1
|
Sangoi AR, Pivovarcikova K, Akgul M, Williamson SR, Ulamec M, Rogala JD, Martinek P, Vanecek T, Hes O, Alaghehbandan R. Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma With Extensive Retraction Artifact: A Potential Diagnostic Pitfall From Micropapillary Urothelial Carcinoma. Int J Surg Pathol 2024:10668969241239678. [PMID: 38567430 DOI: 10.1177/10668969241239678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
In addition to "classic" and eosinophilic subtype, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is well-known to demonstrate various morphological patterns including adenomatoid, microcystic, pigmented, multicystic, papillary, neuroendocrine-like, and small cell-like, all of which are important to appreciate for accurate diagnosis. Herein, we expand on a unique chromophobe RCC morphology not previously described consisting of tumor cells with extensive stromal retraction, mimicking upper urothelial tract micropapillary carcinoma (MPC). Twelve MPC-like chromophobe RCC nephrectomies were reviewed with clinicopathological features recorded; molecular testing was performed on 7 of 12 tumors. Patients were mostly men (n=10) with a mean age of 65 years. Mean tumor size was 6.4 cm with pathological stage distribution as follows: 4 (33%) T1a, 2 (17%) T1b, 1 (8%) T2b, and 3 (25%) T3a. The extent of MPC-like chromophobe RCC foci ranged from 10% to 40% (mean=26%; there was no correlation between the extent of MPC-like chromophobe RCC foci and tumor stage). Other chromophobe RCC morphological patterns were not identified. When performed, all (100%) tumors depicted prototypic chromophobe RCC staining pattern of KIT positivity/KRT7 positivity. Molecular showed 6 of 7 (86%) with multiple chromosomal losses. Clinically significant mutations were identified in NF1, TP53, FLCN (likely somatic), CHEK2, and ZFHX3 genes. Follow up available in 9 patients showed no evidence of disease (mean=23 months). Although the etiology behind the extensive stromal retraction in our tumors is unknown, this may likely be artifactual in nature. Nonetheless, it is important to include MPC-like chromophobe RCC in the spectrum of "variant" morphologies to avoid diagnostic pitfalls from micropapillary carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankur R Sangoi
- Department of Pathology, Stanford Medical Center, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Kristyna Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University Hospital and Medical Facility Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Mahmut Akgul
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Albany Medical Center, Albany, NY, USA
| | - Sean R Williamson
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Monica Ulamec
- Department of Pathology, Sestre Milosrdnice University Hospital Center, Department of Pathology and Scientific Centre of Excellence for Reproductive and Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Joanna Dominica Rogala
- Department of Pathology, Regional Specialist Hospital, Wrocław; Department of Pathology, Public Specialist Hospital, Nowa Sól, Poland
| | - Petr Martinek
- Department of Pathology, Charles University Hospital and Medical Facility Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Vanecek
- Department of Pathology, Charles University Hospital and Medical Facility Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University Hospital and Medical Facility Plzen, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alaghehbandan R, Williamson SR, Michal M. Kidney Tumor Friends: A 15-Year History and Legacy of Ondřej Hes, MD, PhD (1968-2022). Int J Surg Pathol 2023; 31:1173-1178. [PMID: 36788221 DOI: 10.1177/10668969231152589] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Alaghehbandan
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sean R Williamson
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Michal Michal
- Sikl's Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty in Pilsen, Charles University, Pilsen, Czech Republic
- Biopticka Laboratory, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gupta S, Sukov WR, Vanderbilt CM, Shen W, Herrera-Hernandez L, Lohse CM, Thompson RH, Boorjian SA, Leibovich BC, Jimenez RE, Cheville JC. A contemporary guide to chromosomal copy number profiling in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2022; 40:512-524. [PMID: 34092479 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.04.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2021] [Revised: 04/06/2021] [Accepted: 04/28/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The routine clinical implementation of molecular methods other than fluorescence in situ hybridization in the evaluation of renal neoplasia is currently limited, as the current standard of care primarily involves a combination of morphologic and immunophenotypic analysis of such tumors. Amongst various molecular techniques, global copy number profiling using single nucleotide polymorphism-based microarrays, colloquially referred to as SNP-arrays, is being increasingly utilized to profile renal tumors, as several subtypes have characteristic recurrent patterns of copy number alterations. Recurrent copy number alterations in common tumor types include loss of chromosome 3p in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), gain of chromosomes 7 and 17 in papillary RCC and multiple losses in chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 in chromophobe RCC. Such assays are being increasingly utilized in the clinical setting. Herein, we discuss some common clinical applications of such testing that includes high yield diagnostic and prognostic applications. Diagnostic utility includes evaluation of tumor types that are primarily defined by underlying copy number alterations, establishing the underlying subtype in high grade dedifferentiated (unclassified) renal tumors, as well as assessment of loss of heterozygosity, which is an important component in the workup for germline alterations in tumor suppressor genes. Universal adoption of these techniques across clinical laboratories will likely be significantly affected by variables such as cost, reimbursement, and turnaround time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sounak Gupta
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN.
