[Mucous membrane pemphigoid. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment. Centres de référence des maladies bulleuses auto-immunes. Société Française de Dermatologie]

Autoimmunity against laminin 332

Laminin 332 is a heterotrimeric structural protein of the basal membrane zone (BMZ) of the skin and adjacent mucosal tissues. The importance of laminin 332 for the structural integrity of the BMZ is demonstrated by mutations in any of the three genes encoding for its three chains causing variants of junctional epidermolysis bullosa. Autoimmunity against laminin 332 is observed in mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP) and in the rare patients with orf-induced pemphigoid. MMP is an autoimmune blistering disease with predominant mucosal manifestations and autoantibodies against the BMZ of the skin and orifice-close mucous membranes. The main autoantigens of MMP are type XVII collagen (BP180) and laminin 332 targeted in about 80% and 10-20% of patients, respectively. An increasing number of studies has highlighted the association of anti-laminin 332 MMP and malignancies that can be revealed in about a quarter of these patients. This data has led to the recommendation of current guidelines to assay for anti-laminin 332 reactivity in all MMP patients. The present review focuses on anti-laminin 332 MMP describing clinical features, its pathophysiology, and detection of serum anti-laminin 332 IgG. In addition, the available data about the occurrence of malignancies in anti-laminin 332 MMP, the underlying tumor entities, and its biology are detailed.

Towards therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid in mucous membrane pemphigoid: A retrospective single-centre study

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is theoretically a treatment of choice for mucous membrane pemphigoid (MMP), due to its good long-term tolerance and efficacy especially in elderly patients. However, no therapeutic monitoring is currently performed despite its large inter-individual variability.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the exposure/effect relationship based on the area under the curve (AUC) or trough level of mycophenolic acid in MMP patients.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (n = 29 AUC measurements performed between February 2013 and November 2016) treated for MMP at Limoges University Hospital were evaluated using the Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid Disease Area Index score, and patients were classified as improvement (>50% decrease vs. baseline) vs. stabilisation (<50%) or non-response (no improvement). AUC was estimated using a population pharmacokinetic model and Bayesian estimation. The association between exposure parameters, demographic variables and response group was investigated using time-dependent Cox models, and an AUC threshold for 'improvement' was also investigated.

RESULTS

An improvement was observed in approximately 70% of the patients. Only the MPA AUC_0-24 h was retained in the multivariate analysis with a decreased risk of stabilisation/non-response per 10 mg*h/L increase, (HR = 0.64, 95% CI = [0.43-0.94], P = 0.0038). That led to an AUC_0-24 h threshold of 89 mg*h/L associated with excellent performances (AUC ROC = 0.828, Sen = 75%, Spe = 100%, P = 0.0001).

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

An association between MPA exposure and disease was observed. Therapeutic drug monitoring can be proposed with an AUC_0-24 h threshold of 89 mg*h/L. It might improve the long-term response of patients to this drug with better tolerance than rituximab or cyclophosphamide.

A Review Comparing International Guidelines for the Management of Bullous Pemphigoid, Pemphigoid Gestationis, Mucous Membrane Pemphigoid, and Epidermolysis Bullosa Acquisita

Autoimmune blistering disease management can be challenging as treatment modalities vary greatly and no single standard of care exists. We consolidated the recommendations of international management guidelines in order to provide optimal management suggestions to physicians. A comprehensive literature search in PubMed/MEDLINE for published blistering disease management guidelines and consensus statements was conducted in November 2019. Search terms included "guideline or guidelines" or "consensus" and "pemphigoid" or "autoimmune blistering disease" or "epidermolysis bullosa acquisita". We included guidelines from established dermatologic societies and expert consensus groups. We excluded literature reviews, guidelines established by an association without dermatologists, or those specific to a single treatment. Guidelines in all languages were considered. Eleven guidelines from dermatologic associations and consensus groups meeting our inclusion criteria were selected. Several differences between recommendations, most notably when to introduce adjuvants for refractory disease, were found in bullous pemphigoid. In mucous membrane pemphigoid, treatment was directed to the sites involved and managed with systemic corticosteroids and immunosuppressants/biologics. There was no universal consensus on the first-line treatment for epidermolysis bullosa acquisita, but a combination of immunosuppressive, anti-inflammatory, and anti-neutrophil therapy was utilized. Comparison of the management guidelines revealed underrepresentation of guidelines from developing nations and key differences between the management styles among dermatologists from Europe and Asia. We attribute these discrepancies to the time elapsed between guidelines, regional differences, and demands of the local healthcare systems.