Immunoprofile of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: aberrant desmin and EMA expression, retention of INI1, and negative estrogen receptor in 22 female-predominant central nervous system and musculoskeletal cases

Extra-skeletal intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: systematic-literature review

BACKGROUND

Intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (IMC) is a rare malignant tumor in pediatric population. IMC can present as extra- or intra-axial lesion in pediatric patients, though the former is commoner causing raised intracranial pressure (ICP). Radiological diagnosis is a challenge in these cases, as is it difficult to differentiate these from other extra-axial neoplasms due to the wide differential diagnosis in pediatric population. We aim to systematically review the literature and present a rare case of extraskeletal intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma treated with safe maximal resection.

METHODS

A systematic review of literature was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. PubMed and Scopus databases were queried using the search terms, "primary intracranial chondrosarcoma", "extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma", "mesenchymal chondrosarcoma" and "pediatric". Presentation, surgical management and outcome of a 15-year-old male with an extraskeletal IMC are also described.

RESULTS

The search yielded 25 articles which met the inclusion criteria. These published records consisted of 33 IMC cases with mean age at presentation of 9.81 ± 5.2 years (range 2 months to 18 years). Frontal region was the commonest locations (11, 33.3%). Most common presentation was headache (14, 42.4%). All patients underwent surgical intervention: gross total resection (20, 60.6%), subtotal resection (9, 27.3%) and no extent mentioned (4, 12.1%). No adjuvant therapy was received in 15 patients (45.5%). On latest follow-up, 11 patients (33.3%) are on remission, 5 patients (15.2%) are symptom free, 3 patients (9.1%) had recurrence, 2 patients (6.1%) had metastasis and 9 patients (27.3%) expired.

CONCLUSION

IMC is a rare entity in pediatric population with imaging findings which are non-characteristic leading to its diagnostic challenge. It can masquerade as other extra-axial intracranial neoplasm (meningioma or hemangiopericytoma). Combination of clinico-radiological and pathological examination can help in accurate diagnosis.  Safe Maximal resection followed by radiotherapy is the preferred treatment strategy.

Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma arising from soft tissues: A rare case report

BACKGROUND

Chondrosarcomas are an exceedingly rare form of cancer, impacting only a few individuals per million. Among chondrosarcomas, a small fraction belongs to the mesenchymal sub-type. Furthermore, only one-third of mesenchymal chondrosarcomas manifest in extraskeletal locations.

CASE

A 38-year-old woman was referred by a midwife after experiencing pain in the right upper quadrant of her right breast for 2 months. The mass had been palpable for 1 week before the initial assessment. According to radiological evaluations, the tumor is outside breast tissue and not connected to the bones. Hence, a biopsy of the mass is done. The biphasic morphology of the tumor during pathological evaluation, in addition to immunohistochemistry testing, confirms the diagnosis of extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (EMCS). Finally, the mass was surgically removed, and 6 months of chemotherapy were administered to the patient.

CONCLUSION

Given the tumor's rarity and the lack of established guidelines, diagnosing EMCS can be challenging and prone to errors. As such, meticulous sampling, along with precise pathological and imaging investigations, is imperative to accurately establish the diagnosis of these tumors.

Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma from Diagnosis to Clinical Trials

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a rare subtype of chondrosarcoma with a poor prognosis. Although these tumors are sensitive to radiotherapy/chemotherapy, the standard treatment for localized MCS is only surgical resection, and there are no established treatment guidelines for patients with advanced and metastatic MCS. Due to the low incidence of MCS, the pathology of these tumors is still unknown, and other therapeutic options are lacking. Some studies show the potential role of the PDGF/PPI3K/AKT, PKC/RAF/MEK/ERK, and pRB pathways, and BCL2 overexpression in the pathogenesis of MCS. These findings provide an opportunity to use protein kinases and BCL2 inhibitors as potential therapy in MCS. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge about MCS diagnosis and treatment options. We show the immunological and molecular biomarkers used in the diagnosis of MCS. In addition, we discuss the known prognostic and predictive factors in MCS. Finally, we present the novel trends, including targeted therapies and ongoing clinical trials using protein kinase inhibitors and the death receptor 5 (DR5) agonist, which may be the focus of future MCS treatment studies.