| | - William R Sukov
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chad M Vanderbilt
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Wei Shen
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Christine M Lohse
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | | | | | | | - Rafael E Jimenez
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - John C Cheville
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Contemporary Clinical Definitions, Differential Diagnosis, and Novel Predictive Tools for Renal Cell Carcinoma. Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10112926. [PMID: 36428491 PMCID: PMC9687297 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10112926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite significant progress regarding clinical detection/imaging evaluation modalities and genetic/molecular characterization of pathogenesis, advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains an incurable disease and overall RCC mortality has been steadily rising for decades. Concomitantly, clinical definitions have been greatly nuanced and refined. RCCs are currently viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same anatomical origin, but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Thus, RCC pathological diagnosis/subtyping guidelines have become increasingly intricate and cumbersome, routinely requiring ancillary studies, mainly immunohistochemistry. Meanwhile, RCC-associated-antigen targeted systemic therapy has been greatly diversified and emerging, novel clinical applications for RCC immunotherapy have already reported significant survival benefits, at least in the adjuvant setting. Even so, systemically disseminated RCCs still associate very poor clinical outcomes, with currently available therapeutic modalities only being able to prolong survival. In lack of a definitive cure for advanced RCCs, integration of the amounting scientific knowledge regarding RCC pathogenesis into RCC clinical management has been paramount for improving patient outcomes. The current review aims to offer an integrative perspective regarding contemporary RCC clinical definitions, proper RCC clinical work-up at initial diagnosis (semiology and multimodal imaging), RCC pathological evaluation, differential diagnosis/subtyping protocols, and novel clinical tools for RCC screening, risk stratification and therapeutic response prediction.
Collapse
|
5
|
Manini C, Imaz I, de Larrinoa AF, López JI. Algorithm-Based Approach to the Histological Routine Diagnosis of Renal Oncocytic Tumors in Core Biopsy Specimens. Curr Urol Rep 2022; 23:327-333. [PMID: 36169870 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-022-01114-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW A growing number of tumor entities with badly defined limits are enlarging in the last years the family of oncocytic tumors in the kidney. RECENT FINDINGS Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) and renal oncocytoma (RO) are classically well-known tumors, but the borderland between them, and their precise connection, remains a matter of debate. Aside from that, other emerging and provisional entities, like eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma (ESC RCC), eosinophilic vacuolated tumor (EVT), low-grade oncocytic tumor (LOT), and papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity (PRRP), have been recently described. This spectrum of tumors remains a diagnostic challenge in renal pathology, especially if the specimen obtained is scarce. This review focuses on practical diagnostic problems when managing core biopsies and proposes a diagnostic algorithm maximizing the information provided by both morphology and immunohistochemistry. So, a combination of morphologic features on hematoxylin-eosin and six antibodies (CK7, CD117, CK20, CD10, GATA-3, and cathepsin K) is advised to be used in a stepwise fashion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Manini
- Department of Pathology, San Giovanni Bosco Hospital, 10154, Turin, Italy.,Department of Sciences of Public Health and Pediatrics, University of Turin, 10124, Turin, Italy
| | - Igone Imaz
- Department of Pathology, Cruces University Hospital, 48903, Barakaldo, Spain
| | | | - José I López
- Biomarkers in Cancer Unit, Biocruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Plaza de Cruces s/n, 48903, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Amin MB, McKenney JK, Martignoni G, Campbell SC, Pal S, Tickoo SK. Low grade oncocytic tumors of the kidney: a clinically relevant approach for the workup and accurate diagnosis. Mod Pathol 2022; 35:1306-1316. [PMID: 35896615 DOI: 10.1038/s41379-022-01108-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Revised: 05/02/2022] [Accepted: 05/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma were accepted as unique renal tumors in the late 1990s. Since their formal description, criteria for diagnosis have evolved and additional distinct tumor subtypes originally considered as one these two entities are now recognized. The last two decades have witnessed unprecedented interest in the spectrum of low grade oncocytic renal neoplasms in three specific areas: (1) histologic characterization of tumors with overlapping morphologic features between oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma; (2) description of potentially unique entities within this spectrum, such as eosinophilic vacuolated tumor and low-grade oncocytic tumor; and (3) better appreciation of the association between a subset of low grade oncocytic tumors and hereditary renal neoplasia. While this important work has been academically rewarding, the proposal of several histologic entities with overlapping morphologic and immunophenotypic features (which may require esoteric adjunctive immunohistochemical and/or molecular techniques for confirmation) has created frustration in the diagnostic pathology and urology community as information evolves regarding classification within this spectrum of renal neoplasia. Pathologists, including genitourinary subspecialists, are often uncertain as to the "best practice" diagnostic approach to such tumors. In this review, we present a practical clinically relevant algorithmic approach to classifying tumors within the low grade oncocytic family of renal neoplasia, including a proposal for compressing terminology for evolving categories where appropriate without sacrificing prognostic relevance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science, Memphis, TN, USA.
