[Long-term follow-up of the efficacy of methotrexate alone or in combination with low doses of oral corticosteroids in the treatment of alopecia areata totalis or universalis]

European expert consensus statement on the systemic treatment of alopecia areata

Alopecia areata is an autoimmune form of non-scarring hair loss. It is usually characterized by limited areas of hair loss. However, the disease may progress to complete scalp and body hair loss (alopecia totalis, alopecia universalis). In patients with alopecia areata hair loss significantly impacts the quality of life. Children and adolescents with alopecia areata often experience bullying, including physical aggression. The disease severity evaluation tools used in clinical practice are: the Severity of Alopecia Tool (SALT) score and the Alopecia Areata Scale (AAS). A SALT score equal to or greater than 20 constitutes a commonly accepted indication for systemic therapy in alopecia areata. When using the AAS, moderate to severe alopecia areata should be considered a medical indication for systemic treatment. Currently, the only two EMA-approved medications for alopecia areata are baricitinib (JAK 1/2 inhibitor) for adults and ritlecitinib (JAK 3/TEC inhibitor) for individuals aged 12 and older. Both are EMA-approved for patients with severe alopecia areata. Other systemic medications used off-label in alopecia areata include glucocorticosteroids, cyclosporine, methotrexate and azathioprine. Oral minoxidil is considered an adjuvant therapy with limited data confirming its possible efficacy. This consensus statement is to outline a systemic treatment algorithm for alopecia areata, indications for systemic treatment, available therapeutic options, their efficacy and safety, as well as the duration of the therapy.

Alopecia areata: review of epidemiology, pathophysiology, current treatments and nanoparticulate delivery system

Alopecia areata (AA) is a kind of alopecia that affects hair follicles and nails. It typically comes with round patches and is a type of nonscarring hair loss. Various therapies are accessible for the management and treatment of AA, including topical, systemic and injectable modalities. It is a very complex type of autoimmune disease and is identified as round patches of hair loss and may occur at any age. This review paper highlights the epidemiology, clinical features, pathogenesis and new treatment options for AA, with a specific emphasis on nanoparticulate drug-delivery systems. By exploring these innovative treatment approaches, researchers aim to enhance the effectiveness and targeted delivery of therapeutic agents, ultimately improving outcomes for individuals living with AA.

Efficacy of Methotrexate Alone vs Methotrexate Plus Low-Dose Prednisone in Patients With Alopecia Areata Totalis or Universalis: A 2-Step Double-Blind Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Poor therapeutic results have been reported in patients with alopecia areata totalis (AT) or universalis (AU), the most severe and disabling types of alopecia areata (AA). Methotrexate, an inexpensive treatment, might be effective in AU and AT.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of methotrexate alone or combined with low-dose prednisone in patients with chronic and recalcitrant AT and AU.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This academic, multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial was conducted at 8 dermatology departments at university hospitals between March 2014 and December 2016 and included adult patients with AT or AU evolving for more than 6 months despite previous topical and systemic treatments. Data analysis was performed from October 2018 to June 2019.

Interventions

Patients were randomized to receive methotrexate (25 mg/wk) or placebo for 6 months. Patients with greater than 25% hair regrowth (HR) at month 6 continued their treatment until month 12. Patients with less than 25% HR were rerandomized: methotrexate plus prednisone (20 mg/d for 3 months and 15 mg/d for 3 months) or methotrexate plus placebo of prednisone.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary end point assessed on photos by 4 international experts was complete or almost complete HR (Severity of Alopecia Tool [SALT] score <10) at month 12, while receiving methotrexate alone from the start of the study. Main secondary end points were the rate of major (greater than 50%) HR, quality of life, and treatment tolerance.