Dedifferentiated Chondrosarcoma from Molecular Pathology to Current Treatment and Clinical Trials

Dedifferentiated chondrosarcoma (DDCS) is a rare subtype of chondrosarcoma, a primary cartilaginous malignant neoplasm. It accounts for up to 1-2% of all chondrosarcomas and is generally associated with one of the poorest prognoses among all chondrosarcomas with the highest risk of metastasis. The 5-year survival rates range from 7% to 24%. DDCS may develop at any age, but the average presentation age is over 50. The most common locations are the femur, pelvis humerus, scapula, rib, and tibia. The standard treatment for localised disease is surgical resection. Most patients are diagnosed in unresectable and advanced stages, and chemotherapy for localised and metastatic dedifferentiated DDCS follows protocols used for osteosarcoma.

Molecular In-Depth Characterization of Chondrosarcoma for Current and Future Targeted Therapies

Chondrosarcoma (CHS) are heterogenous, but as a whole, represent the second most common primary malignant bone tumor entity. Although knowledge on tumor biology has grown exponentially during the past few decades, surgical resection remains the gold standard for the treatment of these tumors, while radiation and differentiated chemotherapy do not result in sufficient cancer control. An in-depth molecular characterization of CHS reveals significant differences compared to tumors of epithelial origin. Genetically, CHS are heterogenous, but there is no characteristic mutation defining CHS, and yet, IDH1 and IDH2 mutations are frequent. Hypovascularization, extracellular matrix composition of collagen, proteoglycans, and hyaluronan create a mechanical barrier for tumor suppressive immune cells. Comparatively low proliferation rates, MDR-1 expression and an acidic tumor microenvironment further limit therapeutic options in CHS. Future advances in CHS therapy depend on the further characterization of CHS, especially the tumor immune microenvironment, for improved and better targeted therapies.

[Fusion-related round and spindle cell sarcomas of the bone (beyond Ewing)]

Round cell sarcomas represent a diagnostic challenge for pathologists due to the poorly differentiated pattern of these high-grade tumors. Their diagnosis often requires large immunohistochemical panels and the use of molecular pathology. These tumors are largely dominated by Ewing sarcomas, but new families are now well characterized, including in decreasing frequency order in bone, BCOR-altered sarcomas, NFATc2-rearranged sarcomas, mesenchymal chondrosarcomas and more rarely CIC-rearranged sarcomas and myoepithelial tumors. This progress report presents microscopic, immunohistochemical and molecular features of these tumors previously named by the inappropriate term "Ewing-like" sarcomas, in order to enable any pathologist to perceive the morphological features of these sarcomas, to select the immunohistochemical panel that will lead to the diagnosis and to better guide the molecular approach needed to establish the final diagnosis.

Mesenchymal Tumors of the Mediastinum: An Update on Diagnostic Approach

Mesenchymal tumors of the mediastinum are a heterogenous group of rare tumors with divergent lineages. Mediastinal mesenchymal tumors are diagnostically challenging due to their diversity and morphologic overlap with nonmesenchymal lesions arising in the mediastinum. Accurate histologic diagnosis is critical for appropriate patient management and prognostication. Many mediastinal mesenchymal tumors affect distinct age groups or occur at specific mediastinal compartments. Neurogenic tumors, liposarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, and synovial sarcoma are common mesenchymal tumors in the mediastinum. Herein, we provide an update on the diagnostic approach to mediastinal mesenchymal tumors and a review of the histologic features and differential diagnosis of common benign and malignant mesenchymal tumors of the mediastinum.