| | - Jesse K McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guido Martignoni
- Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, Section of Pathology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.,Department of Pathology, Pederzoli Hospital, Peschiera del Garda, Italy
| | - Steven C Campbell
- Department of Urology, and Glickman Urological and Kidney Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Sumanta Pal
- Department of Medical Oncology and Therapeutics Research, City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Satish K Tickoo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Histologic diversity in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma does not impact survival outcome: A comparative international multi-institutional study. Ann Diagn Pathol 2022; 60:151978. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2022.151978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2022] [Accepted: 05/12/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
8
|
Alaghehbandan R, Williamson SR, McKenney JK, Hes O. The Histologic Diversity of Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma With Emphasis on Challenges Encountered in Daily Practice. Adv Anat Pathol 2022; 29:194-207. [PMID: 35470289 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is the third most common renal cell carcinoma in adults. The aim of this review is to provide a comprehensive overview highlighting the broad morphologic spectrum of ChRCC, and offer a practical approach for handling cases in daily practice. For the purpose of this review, we classify ChRCC subtypes as (1) classic, (2) eosinophilic, (3) sarcomatoid, and (4) other rare patterns. The concept of eosinophilic ChRCC has significantly evolved, yet it still is one of the major diagnostic challenges pathologists face in routine practice due to its morphologic overlap with renal oncocytoma. Rare patterns of ChRCC have been described over the last few decades, showing a wide histologic spectrum including those with adenomatoid microcystic pigmented, multicystic, neuroendocrine, small cell, and papillary features. ChRCC represents a heterogenous group of neoplasms, demonstrating varied but unique morphologic and genetic profiles. Although the field of ChRCC knowledge is still evolving, rare patterns can present diagnostic challenges if they are not known to pathologists and/or clinicians. Proper and generous tumor sampling along with careful histologic examination allow for recognition of these rare morphologies. The role of routine molecular testing appears to be limited. From a clinical management standpoint, the rare patterns of ChRCC seem to have no definite clinical implications at present and likely can be managed similarly to usual ChRCC. Finally, we will discuss distinctive novel/emerging renal neoplasms previously considered under the spectrum of ChRCC, low-grade oncocytic renal tumor and eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, with regard to their current significance and implications for future classification strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Sean R Williamson
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute and Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Jesse K McKenney
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute and Glickman Urological Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital in Plzen, Charles University in Prague, Plzen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Evaluating Established Roles, Future Perspectives and Methodological Heterogeneity for Wilms’ Tumor 1 (WT1) Antigen Detection in Adult Renal Cell Carcinoma, Using a Novel N-Terminus Targeted Antibody (Clone WT49). Biomedicines 2022; 10:biomedicines10040912. [PMID: 35453662 PMCID: PMC9026801 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines10040912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is arguably the deadliest form of genitourinary malignancy and is nowadays viewed as a heterogeneous series of cancers, with the same origin but fundamentally different metabolisms and clinical behaviors. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is increasingly necessary for RCC subtyping and definitive diagnosis. WT1 is a complex gene involved in carcinogenesis. To address reporting heterogeneity and WT1 IHC standardization, we used a recent N-terminus targeted monoclonal antibody (clone WT49) to evaluate WT1 protein expression in 56 adult RCC (aRCC) cases. This is the largest WT1 IHC investigation focusing exclusively on aRCCs and the first report on clone WT49 staining in aRCCs. We found seven (12.5%) positive cases, all clear cell RCCs, showing exclusively nuclear staining for WT1. We did not disregard cytoplasmic staining in any of the negative cases. Extratumoral fibroblasts, connecting tubules and intratumoral endothelial cells showed the same exclusively nuclear WT1 staining pattern. We reviewed WT1 expression patterns in aRCCs and the possible explanatory underlying metabolomics. For now, WT1 protein expression in aRCCs is insufficiently investigated, with significant discrepancies in the little data reported. Emerging WT1-targeted RCC immunotherapy will require adequate case selection and sustained efforts to standardize the quantification of tumor-associated antigens for aRCC and its many subtypes.
Collapse
|
10
|
Alaghehbandan R, Przybycin CG, Verkarre V, Mehra R. Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: Novel molecular insights and clinicopathologic updates. Asian J Urol 2021; 9:1-11. [PMID: 35198391 PMCID: PMC8841285 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2021.11.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Revised: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
|
11
|
Single institutional experience on primary neuroendocrine neoplasms of the kidney: a rare distinct entity. Hum Pathol 2021; 114:36-43. [PMID: 33891968 DOI: 10.1016/j.humpath.2021.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Primary pure renal neuroendocrine neoplasms (R-NENs) are a distinct and rare entity. Not much is known about the histopathology and biologic behavior of these tumors. We attempted to review the clinicopathologic aspects of these neoplasms encountered at our institution. We performed a retrospective chart review to identify primary pure (not admixed with any other tumor component) R-NENs from institutional Cancer Registry database. Pathologic review of the diagnostic archival slides was done for detailed assessment of the histologic features. R-NENs were classified according to the current WHO system for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs). Eight pure R-NEN cases were identified, all unifocal, and most (6/8) involved the right kidney. Three patients had poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC), and five had well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumor (NET). All tumors were located near the renal hilum, stained diffusely with synaptophysin, variably with chromogranin, and were negative for renal site-specific marker PAX8 or for markers of renal cell carcinoma. We identified two distinct patterns of growth: one of sheets with interspersed rosettes and the other of large nests with low proliferative crowded centers and peripheral cells with higher proliferation and prominent palisading. Based on Ki-67 proliferative index, the tumors were classifiable into WHO grade 1 or grade 2 (based on GEP-NEN). All three NECs characteristically showed cytologic features intermediate between classic large and small cell type. This is the first comprehensive clinicopathologic study involving the rare group of R-NEN. Classifying and grading them according to the GEP-NEN system is of prognostic significance.
