Immunohistochemical markers for the differential diagnosis of nephrogenic adenomas

Identification of uromodulin deposition in the stroma of perinephric fibromyxoid nephrogenic adenoma by mass spectrometry

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is an epithelial lesion that usually occurs in the mucosa of the urinary tract. Rare cases of deep infiltrative or perinephric lesions have also been reported. Recently, NA with characteristic fibromyxoid stroma (fibromyxoid NA) has been proposed as a distinct variant. Although shedding of distal renal tubular cells due to urinary tract rupture has been postulated as the cause of NA in general, the mechanism underlying extraurinary presentation of NA and fibromyxoid stromal change in fibromyxoid NA remains unknown. In this study, we performed mass spectrometry (MS) analysis in a case of perinephric fibromyxoid NA of an 82-year-old man who underwent right nephroureterectomy for distal ureteral cancer. The patient had no prior history of urinary tract injury or radiation. Periodic acid-Schiff staining-positive eosinophilic structureless deposits in the stroma of fibromyxoid NA were microdissected and subjected to liquid chromatography/MS. The analysis revealed the presence of a substantial amount of uromodulin (Tamm-Horsfall protein). The presence of urinary content in the stroma of perinephric fibromyxoid NA suggests that urinary tract rupture and engraftment of renal tubular epithelial cells directly cause the lesion.

p16 Immunohistochemical Expression in Nephrogenic Adenoma

Nephrogenic adenoma (NA) is a rare metaplastic entity commonly associated with a prior urothelial injury. Most are seen in the urinary bladder and a minority involve the urethra. In this study, we evaluated the expression of p16 as a surrogate marker of this entity and correlated it with clinical pathological parameters. A total of 17 cases of NA were retrospectively studied to assess the immunohistochemical expression of p16 and its value for the diagnosis of this entity.

Nephrogenic Adenoma Arising From a Female Urethral Diverticulum: A Case Report and Potential Diagnostic Pitfalls

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign lesion of the urothelial tract characterized by tubules surrounded by thick, hyalinized basement membranes. There is a great variety of architectural patterns within nephrogenic adenomas, including patterns that mimic malignancy, such as focal clear or hobnail cells, areas of significant nuclear atypia, mitosis, and isolated cystic changes. This represents a diagnostic pitfall, where a malignant lesion can be mistaken for a nephrogenic adenoma, leading to a delay in diagnosis and treatment that adversely affects the outcome. In this case report, we describe a nephrogenic adenoma arising in a female urethral diverticulum and discuss the differential diagnosis, which includes clear cell carcinomas, microcystic variant urothelial carcinomas, and Skene's gland cysts.

Nephrogenic metaplasia in a female person with spinal cord injury: chronic irritation caused by Foley balloon was aggravated by a large uterine fibroid pressing upon the bladder wall for several years: a case report

INTRODUCTION

Chronic irritation caused by urinary catheter may predispose to metaplastic changes in the bladder and very rarely, nephrogenic metaplasia.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 53-year-old lady with T-2 paraplegia and urethral catheter drainage for 27 years presented with haematuria. MRI of pelvis, performed seven years ago, showed a 10 cm intramural fibroid within the anterior aspect of the uterine body which was pushing the collapsed urinary bladder containing the Foley catheter to the left. The patient decided to avoid surgery to remove the fibroid at that time. Ultrasound scan of the urinary bladder done now, revealed a polypoidal lesion in the left superolateral wall. Superficial enhancing lesion with no invasion of the bladder wall was seen in the CT urography. Cystoscopy showed extensive catheter reaction, and in the centre, a slightly more papillary area, which was resected. Histology revealed inflamed bladder mucosa showing tubular and papillary structures lined by cuboidal epithelial cells; the features were of nephrogenic metaplasia. The tubular and papillary structures were lined by cells showing positive immunohistochemical staining for CK7 and PAX8.

DISCUSSION

Catheter reaction and nephrogenic metaplasia was found in the left superolateral wall of the bladder where the large uterine fibroid was pushing the balloon of the catheter against the bladder wall for more than seven years. The patient decided to undergo surgery to remove the large fibroid and thereby prevent further pressure effects upon the urinary bladder.