Results

A total of 89 patients (50 female, 39 male; mean [SD] age, 38.6 [14.3] years) with AT (n = 1) or AU (n = 88) were randomized: methotrexate (n = 45) or placebo (n = 44). At month 12, complete or almost complete HR (SALT score <10) was observed in 1 patient and no patient who received methotrexate alone or placebo, respectively, in 7 of 35 (20.0%; 95% CI, 8.4%-37.0%) patients who received methotrexate (for 6 or 12 months) plus prednisone, including 5 of 16 (31.2%; 95% CI, 11.0%-58.7%) who received methotrexate for 12 months and prednisone for 6 months. A greater improvement in quality of life was observed in patients who achieved a complete response compared with nonresponder patients. Two patients in the methotrexate group discontinued the study because of fatigue and nausea, which were observed in 7 (6.9%) and 14 (13.7%) patients receiving methotrexate, respectively. No severe treatment adverse effect was observed.

Conclusions and Relevance

In this randomized clinical trial, while methotrexate alone mainly allowed partial HR in patients with chronic AT or AU, its combination with low-dose prednisone allowed complete HR in up to 31% of patients. These results seem to be of the same order of magnitude as those recently reported with JAK inhibitors, with a much lower cost.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02037191.

An Updated Review on Current Treatment of Alopecia Areata and Newer Therapeutic Options

Alopecia areata (AA) is a dermatological disease that causes nonscarring hair loss. It can occur at any age and has an unpredictable and variable evolution in individuals. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the novel therapies currently being used, as well as upcoming therapeutic options in the treatment of AA.

On which evidence can we rely when prescribing off-label methotrexate in dermatological practice? - a systematic review with GRADE approach

If an authorized drug is prescribed for a use that is not described in the Summary of Product Characteristics, this is defined as 'off-label use.' Methotrexate is often used off-label for dermatological indications. Off-label use is permitted if physicians can justify the treatment based on scientific evidence available to them. Our objective here was therefore to summarize the evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the dermatological off-label use of methotrexate in a systematic review. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL for studies for evidence on the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in dermatological indications up to November 2019. We used the GRADE system to rate the quality of the evidence. The search retrieved 34,583 hits of which 3566 were selected after the title and abstract screening. After the full-text screening, 143 studies were included, which involved 3688 patients in total. We found low-quality evidence for the effectiveness, efficacy, and safety of the off-label use of methotrexate in 31 dermatological diseases. To optimize the quality of evidence to support off-label use, we need high-quality studies in which well-characterized patients are treated with standardized treatments regimens using well-validated outcomes relevant to patients and physicians.

Oral Pulse Betamethasone, Methotrexate, and Combination Therapy to Treat Severe Alopecia Areata: A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Clinical Trial

The purpose of this study is to compare oral betamethasone pulse therapy, methotrexate therapy and a combination of the two for patients with Alopecia Areata (AA) as an autoimmune disorder. In this study, 36 patients with severe AA were selected and classified into three groups of 12: 1- Oral betamethasone therapy (3 mg, once a week) with placebo; 2- Oral methotrexate (15 mg, once a week) with placebo; and 3- A combination of methotrexate (15 mg, once a week) and betamethasone (3 mg, once a week). The Severity Alopecia Tool (SALT) was used to measure improvements in the lesions through photographs, and the patients also rated their condition on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Assessments were performed, and the results were compared at baseline and then at intervals of three months for nine months. The demographics and SALT score were similar in the three groups (P > 0.05). All the groups showed improvements in SALT, VAS and photographic scores three months after beginning the treatment (P < 0.001). Betamethasone therapy (P = 0.006) and combination therapy (P < 0.001) provided greater SALT improvement than methotrexate, and combination therapy led to a greater improvement in VAS and photographic findings compared to the two other groups (P < 0.05). Oral steroid, methotrexate and combination pulse therapy were effective treatments for AA, while oral steroid pulse therapy and combination therapy were superior to methotrexate.

