GATA3 aids in distinguishing fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma from papillary renal cell carcinoma

Contemporary review of papillary renal cell carcinoma-current state and future directions

Historically, papillary renal cell carcinoma (PRCC) was divided into two types, type 1 and type 2, based solely on morphology. However, it is apparent that PRCC is far more complex and represents a histological, clinical, and molecular spectrum. There has been a significant evolution in our understanding of PRCC, highlighted by the recognition of new and molecularly defined entities that were previously included in PRCC type 2. This contemporary review addresses the evolving concepts regarding the PRCC, including why it is no longer needed to subtype PRCC, the current molecular landscape, prognostic parameters, and PRCC variants, including biphasic PRCC, papillary renal neoplasm with reverse polarity, and Warthin-like PRCC. Pathologists should also be aware of the potential mimickers of both low-grade and high-grade PRCCs as well as some new and emerging entities that may show papillary growth that should be excluded in the diagnostic workup. The evolving knowledge of PRCC biomarkers, morphologic patterns, and PRCC variants could also have important implications for clinical management. Lastly, the heterogeneity within the PRCC spectrum needs to be further studied, aiming to better stratify PRCC for appropriate clinical management and systemic therapy.

Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinoma with Nucleolar Pattern of GATA3 Immunoexpression: Report of 2 Cases

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare aggressive type of renal cell carcinoma. The significant morphologic overlap with other types of renal neoplasia and the limited availability of FH and 2-succinylcholine immunostains for diagnostic use outside large referral centers have created numerous diagnostic pitfalls. As FH-deficient RCC can be associated with hereditary leiomyomatosis and renal cell cancer syndrome, the importance of an accurate diagnosis goes beyond the prognosis and treatment of an individual patient. We present 2 patients with FH-deficient RCC showing a peculiar pattern of GATA3 immunoexpression restricted to tumor nucleoli. If confirmed in further larger studies, this could provide an additional diagnostic clue for considering the FH-deficient RCC diagnosis, and given the frequent papillary morphology and possible hilar location can lead to the misdiagnosis as high-grade urothelial carcinoma, and is an important diagnostic pitfall to be aware of.

The clinicopathologic and molecular features, and treatment outcome of fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma: a retrospective comparison with type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To compare clinicopathologic, molecular features, and treatment outcome between fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) and type 2 papillary renal cell carcinoma (T2 pRCC).

METHODS

Data of T2 pRCC patients and FH-dRCC patients with additional next-generation sequencing information were retrospectively analyzed. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were primary endpoint.

RESULTS

A combination of FH and 2-succino-cysteine (2-SC) increased the rate of negative predictive value of FH-dRCC. Compared with T2 pRCC cases, FH-dRCC cases displayed a greater prevalence in young patients, a higher frequency of radical nephrectomy. Seven FH-dRCC and two T2 pRCC cases received systemic therapy. The VEGF treatment was prescribed most frequently, with an objective response rate (ORR) of 22.2% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 30%. A combined therapy with VEGF and checkpoint inhibitor reported an ORR of 40% and a DCR of 100%. FH-dRCC cases showed a shortened CSS (P = 0.042) and DFS (P < 0.001). The genomic sequencing revealed 9 novel mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Coupled with genetic detection, immunohistochemical biomarkers (FH and 2-SC) can distinguish the aggressive FH-dRCC from T2 pRCC. Future research is awaited to illuminate the association between the novel mutations and the clinical phenotypes of FH-dRCC in the disease progression.

Clinical Characteristics of Molecularly Defined Renal Cell Carcinomas

Kidney tumors comprise a broad spectrum of different histopathological entities, with more than 0.4 million newly diagnosed cases each year, mostly in middle-aged and older men. Based on the description of the 2022 World Health Organization (WHO) classification of renal cell carcinoma (RCC), some new categories of tumor types have been added according to their specific molecular typing. However, studies on these types of RCC are still superficial, many types of these RCC currently lack accurate diagnostic standards in the clinic, and treatment protocols are largely consistent with the treatment guidelines for clear cell RCC (ccRCC), which might result in worse treatment outcomes for patients with these types of molecularly defined RCC. In this article, we conduct a narrative review of the literature published in the last 15 years on molecularly defined RCC. The purpose of this review is to summarize the clinical features and the current status of research on the detection and treatment of molecularly defined RCC.

Exploration of clinicopathological features of rearranged renal cell carcinoma and TFE3, TFEB, and ALK staining performance in renal entities

Rearranged renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are rare types of kidney cancer. The clinicopathological features of rearranged RCC require further validation. The pathological diagnosis usually depends on immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. This study aimed to explore the expression features of anti-TFE3, TFEB, and ALK in different renal entities. In addition, we collected thirty-six TFE3-rearranged RCC, two TFEB-altered RCC, and one ALK-rearranged RCC to explore their clinicopathological features. We observed that TFE3 can sometimes be weakly expressed in non-TFE3-rearranged RCC. TFE3-rearranged RCC usually exhibited strong TFE3 expression. However, clear cell RCC and FH-deficient RCC also displayed strong TFE3 expression. TFEB also can be weakly expressed in clear cell RCC. However, ALK IHC showed a relatively high specificity and was negative for all non-ALK-rearranged RCC. The ALK-rearranged RCC was analyzed using next generation sequencing to explore gene alterations, and we identified a novel gene partner, SLIT1. ALK-rearranged RCC appears to have eosinophilic cytoplasm. Tumor cells with clear cytoplasm may exclude this diagnosis. Psammomatous bodies (22/38) and pattern multiplicity (35/38) were observed in more than half of the patients. In conclusion, weak TFE3 expression did not indicate TFE3 rearrangement. Strong TFE3 expression had a higher value for indicating TFE3-rearranged RCC, although other entities can also exhibit a strong pattern. Young age combined with morphological features (psammomatous calcification and pattern multiplicity) may indicate the diagnosis of rearranged RCC.