PAX7 Is a Sensitive Marker of Skeletal Muscle Differentiation in Rhabdomyosarcoma and Tumors With Rhabdomyosarcomatous Differentiation in the Female Genital Tract

In the female genital tract, rhabdomyosarcoma may occur in "pure" form or as a heterologous constituent of a biphasic neoplasm such as carcinosarcoma or adenosarcoma. Discriminating rhabdomyosarcoma from its histologic mimics relies on confirmation of skeletal muscle differentiation by morphology or immunohistochemistry (IHC), which can be challenging to interpret in some cases owing to limited expression. PAX7, a transcription factor expressed in mammalian muscle progenitor cells, has been reported in up to 86% of soft tissue rhabdomyosarcomas by IHC. To determine whether PAX7 IHC could augment current approaches to identify rhabdomyosarcoma in gynecologic malignancies, we assessed PAX7, myogenin, and MyoD1 IHC on whole tissue sections from 100 gynecologic tumors: 50 with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation and 50 with features mimicking rhabdomyosarcoma. PAX7 expression was present in 96% (48/50) of gynecologic tumors with rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation and was absent in all rhabdomyosarcoma mimics; it was more diffusely expressed than myogenin in 16 cases and was positive in a greater percentage of tumor cells in 28 cases. PAX7 and myogenin were typically coexpressed, and no rhabdomyosarcoma exhibited complete absence of both markers; however, 2 myogenin-negative tumors were PAX7-postive. Morphologically, PAX7 localized to the nuclei of primitive-appearing cells, whereas myogenin was observed in maturing rhabdomyoblasts including strap cells. Our findings highlight the utility of PAX7 as a complementary diagnostic marker of rhabdomyosarcomatous differentiation in gynecologic tumors. PAX7 should be used in combination with other markers of skeletal muscle differentiation, namely myogenin, and may be particularly helpful in cases where myogenin and/or MyoD1 expression is limited.

Chondrosarcoma-from Molecular Pathology to Novel Therapies

Chondrosarcoma (CHS) is the second most common primary malignant bone sarcoma. Overall survival and prognosis of this tumor are various and often extreme, depending on histological grade and tumor subtype. CHS treatment is difficult, and surgery remains still the gold standard due to the resistance of this tumor to other therapeutic options. Considering the role of differentiation of CHS subtypes and the need to develop new treatment strategies, in this review, we introduced a multidisciplinary characterization of CHS from its pathology to therapies. We described the morphology of each subtype with the role of immunohistochemical markers in diagnostics of CHS. We also summarized the most frequently mutated genes and genome regions with altered pathways involved in the pathology of this tumor. Subsequently, we discussed imaging methods and the role of currently used therapies, including surgery and the limitations of chemo and radiotherapy. Finally, in this review, we presented novel targeted therapies, including those at ongoing clinical trials, which can be a potential future target in designing new therapeutics for patients with CHS.

The 2020 WHO Classification of Tumors of Bone: An Updated Review

Bone tumors are a rare and heterogeneous group of neoplasms that occur in the bone. The diversity and considerable morphologic overlap of bone tumors with other mesenchymal and nonmesenchymal bone lesions can complicate diagnosis. Accurate histologic diagnosis is crucial for appropriate management and prognostication. Since the publication of the fourth edition of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone in 2013, significant advances have been made in our understanding of bone tumor molecular biology, classification, prognostication, and treatment. Detection of tumor-specific molecular alterations can facilitate the accurate diagnosis of histologically challenging cases. The fifth edition of the 2020 WHO classification of tumors of soft tissue and bone tumors provides an updated classification scheme and essential diagnostic criteria for bone tumors. Herein, we summarize these updates, focusing on major changes in each category of bone tumor, the newly described tumor entities and subtypes of existing tumor types, and newly described molecular and genetic data.

Intracranial Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma Lacking the Typical Histopathological Features Diagnosed by HEY1-NCOA2 Gene Fusion