Alopecia areata: a review on diagnosis, immunological etiopathogenesis and treatment options

Patients suffering from alopecia areata (AA) can lose hair in focal regions, the complete scalp, including eyelashes and eyebrows, or even the entire body. The exact pathology is not yet known, but the most described theory is a collapse of the immune privilege system, which can be found in some specific regions of the body. Different treatment options, local and systemic, are available, but none of them have been proven to be effective in the long term as well for every treatment there should be considered for the possible side effects. In many cases, treated or non-treated, relapse often occurs. The prognosis is uncertain and is negatively influenced by the subtypes alopecia totalis and alopecia universalis and characteristics such as associated nail lesions, hair loss for more than 10 years and a positive familial history. The unpredictable course of the disease also makes it a mental struggle and AA patients are more often associated with depression and anxiety compared to the healthy population. Research into immunology and genetics, more particularly in the field of dendritic cells (DC), is recommended for AA as there is evidence of the possible role of DC in the treatment of other autoimmune diseases such as multiple Sclerosis and cancer. Promising therapies for the future treatment of AA are JAK-STAT inhibitors and PRP.

Treatment of alopecia areata with 2940-nm fractional erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser

Various laser therapies have been used for the treatment of alopecia areata (AA). Enhanced hair regrowth was reported with the use of ablative fractional 2940-nm erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Er:YAG) laser in a murine model. However, clinical effectiveness of fractional Er:YAG laser for hair disorders has not been investigated in human studies. The aim of our study was to assess the effectiveness of 2940-nm fractional Er:YAG laser in the treatment of chronic AA that is unresponsive to conventional therapies. Twenty-five AA patients underwent three sessions, each 4 to 6 weeks apart, of fractional Er:YAG laser. Clinical evaluation was done at baseline and 1 month post-treatment (follow-up) by photographic assessment. Subjective evaluation by patient satisfaction score was also performed. Photographic evaluation of the patients revealed a mean percent change in SALT score of 17.4 ± 3.5% at follow-up. A total of 16 patients who were treated for patchy AA of the scalp showed 27.8 ± 31.3% regrowth. Five patients who were treated for AA of the beard had 39 ± 34.2% regrowth. Fractional Er:YAG laser might be a therapeutic alternative for patients with patchy AA of the scalp and beard that is unresponsive to conventional therapies.

Alopecia areata: a long-term follow-up study of 104 patients

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata (AA) is a common autoimmune disease that considerably affects the quality of life. Although several studies have investigated the epidemiology, clinical characteristics and treatment of AA, limited recent data are available regarding its long-term course.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the long-term course of AA in different age groups.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of patients who were newly diagnosed with AA from 2008 to 2011 and had at least 7 years of follow-up. Data regarding the initial episode, treatment given, disease-free interval and relapses were analysed.

RESULTS

A total of 104 cases were analysed: 31 childhood-onset, 63 adult-onset and 10 late-onset. At first episode, 88.5% of patients had mild, 3.8% moderate and 7.7% severe AA. Full or significant re-growth was observed in 74%, 94% and 100% of childhood-onset, adult-onset and late-onset AA patients, respectively. There was no re-growth in 13%, 3% and 0% of childhood-onset, adult-onset and late-onset patients, respectively. The duration of the initial episode and the disease-free interval negatively correlated with age. Systemic steroids were the most effective treatment for the primary episode. The frequency of relapses was high overall (52%, 44% and 30% in childhood-onset, adult-onset and late-onset, respectively), but significantly declined over time with a majority (79%) occurring within the first 4 years. The disease-free interval and relapse rate were not correlated with gender, disease severity at onset or treatment given.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of severe disease, duration of an initial episode and the rate of relapses decreased with an older age at onset. In addition, the outcome and the disease-free interval improved with age at onset. The frequency of relapses declined over time and most appear early on. The current treatment modalities do not seem to influence the long-term outcome.

