[Bullous pemphigoid. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment. Centres de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes. Société Française de Dermatologie]

[Local treatments for bullous pemphigoid]

Bullous pemphigoid affects people who are usually very frail, because they are very old and frequently have neurological co-morbidities. Over the past twenty years, therapeutic management has improved thanks to the application of highly potent corticosteroid-based creams, following a well-established regimen, for several months. Well-conducted nursing care is therefore essential not only to cover wounds, but also to treat the disease. Dedicated nursing time is also an opportunity to provide support to patients, who are often very uncomfortable.

Strategies to Improve Outcomes of Bullous Pemphigoid: A Comprehensive Review of Clinical Presentations, Diagnosis, and Patients' Assessment

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most frequent autoimmune bullous disease mainly affecting elderlies. Diagnosis usually results from clinical features, histological examination, and the quantification of circulating typical autoantibodies, due to its higher incidence in elderly patients, bullous pemphigoid treatment and management still represents a challenge due to the higher frequency of several comorbidities in this group of patients, which may also be linked to a reduced tolerance to BP treatments. Hence, an early diagnosis and a prompt correct treatment are mandatory to reach better clinical outcomes and improve as much as possible BP outcomes. Herein, we carried out a comprehensive literature review about the known clinical presentations, diagnosis, assessment and monitoring procedures used in daily clinical practice in patients with BP, to better define strategies to improve as much as possible BP clinical outcomes.

A Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Clinical Outcomes in Pemphigoid Gestationis

Background: Treatment regimens for pemphigoid gestationis (PG) are non-standardized, with most evidence derived from individual case reports or small series.

Objectives: To systematically review current literature on treatments and clinical outcomes of PG and to establish recommendations on its therapeutic management.

Methods: An a priori protocol was designed based on PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were searched for English-language articles detailing PG treatments and clinical outcomes, published between 1970 and March 2020.

Results: In total, 109 articles including 140 PG patients were analyzed. No randomized controlled trials or robust observational studies detailing PG treatment were found. Systemic corticosteroids ± topical corticosteroids and/or antihistamines were the most frequently prescribed treatment modality (n = 74/137; 54%). Complete remission was achieved by 114/136 (83.8%) patients. Sixty-four patients (45.7%) were given more than one treatment modality due to side effects or ineffectiveness. Leaving aside topical corticosteroids as monotherapy ± antihistamines in patients with mild disease, systemic corticosteroids ± topical corticosteroids and/or antihistamines led to complete remission in the highest proportion of patients (83%), while steroid-sparing treatments ± topical corticosteroids and/or antihistamines were associated with the lowest proportion of flares (55.5%).

Limitations: The review has been drafted based on a limited number of single case reports and small case series. Underreporting/underdiagnosis of patients with mild-to-moderate PG, partial/absent follow-up, absence of precise description of neonatal outcomes and lack of validated objective scores for measuring disease severity are other limitations of our study. Our systematic review was affected by publication bias.

Conclusion: Systemic corticosteroids are the most frequently used treatment for PG. Whilst most patients achieve complete remission, many of them have refractory/persistent disease requiring multiple lines of therapy. Therefore, we provided an algorithm for PG treatment integrating the results of this systematic review with current knowledge available for bullous pemphigoid. High-quality studies will further help assess the effectiveness of different treatment options for PG.

A Review Comparing International Guidelines for the Management of Bullous Pemphigoid, Pemphigoid Gestationis, Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid, and Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita

Autoimmune blistering disease management can be challenging as treatment modalities vary greatly and no single standard of care exists. We consolidated the recommendations of international management guidelines in order to provide optimal management suggestions to physicians. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE for published blistering disease management guidelines and consensus statements was conducted in November 2019. Search terms included "guideline or guidelines" or "consensus" and "pemphigoid" or "autoimmune blistering disease" or "epidermolysis bullosa acquisita". We included guidelines from established dermatologic societies and expert consensus groups. We excluded literature reviews, guidelines established by an association without dermatologists, or those specific to a single treatment. Guidelines in all languages were considered. Eleven guidelines from dermatologic associations and consensus groups meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Several differences between recommendations, most notably when to introduce adjuvants for refractory disease, were found in bullous pemphigoid. In mucous membrane pemphigoid, treatment was directed to the sites involved and managed with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants/biologics. There was no universal consensus on the first-line treatment for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, but a combination of immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neutrophil therapy was utilized. Comparison of the management guidelines revealed underrepresentation of guidelines from developing nations and key differences between the management styles among dermatologists from Europe and Asia. We attribute these discrepancies to the time elapsed between guidelines, regional differences, and demands of the local healthcare systems.

Glucocorticoids: The mode of action in bullous pemphigoid

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common of pemphigoid diseases caused by autoantibodies against the structures of dermoepidermal junction followed by complement activation, innate immune cell infiltration, neutrophil proteinase secretion and subepidermal blister formation. The first-line treatment of BP is topical and systemic glucocorticoids (GC). Regulation of the immune system and inflammatory cells is the main target of GC actions. GCs act through genomic and non-genomic mechanisms. The human glucocorticoid receptor (GR) mediates most of the biologic effects of GC: cytosolic GR binds GCs and is capable to bind to glucocorticoid response elements in DNA and either transactivate or transrepress genes depending on the tissue and cell type. In addition, GR exerts rapid, non-genomic effects possibly mediated by membrane-localized receptors or by translocation to mitochondria. GCs can also interact directly with several enzymes and cytokines. As a target treatment for BP, the production of autoantibodies should be discontinued. GCs, in spite of their wide immunosuppressive actions, are weak to stop immunoglobulin G (IgG) autoantibody formation. However, both systemic and topical GCs are able to reduce the clinical symptoms of BP. GCs are used to inhibit the secondary inflammation and symptoms, such as blistering and pruritus, and it is shown that GC treatment will gradually decrease also the autoantibody formation. Our review article analyses the mode of action of GC treatment in BP, as far it is possible due to paucity of modern immunological studies.

Bullous Pemphigoid: A Review of its Diagnosis, Associations and Treatment

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is the most common autoimmune subepidermal blistering disease in Western countries, and typically affects the elderly. BP is immunologically characterized by tissue-bound and circulating autoantibodies directed against either the BP antigen 180 (BP180, or BPAG2) or the BP antigen 230 (BP230, or BPAG1e), or even both, which are components of hemidesmosomes involved in the dermal-epidermal cohesion. Risk factors for BP include old age, neurologic diseases (dementia, Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular disease), and some particular drugs, including loop diuretics, spironolactone and neuroleptics. The spectrum of clinical presentations is extremely broad. Clinically, BP is an intensely pruritic erythematous eruption with widespread blister formation. In the early stages, or in atypical, non-bullous variants of the disease, only excoriated, eczematous or urticarial lesions (either localized or generalized) are present. The diagnosis of BP relies on immunopathologic findings, especially based on both direct and indirect immunofluorescence microscopy observations, as well as on anti-BP180/BP230 enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays (ELISAs). BP is usually a chronic disease, with spontaneous exacerbations and remissions, which may be accompanied by significant morbidity. In the past decade, potent topical corticosteroids have emerged as an effective and safe first-line treatment for BP, but their long-term feasibility is still controversial. Newer therapeutic agents targeting molecules involved in the inflammatory cascade associated with BP represent future alternatives to classical immunosuppressant drugs for maintenance therapy.

Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP), a predictive marker of bullous pemphigoid severity and outcome

Bullous Pemphigoid (BP) is an inflammatory rare autoimmune bullous dermatosis, which outcome cannot be predicted through clinical investigations. Eosinophils are the main immune infiltrated cells in BP. However, the release of Major Basic Protein (MBP), Eosinophil Derived Neurotoxin (EDN), and Eosinophil Cationic Protein (ECP) upon eosinophil activation has still not been evaluated with respect to BP development. MBP, EDN and ECP were measured by ELISA in serum (n = 61) and blister fluid (n = 20) of patients with BP at baseline, and in serum after 2 months of treatment (n = 41). Eosinophil activation in BP patients was illustrated at baseline by significantly higher MBP, EDN and ECP serum concentrations as compared with control subjects (n = 20), but without distinction according to disease severity or outcome. EDN and ECP values were even higher in the blister fluids (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), whereas MBP values were lower (P < 0.001). ECP serum concentration decreased after 60 days of treatment in BP patients with ongoing remission but not in patients who later relapsed (P < 0.05). A reduction of at least 12.8 ng/mL in ECP concentrations provided a positive predictive value for remission of 81%, showing that ECP serum variation could be a useful biomarker stratifying BP patients at risk of relapse.

Integrating longitudinal serum IL-17 and IL-23 follow-up, along with autoantibodies variation, contributes to predict bullous pemphigoid outcome

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) is an inflammatory autoimmune bullous disease involving cytokines and proteases in the process of blister formation. Recently, IL-17 and IL-23 were evidenced in lesional skin and serum of BP patients at time of diagnosis, but their involvement in disease outcome has still not been investigated yet. We then analysed IL-17 and IL-23 serum levels during the first months of follow-up upon treatment. Compared with age- and sex- matched controls, high levels of IL-23 were observed at baseline in BP patients serum (P < 0.01), while IL-17 levels was not. However, some BP patients expressed high IL-17 serum level, independently of disease severity. In these patients, those with ongoing remission reduced IL-17 concentration upon treatment (P < 0.001), whereas IL-17 level remained elevated in patients who relapsed. Meanwhile, IL-23 serum levels increased during the first month of treatment in BP patients who later relapsed (P < 0.01) and MMP-9 serum level was not controlled. Accordingly, we found that both IL-17 and IL-23 increased MMP-9 secretion from leukocytes in-vitro. Then, we showed that elevated IL-17/IL-23 serum concentrations helped to discriminate BP patients who later relapsed. Such uncontrolled inflammatory response raises the question whether these molecules could become biological target for BP patients resistant to steroid treatment.

Positive Direct Immunofluorescence Is of Better Value than ELISA-BP180 and ELISA-BP230 Values for the Prediction of Relapse after Treatment Cessation in Bullous Pemphigoid: A Retrospective Study of 97 Patients

BACKGROUND

ELISA-BP180 values and direct immunofluorescence (DIF) are prognostic factors for relapse after treatment cessation in bullous pemphigoid (BP).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relevance of ELISA-BP230 antibodies for predicting relapse 6 months after treatment cessation.

METHODS

We retrospectively selected patients with BP and available data from ELISA-BP180 and -BP230 and DIF performed at treatment cessation. The rate of relapse was calculated at 6 months. We compared ELISA-BP180 and -BP230 values and DIF in patients with relapse and remission.

RESULTS

We included 97 patients. At 6 months, 25.6% of patients showed relapse. The proportion of patients with an ELISA-BP230 value ≥27 UA/ml was higher, but not significantly, for those with relapse than for those with remission (p = 0.11). The frequency of positive DIF findings was significantly higher for patients with relapse (p = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

DIF is of better value than ELISA-BP180 and -230 tests to predict relapse after treatment cessation in BP.

Bullous pemphigoid in infants: characteristics, diagnosis and treatment

BACKGROUND

Bullous pemphigoid (BP) in infants is a rare but increasingly reported autoimmune blistering skin disease. Autoantibody reactivity is usually poorly characterized. Current guidelines do not address specific aspects of the infantile form of BP. The objectives of this study are to define clinical and diagnostic characteristics of infantile BP and develop a treatment algorithm.

METHODS

Detailed characterization of a current case series of five infants with BP from our departments. Comprehensive analysis of all reported cases (1-12 months) with respect to clinical and laboratory characteristics, treatment and outcome.