Intracranial mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a rare neoplasm. The diagnosis of MCS is confirmed by the presence of a biphasic pattern on histological examination, comprising undifferentiated small round cells admixed with islands of well-differentiated hyaline cartilage; however, a differential diagnosis may be challenging in some cases. A 28-year-old woman with a 2-month history of headache was referred to our hospital. Radiologic studies showed an extra-axial lobulated mass composed of calcified and uncalcified areas occupying the left middle fossa. Surgical resection was planned, but her headache suddenly worsened before her planned hospital admission and she was admitted as an emergency. Radiologic studies showed an acute hemorrhage in the uncalcified part of the mass. The mass was resected via the left zygomatic approach after embolization of the feeder vessels. The most likely histopathological diagnosis was MCS. However, the typical bimorphic pattern was not identified in our surgical samples; each undifferentiated area and well-differentiated area was observed separately in different tissue specimens, and no islands of well-differentiated hyaline cartilage were identified within the undifferentiated areas in the same specimen. Molecular assays confirmed the presence of HEY1-NCOA2 fusion. IRF2BP2-CDX1 fusion and IDH1/2 mutations were negative. The final diagnosis of MCS was made based on the presence of HEY1-NCOA2 gene fusion. MCS should be included in the differential diagnosis when radiologic studies show an extra-axial lobulated mass with calcification. Furthermore, molecular demonstration of HEY1-NCOA2 gene fusion may help make a precise diagnosis of MCS, especially in surgical samples lacking the typical histopathological features.

Intracranial Extraskeletal Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma: Case Report and Review of the Literature of Reported Cases in Adults and Children

BACKGROUND

Intracranial extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare, malignant variant of chondrosarcoma that is characterized by undifferentiated mesenchymal cells interspersed with pockets of mature hyaline cartilage.

CASE DESCRIPTION

In this study, we report a 23-year-old female patient who underwent multiple craniotomies for tumor resection, as well as adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We review the literature for reported cases and discuss the histopathologic features, radiologic findings, therapeutic approaches, and outcomes associated with this rare tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Intracranial extra-skeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcomas are very aggressive tumors, and their management should emphasize attempting gross total resection followed by adjuvant treatment modalities, including radiation therapy and/or chemotherapy.

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma metastasising to the pancreas

The mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) is a rare malignant tumour and accounts for less than 3% of primary chondrosarcomas. Mostly MC arises from the craniofacial bones, the ribs, the ilium, the femur and the vertebrae. A 54-year-old man was treated due to an icterus of unknown origin. The medical history of the patient consists of a multimodal treated MC of the thoracic vertebrae. A CT imaging identified a 2×4 cm sized mass of the pancreatic head. Suspecting a pancreatic head carcinoma surgical removal was performed. Histopathological a metastasis of MC was diagnosed. Our patient left the hospital after 17 days and died 23 month after surgery. Metastases of MC to the pancreas are rare. When detecting a mass of the pancreas in patients with a medical history of an MC, a metastasis of these tumour should be taken in consideration.

Extraskeletal Mesenchymal Chondrosarcoma

Extraskeletal mesenchymal chondrosarcoma is a rare soft tissue sarcoma arising from soft tissues, mainly of the lower extremities, meninges, and orbits. It usually presents during the second to third decades of life, and has a slight predominance in females. Histologically, it has a typical biphasic pattern comprising small cells and islands of hyaline cartilage. It can pose a diagnostic challenge in small biopsy specimens where 1 of the 2 components can be absent. The prognosis is extremely variable; survival varies depending on the location of the tumor.

Mesenchymal chondrosarcomas showing immunohistochemical evidence of rhabdomyoblastic differentiation: a potential diagnostic pitfall

The diagnosis of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma, a distinctive biphasic malignant neoplasm harboring the HEY1-NCOA2 gene fusion and consisting of primitive round to spindled cells admixed with foci of relatively mature hyaline cartilage, is usually straightforward by morphologic evaluation alone. However, in the setting of a limited biopsy, specimens lacking cartilage generate a broad differential diagnosis, encompassing a variety of other primitive sarcomas, including spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma. Although a small number of cases of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma with aberrant skeletal muscle marker expression have been reported, pathologists are largely unaware of this potential diagnostic pitfall. We report 6 additional cases of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma showing expression of multiple skeletal muscle markers, including one case initially misdiagnosed as "spindle cell/sclerosing rhabdomyosarcoma" on needle biopsy. Awareness of this phenomenon and judicious application of molecular diagnostic testing for the HEY1-NCOA2 fusion are critical to avoid misclassification of mesenchymal chondrosarcoma as rhabdomyosarcoma, with potentially adverse patient impact.