Alopecia Areata: a Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis and Management

Alopecia areata is a common hair loss condition that is characterized by acute onset of non-scarring hair loss in usually sharply defined areas ranging from small patches to extensive or less frequently diffuse involvement. Depending on its acuity and extent, hair loss is an important cause of anxiety and disability. The current understanding is that the condition represents an organ-specific autoimmune disease of the hair follicle with a genetic background. Genome-wide association studies provide evidence for the involvement of both innate and acquired immunity in the pathogenesis, and mechanistic studies in mouse models of alopecia areata have specifically implicated an IFN-γ-driven immune response, including IFNγ, IFNγ-induced chemokines and cytotoxic CD8 T cells as the main drivers of disease pathogenesis. A meta-analysis of published trials on treatment of alopecia areata states that only few treatments have been well evaluated in randomized trials. Nevertheless, depending on patient age, affected surface area and disease duration, an empiric treatment algorithm can be designed with corticosteroids and topical immunotherapy remaining the mainstay of therapy. The obviously limited success of evidence-based therapies points to a more important complexity of hair loss. At the same time, the complexity of pathogenesis offers opportunities for the development of novel targeted therapies. New treatment opportunities based on the results of genome-wide association studies that implicate T cell and natural killer cell activation pathways are paving the way to new approaches in future clinical trials. Currently, there are ongoing studies with the CTLA4-Ig fusion protein abatacept, anti-IL15Rβ monoclonal antibodies and the Janus kinase inhibitors tofacitinib, ruxolitinib and baricitinib. Ultimately, the options available for adapting to the disease rather than treating it in an effort to cure may also be taken into consideration in selected cases of long-standing or recurrent small spot disease.

A Comment on JAK Inhibitors for Treatment of Alopecia Areata

A meta-analysis of published trials on the treatment of alopecia areata (AA) came to the conclusion that most have been reported poorly and so small that any important clinical benefits are inconclusive, and considering the possibility of spontaneous remission, especially for those in the early stages of the disease, the options of not being treated or depending on individual preference, and of wearing a wig may be alternative ways of dealing with the condition. And yet, from clinical practice, we know that depending on patient age, surface area, disease duration, and comorbidities an empiric treatment algorithm can be designed that is successful in a significant proportion of patients. More recently, it has been suggested that Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors may represent the drug of choice for AA, based on robust scientific background and preliminary clinical study results. The fact is that a sophisticated treatment of AA cannot be reduced to one drug, while in many patients, depending on disease duration and surface area, either intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy, intralesional triamcinolone acetonide or subcutaneous methotrexate will achieve remission rates in the range of the efficacy of the JAK inhibitors. Moreover, at this time point, affordability of the JAK inhibitors for long-term treatment, sustainability of treatment result, and long-term safety are major issues with regard to the treatment of AA with JAK inhibitors.

Low-Dose Systemic Methotrexate Therapy for Recalcitrant Alopecia Areata

Background

Alopecia areata (AA) is an autoimmune skin disease difficult to manage and treat. The pathogenesis of AA features a T-cell-associated autoimmune process, and systemic immunosuppressive therapy is prescribed widely for AA.

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of systemic low-dose methotrexate (LD-MTX) therapy in treatment of recalcitrant AA multiplex.

Methods

In a retrospective, non-controlled study, we evaluated 29 patients with recalcitrant AA treated with LD-MTX and assessed the therapeutic response according to severity of disease, disease duration, cumulative dose of MTX, and drug safety.

Results

MTX was administered twice weekly, and the mean maximum weekly dose was 14.48 mg. The response was A5 (regrowth=100.0%) in 14 (48.3%) patients and A4 (regrowth of 75%~90%) in 12 (41.4%) patients. Three patients had poor response to LD-MTX treatment (A2: n=2 [6.9%], A1: n=1 [3.4%]). All three of the patients showing a poor response had disease durations exceeding 24 months. Relapse was observed in 31% of patients with more than 75% regrowth. Common side-effects were elevated liver enzyme levels and gastrointestinal discomfort.

Conclusion

LD-MTX appears to be an effective and well-tolerated treatment for recalcitrant AA multiplex.

