High levels of intratumor heterogeneity characterize the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers in high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Bispecific fibrous glue synergistically boosts vascular normalization and antitumor immunity for advanced renal carcinoma therapy

Immune checkpoint blockade therapy represented by programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor for advanced renal carcinoma with an objective response rate (ORR) in patients is less than 20%. It is attributed to abundant tumoral vasculature with abnormal structure limiting effector T cell infiltration and drug penetration. We propose a bispecific fibrous glue (BFG) to regulate tumor immune and vascular microenvironments simultaneously. The bispecific precursor glue peptide-1 (pre-GP1) can penetrate tumor tissue deeply and self-assemble into BFG in the presence of neuropilin-1 (NRP-1) and PD-L1. The resultant fibrous glue is capable of normalizing tumoral vasculature as well as restricting immune escape. The pre-GP1 retains a 6-fold higher penetration depth than that of antibody in the multicellular spheroids (MCSs) model. It also shows remarkable tumor growth inhibition (TGI) from 19% to 61% in a murine advanced large tumor model compared to the clinical combination therapy. In addition, in the orthotopic renal tumor preclinical model, the lung metastatic nodules are reduced by 64% compared to the clinically used combination. This pre-GP1 provides a promising strategy to control the progression and metastasis of advanced renal carcinoma.

Highly expressed of BID indicates poor prognosis and mediates different tumor microenvironment characteristics in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Studies have found that BH3 interacting domain death agonist (BID) is closely related to the occurrence and development of many kinds of tumors. However, little attention has been paid to the situation of BID in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). So, our aim was to explore the effect of BID in ccRCC.

METHODS

Survival analysis, ROC curve, correlation analysis and Cox regression analysis were executed to analyze the prognostic value and clinical correlation of BID in ccRCC. The risk prognosis model was constructed in the training cohort and further validated in the internal testing cohort, ICGC cohort, and GEO cohort. Transcriptome sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of clinical specimens were used to validate the results of bioinformatics analysis. The GSEA, ESTIMATE algorithm, CIBERSORT algorithm, ssGSEA, TIDE score, correlation and difference analysis were used to analyze the effects of BID on immune infiltration in tumor microenvironment (TME).

RESULTS

BID was highly expressed in ccRCC tissues, which was verified by transcriptome sequencing and immunohistochemical staining of clinical specimens. Patients with high expression of BID had a worse prognosis. BID is an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC. The prognostic model based on BID can accurately predict the prognosis of patients in different cohorts. In addition, the expression levels of BID was closely related to immunomodulatory molecules such as PD-1, LAG3, and CTLA4. Enrichment analysis indicated that BID was significantly enriched in immune-related responses and cancer-related pathways. The change of BID expression mediates different characteristics of immune infiltration in TME.

CONCLUSIONS

BID is highly expressed in ccRCC, which is a reliable biomarker of ccRCC prognosis. It is closely related to TME, and may be a potential target for immunotherapy in patients with ccRCC.

A rare case of TFEB/6p21/VEGFA-amplified renal cell carcinoma diagnosed by whole-exome sequencing: clinicopathological and genetic feature report and literature review

BACKGROUND

TFEB/6p21/VEGFA-amplified renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is rare and difficult to diagnose, with diverse histological patterns and immunohistochemical and poorly defined molecular genetic characteristics.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a 63-year-old male admitted in 2017 with complex histomorphology, three morphological features of clear cell, eosinophilic and papillary RCC and resembling areas of glomerular and tubular formation. The immunophenotype also showed a mixture of CD10 and P504s. RCC with a high suspicion of collision tumors was indicated according to the 2014 WHO classification system; no precise diagnosis was possible. The patient was diagnosed at a different hospital with poorly differentiated lung squamous cell carcinoma one year after RCC surgery. We exploited molecular technology advances to retrospectively investigate the patient's molecular genetic alterations by whole-exome sequencing. The results revealed a 6p21 amplification in VEGFA and TFEB gene acquisition absent in other RCC subtypes. Clear cell, papillary, chromophobe, TFE3-translocation, eosinophilic solid and cystic RCC were excluded. Strong TFEB and Melan-A protein positivity prompted rediagnosis as TFEB/6p21/VEGFA-amplified RCC as per 2022 WHO classification. TMB-L (low tumor mutational load), CCND3 gene acquisition and MRE11A and ATM gene deletion mutations indicated sensitivity to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor combinations and the FDA-approved targeted agents Niraparib (Grade C), Olaparib (Grade C), Rucaparib (Grade C) and Talazoparib (Class C). GO (Gene Ontology) and KEGG enrichment analyses revealed major mutations and abnormal CNVs in genes involved in biological processes such as the TGF-β, Hippo, E-cadherin, lysosomal biogenesis and autophagy signaling pathways, biofilm synthesis cell adhesion substance metabolism regulation and others. We compared TFEB/6p21/VEGFA-amplified with TFEB-translocated RCC; significant differences in disease onset age, histological patterns, pathological stages, clinical prognoses, and genetic characteristics were revealed.

