Rising incidence of appendiceal neoplasms over time: Does pathological handling of appendectomy specimens play a role?

Appendiceal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Presenting As Acute Appendicitis: A Case Report

Appendiceal signet ring cell carcinoma is an exceedingly rare neoplasm which makes up only 4% of carcinomas of the appendix. It is a rare cause of abdominal pain which can mimic acute appendicitis. This case reports a 77-year-old female who presented to the emergency room with a complaint of right lower quadrant abdominal pain. After exploratory laparoscopy and histopathological studies, the patient was found to have peritoneal carcinomatosis and appendiceal signet ring cell carcinoma. This diagnosis unfortunately carries a relatively poor prognosis due to its aggressive nature. This study discusses the etiology, prevalence, clinical findings, and treatment of a rare cause of abdominal pain. This report sheds light on the importance of early detection and treatment of appendiceal signet ring cell carcinoma.

Primary Pituitary Carcinoids Do Not Exist: A Reappraisal in the Era of Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumours

The World Health Organization classification of pituitary tumours, published in 2022, supported a change in the terminology from "pituitary adenoma" to "pituitary neuroendocrine tumour" (PitNET). The neuroendocrine cells represent an integral part of the diffuse neuroendocrine system, including, among others, thyroid C cells, the parathyroid chief cells, and the anterior pituitary. Normal and neoplastic adenohypophyseal neuroendocrine cells have light microscopic, ultrastructural features and an immunoprofile compatible with the neuroendocrine cells and neuroendocrine tumours from other organs. Moreover, neuroendocrine cells of pituitary origin express transcription factors which indicate their cell-lineage origin. Thus, pituitary tumours are now considered as a continuum with other neuroendocrine tumours. PitNETs may occasionally be aggressive. In this context, the term "pituitary carcinoid" has no specific meaning: it either represents a PitNET, or a metastasis to the pituitary gland of a neuroendocrine tumour (NET). An accurate pathological evaluation, combined where necessary with functional radionuclide imaging, can define the origin of the tumour. We recommend that clinicians liaise with patient groups to understand the terminology to define primary tumours of adenohypophyseal cells. It is incumbent upon the responsible clinician to explain the use of the word "tumour" in a given clinical context.

High Incidence of Appendiceal Neoplasms in the Elderly: A Critical Concern for Non-Surgical Treatment

OBJECTIVE

Appendiceal neoplasms (ANs) are rare tumors that are often discovered incidentally during histopathological examinations. The increasing incidence of ANs is a critical issue in the non-operative management of acute appendicitis. This study aimed to document the temporal trends over a 12-year period by analyzing the clinical presentation, imaging findings, and histopathological features of ANs.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Health records of patients who underwent appendectomy from 2011 to 2022 were examined. Demographic and clinical data, laboratory results, imaging findings, and histopathological features were documented. The characteristics of both ANs and non-neoplastic cases were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 22,304 cases were identified, of which 330 (1.5%) were diagnosed with ANs. The odds ratio for ANs increased with age, with the highest odds ratio observed in patients aged 70 or older. Receiver Operating Characteristic analysis showed that age and appendiceal diameter were significant predictors of ANs. An optimal age cut-off point of 28.5 years was determined, yielding a sensitivity of 72% and a specificity of 64%. For appendiceal diameter, the optimal cut-off was found to be 9.5 mm, exhibiting a sensitivity of 77% and a specificity of 56%.

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence of ANs remains relatively low, a steady increase has been observed over the past decade. The increasing rate of ANs raises concerns regarding non-surgical management options. The results of this study highlight the importance of considering ANs as a potential diagnosis in older patients and in patients with an appendix diameter greater than 9.5 mm. These findings may have implications for treatment and management.

Cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) levels in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma predict response to neo-adjuvant chemotherapy and overall survival

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Serum tumor markers are widely used for diagnosis, prognosis, treatment response, and surveillance. Our study evaluated cancer embryonic antigen (CEA) in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

METHODS

The National Cancer Database was reviewed (2004-2011) for patients with surgical treatment for appendiceal adenocarcinoma. Patients were stratified into two groups: normal and elevated CEA. Multivariable adjusted Cox proportional hazards regression analyses were used to determine the independent effect of CEA on survival.

RESULTS

Our study consisted of 2867 patients, 54.0% having elevated CEA. Patients with elevated CEA were more likely to have Stage IV disease, be female, and African American; all p < 0.001. Three-year overall survival (OS) was significantly higher with normal CEA (75.5% vs. 62.8%, p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, elevated CEA was associated with worse survival (hazard ratio 1.49, 95% confidence interval 1.23-1.80). Patients with elevated CEA had improved 3-year OS with neo-adjuvant compared to adjuvant chemotherapy (p = 0.004), while those with normal CEA showed no difference.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with surgically treated appendiceal adenocarcinoma, preoperative elevation in CEA independently predicts decreased 3-year survival and correlates with improved OS with neo-adjuvant therapy. CEA levels should be considered in clinical decision-making regarding neo-adjuvant therapy in patients with appendiceal adenocarcinoma.

The other colon cancer: a population-based cohort study of appendix tumour trends and prognosis

AIM

Appendiceal neoplasms are rare subtypes of colorectal tumours that mainly affect younger patients some 20 years earlier than other colon tumours. The aim of this study was to gain more insight into the histological subtypes of this rare disease and include cases previously excluded, such as mucinous neoplasia.