Unsuccessful Treatment of Alopecia Areata with Simvastatin/Ezetimibe: Experience in 12 Patients

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Alopecia areata is a common immune-mediated hair condition with limited treatment options and success rates. There is evidence that statins, which are used for reducing atherogenesis and cardiovascular disease, have immunomodulatory activities and therefore may also be used for treatment of selected dermatologic conditions, including alopecia areata. Among treatments evaluated for alopecia areata, oral simvastatin/ezetimibe therapy is currently under the scrutiny of expert opinion.

METHODS

Prospective observational study of the efficacy and tolerability of simvastatin/ezetimibe 40/10 mg (Inegy; MSD Merck Sharp & Dohme AG, Lucerne, Switzerland) over a treatment period of 6 months in alopecia totalis, universalis, multipatch involvement of the scalp >30%, ophiasis, or diffuse alopecia areata.

RESULTS

Of the 12 patients included in the study, 67% had no hair regrowth, 24% transient diffuse or patchy hair regrowth, and 24% patchy regrowth of pigmented hair which was not considered cosmetically satisfactory. Adverse effects were observed in 24% of patients, who reported myalgia. One patient showed elevation of creatine phosphokinase.

CONCLUSION

Simvastatin/ezetimibe is not effective for treatment of alopecia areata, at least in severe and/or cases refractory to other treatments, either as monotherapy or as adjuvant. Ultimately, in choosing such a treatment with questionable benefit, one must take the risk of serious adverse effects into careful consideration.

Phototherapy for alopecia areata

Phototherapy is a useful therapeutic method for various skin diseases due to its modulatory effect on the cutaneous immune system. Alopecia areata is a dermatosis characterized by partial or complete hair loss. Collapse of the immune privilege of the hair follicle, which induces noncicatricial alopecia, is an important factor in its etiology. Several forms of phototherapy are used in dermatology.

Efficacy and Safety of Methotrexate Combined with Low- to Moderate-Dose Corticosteroids for Severe Alopecia Areata

BACKGROUND

In severe alopecia areata (AA), spontaneous recovery is unlikely, and treatment is not standardized.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate (MTX) used alone or combined with low- to moderate-dose oral corticosteroids (OC) for treating severe AA (totalis, universalis and severe multifocal).

METHODS

Retrospective monocentric study of all consecutive patients receiving this treatment between 2006 and 2012. Efficacy was defined as achieving a total regrowth of terminal hair.

RESULTS

26 patients were included (17 with AA universalis or totalis and 9 with severe multifocal AA). Total regrowth was noted in 15/26 patients. After 3 months of treatment, hair regrowth >80% was associated with further complete regrowth, and hair regrowth <30% was associated with later treatment failure (p = 0.0014). When treatment was tapered, 11/15 patients with initial complete efficacy experienced AA relapse.

CONCLUSION

MTX combined with low- to moderate-dose OC may be an efficient and well-tolerated treatment for severe AA. However, long-term maintenance treatment is usually required.

High Relapse Rates Despite Early Intervention with Intravenous Methylprednisolone Pulse Therapy for Severe Childhood Alopecia Areata

BACKGROUND

Previous data suggest that early application of intravenous methylprednisolone pulse therapy (IV-MPPT) may improve the disease course of alopecia areata. The objective of this study was to investigate the outcome of IV-MPPT in severe childhood alopecia areata, predominantly with short disease duration.

METHODS

Eighteen children (10 girls, 8 boys) younger than 17 years old (median age 7.7 yrs, range 2.1-16.5 yrs) treated with IV-MPPT for severe childhood alopecia areata in a referral center for pediatric dermatology over 3 years (median disease duration 4 mos, range 1-12 mos) were retrospectively evaluated. Five patients had alopecia areata totalis or universalis and 13 had alopecia multilocularis. The median scalp area affected by alopecia was 60% (range 30%-100%). All patients underwent two or three cycles of IV-MPPT at monthly intervals (maximum 500 mg/day on three consecutive days).