Collapse
|
12
|
Comprehensive Review of Numerical Chromosomal Aberrations in Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Including Its Variant Morphologies. Adv Anat Pathol 2021; 28:8-20. [PMID: 33021507 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) accounts for 5% to 7% of all renal cell carcinomas. It was thought for many years that ChRCC exhibits a hypodiploid genome. Recent studies using advanced molecular genetics techniques have shown more complex and heterogenous pattern with frequent chromosomal gains. Historically, multiple losses of chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 10, 13, 17, and 21 have been considered a genetic hallmark of ChRCC, both for classic and eosinophilic ChRCC variants. In the last 2 decades, multiple chromosomal gains in ChRCCs have also been documented, depicting a considerably broader genetic spectrum than previously thought. Studies of rare morphologic variants including ChRCC with pigmented microcystic adenomatoid/multicystic growth, ChRCC with neuroendocrine differentiation, ChRCC with papillary architecture, and renal oncocytoma-like variants also showed variable chromosomal numerical aberrations, including multiple losses (common), gains (less common), or chromosomal changes overlapping with renal oncocytoma. Although not the focus of the review, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) data in ChRCC show TP53, PTEN, and CDKN2A to be the most mutated genes. Given the complexity of molecular genetic alterations in ChRCC, this review analyzed the existing published data, aiming to present a comprehensive up-to-date survey of the chromosomal abnormalities in classic ChRCC and its variants. The potential role of chromosomal numerical aberrations in the differential diagnostic evaluation may be limited, potentially owing to its high variability.
Collapse
|
13
|
Kojima F, Matsuzaki I, Kuroda N, Mikasa Y, Musangile FY, Iwamoto R, Takahashi Y, Matsubara A, Kohjimoto Y, Hara I, Murata SI. Clinicopathological and Molecular Characteristics of Macroscopically Yellowish-Colored Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma Compared to Non-Yellowish-Colored Chromophobe Renal Cell Carcinoma. Clin Med Insights Pathol 2021; 14:2632010X211064821. [PMID: 34927071 PMCID: PMC8671824 DOI: 10.1177/2632010x211064821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Each histological variant of renal cell tumors has a unique color. The yellowish color of clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is explained by the presence of intracytoplasmic lipid and glycogen accumulation. Color changes in CCRCC are correlated with clinicopathological and metabolic changes, as well as biological behavior. We analyzed and compared the clinical, histopathological, and immunohistochemical features and gene expression profiles, in lipid metabolism of yellowish-colored ChRCC (ChRCC-Y), non-yellowish-colored ChRCC (ChRCC-N), and CCRCC. Of 14 ChRCCs, we retrieved 6 ChRCC-Ys. Patients with ChRCC-Y are younger than those with ChRCC-N, and the tumor is not predominant in males. ChRCC-Ys are smaller than ChRRC-Ns. Three ChRCC-Ys exhibited individual discrete tubule formation. No ChRCC-Ns exhibited individual discrete tubule formation. Two of 6 ChRCC-Ys showed relatively diffuse adipophilin positivity. No ChRCC-Ns demonstrated diffuse positivity for adipophilin. The expression of SCD, FDFT1, and E2F1 showed a tendency to be lower in ChRCC-Y than in ChRCC-N. The expression of PDGFB showed a tendency to be higher in ChRCC-Y than in ChRCC-N. This study demonstrated ChRCC-Y did not indicate an increase in lipid and cholesterol metabolism and that ChRCC-Y did not have the common molecular alteration of CCRCC. The absence of such metabolic acceleration in ChRCC-Y might support the biological indolent behavior. Furthermore, we revealed that macroscopic color changes might be correlated with various clinicopathological features and immunohistochemical and molecular changes from different perspectives. We believe further characterization of RCC, including tumor heterogeneity, is needed to improve the management of patients with RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fumiyoshi Kojima
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Ibu Matsuzaki
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Naoto Kuroda
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kobe Kyodo Hospital, Nagata-ku, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yurina Mikasa
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Fidele Y Musangile
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Ryuta Iwamoto
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Yuichi Takahashi
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Akiko Matsubara
- Division of Human Pathology, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Shiga, Japan
| | - Yasuo Kohjimoto
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Isao Hara
- Department of Urology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| | - Shin-ichi Murata
- Department of Human Pathology, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alaghehbandan R, Perez Montiel D, Luis AS, Hes O. Molecular Genetics of Renal Cell Tumors: A Practical Diagnostic Approach. Cancers (Basel) 2019; 12:E85. [PMID: 31905821 PMCID: PMC7017183 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12010085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2019] [Revised: 12/20/2019] [Accepted: 12/23/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Renal epithelial cell tumors are composed of a heterogeneous group of tumors with variable morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular features. A "histo-molecular" approach is now an integral part of defining renal tumors, aiming to be clinically and therapeutically pertinent. Most renal epithelial tumors including the new and emerging entities have distinct molecular and genetic features which can be detected using various methods. Most renal epithelial tumors can be diagnosed easily based on pure histologic findings with or without immunohistochemical examination. Furthermore, molecular-genetic testing can be utilized to assist in arriving at an accurate diagnosis. In this review, we presented the most current knowledge concerning molecular-genetic aspects of renal epithelial neoplasms, which potentially can be used in daily diagnostic practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Royal Columbian Hospital, Vancouver, BC V3E 0G9, Canada;
| | - Delia Perez Montiel
- Department of Pathology, Institute Nacional de Cancerologia, INCAN, Mexico DF 14080, Mexico;
| | - Ana Silvia Luis
- Department of Pathology, Centro Hospitalar de Vila Nova de Gaia-Espinho, Vila Nova de Gaia, Cancer Biology and Epigenetics Group (CBEG), IPO Porto Research Center (CI-IPOP), Portuguese Oncology Institute of Porto (IPO Porto) & Porto Comprehensive Cancer Center (P.CCC), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal;
- Department of Microscopy, Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar, University of Porto (ICBAS-UP), 4200-072 Porto, Portugal