CONCLUSION

We clarified the patient's challenging diagnosis and discussed the clinicopathology, immunophenotype, differential diagnosis, and molecular genetic information regarding TFEB/6p21/VEGFA-amplified RCC via exome analysis and a literature review.

Cell Differentiation Trajectory Predicts Prognosis and Immunotherapeutic Response in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is the main type of malignancy in kidney related to glucose metabolism. Primary single cell culture and single cell sequencing are novel research technologies. In this study, we explored the differentiation status of ccRCC cells and its significance in prognosis and immunotherapeutic response through bioinformatics. We characterized distinct differentiation states and differentiation-related genes (DRGs) in ccRCC cells through single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis. Combined with bulk RNA-seq data, we classified patients into two clusters and found that this classification was closely correlated with patient prognosis and immunotherapeutic responses. Based on machine learning, we identified a prognostic risk model composed of 14 DRGs, including BTG2, CDKN1A, COL6A1, CPM, CYB5D2, FOSB, ID2, ISG15, PLCG2, SECISBP2, SOCS3, TES, ZBTB16, and ZNF704, to predict the survival rate of patients and then constructed a nomogram model integrating clinicopathological characteristics and risk score for clinical practice. In the study of immune checkpoints, we found that patients in the high-risk group had a disposition to get worse prognosis and better effects of immune checkpoint blocking therapies. Finally, we found the expression level of model DRGs was associated with a tumor-immune microenvironment (TIME) pattern and the response of 83 compounds or inhibitors was significantly different in the two risk groups. In a word, our study highlights the potential contribution of cell differentiation in prognosis judgment and immunotherapy response and offers promising therapeutic options for ccRCC patients.

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma with prominent microvascular hyperplasia: Morphologic, immunohistochemical and molecular-genetic analysis of 7 sporadic cases

Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) is well known for intratumor heterogeneity. An accurate mapping of the tumor is crucial for assessing prognosis, and perhaps this can be linked to potential success/failure of targeted therapies. We assembled a cohort of 7 CCRCCs with prominent vasculature and microvascular hyperplasia (ccRCCPV), resembling those seen in high grade gliomas. A control group of classic CCRCC with no variant morphologies was also included. Both groups were analyzed for clinicopathologic, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular genetic features. No statistically significant differences in mRNA expression of studied genes between the two groups were found. Using NGS panel Trusight Oncology 500 (TSO500), only one clinically significant gene mutation, VHL c.263G > A, p. (Trp88Ter), was found. TMB (Tumor Mutation Burden) and MSI (MicroSatellite Instability) were low, and no copy number variations (CNVs) were detected in the study cohort. Prominent microvascular hyperplasia in CCRCC is a rare phenomenon. From molecular genetic point of view, these tumors do not appear to be different from classic CCRCC. Prognostically, they also demonstrated similar clinical behaviors.

Natural history and growth kinetics of clear cell renal cell carcinoma in sporadic and von Hippel-Lindau disease

Background

To evaluate and compare the natural history and growth kinetics of sporadic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) with those of ccRCC in von Hippel-Lindau disease (VHL).

Methods

Sixty patients in the sporadic group with 61 tumors and 15 patients in the VHL group with 30 tumors whom all underwent delayed surgery after at least 12 months of active surveillance (AS) were enrolled to conduct a retrospective cohort study. The growth rate was calculated, and the growth kinetics between the sporadic and VHL groups were compared. The patient and tumor characteristics were reviewed, and their correlation with growth rate was analyzed.

Results

The mean growth rate of sporadic ccRCC was 0.91 cm/year (ranging from 0–4.74 cm/year) and that of VHL ccRCC was 0.47 cm/year (ranging from 0.04–1.89 cm/year). The growth rate of sporadic ccRCC showed a tendency of being faster than that of VHL ccRCC but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.07). The factors affecting the growth rate were different between the two groups. For VHL ccRCC, the only factor that correlated with growth rate was initial tumor diameter (P<0.001), but for sporadic ccRCC, the only factor was pathological nuclear grade (P<0.001).

Conclusions

The growth rate of VHL-associated ccRCC might be slower than that of sporadic ccRCC. Furthermore, we identified a disparity in growth kinetics between sporadic and VHL-associated ccRCC.

PRMT1 expression in renal cell tumors- application in differential diagnosis and prognostic relevance

BACKGROUND

Protein arginine methyltransferase-1 (PRMT1) is associated with the progression of various tumor types and the process of epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT). However, the expression of PRMT1 in renal cell tumors (RCT) is unknown.