RESULTS

In total 81 cases were identified (including our own). The mean age was 4.5 months. Moderately severe and severe disease was seen in 84% of cases. Involvement of hands and feet was present in all cases. Immunofluorescence microscopy was comparable with BP in adults. Where analyzed, the NC16A domain of bullous pemphigoid 180 kDa antigen/collagen XVII (BP180) was identified as the major target antigen. BP180 NC16A ELISA values in our cohort were significantly higher than in a control cohort of 28 newly diagnosed adult patients. 50% of patients were treated with systemic corticosteroids, 20% with a combination of systemic corticosteroids and dapsone or sulfapyridine and 10% with topical corticosteroids alone. 14% of patients needed a combination of multiple immunosuppressants. All but one patient reached remission. Relapses were rare.

CONCLUSIONS

Presentation of infantile BP is often severe with blistering of hands and feet present in all cases. Pathogenesis and diagnostic criteria are comparable to adult BP, yet BP180 NC16A ELISA levels seem to be significantly higher in infants. The overall disease outcome is favorable. Based on the results of this study we propose a treatment algorithm for infantile BP.

Assessment of bullous pemphigoid disease area index during treatment: a prospective study of 30 patients

BACKGROUND

Recently, a consensus Bullous Pemphigoid Disease Area Index (BPDAI) was proposed to measure therapeutic outcomes in bullous pemphigoid (BP).

OBJECTIVE

To compare BPDAI with other clinical parameters of disease activity at baseline and to describe the variations of BPDAI during the initial phase of treatment.

METHODS

Thirty BP patients were included and followed for 1 year. BPDAI was assessed at baseline and on days 30, 90 and 360 by the same investigator. Concomitantly, the number of daily new blisters, the skin surface area of erythematous/eczematous/urticarial plaques and blisters/erosions, total lesion area (TLA), pruritus score and mucosal involvement were recorded.

RESULTS

At baseline, BPDAI was 46.7 ± 25 (mean ± SD); it was well correlated with erythematous/eczematous/urticarial skin surface (r = 0.63), TLA (r = 0.83), number of daily new blisters (r = 0.7; p ≤ 0.0002) and anti-BP180 autoantibodies (r = 0.49; p = 0.006), but not with anti-BP230 autoantibodies. For the 8 patients with severe BP at baseline, the mean BPDAI was 76.5, versus 35.9 for moderate BP (p = 0.0007). A value of 56 was proposed as a cut-off value for severe BP. BPDAI decreased to 11.9 ± 8.7, 10.7 ± 12.7 and 2.5 ± 4.1 on days 30, 90 and 360, respectively.

CONCLUSION

BPDAI rapidly decreased during the early treatment stage of BP with variations almost totally conditioned by the skin activity component.

[Bullous pemphigoid]

Pemphigoid diseases are a group of autoimmune disorders characterized by subepidermal blistering and autoantibodies against structural proteins of the dermal-epidermal junction. In bullous pemphigoid, the most common subepidermal blistering autoimmune disease, antibodies are directed against the hemidesmosomal antigens BP180 (collagen type XVII) and BP230. Bullous pemphigoid typically presents with severe pruritus and tense blisters accompanied by erosions and crusts in elderly patients. Diagnostic landmarks are the detection of linear IgG and/or C3 deposits at the dermo-epidermal junction by direct immunofluorescence microscopy of a perilesional biopsy and the detection of serum autoantibodies by indirect immunofluorescence microscopy on human salt-split skin and ELISA employing recombinant immunodominant fragments of BP180 and BP230. Treatment options include topical (class IV) and/or systemic corticosteroids, frequently combined with immunomodulatory agents like dapsone and tetracyclines or immunosuppressants such as methotrexate and azathioprine.

Urticaria and angioedema

Urticaria and angioedema are common disorders that can severely impair the quality of a patient's life and can be extremely difficult to treat. Symptoms can persist for years to decades. The causes of urticaria and angioedema are varied and may be immunologic, nonimmunologic, or idiopathic. This article reviews the literature and provides primary care physicians with up-to-date information of the epidemiology, basic pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management of this common and often debilitating condition. Additionally, clinical manifestations of acute and chronic urticaria, hereditary and acquired angioedema, as well as the physical urticarias will be discussed.