Tumour-like lesions of the urinary bladder

There are a number of benign epithelial proliferations in the bladder that may be difficult to distinguish from carcinomas, including urothelial carcinoma and its variants, squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. If misdiagnosed, there is the potential for over treatment, with its attendant risk of complications, as well as errors relating to prognostic assessment. In the case of the misdiagnosis of high grade proliferative lesions that mimic invasive carcinoma, unnecessary radical surgery, chemotherapy and radiotherapy may result. Similarly, the misdiagnosis of lesions that have the appearance of low grade carcinoma can prompt a lifetime of radiological investigation and cystoscopies. In this review, we discuss a variety of entities that may be diagnostically challenging and emphasise the importance of identifying key morphological features that have diagnostic utility. We also highlight the importance of relevant clinical information and the clinical settings in which these lesions may occur. In this review we have divided the lesions on the basis of morphology in order to facilitate discussion relating to the differential diagnosis. The architectural patterns we discuss include papillary lesions (polypoid/papillary cystitis and papillary urothelial hyperplasia), pseudocarcinomatous proliferations (pseudocarcinomatous urothelial hyperplasia, florid proliferation of von Brunn nests and fibroepithelial polyps), glandular lesions (intestinal metaplasia and müllerianosis) and lesions with several different patterns (prostatic type urethral polyps and nephrogenic adenoma or metaplasia).

Common and uncommon features of nephrogenic adenoma revisited

Nephrogenic adenoma is a common diagnosis in urological pathology that may be challenging for general pathologists. Due to its polymorphic appearance under the microscope, some cases can be misdiagnosed as malignancy and then unnecessarily overtreated. Aside from the typical tubules, cysts and papillae, nephrogenic adenoma may display a broad spectrum of histologic appearances and locations, some of them atypical or unexpected. These unusual and concerning features will have special consideration in this description. The goal of the review is to increase awareness of general pathologists of the varied histology of nephrogenic adenoma.

Can We Identify Nephrogenic Adenoma in Urine Cytology Specimens? A Study Evaluating Previously Described Cytomorphologic Features in Correlation With PAX8 Immunohistochemical Staining Results

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to determine if the diagnosis of nephrogenic adenoma (NA) can be made on cytologic criteria alone and if pair box gene transcription factor 8 (PAX8) is useful in the diagnosis of NA in daily cytology practice.

METHODS

Cytologic features of NA previously described in a literature were used to identify NA cells in urinary specimens. Subsequently, all cytology and corresponding biopsy specimens were stained with the PAX8 immunohistochemistry stain. The stains were examined; the results were tabulated.

RESULTS

A total of 44 specimens were reviewed (35 with corresponding biopsy specimens diagnosed as NA and nine negative for NA diagnosis on corresponding biopsy specimens). Of them, 14 demonstrated features previously described as NA. None of atypical cells that were morphologically suspicious for NA showed positive staining, whereas all of the corresponding biopsy sections demonstrated nuclear PAX8 positivity. Only rare lymphocytes present in cytology specimens showed nuclear staining with PAX8.

CONCLUSIONS

Assuming that the results of the PAX8 stain performed are accurate at least in most cases, as suggested by the presence of internal positive controls, our study shows that the previously described cytologic features of NA cannot be used as diagnostic criteria, since they are not characteristic for this entity.

Nephrogenic adenoma of the urinary tract: clinical, histological, and immunohistochemical characteristics

Nephrogenic adenoma is a benign condition of the urinary tract resulting from the displacement and seeding of renal tubular cells from the renal pelvis to the urethra. A retrospective series of 134 cases collected from four hospitals in three different countries was analyzed in this study. Recorded clinical data included age and sex, topography, urological antecedents, coexistent lesions, and follow-up. Cytonuclear and architectural features were reviewed, and PAX-8, p63, PSMA, S100A1, CEA, EMA, CD117, cannabinoid receptor CB1, AMACR, E-cadherin, and CD10 antibodies were included in an immunohistochemical panel. Males predominated (105 M/29 F) with an average age of 66 years (range, 14-96). Urothelial carcinoma was the most frequent clinical antecedent (43.2 %) and also the most common coexisting lesion (14 %). Tubular architecture was the most frequent pattern detected (40 %) although most cases showed a mixed pattern (45.5 %). Deep infiltrative growth into the muscularis propria occurred in two cases. EMA and PAX-8 were expressed in 100 % of nephrogenic adenomas, while E-cadherin reactivity was observed in 66.6 % of cases, cannabinoid receptor CB1 in 25 %, CD10 in 13.6 %, CD117 in 4.1 %, and AMACR in 2.7 %. For the rest of the antigens, no reactivity was found. The average time lapse between the pathological antecedent and the discovery of a nephrogenic adenoma was 32 months. We conclude that nephrogenic adenoma displays a broad spectrum of histological features that may mimic malignancy. In our experience, CB1 immunostaining adds a further argument in favor of a renal origin of this lesion. The combination of PAX-8+, p63-, and EMA + distinguishes nephrogenic adenoma from urothelial and prostate carcinoma, its most frequent malignant look-alikes.