METHODS

We evaluated PRMT1 immunohistochemical (IHC) expression on tissue microarray (TMA) of 208 specimens of RCT, including clear cell renal cell carcinomas (ccRCC), papillary RCC type I and II (pRCC I and II), chromophobe RCC (chRCC), renal oncocytomas (RO), collecting duct carcinomas - Bellini (CDC) and multilocular cystic renal cell neoplasms of low malignant potential (MLCRN-LMP). Moreover, a subset of ccRCC, pRCC, chRCC, RO were also studied using conventional sections. PRMT1 expression in tumor tissue was compared to the IHC expression of EMT-related transcription factors (ZEB1, RUNX1, and TWIST1) and cell surface markers (ß-catenin, N- and E-cadherin). Additionally, qRT-PCR expression of PRMT1 in ccRCC, pRCC, and chRCC was evaluated and the results were compared to the mRNA PRMT1 transcript profiling data in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) cohort.

RESULTS

PRMT1 immunoreactivity was observed in the majority of ccRCC, RO, all MLCRN-LMP, but in a minority of chRCC (p = 0.044), and it was associated with low grade and low stage ccRCC (p = 0.014; p = 0.044, respectively). ZEB1 immunoreactivity was noted in all RO, in minority of chRCC and neither of MLCRN-LMP (p < 0.001). The majority of PRMT1-negative ccRCC was negative to ZEB1 and showed cytoplasmic expression of TWIST1 (p = 0.028; p < 0.001, respectively). PRMT1 positive ccRCC mostly expressed RUNX1 (p = 0.019). PRMT1 and ZEB1 expression were associated with better cancer-specific survival in patients with ccRCC (p = 0.029; p = 0.009, respectively). In multivariate analysis, ZEB1 expression was an independent prognostic factor for cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.367; p = 0.026). Significant IHC heterogeneity was observed in PRMT1, ZEB1 and TWIST1 expression (p < 0.001). Homogenous loss of PRMT1 was associated with high grade and high stage ccRCC, while the homogenous loss of PRMT1 and ZEB1 was more frequent in patients who died of ccRCC (p = 0.017; p = 0.040; p = 0.044; p = 0.009, respectively). Relative mRNA-PRMT1 expression in both cohorts was down-regulated in tumor tissue compared to non-tumor parenchyma (p = 0.009). Unlike in our samples, mRNA-PRMT1 expression in the TCGA cohort was not correlated to ccRCC tumor stage or grade. PRMT1, ZEB1, and TWIST1 expression were not associated with EMT related aberrant ß-catenin expression, a gain of N-cadherin or loss of E-cadherin expression. Only RUNX1 was associated with a gain of N-cadherin (p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

IHC expression of PRMT1 may be characteristic for low grade and low stage ccRCC, while the homogenous loss of PRMT1 may be significant for high grade and high stage ccRCC. Both, PRMT1 and/or ZEB1 expression, could be associated with better survival of the patients with ccRCC.

Potential impact of PD-L1 (SP-142) immunohistochemical heterogeneity in clear cell renal cell carcinoma immunotherapy

Intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) detection remains a challenge in modern oncology because it can have a direct impact on the success of new therapies. Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 immunotherapy is an emerging treatment modality that is showing great promise for clear cell renal cell carcinoma (CCRCC) patients with advanced disease. Patient selection for such therapy relies upon the immunohistochemical detection of PD-1/PD-L1, however the degree of ITH for these markers among tumor cells and/or inflammatory mononuclear infiltrates remains unknown. Therefore, we analyzed PD-L1 (SP-142) expression in the tumor inflammatory cells of 22 CCRCC cases with the aim to define the pattern of PD-L1 expression, and to compare the reliability of current tumor sampling protocols (RS) with a multisite tumor sampling strategy (MSTS). While the RS protocol identified 5/22 (22.7%) of cases that were positive for PD-L1 expression, MSTS identified 10/22 (45.45%) of cases. This suggests that RS may miss a proportion of CCRCC patients that might benefit from immunotherapy. In addition, MSTS demonstrated that positive and negative regions of PD-L1 expression are very variable within each tumor.

Loss of PD-L1 (SP-142) expression characterizes renal vein tumor thrombus microenvironment in clear cell renal cell carcinoma

Immunotherapy is a promising tool in the treatment of patients with advancer renal cancer, in particular the blockage of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is an example of heterogeneous neoplasm and this particular characteristic is responsible of many therapeutic failures so far. Since variations in the local microenvironment across a tumor may conditionate the effect of this new therapy, a deeper knowledge of this issue seems advisable for any treatment success. We have analyzed the PD-L1 (SP142) expression in three different areas in the tumor and in two areas in the renal vein/caval thrombi in 39 advanced clear cell renal cell carcinomas to determine the extent and potential clinical significance of this regional variability. A statistically significant decrease in PD-L1 expression has been detected between the main tumor and its thrombus faction (p < 0.0001). Also, we have observed a high variability in the PD-L1 positivity across the three different areas of the main tumor tested, with only three cases being uniformly positive in all tested areas. In conclusion, PD-L1 expression display a highly variable distribution in clear cell renal cell carcinomas and this particularity should be kept in mind when selecting the tumor samples to be tested for immunotherapy.