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University in Prague, Faculty of Medicine in Plzen, 304 60 Pilsen, Czech Republic
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Michalova K, Tretiakova M, Pivovarcikova K, Alaghehbandan R, Perez Montiel D, Ulamec M, Osunkoya A, Trpkov K, Yuan G, Grossmann P, Sperga M, Ferak I, Rogala J, Mareckova J, Pitra T, Kolar J, Michal M, Hes O. Expanding the morphologic spectrum of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: A study of 8 cases with papillary architecture. Ann Diagn Pathol 2019; 44:151448. [PMID: 31918172 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.151448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Although typically arranged in solid alveolar fashion, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC) may also show several other architectural growth patterns. We include in this series 8 chromophobe RCC cases with prominent papillary growth, a pattern very rarely reported or only mentioned as a feature of chromophobe RCC, which is lacking wider recognition The differential diagnosis of such cases significantly varies from the typical chromophobe RCC with its usual morphology, particularly its distinction from papillary RCC and other relevant and clinically important entities. Of 972 chromophobe RCCs in our files, we identified 8 chromophobe RCCs with papillary growth. We performed immunohistochemistry and array Comparative Genomic Hybridisation (aCGH) to investigate for possible chromosomal aberrations. Patients were 3 males and 5 females with age ranging from 30 to 84 years (mean 57.5, median 60 years). Tumor size was variable and ranged from 2 to 14 cm (mean 7.5, median 6.6 cm). Follow-up was available for 7 of 8 patients, ranging from 1 to 61 months (mean 20.1, median 12 months). Six patients were alive with no signs of aggressive behavior, and one died of the disease. Histologically, all cases were composed of dual cell population consisting of variable proportions of leaf-like cells with pale cytoplasm and eosinophilic cells. The extent of papillary component ranged from 15 to 100% of the tumor volume (mean 51%, median 50%). Sarcomatoid differentiation was identified only in the case with fatal outcome. Immunohistochemically, all tumors were positive for CK7, CD117 and Hale's Colloidal Iron. PAX8 was positive in 5 of 8 cases, TFE3 was focally positive 3 of 8 tumors, and Cathepsin K was focally positive in 2 of 8 tumors. All cases were negative for vimentin, AMACR and HMB45. Fumarate hydratase staining was retained in all tested cases. The proliferative activity was low (up to 1% in 7, up to 5% in one case). Three cases were successfully analyzed by aCGH and all showed a variable copy number variation profile with multiple chromosomal gains and losses. CONCLUSIONS: Chromophobe RCC demonstrating papillary architecture is an exceptionally rare carcinoma. The diagnosis can be challenging, although the cytologic features are consistent with the classic chromophobe RCC. Given the prognostic and therapeutic implications of accurately diagnosis other RCCs with papillary architecture (i.e., Xp11.2 translocation RCC, FH-deficient RCC), it is crucial to differentiate these cases from chromophobe RCC with papillary architecture. Based on this limited series, the presence of papillary architecture does not appear to have negative prognostic impact. However, its wider recognition may allow in depth studies on additional examples of this rare morphologic variant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kvetoslava Michalova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Maria Tretiakova
- Department of Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Kristyna Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Royal Columbian Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Delia Perez Montiel
- Department of Pathology, Institute Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Monika Ulamec
- Ljudevit Jurak Pathology Department, University Clinical Hospital "Sestre milosrdnice", Pathology Department, School of Dental Medicine, University of Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | - Kiril Trpkov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Gao Yuan
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Petr Grossmann
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Maris Sperga
- Department of Pathology, University of Split, Croatia
| | - Ivan Ferak
- Department of Pathology, AGEL, Novy Jicin, Czech Republic
| | - Joanna Rogala
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Jana Mareckova
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Tomas Pitra
- Department of Urology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Jiri Kolar
- Department of Urology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Michal
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Multi-institutional re-evaluation of prognostic factors in chromophobe renal cell carcinoma: proposal of a novel two-tiered grading scheme. Virchows Arch 2019; 476:409-418. [PMID: 31760491 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-019-02710-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 10/10/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
A histological grading system of chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (chRCC) is highly desirable to identify approximately 5-10% of tumors at risk for progression. Validation studies failed to demonstrate a correlation between the four-tiered WHO/ISUP grade and outcome. Previous proposals with three-tiered chromophobe grading systems could not be validated. In this study, the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation, necrosis, and mitosis was analyzed in a Swiss cohort (n = 42), an Italian cohort (n = 103), a German cohort (n = 54), a Japanese cohort (n = 119), and The Cancer Genome Atlas cohort (n = 64). All 3 histological parameters were significantly associated with shorter time to tumor progression and overall survival in univariate analysis. Interobserver variability for identification of these parameters was measured by Krippendorff's alpha coefficient and showed high concordance for the identification of sarcomatoid differentiation and tumor necrosis, but only low to medium concordance for the identification of mitosis. Therefore, we tested a two-tiered tumor grading system (low versus high grade) based only on the presence of sarcomatoid differentiation and/or necrosis finding in the combined cohorts (n = 382). pT stage, patient's age (> 65 vs ≤ 65), lymph node and/or distant metastasis, and the two-tiered grading system (low versus high grade) were significantly associated with overall survival and were independent prognostic parameters in multivariate analysis (Cox proportional hazard). This multi-institutional evaluation of prognostic parameters suggests tumor necrosis and sarcomatoid differentiation as reproducible components of a two-tiered chromophobe tumor grading system.
