Distribution pattern and pathologic analysis of metastatic sentinel and non-sentinel lymph nodes in lymphatic basin dissection for clinical T2/T3 oral cancer with clinical N0 status

Prognostic role of lymph node micrometastasis in oral and oropharyngeal cancer: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

An estimated 20% of patients with oral and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OOSCC) have micrometastases (Mi) or isolated tumor cells (ITC) in the cervical lymph nodes that evade detection by standard histological evaluation of lymph node sections. Lymph node Mi and ITC could be one reason for regional recurrence after neck dissection. The aim of this study was to review the existing data regarding the impact of Mi on the survival of patients with OOSCC.

METHODS

PubMed and the Cochrane Library were searched for articles reporting the impact of Mi and ITC on patient survival. Two authors independently assessed the methodological quality of retrieved studies using the Downs and Black index. Data were also extracted on study type, number of included patients, mode of histological analysis, statistical analysis, and prognostic impact.

RESULTS

Sixteen articles with a total of 2064 patients were included in the review. Among the 16 included studies, eight revealed a statistically significant impact of Mi on at least one endpoint in the Kaplan-Meier and/or multivariate analysis. Three studies regarded Mi as Ma, while five studies found no impact of Mi on survival. Only one study demonstrated an impact of ITC on patient's prognosis in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

The majority of cases included in the review were patients with oral cancer. The findings provide low-certainty evidence that Mi negatively impacts survival. Data on ITC were scarcer, so no conclusions can be drawn about their effect on survival. The lower threshold to discriminate between Mi and ITC should be defined for OOSCC since the existing thresholds are based on data from different tumors. The histological, immunohistological, and anatomical characteristics of Mi and ITC in OOSCC as well as the effect of radiotherapy on Mi should be further investigated separately for oral and oropharyngeal carcinomas.

Indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy in node-negative oral cancers

BACKGROUND

We aimed to define the indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), the third option for cervical treatment in oral cancer with negative cervical lymph nodes.

METHODS

The greatest depth of invasion (DOI) and long diameter (LD) of the primary site were used as exposures. SLN metastasis was considered the outcome.

RESULTS

In three trials conducted between 2009 and 2016, 158 patients were eligible and reassigned to this study group. The scatterplot based on the respective values of DOI and LD would eventually be divided into three sections. In cases of sections T1, T2, and T3, the proportions of SLN metastasis positivity were 21.3%, 35.3%, and 51.2%, respectively. In certain cases of T1 with 2 mm < DOI ≤ 5 mm and 8 mm < LD ≤ 20 mm, the proportion of SLN metastasis positivity was 40.9%.

CONCLUSIONS

SLNB-navigated or assisted neck dissection can be added as an effective procedure for N0 neck control.

Sentinel node biopsy in node negative early oral cancers: Solution to the conundrum!

Ideal management of the node-negative neck in early oral cancers is a debated issue. Elective neck dissection (END) is recommended in these patients as it offers a survival benefit. However, about 50-70% of patients who do not harbor occult metastasis are overtreated with this approach. Surgery is associated with morbidity, predominantly shoulder dysfunction. Numerous attempts have been made to identify true node-negative patients through imaging and prediction models but none have high diagnostic accuracy to safely spare the neck dissection. The recent publications of 2 large randomized controlled trials comparing the outcomes of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) and END have spurred interest in SNB. Both the trials reported SNB to be an oncologically safe procedure and spared unnecessary neck dissections. The functional outcomes of the trials showed that SNB limits the morbidity compared to END, which albeit evens out at the end of one-year post-surgery. Despite its benefits, SNB has failed to gain widespread acceptability due to various limitations including the need for infrastructure, equipment costs, staff, and multidisciplinary collaboration of nuclear medicine, surgical, and pathology fraternity. The labor-intensive pathology protocol with serial step sectioning and immunohistochemistry poses a challenge to the feasibility at a high-volume center. This perspective discusses these limitations and propose plausible solutions to the conundrum. To make it widely applicable and feasible across the globe efforts should be directed to understand biology better, find novel solutions, and implement the lessons learned over decades from other sites.