Cytologic diagnosis of round cell sarcomas in the era of ancillary testing: an updated review

Round cell sarcomas constitute a large proportion of "small round blue cell tumors," which encompass a broad differential diagnosis and can be difficult to distinguish on cytomorphologic grounds alone. Numerous pathogenetic insights and advances in ancillary testing in soft tissue pathology over the last several decades have made accurate classification of soft tissue neoplasms increasingly feasible. Immunohistochemistry and genetic/molecular testing can now be performed on all cytologic preparations, including unstained smears, needle rinses, cell blocks, and liquid-based preparations, and this has greatly increased our diagnostic abilities. Nevertheless, there remain numerous diagnostic challenges, including variable sensitivity and specificity of available immunohistochemical markers, overlapping immunophenotypes between entities, and "promiscuity" of genetic alterations such as EWSR1 rearrangements, present in a multitude of tumor types. Herein we provide a review on the cytologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of the more frequently encountered round cell sarcomas, as well as recently described entities, with an emphasis on diagnostic pitfalls and judicious use of ancillary studies.

Integrating Morphology and Genetics in the Diagnosis of Cartilage Tumors

Cartilage-forming tumors of bone are a heterogeneous group of tumors with different molecular mechanisms involved. Enchondromas are benign hyaline cartilage-forming tumors of medullary bone caused by mutations in IDH1 or IDH2. Osteochondromas are benign cartilage-capped bony projections at the surface of bone. IDH mutations are also found in dedifferentiated and periosteal chondrosarcoma. A recurrent HEY1-NCOA2 fusion characterizes mesenchymal chondrosarcoma. Molecular changes are increasingly used to improve diagnostic accuracy in chondrosarcomas. Detection of IDH mutations or HEY1-NCOA2 fusions has already proved their immense value, especially on small biopsy specimens or in case of unusual presentation.

Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation in the lingual area of the mandibular body versus osteochondroma at the mandibular condyle

Background

Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation (BPOP) is benign and usually occurs in the small tubular bones of the hands and feet, but it is extremely rare in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Methods

The present study compares a case of BPOP occurring in the lingual area of the right mandibular body with a representative case of osteochondroma occurring in the left mandibular condyle using immunohistochemical methods.

Results

BPOP showed no continuity to the cortical bone of the mandible on X-ray and was histologically composed of immature cartilage and bone tissues, whereas osteochondroma showed overgrowth of hypertrophic chondrocytes accompanied by mature bone with endochondral ossification. Although BPOP showed no features of cellular atypia or malignant transformation, it expressed more osteogenic proteins, including BMP-2, BMP-4, RUNX2, OC, AP, OPG, RANKL, CTGF, and bFGF, than osteochondroma. Furthermore, the perichondral spindle cells and marrow osteoblasts/fibroblasts of BPOP showed stronger immunoreaction of PCNA, p53, β-catenin, BCL2, pAKT, survivin, 14-3-3, CEA, EMA, pan-K, and S-100 than the tumor cells of osteochondroma.

Conclusions

Therefore, it was presumed that similar to embryonal osteochondroid tissue, BPOP might be activated by osteogenic and oncogenic signaling and that this increased signaling may explain the rapid growth and high recurrence of BPOP.

Chondro-Osseous Lesions of Soft Tissue

Soft tissue lesions can contain bone or cartilage matrix as an incidental, often metaplastic, phenomenon or as a diagnostic feature. The latter category includes a diverse group ranging from self-limited proliferations to benign neoplasms to aggressive malignancies. Correlating imaging findings with pathology is mandatory to confirm that a tumor producing bone or cartilage, in fact, originates from soft tissue rather than from the skeleton. The distinction can have dramatic diagnostic and therapeutic implications. This content focuses on the gross, histologic, radiographic, and clinical features of bone or cartilage-producing soft tissue lesions. Recent discoveries regarding tumor-specific genetics are discussed.

