Immunophenotype of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in atypical Spitzoid tumors according to the risk of progression

Tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) - Pathologia, quo vadis? - A global survey

Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and the tumor microenvironment have become increasingly important in cancer research, and immunotherapy has achieved major breakthroughs in improving patient outcomes. Despite the significant role of the pathologist in identifying, subtyping and reporting TILs, the implementation and assessment of TILs in pathology routine remains vague. To assess the actual use of TILs in routine clinical practice, a formal standardized questionnaire was disseminated on two social media platforms ("X" and LinkedIn) and by email in June 2024. Based on the results, we conducted a literature review on TILs via Medline/Pubmed in the two most scored and reported entities, namely malignant melanoma and colorectal cancer (CRC). 77 participants from 24 different countries around the world, mostly pathologists (n = 63, 82.0 %), completed the survey. More than half of the participants do not assess or report TILs in their daily (clinical) practice, a trend consistent across the countries included in the study. A variety of methods are used to report TILs, ranging from Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based scoring algorithms to quantification by eyeballing. Despite recognizing the importance of TIL assessment in clinical routine, many participants find it time-consuming and express a strong preference for AI-based quantification. Our survey reflects the perspective of mostly early career pathologists who recognize the importance of TILs in cancer but face challenges in implementation. The development of AI tools and consensus guidelines could alleviate these barriers. In addition, increasing the visibility and understanding of the role of pathologists within the medical community remains critical.

Restrospective reappraisal of the prognostic classification of spitzoid melanocytic neoplasms after BRAF and NRAS mutation characterisation: a single institution experience

AIMS

The current WHO classification of melanocytic tumours excludes neoplasms showing BRAF or NRAS mutations from the Spitz category. This study aimed to review and reclassify atypical melanocytic tumours with spitzoid morphological features diagnosed between 2009 and 2021 in our hospital after expanding the molecular profile, including BRAF and NRAS mutations in all cases.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A total of 71 neoplasms showing spitzoid features (Spitz-like) and atypia were included. The risk of progression of tumours was first studied by integrating the morphology, immunohistochemistry (p16, Ki67, HMB45 and PRAME) and fluorescence in-situ hybridisation (FISH) results (melanoma multiprobe and 9p21). In a second step, after expanding the molecular study, including BRAF and NRAS mutational status, the neoplasms were finally classified into four subgroups: atypical Spitz tumour (AST, n = 45); BRAF-mutated naevus/low-grade melanocytoma with spitzoid morphology (BAMS, n = 2); Spitz melanoma (SM, n = 14); and BRAF or NRAS mutated melanoma with spitzoid features (MSF, n = 10). Follow-up of patients revealed uneventful results for AST and BAMS. Only one SM presented lymph node metastasis after 134 months. Conversely, patients with MSF showed an unfavourable outcome: three developed lymph node metastases after a mean time of 22 months, with one patient presenting distant metastasis and dying of the disease 64 months from diagnosis. The progression-free survival showed significant differences between the four groups of spitzoid tumours (P < 0.001) and between both melanoma subtypes (P = 0.012).

CONCLUSIONS

The classification and prognostication of atypical neoplasms with spitzoid features requires the integration of histomorphology with the molecular investigation of tumours, which should include BRAF and NRAS mutational status.