Complications du curage ganglionnaire réalisé après exérèse du ganglion sentinelle dans le mélanome

Late arm and shoulder problems after axillary therapeutic lymph node dissection in patients with melanoma

INTRODUCTION

Lymphedema is exempted, only a few studies have dealt with the late adverse effects in melanoma patients who have undergone axillary therapeutic lymph node dissection (ATLND) for the clinical nodal disease. We evaluated the data on late arm/shoulder problems (ASPs) reported by the patients and daily life impairment after ATLND and identified the risk factors.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, 82 patients underwent full en bloc Level I-III ATLND. After a median of 56 months (range 34-104), 76 patients (compliance: 93%) rated their ASPs and daily life dysfunction in a questionnaire, leading to the calculation of individual a Symptom/Problem Summary Score and a Function Summary Score. Multivariate analyses identified risk factors.

RESULTS

Two groups of patients were identified. Group 1: no or mild ASPs, n = 56 (74%). Group 2: at least one moderate, severe and very severe ASP, n = 20 (26%). Overall, lymphedema, numbness and restricted arm movements represented the most frequent ASPs. Based on the distribution of the summary scores, about 60% of the patients reported no or only mild symptoms/problems and no or mild dysfunction. More than mild impairment of daily life was reported by five patients. On multivariate analyses, increasing tumor size and decreasing age were identified as risk factors.

CONCLUSION

Our sample shows that ATLND in melanoma patients with the clinically detectable disease can be performed without a major risk of late ASPs and impaired daily life. Increasing tumor size and decreasing age at the surgery are risk factors for developing ASP-related dysfunction.

Prospective Randomized Study to Compare Lymphocele and Lymphorrhea Control Following Inguinal and Axillary Therapeutic Lymph Node Dissection With or Without the Use of an Ultrasonic Scalpel

BACKGROUND

Many attempts to prevent lymphatic complications following therapeutic lymph node dissection (TLND) have included modifications in surgical techniques through the use of ultrasonic scalpels (USS) or lymphostatic agents. Previous randomized studies that enrolled heterogeneous groups of patients attempted to confirm the efficacy of such techniques. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of the USS following TLND.

METHODS

Between 2009 and 2013, patients undergoing inguinal or axillary TLND or completion lymph node dissection after positive sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma were randomized into two surgical dissection technique groups. In the USS dissection arm, surgery was conducted using a USS. These were compared with a control group whereby ligation and monopolar electrocautery was utilized. For axillary dissection, a standardized level III lymphadenectomy was performed. A complete inguinal lymphadenectomy including Cloquet's node was performed, and at the end of the procedure a Redon suction drain was routinely placed in the axilla and groin. The primary endpoint was to compare the time to drain removal in both groups, while the secondary endpoint was to evaluate the rate of complications (infection, fistula, lymphocele formation, wound dehiscence, lymphedema) between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 80 patients were enrolled in this trial; 40 patients were randomly assigned to both the USS group and the control (C) group. No significant differences were observed in terms of duration of drainage (USS: 31 ± 20 vs. C: 32 ± 18; p = 0.83); however, a significantly increased rate of lymphedema (defined as an increased circumference of the operated limb of more than 10 %) was identified in the USS group (USS: 50 % vs. C: 27.5 %; p = 0.04). No other significant differences were recorded for postoperative complications, including surgical site infection (USS: 5 % vs. C: 7.5 %; p = 0.68), lymphatic fistula (USS: 5 % vs. C: 2.5 %; p = 0.62), lymphocele (USS: 32.5 % vs. C: 22.5 %; p = 0.33), and hematoma (USS: 5 % vs. C: 2.5 %; p = 0.62).

CONCLUSION

The use of USS failed to offer any significant reduction in length of drain usage and operative complication, but it seems to increase the rate of lymphedema formation.

Femoral hernia, a rare complication following deep inguinal lymph node dissection

A 72-year-old woman underwent complete deep inguinal lymph node dissection on her right side subsequent to metastasis from malignant melanoma. On the second postoperative day, the patient reported of nausea and vomiting. She presented with a mass in the resected area that gradually increased in size to approximately 15×20 cm. The wound was opened a few hours after onset of symptoms and a large femoral hernia with 40 cm of small intestine was immediately revealed protruding in the groin. Prophylactic suturing of the inguinal ligament and Coopers ligament can reduce the risk of postoperative femoral hernia. Further, the authors argue that drainage for seroma and haematoma should be performed with utmost care, considering other possible causes and, if necessary, guided by ultrasonography.