METHOD

The cohort study included 1097 patients from the Munich Cancer Registry (MCR) diagnosed between 1998 and 2020. Joinpoint analysis was used to determine trend in incidence. Baseline demographic comparisons and survival analyses using competing risk and univariate/multivariate methods were conducted according to tumour histology: adenocarcinoma (ADENO), neuroendocrine neoplasia (NEN), mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (MANEC), and low- (LAMN) and high-grade mucinous neoplasia (HAMN).

RESULTS

Up to 2016 the number of cases increased significantly [annual per cent change (APC) = 6.86, p < 0.001] followed by a decline in the following years (APC = -14.82, p = 0.014; average APC = 2.5, p = 0.046). Comparison of all patients showed that NEN (48.4%) and mucinous neoplasms (11.6%) had a considerably better prognosis than ADENO (36.0%) and MANEC (3.0%, p < 0.0001). A multivariate analysis within the NEN and ADENO subgroups revealed that further histological classification was not prognostically relevant, while older age and regional tumour spread at diagnosis were associated with a poor prognosis. ADENO histology with high tumour grade and appendectomy only was also associated with poorer survival.

CONCLUSION

Appendiceal neoplasms are histologically heterogeneous; however, this diversity becomes less relevant compared with the marked difference from cancers of the remaining colon. The previously observed increase in cases appears to be abating; fewer cases of appendicitis and/or appendectomies or changes in histopathological assessment may be behind this trend.

Histopathological Evaluation of Gallbladder Specimens Obtained From Living Liver Donors

BACKGROUND

Cholecystectomy is routinely performed during living donor hepatectomy both to see the structure of the biliary tract and to determine the demarcation line based on the biliary tract junction. This study aims to present the general histopathological features of the gallbladder specimen obtained from living liver donors (LLD).

METHODS

Data from 2577 LLDs who underwent living donor hepatectomy (n = 2511) or aborted living donor hepatectomy (n = 66) in our Liver Transplantation Institute between September 2005 and June 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Age, gender, macroscopic (length, diameter, and wall thickness), and microscopic (histopathological) features of the gallbladder of the LLDs were recorded for use in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 2493 LLDs (men: 1486, women: 1007) with a median age of 29 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 13) met the inclusion criteria in this study. The median length, width and wall thickness of the gallbladder specimens were measured as 70 mm (IQR: 20), 50 mm (IQR: 20), and 2 mm (IQR: 1), respectively. The most common histopathological findings are normal structure (2026; 81.3%), chronic cholecystitis (n = 446; 17.9%), adenomyomatosis (n = 9), and papillary hyperplasia (n = 6), respectively. The most common pathologic findings in the gallbladder lumen are cholesterolosis (n = 207; 0.4%), cholelithiasis (n = 53), cholesterol polyp (n = 31), and noncholesterol polyp (n = 19), respectively. Significant differences were detected between the male and female genders in terms of age (P < .001), height (P < .001), weight (P < .001), body mass index (P < .001), gallbladder width (P = .001), gallbladder length (P < .001), histopathological finding (content) (P < .001), and lymph node around the gallbladder (P = .015).

CONCLUSIONS

The results we obtained in this study are true gallbladder pathologies that can be detected in healthy people. In this study, it was shown that the diameter and size of the gallbladder were larger in men, whereas the incidence of cholesterolosis and cholelithiasis was higher in women.

Demographic trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours in England between 1995 and 2016: Population-based analysis

AIMS

Recent data suggest that the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours is increasing. This study aimed to determine temporal trends in the incidence of malignant appendiceal tumours within England and a possible influence by demographic factors.

METHODS

All incident cases of appendiceal tumours in patients aged 20 years and above were identified from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service database between 1995 and 2016 using ICD-9/10 codes. Cancers were categorized according to histology. Joinpoint regression analysis was used to investigate changes in age-standardized incidence rates by age, sex, histological subtype and index of multiple deprivation quintiles, based on socioeconomic domains (income, employment, education, health, crime, barriers to housing and services and living environment). Average annual per cent changes (AAPCs) were estimated by performing Monte-Carlo permutation analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 7333 tumours were diagnosed and 7056 patients were analysed, comprising 3850 (54.6 per cent) neuroendocrine tumours (NETs), 1892 (26.8 per cent) mucinous adenocarcinomas and 1314 (18.6 per cent) adenocarcinoma (not otherwise specified). The overall incidence of appendiceal tumours increased from 0.3 per 100 000 to 1.6 per 100 000 over the study interval. Incidence rate increases of comparable magnitude were observed across all age groups, but the AAPC was highest among patients aged 20-29 years (15.6 per cent, 95 per cent c.i 12.7-18.6 per cent) and 30-39 years (14.2 per cent, 12.2-16.2 per cent) and lowest among those aged 70-79 years (6.8 per cent, 5.7-8.0 per cent). Similar incidence rate increases were reported across all socioeconomic deprivation quintiles and in both sexes. Analysis by grade of NET showed that grade 1 tumours accounted for 63 per cent between 2010 and 2013, compared with 2 per cent between 2000 and 2003.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence rate of malignant appendiceal tumours has increased significantly since 1995 and is mainly attributed to an increase in NETs. The increased diagnosis of low-grade NETs may in part be due to changes in pathological classification systems.