, maxillary sinus primary site, and negative human papillomavirus (HPV) status were all correlated with significantly worse 5-year OS. Direct meta-analysis of 8 studies demonstrated patients with surgery were more likely to be alive at 5 years compared to those who did not receive surgery (odds ratio, 2.26; 95% CI, 1.48-3.47; P < .001). Recurrence was reported in 628 of 1471 patients from 26 studies (42.7%) with an aggregate 5-year locoregional control rate of 67.1% (range, 50.4%-93.3%).

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that the 5-year OS rate for DN-SCC may approach 54.5% and recurrence rate approaches 42.7%. In addition, various tumor characteristics including advanced T stage, positive nodal status, maxillary sinus origin, and negative HPV status are all associated with decreased survival.

Sinonasal Squamous Cell Carcinoma, a Narrative Reappraisal of the Current Evidence

Simple Summary

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinomas are a group of diverse tumors affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. As a direct consequence of their rarity and heterogeneity, diagnosis is challenging, and treatment does not follow universally accepted protocols. Though surgery represents the mainstay of treatment, neoadjuvant and adjuvant therapies have pivotal roles in improving outcomes of patients treated with curative intent. Indications to endoscopic surgery have been expanding over the last three decades, but a considerable number of patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma still need open surgical procedures. Management of the neck in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is controversial. Curative-intended treatment of recurrent and/or metastatic tumors, alongside palliation of uncurable cases, represent poorly explored aspects of this disease.

Abstract

Sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma is a rare tumor affecting the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Several aspects of this disease, ranging from epidemiology to biology, pathology, diagnosis, staging, treatment, and post-treatment surveillance are controversial, and consensus on how to manage this sinonasal cancer is lacking. A narrative literature review was performed to summarize the current evidence and provide the reader with available data supporting the decision-making process in patients affected by sinonasal squamous cell carcinoma, alongside the authors’ personal opinion on the unsolved issues of this tumor. The review has highlighted several advances in molecular definition of epithelial cancers of the sinonasal tract. Surgery represents the pivot of treatment and is performed through an endoscopic transnasal approach whenever feasible. Open surgery is required for a large proportion of cases. Reconstruction of the defect follows principles of skull base and cranio-maxillo-facial reconstruction. Chemotherapy is given as neoadjuvant treatment or concomitantly to radiotherapy. Photon-based radiation therapy has a crucial role in the adjuvant setting. Particle therapy is providing promising results. Management of the neck should be planned based on the presence of clinically appreciable metastases, primary tumor extension, and need for recipient vessels. Biotherapy and immunotherapy are still underexplored therapeutical modalities.

Conditional and Overall Disease-Specific Survival in Patients With Paranasal Sinus and Nasal Cavity Cancer: Improved Outcomes in the Endoscopic Era

BACKGROUND

The management of paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignancies has evolved significantly with the development of advanced endoscopic techniques and improvements in adjuvant therapy. We sought to characterize both disease-specific survival (DSS) and 5-year conditional disease-specific survival (CDSS, the change in life expectancy with increasing survivorship) for sinus malignancies diagnosed before and after the year 2000.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with sinus and nasal cavity cancer between 1973-2015 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, End Results (SEER) registry. Kaplan-Meier analysis for DSS was stratified by year of diagnosis before and after 2000. Cox-proportional hazards models of DSS controlling for stage, age, and year of diagnosis were generated. CDSS was calculated using Cox-regression models stratified by stage.

RESULTS

We analyzed 10,535 patients. Diagnosis after the year 2000 was independently associated with improved DSS (HR:0.81, 95% CI: 0.75-0.87, P < .001) after controlling for age and stage. After stratifying by stage, diagnosis after year 2000 was associated with improved DSS for localized (HR:0.71, 0.59-0.86, P < .001) malignancies, regional (HR: 0.86, 0.78-0.94, P = .001) and distant malignancies (HR 0.74, 0.63-0.87, P < .001). CDSS improved with increasing survivorship for all stages of sinus and nasal cavity cancer, and those diagnosed after 2000 had improved CDSS compared to those diagnosed before 2000. Descriptively, the association of year of diagnosis with CDSS diminished with increasing survivorship for localized cancers, but was consistent for other stages.

CONCLUSION

For paranasal sinus and nasal cavity malignancies, year of diagnosis independently influences both DSS and CDSS. Improved survival is likely due to advances in both surgical and adjuvant treatments. To our knowledge, this study is the first to examine CDSS for these malignancies.