Collapse
|
17
|
Shehabeldin AN, Ro JY. Neuroendocrine tumors of genitourinary tract: Recent advances. Ann Diagn Pathol 2019; 42:48-58. [DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2019.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2019] [Accepted: 06/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
18
|
Wang G, Yuan R, Tucker T, Gates AB, Bellamy CD, Hayes MM. Combined Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma with Neuroendocrine Differentiation and Mucinous Tubular and Spindle Cell Carcinoma. Case Rep Pathol 2018; 2018:8734823. [PMID: 30693127 PMCID: PMC6332978 DOI: 10.1155/2018/8734823] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
A unique case of combined papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) and mucinous tubular and spindle cell carcinoma (MTSCC) presenting in a man aged 67 years is reported. The two separate components were distinct on morphological, immunohistochemical (IHC), and genetic grounds, while type 2 PRCC predominated. Three years after the initial diagnosis, the PRCC component metastasized to the lungs where it morphologically mimicked a pulmonary neuroendocrine tumor. Retrospectively focal neuroendocrine differentiation was demonstrated by IHC in the PRCC component of the primary neoplasm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gang Wang
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Ren Yuan
- Department of Radiology, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Tracy Tucker
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Allan B. Gates
- Department of Pathology, Abbotsford Regional Hospital, Abbotsford, BC, Canada
| | | | - Malcolm M. Hayes
- Department of Pathology, BC Cancer Vancouver Centre, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
He H, Trpkov K, Martinek P, Isikci OT, Maggi-Galuzzi C, Alaghehbandan R, Gill AJ, Tretiakova M, Lopez JI, Williamson SR, Montiel DP, Sperga M, Comperat E, Brimo F, Yilmaz A, Pivovarcikova K, Michalova K, Slouka D, Prochazkova K, Hora M, Bonert M, Michal M, Hes O. "High-grade oncocytic renal tumor": morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic study of 14 cases. Virchows Arch 2018; 473:725-738. [PMID: 30232607 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2456-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2018] [Revised: 08/29/2018] [Accepted: 09/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The spectrum of the renal oncocytic tumors has been expanded in recent years to include several novel and emerging entities. We describe a cohort of novel, hitherto unrecognized and morphologically distinct high-grade oncocytic tumors (HOT), currently diagnosed as "unclassified" in the WHO classification. We identified 14 HOT by searching multiple institutional archives. Morphologic, immunohistochemical (IHC), molecular genetic, and molecular karyotyping studies were performed to investigate these tumors. The patients included 3 men and 11 women, with age range from 25 to 73 years (median 50, mean 49 years). Tumor size ranged from 1.5 to 7.0 cm in the greatest dimension (median 3, mean 3.4 cm). The tumors were all pT1 stage. Microscopically, they showed nested to solid growth, and focal tubulocystic architecture. The neoplastic cells were uniform with voluminous oncocytic cytoplasm. Prominent intracytoplasmic vacuoles were frequently seen, but no irregular (raisinoid) nuclei or perinuclear halos were present. All tumors demonstrated prominent nucleoli (WHO/ISUP grade 3 equivalent). Nine of 14 cases were positive for CD117 and cytokeratin (CK) 7 was either negative or only focally positive in of 6/14 cases. All tumors were positive for AE1-AE3, CK18, PAX 8, antimitochondrial antigen, and SDHB. Cathepsin K was positive in 13/14 cases and CD10 was positive in 12/13 cases. All cases were negative for TFE3, HMB45, Melan-A. No TFEB and TFE3 genes rearrangement was found in analyzable cases. By array CGH, complete chromosomal losses or gains were not found in any of the cases, and 3/9 cases showed absence of any abnormalities. Chromosomal losses were detected on chromosome 19 (4/9), 3 with losses of the short arm (p) and 1 with losses of both arms (p and q). Loss of chromosome 1 was found in 3/9 cases; gain of 5q was found in 1/9 cases. On molecular karyotyping, 3/3 evaluated cases showed loss of heterozygosity (LOH) on 16p11.2-11.1 and 2/3 cases showed LOH at 7q31.31. Copy number (CN) losses were found at 7q11.21 (3/3), Xp11.21 (3/3), Xp11.22-11.21 (3/3), and Xq24-25 (2/3). CN gains were found at 13q34 (2/3). Ten patients with available follow up information were alive and without disease progression, after a mean follow-up of 28 months (1 to 112 months). HOT is a tumor with unique morphology and its IHC profile appears mostly consistent. HOT should be considered as an emerging renal entity because it does not meet the diagnostic criteria for other recognized eosinophilic renal tumors, such as oncocytoma, chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3 and TFEB RCC, SDH-deficient RCC, and eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huiying He
- Department of Pathology, Health Science Center, Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Kiril Trpkov
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Petr Martinek
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Ozlem Tanas Isikci
- Department of Pathology, Ankara Education and Research Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Cristina Maggi-Galuzzi
- Robert J. Tomsich Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Royal Columbian Hospital, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anthony J Gill
- Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia.,University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, NSW, 2065, Australia
| | - Maria Tretiakova
- Department of Anatomic Pathology, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Jose Ignacio Lopez
- BioCruces Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | | - Delia Perez Montiel
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Maris Sperga
- Department of Pathology, Riga Stradin's University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Eva Comperat
- Sorbonne Université Service d'Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques Hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Paris, France
