|
1
|
Cui L, Zhu Z, Feng Y, Zhang Y. Keratin 17 is Not Always a Marker of Proliferation of Keratinocytes in Skin Diseases. Clin Cosmet Investig Dermatol 2021; 14:1247-1251. [PMID: 34552343 PMCID: PMC8450673 DOI: 10.2147/ccid.s322226] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Purpose Keratin 17 (K17) is an embryonic keratin and overexpression is seen in psoriasis, which is a hyperproliferation skin disease. Nonetheless, whether it is also highly expressed in other proliferative skin diseases remains unclear. The aim of this study is to explore the expression of K17 in cutaneous lichen planus (CLP), lichen simplex chronicus (LSC), and prurigo nodularis (PN). Methods A total of 20 skin samples from CLP lesions, 20 from LSC lesions, 20 from PN lesions, and 10 healthy adult skin tissues were obtained. Then, the expression of K17 was analyzed using immunohistochemistry on paraffin-embedded tissue sections. Furthermore, quantitative and semi-quantitative immunohistochemical scores of K17 were independently evaluated under a microscope by 2 dermatologists. Results Immunohistochemical analysis revealed that in normal skin, K17 was minimally expressed. Nevertheless, it was highly expressed in all epidermal layers in CLP lesions (P-value <0.01), and negatively expressed in LSC and PN lesions (all P-value >0.05). The average gray value of K17 in CLP was 151.153±13.985 (P-value <0.001), while the average values of K17 in LSC and PN were 178.720±12.001 and 181.316±8.920, respectively (all P-value >0.05). Conclusion K17 is potentially expressed in certain inflammatory skin diseases, including psoriasis and lichen planus. Besides, it is not always a marker of hyperproliferation of keratinocytes in skin diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li Cui
- Department of Dermatology, Shaanxi Provincial People's Hospital, Xian, People's Republic of China
| | - Zirong Zhu
- Department of Dermatology, Xi'an People's Hospital, Xian, People's Republic of China
| | - Yiguo Feng
- Department of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, People's Republic of China
| | - Yanfei Zhang
- Department of Dermatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xian, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Persechino F, Ranieri D, Guttieri L, Nanni M, Torrisi MR, Belleudi F. Expression Profile of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors, Keratinocyte Differentiation Markers, and Epithelial Mesenchymal Transition-Related Genes in Actinic Keratosis: A Possible Predictive Factor for Malignant Progression? BIOLOGY 2021; 10:biology10040331. [PMID: 33920760 PMCID: PMC8071104 DOI: 10.3390/biology10040331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Simple Summary In this work, we checked the modulation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) along with differentiation-related and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related markers to identify expression profiles that could be predictive for actinic keratosis (AK) progression through the “differentiated” pathway. We found that the downregulation of the analyzed differentiation markers, but not the modulation of the EMT-related markers, correlated with the canonical progression of AK. In addition, the observed modulation of FGFR2 mesenchymal/epithelial isoforms compatible with FGFR2 isoform switch, as well as the upregulation of FGFR4 suggested their correlation with early steps of AK pathogenesis. In contrast, the increase of mesenchymal FGFR3c isoform expression appeared to suggest that this event correlated with late steps of AK progression. In addition, the strong modulation of filaggrin (FIL), Snail1, as well as of FGFR2c, FGFR4, and their ligand Fibroblast Growth Factor 2 (FGF2), observed in some of the keratinocytic intraepithelial neoplasia grade I (KIN I) samples, may indicate that they could be molecular markers predictive for those KIN I lesions destined to a direct progression to squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) through the “differentiated” pathway. Abstract Actinic keratosis (AK) is the ultra violet (UV)-induced preneoplastic skin lesion clinically classified in low (KIN I), intermediate (KIN II), and high (KIN III) grade lesions. In this work we analyzed the expression of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs), as well as of keratinocyte differentiation and epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related markers in differentially graded AK lesions, in order to identify specific expression profiles that could be predictive for direct progression of some KIN I lesions towards squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). Our molecular analysis showed that the keratinocyte differentiation markers keratin 1 (K1), desmoglein-1 (DSG1), and filaggrin (FIL) were progressively downregulated in KIN I, II, and III lesions, while the modulation of epithelial/mesenchymal markers and the induction of the transcription factors Snail1 and Zinc finger E-box-binding homeobox 1 (ZEB1) compatible with pathological EMT, even if observable, did not appear to correlate with AK progression. Concerning FGFRs, a modulation of epithelial isoform of FGFR2 (FGFR2b) and the mesenchymal FGFR2c isoform compatible with an FGFR2 isoform switch, as well as FGFR4 upregulation were observed starting from KIN I lesions, suggesting that they could be events involved in early steps of AK pathogenesis. In contrast, the increase of FGFR3c expression, mainly appreciable in KIN II and KIN III lesions, suggested a correlation with AK late progression. Interestingly, the strong modulation of FIL, Snail1, as well as of FGFR2c, FGFR4, and of their ligand FGF2, observed in some of the KIN I samples, may indicate that they could be molecular markers predictive for those low graded lesions destined to a direct progression to SCC. In conclusion, our data point on the identification of molecular markers predictive for AK rapid progression through the “differentiated” pathway. Our results also represent an important step that, in future, will help to clarify the molecular mechanisms underlying FGFR signaling deregulation in epithelial tissues during the switch from the pre-neoplastic to the oncogenic malignant phenotype.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Flavia Persechino
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (D.R.); (L.G.); (M.R.T.)