Immunohistochemistry as potential diagnostic pitfall in the most common solid tumors of children and adolescents

Making a correct diagnosis when dealing with a small round blue cell tumor (SRBCT) of children and adolescents may be relatively straightforward if the tumor arises in the typical clinical setting and the classic pathologic features are all recognizable. However it is widely known that diagnostic difficulties may arise because of: (i) many tumors share overlapping morphological and/or immunohistochemical features; (ii) considerable clinical, pathologic, and immunohistochemical variations do exist; (iii) the increasing use of small biopsies in daily practice makes the diagnosis of these neoplasms more challenging. Accordingly, immunohistochemical analyses are currently mandatory in establishing the correct diagnosis. In this regard there is the need to identify more sensitive and specific immunomarkers useful in the distinction of the several tumor entities. Over the last decades, several markers, such as CD99, WT1 protein, desmin, myogenin, NB84, and INI1 have been identified, providing a considerable help in recognition of the most common solid tumors (ESW/pPNET, rhabdomyosarcoma, neuroblastoma, Wilms' tumor, desmoplastic small round cell tumor; malignant rhabdoid tumor) in children and adolescents. However, at the same time, their unusual, unexpected expression can result in a misinterpretation of the immunohistochemical results, especially by pathologists who are not familiar with oncologic pediatric pathology. Therefore the present review focuses on the potential immunohistochemical pitfalls which should be kept in mind by pathologists to prevent diagnostic errors when dealing with SRBCTs.

Detection of HEY1-NCOA2 fusion by fluorescence in-situ hybridization in formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues as a possible diagnostic tool for mesenchymal chondrosarcoma

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MC) is an extremely rare subtype of chondrosarcoma. A tumor specific fusion gene, HEY1-NCOA2 fusion, was recently identified in this tumor. The finding raises the possibility that the diagnosis of MC can be improved by examining the fusion gene. In the present study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy of fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in detecting HEY1-NCOA2 fusion for the diagnosis of MC. Specimens from 10 patients diagnosed with MC were used for the study. Dual-color FISH was performed using two different probes that specifically hybridize to HEY1 and NCOA2, respectively. Fusion signals were identified in all but two specimens, in which no signal was detected, presumably because of inadequate sample preparation. In accordance with results of a previous study, FISH analysis was highly sensitive in detecting HEY1-NCOA2 fusion in adequately prepared MC samples. The current study adds further support for the use of HEY1-NCOA2 fusion as a valid diagnostic marker for MC.

Chondrosarcoma Variants

This article presents a review of chondrosarcoma variants, with a focus on the extraordinarily rare variants of chondrosarcoma in which hyaline cartilage is not the dominant feature. Discussed are the differential diagnoses for these neoplasms, radiologic studies, gross and microscopic features, and prognosis. Summaries are provided of the key features for the major variants.

Expression of aromatase and estrogen receptor alpha in chondrosarcoma, but no beneficial effect of inhibiting estrogen signaling both in vitro and in vivo

Background

Chondrosarcomas are malignant cartilage-forming tumors which are highly resistant to conventional chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Estrogen signaling is known to play an important role in proliferation and differentiation of chondrocytes and in growth plate regulation at puberty. Our experiments focus on unraveling the role of estrogen signaling in the regulation of neoplastic cartilage growth and on interference with estrogen signaling in chondrosarcomas in vitro and in vivo.

Methods

We investigated the protein expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ESR1), androgen receptor (AR), and aromatase in tumor specimens of various chondrosarcoma subtypes, and (primary) chondrosarcoma cultures. Dose-response curves were generated of conventional central chondrosarcoma cell lines cultured in the presence of 17β-estradiol, dihydrotestosterone, 4-androstene-3,17 dione, 4-hydroxytamoxifen, fulvestrant and aromatase inhibitors. In a pilot series, the effect of anastrozole (n = 4) or exemestane (n = 2) treatment in 6 chondrosarcoma patients with progressive disease was explored.

Results

We showed protein expression of ESR1 and aromatase in a large majority of all subtypes. Only a minority of the tumors showed few AR positive cells. The dose-response assays showed no effect of any of the compounds on proliferation of conventional chondrosarcoma in vitro. The median progression-free survival of the patients treated with aromatase inhibitors did not significantly deviate from untreated patients.

Conclusions

The presence of ESR1 and aromatase in chondrosarcoma tumors and primary cultures supports a possible role of estrogen signaling in chondrosarcoma proliferation. However, our in vitro and pilot in vivo studies have shown no effect of estrogen-signaling inhibition on tumor growth.