| | - Fadi Brimo
- Department of Pathology, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Ali Yilmaz
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Calgary Laboratory Services and University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Kristyna Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Kveta Michalova
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - David Slouka
- Biomedicine Center, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Kristyna Prochazkova
- Department of Urology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Hora
- Department of Urology, Charles University, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Michael Bonert
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Michal Michal
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Cytogenetic and immunohistochemical study of 42 pigmented microcystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (PMChRCC). Virchows Arch 2018; 473:209-217. [DOI: 10.1007/s00428-018-2389-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2017] [Revised: 05/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/11/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
|
21
|
Mostafa ME, Abdelkader A, Kuroda N, Pérez-Montiel D, Banerjee A, Hes O, Iczkowski KA. Variation in nuclear size and PD-L2 positivity correlate with aggressive chromophobe renal cell carcinoma. Ann Diagn Pathol 2018; 34:31-35. [PMID: 29661724 DOI: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2018.01.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2018] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (CRCC) is not amenable to International Society for Urologic Pathology-endorsed nucleolar grading. Novel grading approaches were proposed, but the rarity of adverse pathology hampers their discriminatory value. We investigate simple linear micrometer measurements and a proposed immunostain in CRCCs. 32 patients' CRCCs were studied: 12 adverse cases (stage pT3, recurrence, or metastasis), 15 controls (stage ≤pT2, no recurrence or metastasis after >3 years), and 8 metastases (3 were paired with primary adverse cases). The ratio of greatest dimensions of largest and smallest nuclei, in each of 5 "worst" high-power fields, excluding those with degenerative features, was designated variation in nuclear size (VNS). Percent multinucleate cells (PMC) were also counted. Mouse anti PD-L2 monoclonal antibody immunostaining was performed. Mean VNS measured in adverse primary and control primary tumors were 3.7 ± 0.5 and 2.4 ± 0.4 respectively (P < .001), and 3.4 ± 0.4 for metastases (P < .001). Optimal VNS cut-off was 2.5, with sensitivity and specificity 0.85 and 0.81, respectively. PMCs were 6.0 ± 3.0 for adverse group, 5.7 ± 2.7 for controls, and 4.1 ± 1.6 for metastases (P = NS). PD-L2 could not discriminate adverse versus good primary tumors (χ21.6, P = .2), but was higher in metastases (χ2 6.9, P < .01), or metastases plus adverse primary tumors (χ2 4.8, P = .03), compared to good-pathology primary tumors. In conclusion, VNS is an easily obtained measurement that can predict adverse behavior of chromophobe RCC, and may impart value for needle biopsy reporting and the choice of active surveillance. PD-L2 was elevated in metastases but was less useful for primary tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed E Mostafa
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Amrou Abdelkader
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Naoto Kuroda
- Department of Diagnostic Pathology, Kochi Red Cross Hospital, Japan
| | - Delia Pérez-Montiel
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico, D.F., Mexico
| | - Anjishnu Banerjee
- Department of Biostatistics, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, Charles University, Faculty of Medicine in Plzeň, Czechia
| | - Kenneth A Iczkowski
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
La Rosa S, Sessa F, Uccella S. Mixed Neuroendocrine-Nonneuroendocrine Neoplasms (MiNENs): Unifying the Concept of a Heterogeneous Group of Neoplasms. Endocr Pathol 2016; 27:284-311. [PMID: 27169712 DOI: 10.1007/s12022-016-9432-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 119] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
The wide application of immunohistochemistry to the study of tumors has led to the recognition that epithelial neoplasms composed of both a neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine component are not as rare as traditionally believed. It has been recommended that mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are classified as only those in which either component represents at least 30 % of the lesion but this cutoff has not been universally accepted. Moreover, since their pathogenetic and clinical features are still unclear, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms are not included as a separate clinicopathological entity in most WHO classifications, although they have been observed in virtually all organs. In the WHO classification of digestive tumors, mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm is considered a specific type and is defined as mixed adenoneuroendocrine carcinoma, a definition that has not been accepted for other organs. In fact, this term does not adequately convey the morphological and biological heterogeneity of digestive mixed neoplasms and has created some misunderstanding among both pathologists and clinicians. In the present study, we have reviewed the literature on mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine epithelial neoplasms reported in the pituitary, thyroid, nasal cavity, larynx, lung, digestive system, urinary system, male and female genital organs, and skin to give the reader an overview of the most important clinicopathological features and morphological criteria for diagnosing each entity. We also propose to use the term "mixed neuroendocrine-nonneuroendocrine neoplasm (MiNEN)" to define and to unify the concept of this heterogeneous group of neoplasms, which show different characteristics mainly depending on the type of neuroendocrine and nonneuroendocrine components.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano La Rosa
- Department of Pathology, Ospedale di Circolo, viale Borri 57, 21100, Varese, Italy.
