Renal angiomyolipoma: Clinico-pathologic study of 17 cases with emphasis on the epithelioid histology and p53 gene abnormalities

Mechanistic Target of Rapamycin Kinase is a Common Convergent Pathway to Renal Neoplasia: A Contemporary Review

Mechanistic target of rapamycin kinase (mTOR) is a member of the phosphatidylinositol-3-hydroxide kinase (PI3 K)-related protein kinase family that functions as a central regulator of cell growth, metabolism, proliferation, and survival. The role of the TSC-mTOR signaling pathway in kidney tumors has been implicated in some hamartoma syndromes; however, with the advent and wide utilization of molecular studies, a growing number of kidney tumors have been linked to somatic or germline mutations involving genes that encode for this pathway, including eosinophilic solid and cystic renal cell carcinoma, low-grade oncocytic tumor, eosinophilic vacuolated tumor, renal cell carcinoma with fibromyomatous stroma and angiomyolipoma, among others. Herein, we review the contemporary developments of mTOR pathway-related renal neoplasia, focusing on the clinicopathologic features of the tumor entities.

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipomas overexpress TFE3 and the TFE3-regulated gene TRIM63 in the absence of TFE3 rearrangement

Angiomyolipoma (AML) is a neoplasm within the perivascular epithelioid cell tumor family that occurs somewhat frequently in the kidney. Most are indolent and discovered incidentally, with rare tumors demonstrating malignant clinical behavior. A small subset of renal AMLs with epithelioid features are associated with aggressive behavior, and may demonstrate morphologic overlap with renal cell carcinomas (e.g., clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC), TFE3-rearranged RCC). Prior studies of spindle cell and epithelioid AMLs have identified rare examples with underlying TFE3 gene fusions. TFE3 protein expression (demonstrated by immunohistochemistry) with no evidence of concurrent TFE3 rearrangements has been reported previously in 4/24 AMLs (17%) (Argani et al. Am J Surg Pathol 34:1395-1406, 2010). Currently, the relationship between TFE3 protein expression, TFE3 fusions, and expression of TFE3-mediated genes remains incompletely understood in renal epithelioid AMLs. We sought to explore these relationships using TFE3 break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and TRIM63 RNA in situ hybridization (ISH) on epithelioid AMLs with moderate to strong TFE3 expression by immunohistochemistry. RNA sequencing (fusion panel) was performed on two cases with negative FISH results to assess for FISH-cryptic gene fusions. The series comprised five epithelioid AMLs from four patients (three women, one man) aged 13 to 76 years. All were considered positive for TFE3 by immunohistochemistry (2 + /3 + expression). TRIM63 ISH was performed on four specimens from three patients, yielding positive results in 3/3 tumors (100%) that were successfully analyzed. TFE3 break-apart FISH was performed on all samples, demonstrating a TFE3 rearrangement in only 1/4 tumors (25%). RNA sequencing demonstrated the absence of productive TFE3 gene fusions in three tumors with negative break-apart TFE3 FISH results. This study demonstrates that renal epithelioid AMLs overexpress TFE3 and TFE3-mediated genes (TRIM63) even in the absence of TFE3 rearrangements. This finding could be explained by functional upregulation of TFE3 secondary to activation of the mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Expression of TFE3 and TRIM63 in this tumor type represents a potential pitfall, given the morphologic and immunophenotypic overlap between epithelioid AML and TFE3-altered renal cell carcinoma.

Comprehensive Insights Into Renal Perivascular Epithelioid Cell Neoplasms: From Molecular Mechanisms to Clinical Practice

Perivascular epithelioid cell neoplasms (PEComas) are a rare category of mesenchymal tissue tumors, manifesting across various tissues and organs such as the kidneys, liver, lungs, pancreas, uterus, ovaries, and gastrointestinal tract. They predominantly affect females more than males. PEComas characteristically express both melanocytic and smooth muscle markers, making immunohistochemistry vital for their diagnosis. Renal angiomyolipoma (AML) represents a common variant of PEComas, typically marked by favorable prognoses. Nonetheless, only a small fraction of subtypes, especially epithelioid AML, possess the capacity to be malignant. Renal PEComas usually appear as asymptomatic masses accompanied by vague imaging characteristics. The main methods for diagnosis are histopathological analysis and the application of immunohistochemical stains. Presently, a uniform treatment plan for renal PEComas is absent. Strategies for management include active surveillance, selective arterial embolization, surgical procedures, and drug-based treatments. The focus of this review is on renal PEComas, shedding light on their pathogenesis, pathological characteristics, clinical presentations, diagnosis, and treatment modalities, and incorporating a clinical case study.

Epithelioid Angiomyolipoma With Prominent Papillary Architecture Mimicking Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Case Report

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) (epithelioid PEComa of the kidney), is a rare subtype of renal angiomyolipoma with the potential for aggressive behavior and a known diagnostically challenging entity. We present a renal EAML with unusual papillary architecture and tumor cells with abundant eosinophilic cytoplasm and cherry-red nucleoli with perinucleolar halos, strongly mimicking a fumarate hydratase (FH) deficient renal cell carcinoma (RCC). We herein report our findings and discuss the morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular pitfalls to consider in the differential of EAML, including with FH-deficient RCC and more recently described entities: TFEB-amplified RCC and other renal tumors with alterations in TSC1/2. Novel findings in this tumor include papillary morphology and a novel telomerase reverse transcriptase promoter rearrangement, which has not been previously reported in EAML.

p53 aberration and TFE3 gene amplification may be predictors of adverse prognosis in epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney

BACKGROUND

Although epithelioid angiomyolipoma of the kidney has been studied by several groups, the reported prevalence of malignant behavior remains uncertain and there are not yet definitive predictive biomarkers. We evaluated the behavior of renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma in a consecutive series in a single institution and investigated the prognostic value of aberrant p53 expression and TFE3 gene abnormality.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 14 epithelioid angiomyolipomas, most with pure or close to pure epithelioid components, comprising 12 consecutive cases who had attended our institution and two consultation cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization with TFE3 break-apart probe was performed on 14 cases. The 14 cases were also labeled for p53 and TFE3 by immunohistochemistry. All cases were followed up.