| | - Danilo Ranieri
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (D.R.); (L.G.); (M.R.T.)
| | - Luisa Guttieri
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (D.R.); (L.G.); (M.R.T.)
| | - Monica Nanni
- Tissue Biology Research Unit, Department of Surgery, University Children’s Hospital, CH–8032 Zurich, Switzerland;
| | - Maria Rosaria Torrisi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (D.R.); (L.G.); (M.R.T.)
- S. Andrea University Hospital, 00100 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Belleudi
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, 00189 Rome, Italy; (F.P.); (D.R.); (L.G.); (M.R.T.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Dasgupta S, Koljenović S, van den Bosch TPP, Swagemakers SMA, van der Hoeven NMA, van Marion R, van der Spek PJ, van Doorn HC, van Kemenade FJ, Ewing-Graham PC. Evaluation of Immunohistochemical Markers, CK17 and SOX2, as Adjuncts to p53 for the Diagnosis of Differentiated Vulvar Intraepithelial Neoplasia (dVIN). Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2021; 14:ph14040324. [PMID: 33918187 PMCID: PMC8066509 DOI: 10.3390/ph14040324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Histological diagnosis of differentiated vulvar intraepithelial neoplasia (dVIN), the precursor of human papillomavirus (HPV)-independent vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC), can be challenging, as features of dVIN may mimic those of non-dysplastic dermatoses. To aid the diagnosis, p53-immunohistochemistry (IHC) is commonly used, and mutant expression patterns are used to support a histological diagnosis of dVIN. However, a proportion of dVIN can show wild-type p53-expression, which is characteristic of non-dysplastic dermatoses. Furthermore, recent research has identified a novel precursor of HPV-independent VSCC—the p53-wild-type differentiated exophytic vulvar intraepithelial lesion (de-VIL). Currently, there are no established diagnostic IHC-markers for p53-wild-type dVIN or de-VIL. We evaluated IHC-markers, cytokeratin 17 (CK17), and SRY-box 2 (SOX2), as diagnostic adjuncts for dVIN. For this, IHC-expression of CK17, SOX2, and p53 was studied in dVIN (n = 56), de-VIL (n = 8), and non-dysplastic vulvar tissues (n = 46). For CK17 and SOX2, the percentage of cells showing expression, and the intensity and distribution of expression were recorded. We also performed next generation targeted sequencing (NGTS) on a subset of dVIN (n = 8) and de-VIL (n = 8). With p53-IHC, 74% of dVIN showed mutant patterns and 26% showed wild-type expression. Median percentage of cells expressing CK17 or SOX2 was significantly higher in dVIN (p53-mutant or p53-wild-type) and de-VIL than in non-dysplastic tissues (p < 0.01). Diffuse, moderate-to-strong, full epithelial expression of CK17 or SOX2 was highly specific for dVIN and de-VIL. With NGTS, TP53 mutations were detected in both dVIN and de-VIL. We infer that immunohistochemical markers CK17 and SOX2, when used along with p53, may help support the histological diagnosis of dVIN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shatavisha Dasgupta
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Senada Koljenović
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
| | - Thierry P. P. van den Bosch
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
| | - Sigrid M. A. Swagemakers
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
- Department of Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nick M. A. van der Hoeven
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Ronald van Marion
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
| | - Peter J. van der Spek
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
- Department of Clinical Bioinformatics, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Helena C. van Doorn
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Folkert J. van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
| | - Patricia C. Ewing-Graham
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (S.K.); (T.P.P.v.d.B.); (S.M.A.S.); (R.v.M.); (P.J.v.d.S.); (F.J.v.K.); (P.C.E.-G.)
| |
Collapse
|