RESULTS

Within 7 months after the last IV-MPPT session, 10 of 18 children had good response (≥75% of hair regrowth), with eight showing improvement within the first 4 months. Of the remaining eight patients, one had moderate response (50%-74% regrowth), three had poor response (1%-49% regrowth), and four (all with alopecia areata universalis or totalis) had no response. Seven of the initial 10 good responders experienced relapses, with marked hair loss after the last IV-MPPT session. The estimated median time to relapse was 8 months (95% confidence interval 7, 9 mos).

CONCLUSION

IV-MPPT, even early in the course of disease, did not affect long-term outcome of alopecia areata in our group of severely affected patients.

Efficacy and safety of methotrexate in alopecia areata

BACKGROUND

Alopecia areata is a chronic disorder of the hair follicles and nails, of unknown etiology, with clear autoimmune components and genetic factors. Several therapeutic options have been suggested; however, no treatment is able to modify the disease course. Methotrexate is an immunosuppressant used in various dermatoses and recently introduced as a therapeutic option for alopecia areata.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of methotrexate in alopecia areata.

METHODS

In a retrospective, non-controlled study, we evaluated 31 patients with alopecia areata in current or prior treatment with methotrexate to assess the therapeutic response according to sex, age, pattern of alopecia areata, disease duration, cumulative dose of methotrexate, use of systemic corticosteroids or other treatments, and drug safety.

RESULTS

Regrowth greater than 50% was observed in 67.7% of patients, with the best responses observed in those with <5 years of disease progression (79%), age over 40 years (73.3%), male patients (72.8%), cumulative dose of methotrexate 1000-1500 mg, and multifocal alopecia areata (93%). Among patients receiving systemic corticosteroids in combination with methotrexate, 77.3% had greater than 50% regrowth, compared with 44.4% in those who used methotrexate alone. The therapeutic dose ranged from 10-25 mg/week. No patient had serious adverse effects. Relapse was observed in 33.3% of patients with more than 50% regrowth.

CONCLUSION

Methotrexate appears to be a promising and safe medication for the treatment of severe alopecia areata when used alone or in combination with corticosteroids.

Alopecia universalis during treatment with leflunomide and adalimumab - case report

Alopecia areata is a non-scarring form of alopecia that can be localized or widespread. Its etiology is unknown, but immunological factors are implicated in its pathogenesis. With the more frequent use of anti TNFα biologic drugs, some alopecia areata cases during their use have been described. We report a case of universal alopecia in a patient with rheumatoid arthritis while using adalimumab and leflunomide.

Treatment options for alopecia: an update, looking to the future

INTRODUCTION

Hair loss is a very common complaint. The diagnosis is based on clinical, dermoscopic and pathological examination. The treatment is usually continuous and requires strong compliance.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to i) summarize current treatment options for the most common forms of hair loss; ii) update the literature on treatment options to emerge over the 3 years since the release of the first edition of this article in 2009; and iii) outline future strategies for treating alopecia.

EXPERT OPINION

There is good evidence-based information for the treatment of androgenetic alopecia. There are very few good-quality randomized studies, and no information about long-term results for most of the available treatments for alopecia areata and cicatricial alopecias. Significant research success has been achieved over the past few years through i) discovering the genetic profile of alopecia areata; ii) working on follicular neogenesis in androgenetic alopecia; and iii) discovering the PPAR-γ pathway in scarring alopecia.

Alopecia areata: a new treatment plan

Many therapeutic modalities have been used to treat alopecia areata, with variable efficacy and safety profiles. Unfortunately, none of these agents is curative or preventive. Also, many of these therapeutic agents have not been subjected to randomized, controlled trials, and, except for topical immunotherapy, there are few published studies on long-term outcomes. The treatment plan is designed according to the patient's age and extent of disease. In this paper, the therapeutic agents are organized according to their efficacy and safety profiles into first-line, second-line, and third-line options.