| | - Fausto Sessa
- Department of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| | - Silvia Uccella
- Department of Surgical and Morphological Sciences, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Foix MP, Dunatov A, Martinek P, Mundó EC, Suster S, Sperga M, Lopez JI, Ulamec M, Bulimbasic S, Montiel DP, Alaghehbandan R, Peckova K, Pivovarcikova K, Ondrej D, Rotterova P, Skenderi F, Prochazkova K, Dusek M, Hora M, Michal M, Hes O. Morphological, immunohistochemical, and chromosomal analysis of multicystic chromophobe renal cell carcinoma, an architecturally unusual challenging variant. Virchows Arch 2016; 469:669-678. [PMID: 27631338 DOI: 10.1007/s00428-016-2022-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2016] [Revised: 07/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/05/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Chromophobe renal cell carcinoma (ChRCC) is typically composed of large leaf-like cells and smaller eosinophilic cells arranged in a solid-alveolar pattern. Eosinophilic, adenomatoid/pigmented, or neuroendocrine variants have also been described. We collected 10 cases of ChRCC with a distinct multicystic pattern out of 733 ChRCCs from our registry, and subsequently analyzed these by morphology, immunohistochemistry, and array comparative genomic hybridization. Of the 10 patients, 6 were males with an age range of 50-89 years (mean 68, median 69). Tumor size ranged between 1.2 and 20 cm (mean 5.32, median 3). Clinical follow-up was available for seven patients, ranging 1-19 years (mean 7.2, median 2.5). No aggressive behavior was documented. We observed two growth patterns, which were similar in all tumors: (1) variable-sized cysts, resembling multilocular cystic neoplasm of low malignant potential and (2) compressed cystic and tubular pattern with slit-like spaces. Raisinoid nuclei were consistently present while necrosis was absent in all cases. Half of the cases showed eosinophilic/oncocytic cytology, deposits of pigment (lipochrome) and microcalcifications. The other half was composed of pale or mixed cell populations. Immunostains for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), CK7, OSCAR, CD117, parvalbumin, MIA, and Pax 8 were positive in all tumors while negative for vimentin, TFE3, CANH 9, HMB45, cathepsin K, and AMACR. Ki67 immunostain was positive in up to 1 % of neoplastic cells. Molecular genetic examination revealed multiple chromosomal losses in two fifths analyzable tumors, while three cases showed no chromosomal numerical aberrations. ChRCC are rarely arranged in a prominent multicystic pattern, which is probably an extreme form of the microcystic adenomatoid pigmented variant of ChRCC. The spectrum of tumors entering the differential diagnosis of ChRCC is quite different from that of conventional ChRCC. The immunophenotype of ChRCC is identical with that of conventional ChRCC. Chromosomal numerical aberration pattern was variable; no chromosomal numerical aberrations were found in three cases. All the cases in this series have shown an indolent and non-aggressive behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Pané Foix
- Department of Pathology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ana Dunatov
- Department of Pathology, University of Split, Split, Croatia
| | - Petr Martinek
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Enric Condom Mundó
- Department of Pathology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Bellvitge Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBELL), Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Pathology and Experimental Therapeutics, School of Medicine, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Saul Suster
- Department of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Maris Sperga
- Department of Pathology, East University, Riga, Latvia
| | - Jose I Lopez
- Department of Pathology, Cruces University Hospital, Biocruces Research Institute, University of the Basque Country, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Monika Ulamec
- "Ljudevit Jurak" Pathology Department, Clinical Hospital Center "Sestre milosrdnice", Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Stela Bulimbasic
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Delia Perez Montiel
- Department of Pathology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Reza Alaghehbandan
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kvetoslava Peckova
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Krystina Pivovarcikova
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Daum Ondrej
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Pavla Rotterova
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Faruk Skenderi
- Department of Pathology, Clinical Center of the University of Srajevo, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Kristyna Prochazkova
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Martin Dusek
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Milan Hora
- Department of Urology, Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital, Charles University, Plzen, Czech Republic
| | - Michal Michal
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | - Ondrej Hes
- Department of Pathology, , Medical Faculty and Charles University Hospital Plzen, Charles University, Alej Svobody 80, 304 60, Pilsen, Czech Republic.
- Biomedical Centre, Faculty of Medicine in Lzen, Charles University in Prague, Plzen, Czech Republic.
| |
Collapse
|