RESULTS

Three of the epithelioid angiomyolipomas were strongly positive for TFE3 and two had a mutant expression of p53. Although no TFE3 gene rearrangement was found, the two tumors with strong TFE3 expression showed TFE3 gene amplification. Follow-up details were available for seven of the 12 consecutive cases: two of them had developed metastases and died (29%), their mean overall survival was 41 months, and both had mutant p53 expression. The two consultation cases with TFE3 gene amplification developed recurrence/metastasis within 1 year after surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Our series study from a single institution presented the prevalence of malignant behavior in pure epithelioid angiomyolipomas, although the small number of cases with follow-up data greatly reduced the accuracy. p53 may be a prognostic marker for epithelioid angiomyolipoma. Cases with TFE3 gene amplification had poor prognoses.

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma: computed tomography manifestation and radiologic-pathologic correlation depending on different epithelioid component percentages

BACKGROUND

Renal epithelioid angiomyolipoma (EAML) is a rare and potentially malignant mesenchymal lesion mainly composed of epithelioid cells. Although some case reports or small case series have been published, the computed tomography (CT) manifestations and radiologic-pathologic correlation depending on different epithelioid component percentages have not been studied before.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the CT manifestation and radiologic-pathologic correlation between renal EAML and angiomyolipoma (AML) with epithelioid component.

METHODS

The clinicopathologic and imaging data of 53 patients with an original diagnosis of EAML or AML with epithelioid component were retrospectively collected from three hospitals. All tissue specimens were re-sectioned and re-observed under the microscope. Samples were divided into an EAML group (≥ 80% epithelioid component, n = 25) and AML with epithelioid component group (5% ≤ epithelioid component < 80%, n = 28). Two radiologists reviewed the images in consensus, describing and comparing the CT manifestation, including the long diameter of the tumor, morphology, presence of necrosis or cystic change, hemorrhage, fat, calcification, enlarged blood vessels, and dynamic enhancement pattern according to the Hounsfield unit value of each CT phase between the two groups. The radiologic-pathologic correlation depending on the different percentages of epithelioid component were studied.

RESULTS

The long diameter of the tumor, presence of necrosis or cystic change, fat, enhancement pattern, and tumor-to-cortex enhancement ratio of the cortical phase between the two groups were significantly different (z =  - 2.932, P = 0.003; χ² = 18.020, P < 0.001; χ² = 16.377, P < 0.001; P = 0.020; and T =  - 3.944, P < 0.001, respectively). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the significant predictive factors of EAML included the presence of necrosis or cystic change [odds ratio (OR) 11.864, P = 0.001] and absence of fat (OR 0.095, P = 0.003). Correlation analysis found that the presence of necrosis or cystic change (r = 0.679, P < 0.001) and fat (r =  - 0.603, P < 0.001) were both moderately related to the epithelioid component percentage. The combined model based on the presence of necrosis or cystic change and absence of fat yielded the best diagnostic performance in discriminating EAML and AML with epithelioid component with the highest area under the curve (0.887).

CONCLUSION

EAML has characteristic CT signs; these characteristic CT signs are closely related to the epithelioid component percentage. The presence of necrosis or cystic change and the absence of fat were independent predictors of EAML.

A comparative study of contrast-enhanced ultrasound and contrast-enhanced CT for the detection and characterization of renal masses

This study aims to compare the value of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) and contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant renal masses. Included in this retrospective study were 143 renal masses in 141 patients using histopathological findings as the gold standard. A comparison was made of the two modalities in image characteristics for their accuracy in the differential diagnosis of renal masses. CEUS and CECT were both used for 39 masses in 37 patients, with 31 (79.5%) being malignant and 8 (20.5%) benign. The differences between the benign and malignant groups in perfusion intensity, perfusion uniformity and entry and exit of the contrast agent were not statistically significant (P > 0.05). However, CEUS could better display the circular perfusion of renal cell carcinoma than CECT (P < 0.05). CECT alone detected 109 masses in 107 patients, with 93 (85.3%) being malignant and 16 (14.7%) benign. CEUS detected 73 masses in 71 patients, with 56 (76.7%) being malignant and 17 (23.3%) benign. No statistically significant differences were observed between CEUS and CECT in the diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma (92.8% vs. 90.3%), with a specificity of 52.9% vs. 31.2%, an accuracy of 83.5% vs. 81.6%, and a positive predictive value of 86.7% vs. 88.4% or a negative predictive value of 69.2% vs. 35.7% (P > 0.05 for all). These results suggested both CEUS and CECT are highly valuable in the differential diagnosis of renal masses, and CEUS can be used as an important supplement for CECT in diagnosis of renal cancer.